1
God isn't a peeping Thomas.
And straight activity doesn't have a risk? Who am I to draw the line, let the people decide for themselves, perhaps who are WE to decide what people can and can't do in bed?
You realize that reductio ad absurdum is also a fallacy right? I'm comparing it to what you view as destructive.
Perhaps I can make my point through this, one man says its alright to clip his nails, another criticizes him saying you're killing microbacteria whats to stop you from going on a shooting spree at a school? We aren't on the same page here.
we can't tell people what to do and what not to do, but GOD will judge everyone according to what they have done, and if they have sinned by homosexual acts which is considered an abomination, then HE won't have any part of that soul in heaven. we don't make the rules but we will be judged by them.
Please don't quote troll posts. It's more for us to have to clean up. Thanks.
My intention wasn't to discuss what the bible says on the matter.
well now, if you dont want to discuss what the bible says about this, then your on the wrong site.
Everything has a certain amount of risk, but homosexual activity has a risk of unpleasant side effects. Where do you draw the line?
then no one I ever knew will inherit. when my husband and I divorced and I re-married I became an adulteress. well all my hope should be gone now. of course he was one first, so I suppose he is will never see the likes of heaven. my heart goes out to the old man I see living on the streets never sober has no where to live no family, and no heaven to look to.
Yes I can easily explain. Matthew 21:31 “Which of the two did what his father wanted?” “The first,” they answered. Jesus said to them, “Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you.
People will say that God had made all things clean so that they can still eat their traditional christmas ham every year, but homosexual still have to go according to the laws; I know that homsexual acts was not what God had intended for man and eating pork also; but picking out what you like and doesn't like from the laws is consider to be unlawful, because you are making your own doctrine.
(ERV) In the same way, men stopped having natural sex with women and began wanting each other all the time. Men did shameful things with other men, and in their bodies they received the punishment for those wrongs.
(GNB) In the same way the men give up natural sexual relations with women and burn with passion for each other. Men do shameful things with each other, and as a result they bring upon themselves the punishment they deserve for their wrongdoing.
A little tidbit of info. Sodomy is actually illegal in several US states.
Oral is actually inclued in most anti sodomy laws as well as anal. so youre correct. But the act of sodomy itslf between a straight couple isnt sinful, so the act as a whole isnt. Just because one group you believe to be sinful participate in the act it doesnt invalidate the act itself.Like I said before ---- you have been decieved by Satan's manipulation of the modern-day definitions of words...
What you have said [above] is based on a modern - changed - definition -- which I believe is intended to create chaos and confusion - to attempt to cause people to disregard what the Bible says about it. ( The Bible says that [ all ] sodomy is a sin. )
Yes - a man can commit sodomy with a woman. And, because of that - it can be said that sodomy is not strictly a "gay thing"; however, you would be hard-pressed to convince me that sodomy is not the "distinguishing characteristic" of a "gay relationship"...
By definition - because of the specific nature of the activity - at least one man is always involved. And, by definition - the "receiving body part" ( male or female ) is always the same. Oral is not included.
This is the true definition of sodomy ( 'Anal' ). And, if you go back in time far enough - or examine the Bible closely enough - you will discover this to be the truth.
You may not presently agree with this - but - sometime between now and Judgment Day - you will.
It is not my intent to argue the point - so - we can simply "agree to disagree agreeably"...
![]()