Even Military Becoming Hostile to Christians - Chick Publications (Battle Cry)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#1
bclogo.gif


militaryprayer.jpg



Even Military Becoming Hostile to Christians​

*Issue Date: September/October 2013​


Before the government lifted the ban on open homosexuals in the military, Bible-believing chaplains were feeling growing hostility to the gospel and biblical truth. As evidence, World News Service lists the following: “[T]his year: An Army Reserve training brief on hate groups declares that evangelical Christians and Roman Catholics are extremists as dangerous as al Qaeda. A commander tells a chaplain to “stay in your lane” when he offers spiritual advice about the military’s exploding sexual assault problem. “Last year: A superior tells an Air Force major to remove from his desk the Bible he had kept there for 23 years. An Army lieutenant colonel instructs his subordinates to recognize the “religious right in America” as a domestic hate group like the KKK and Neo-Nazis. An Army master sergeant with 25 years of service faces punishment for serving Chick-fil-A sandwiches at his promotion party.“Two years ago: Christian prayers banned at veteran funeral services in Houston’s National Cemetery. Bibles temporarily banned at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. A Christian cross banned from a military chapel in Afghanistan. A chaplain called into his supervisor’s office and chewed out for closing a prayer with the words “In Jesus’ name.”For several years, an atheist humanist organization called the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) has been mounting lawsuits against any Christian displays on government property. Now, a Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) is specifically targeting Bible believers in the military.*Its founder, Mikey Weinstein, a vehement anti-Christian and former Air Force advocate general, has surfaced in the discussion of military religious freedom. This was alarming because he recently stated in a Huffington Post column that evangelical Christians are “monsters of human degradation.”The Pentagon has responded that, while “proselytizing” is forbidden by regulations, the right to evangelize was carefully protected. Southern Baptist leaders immediately questioned who would be deciding the difference. Webster’s dictionary finds little significant difference in the definitions.Most telling is the actual experiences of chaplains and Christians in the military.*The Wall Street Journal*provides the following quote: Joe Carter, a former Marine and an editor for the online evangelical magazine*The Gospel Coalition, says nobody can take religious freedom for granted. “There was a time—just a few years ago, in fact—when we could laugh off such views by extremists like Weinstein. But the political climate has become increasingly hostile to religious liberties.”Coast Guard Rear Admiral William Lee spoke at this year’s National Day of Prayer: “They expect us to check our religion in at the door —don’t bring that here,” Lee said. “Leaders like myself are feeling the constraints of rules and regulations and guidance issued by lawyers that put us in a tighter and tighter box regarding our constitutional right to express our religious faith. … Pray that we will be able to weather the storm.” Lee received five standing ovations.This is just a small sampling of the news articles exposing this trend in the military. No part of our life is immune to this massive attack by Satan’s disciples who have invaded our culture. For over a hundred years prophetic voices have warned of creeping humanism, anti-Christian and anti-biblical teachings in our schools, media, and some “churches.” We failed to listen and now the monster is out of the cage.The precious freedom that we see slipping away was bought by the blood of millions of our brave soldiers.* Unless enough hearts are turned back to God to reestablish a measure of righteousness in the land, they may have died in vain.Tract saturation was a major factor in past revivals. The more tracts you can get out, the better our chances of sparking the revival so desperately needed.
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,299
15
0
#2
Chick publications is often times disgusting and westboro-ish. I wouldn't recommend them. Go with another tract please!
 
F

Fubario

Guest
#3
Despite any personal opinions, what the tract is saying is true, I recall a youtube video where an American government official suggested that Christian extremists were considered terrorists (this is not verbatim), so heed the tract; it appears that there is a time coming when Christianity in the States might be outlawed.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#4
Jack Chick is a waste of time.
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,299
15
0
#5
Oh no argument there. I'm just talking about the part where it talks about tract saturation. Just suggesting that people don't use chick publications tracts as they are often just filled with hate propaganda
 

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#6
Chick publications is often times disgusting and westboro-ish. I wouldn't recommend them. Go with another tract please!

