Science Disproves Evolution
- Thread starter Pahu
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Archaeopteryx is still hotly debated in its positioning because of a wide array of bizarre characteristics it has. The question on when something starts being a bird is a tad bit messy because some extinct animals that most people definitely don't want to say are birds, like Epidexipteryx, might be more closely related to modern birds than Archaeopteryx was.
P
Many 
The first eyes were improvements upon improvements to light-sensitive cells, which could have started off as it's intrinsic feeling of heat. 'Feel heat, move towards heat, find light-loving algae food.' Eventually some light detection allowed them to better find where the food was, and this was very gradually improved upon over many generations.
The first eyes were improvements upon improvements to light-sensitive cells, which could have started off as it's intrinsic feeling of heat. 'Feel heat, move towards heat, find light-loving algae food.' Eventually some light detection allowed them to better find where the food was, and this was very gradually improved upon over many generations.
Many
The first eyes were improvements upon improvements to light-sensitive cells, which could have started off as it's intrinsic feeling of heat. 'Feel heat, move towards heat, find light-loving algae food.' Eventually some light detection allowed them to better find where the food was, and this was very gradually improved upon over many generations.
The first eyes were improvements upon improvements to light-sensitive cells, which could have started off as it's intrinsic feeling of heat. 'Feel heat, move towards heat, find light-loving algae food.' Eventually some light detection allowed them to better find where the food was, and this was very gradually improved upon over many generations.
Also, when was the upside down image corrected by an equally developing brain?
P
The retina, the first eyes were basically just retinal patches. The upside down image correction wasn't needed until we had developed very concaved retinas, getting towards the development of the iris.
That's for our eyes, a couple of lineages started differently. Trilobites have no iris and have almost stone eyes, made out of... calcium? Something hard and crystalline.
That's for our eyes, a couple of lineages started differently. Trilobites have no iris and have almost stone eyes, made out of... calcium? Something hard and crystalline.
P
The genome is separate altogether for all species.
For instance, humans have 22, ferns have 24.
- Those smart ferns!
- - We pulled off before we got really complex, (at least as genetically complex as a fern).
For instance, humans have 22, ferns have 24.
- Those smart ferns!
- - We pulled off before we got really complex, (at least as genetically complex as a fern).
But, how about an answer to that question on specifically what you'd claim is wrong with the science of retroviral and transposon DNA insertions, lengthening the genome? We are really at a point there where I can present you with science that should change your mind.