should gentiles (or anyone today) be circumcised?
I would say yes. Because Jesus never said not to, and He told us to follow the Torah.
And as always, not for anything relating to justification, salvation or righteousness.
should gentiles (or anyone today) be circumcised?
Because he was under the old covenant. It was the law of the covenant.
So all that saga with the apostles in the church at Jerusalem, the issues Paul raised with the Galations, etc. were just to muddy the waters, in your expert opinion? Sort of to keep Christians on their toes, to see if they'd miss it?I would say yes. Because Jesus never said not to, and He told us to follow the Torah.
And as always, not for anything relating to justification, salvation or righteousness.
I would say yes. Because Jesus never said not to, and He told us to follow the Torah.
And as always, not for anything relating to justification, salvation or righteousness.
"Even" means "that is."
The enmity of Eph 2:15, which is not the only enmity in the NT, was the ordinances of the law,
specifically the defilement laws which, in effect, kept the Jews separated from the Gentiles
and were the source of the Jews' hostility toward, and the wall of separation between, the Gentiles.
The Mosaic law causing that hostility and wall was abolished, set aside as weak and useless
for righteousness (Heb 7:18-19), thereby making peace between Jew and Gentile (Eph 2:15).
It is faith in the work of the cross and nothing else. Think of it, God became a man and still is a man and died for you and me. No other religion can say that. Praise God.
All laws are valid, some just 'hinge' on other laws, the laws of Love are most important, Love
God, first, and, with your everything--mind, soul, spirit, body, and, the 2nd commandment (law) of Love "like the first," which, Jesus said those words, yes, and, the 2nd : Love others as you love yourself.![]()
What does that do? How can I be saved or delivered by obeying these laws. Atheist help there neighbors and give to charity and deny themselves to help others. What sets a true christian apart?
You seem to think that we're advocating following the law for righteousness' sake. We are not. I fall short of keeping the law perfectly every day. God doesn't love me less, nor is my salvation in jeopardy.
Believers should follow the law because that's who He was talking to in Matthew 5. Believers also need the Spirit equally. Most importantly, all people need only Jesus for salvation.
So the God who wrote the Law was "under the old covenant" yet somehow says we shouldn't be "under the old covenant", yet He still tells us to follow the Law?
I would say yes. Because Jesus never said not to, and He told us to follow the Torah.
And as always, not for anything relating to justification, salvation or righteousness.
A rabbi blessing wine isn't in God's law, just man's. You won't find that instruction anywhere in your Bible.
If you want to to say that Jesus broke the Pharisees Oral/Talmudic law, I agree with you 150%.
But there is still no compelling evidence that Jesus broke the law that HE gave to Moses.
I guess the phrase 'follow the law' needs to be clarified on your part because its ambiguity creates problems. Paul said that law and grace are incompatible in a person's walk. The purpose of the law (besides dealing with sin) was to teach love to a people who did not have the same revelation of the holy spirit that we have under the new covenant. That spirit is love and now lives in our hearts teaching us how to love. Apart from adding to this learning process, what else would believers need the law for?
I'll be the first to admit, I fail at it all the time. It can't be kept perfectly. That's why God set up sacrifices and atonement. My atonement is Jesus.
But out of curiosity, which parts of the law are certain I'm not following?
So if Jesus fulfilled the Law (which He did) thereby making it obsolete as some say...we have a problem a huge contradiction, in that Jesus Himself said...and yes we have seen this verse many times, but look at it again just a little closer:
and Jesus said....
Mat 5:17 "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill.
Mat 5:18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.
Okay, so He said He did NOT come to destroy the Law, in other words He did not come to make the Law obsolete, then He says something very profound which many folk overlook.....He states categorically that until Heaven and Earth pass away, nothing of the Law will pass away...have the Heavens and the Earth passed away??....of course not!!
So why would He say this?....because He made it clear that there should be no mistake about understanding what He meant, Gods Laws are here to stay...TILL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS AWAY!
People get mixed up between the Laws of God and the laws of the Pharisees....BIG difference!
We moan about 600 and something Laws of God yet our own man made laws tally to the thousands and we embrace them because it is "the law"....
show where Jesus said we keep the Law but do not have to use them...He said they will not pass away!..what does that mean?...simple they are still to be obeyed...besides, you are saying God like a "compulsive hoarder"?..why would one keep something when it is of no use?
Sop in essence we might need to discern what the Letter of the Law is, and what the Spirit of the Law is?