Nope. That will not happen.

Chick Publications does a lot of good. They expose the wicked and satanic Roman Catholic church, the Vatican, and the Jesuits for who they really are.


A lot of today's "Christian" bookstores won't even sell a quarter of the good material that Chick Publications offers.


Most of the Christian bookstores today are apostate and are friendly with the Roman Catholic church, which is the MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH (See Revelation 17:5).


I strongly recommend Chick Publications to anyone.


If you want the whole truth, then simply visit their website.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#7
All I remember is his tract Dark Dungeon which as a Pathfinder(D&D offshoot) I found hilarious
 
M

Married_Richenbrachen

Guest
#8
Chick publications is often times disgusting and westboro-ish. I wouldn't recommend them. Go with another tract please!
Better disgusting and Westboroish with truth, than lukewarm and liberalish, with falsehood. Chick might not have everything right in his tracts (I think his beliefs about Israel are wrong), but I'd much sooner a fire-and-brimstone type message against sin, than a God-is-loving-and-merciful type message that doesn't mention the need of all for the Saviour.
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#9
Nope. That will not happen.

Chick Publications does a lot of good. They expose the wicked and satanic Roman Catholic church, the Vatican, and the Jesuits for who they really are.

I strongly recommend Chick Publications to anyone.

We know it's not going to happen--your consistent promotion of false teachers like Ruckman, Riplinger, and now Jack Chick is obscene and demonic.
:mad:

Jack Chick's False Gospel

Jack Chick's False Gospel
Chick Tracts are Dangerous!
By David J. Stewart
Jack Chick plainly teaches in every Chick Track that faith in Jesus Christ is insufficient to save unless you arewilling to cease from your sins. That is works salvation!!! Mr. Chick puts the cart before the horse, demanding a willingness to change as a qualifying prerequisite to faith in Christ. That is a back door approach to Lordship Salvation. I am not loyal to men, but to the Word of God. Anyone who messes with the gospel needs to be exposed. Jack Chick is hindering sinners from coming to Christ!

Jack Chick does not believe that faith in Christ is enough to be saved; he also teaches that a sinner MUST have intentions to reform to be saved. That is a very false gospel, ANOTHER GOSPEL. Mr. Chick can try to hide behind his statement of faith, which is vague; but his tracts, every one of them, teach the Lordship Salvation heresy!!!

A man told me that he wouldn't get saved for a long time, because Jack Chick's Chick Tracts had taught him that God wouldn't save him unless he was willing to stop shacking up with his girlfriend in fornication. Since the man wasn't willing to turn from some of the sins in his life, he thought he couldn't be saved. I think that's a big issue and Jack Chick is corrupting the gospel, adding a step that God never added to be saved. We are the SINNERS and Jesus is the SAVIOR... it's that simple! A person is saved if they acknowledge their guilt of sin before God (Romans 3:19) and trust upon Jesus, the Christ, the Son of God (John 20:31)!!!

I am sick and tired of Christian leaders being loyal to each other instead of the Bible. Anything can be justified. It is apostasy! I see pastors of large churches blindly supporting other pastors who deny the inspiration of the King James Bible. They're a disgrace to the ministry!!! Get right with God you Bible-inspiration-denying imposter!

And then I see influential Christian authors and leaders supporting men like Jack Chick who teach millions of people that they cannot be saved unless they surrender to Christ and are willing to stop sinning. In step one Jack Chick says to admit you are a sinner, and then in step two he requires people to be willing to turn from sin (repent). Biblical repentance only requires step one; not step two. Since this is a separate step from admitting you're a sinner, clearly Jack Chick expects people to reform to be saved. This is a false gospel and I'm going to contend for the Christian faith against anyone who hinders sinners from coming to Christ for salvation. Jack Chick is hindering sinners from coming to Christ!
I am not being unkind, but it's time for Christians to stop getting their theology from Hollywood movie stars like Kirk Cameron, high-level Freemasons like Pat Robertson (who was ordained into the ministry at the Freemason Street Baptist Church), Council On Foreign Relations [CFR] members like Rick Warren, and cartoon artists like Jack Chick. WHAT SAITH THE SCRIPTURE? WHAT SAITH THE SCRIPTURE? WHAT SAITH THE SCRIPTURE? WHAT SAITH THE SCRIPTURE?

All of these men teach that faith in Christ is not sufficient for salvation unless a person is willing to surrender their life to Christ and be willing to stop sinning. This is salvation by WORKS (which is not salvation at all, Romans 11:6). The Bible speaks plainly in Romans 4:5, “But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.”That's what saith the Scripture! How much clearer could the Word of God be... but to him that WORKETH NOT... HIS FAITH IS COUNTED FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS!!!

Jack Chick and others like him need to get out of the driver's seat and stop trying to do the Holy Spirit's job of convicting sinners concerning their sins and the changes that need to be made in one's life. That's God's department.

Mr. Chick's artwork is captivating and unsurpassed in quality. It is certainly true that Chick Tracts get read.
Unfortunately, Jack Chick is doctrinally flawed (as are many religious leaders, authors, and influential people in churches today). Chick Tracts are recognized worldwide. Mr. Chick's ministry has received tens-of-millions of dollars in revenues from the sale of his religious cartoon tracts. The ministry boasts of having sold over 500,000,000 copies worldwide!

Tragically, many people are being deceived by Mr. Chick's false gospel. Truly the love of money is the root of all evil (1st Timothy 6:10).
The following page appears on the back of all Chick Tracts...

In step #2 on how to go to Heaven, Jack Chick teaches damnable heresy... “Be willing to turn from sin (repent).” This is unbiblical. To require sinners to “be willing to turn from sin” to be saved is an act of self-righteousness.

Carefully notice that this is not acknowledging one's sinnership, for that is requirement #1 in Chick Tracts. Jack Chick adds an entirely new requirement to be saved; not only admitting one's guilt of being a sinner, but also being willing to cease from those sins. In effect, Jack Chick is trying to do the Holy Spirit's job. Instead of allowing God to change a person who has come to Christ to be saved; Jack Chick requires sinners to change themselves as a prerequisite to placing their faith in Christ. This is a false gospel of qualification by works. 2nd Corinthians 11:3-4 warns us about “another gospel.”

Jack Chick has perverted the Gospel. The word “repent” in the Bible simply means “a change of mind”; not a change of behavior. Jack Chick cites Acts 17:30 as evidence of his perversion of the Gospel... “And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent.” Although it is certainly true that repentance is necessary for salvation, the Bible does not teach that a sinner must “be willing to turn from sin” in order to be saved. Jack Chick wrongly assumes that repentance means from sin; thus, he has fabricated his own false gospel of works salvation. This is a very serious issue, because if one's wrong on salvation—they're wrong on everything.
Please read REPENT! REPENT! REPENT! to learn the Biblical meaning of repentance.

Also, I just want to point out that California appears to be a hot-bed of heresy, considering that John MacArthur, Jack Chick, Ray Comfort, and Kirk Cameron are all based in the state of California.

Jack Chick's teaching on repentance is that you cannot come to Christ for salvation unless you first intend not to walk in sin after you receive Him. This is “qualification by works” as a prerequisite for receiving Christ as Savior.

Also, notice the prayer that Jack Chick leads sinners to pray in order to be saved. He includes the phrase... “I am willing to turn from sin.” This is of the Devil. Salvation is a free gift, NOT conditioned upon our willingness to turn from sin. You can't show me one Scripture where the Word of God requires someone to be willing to forsake their sins to be saved. Again, it is “qualification by works” as a prerequisite for receiving Christ as Savior. Please notice that the words “believe” and “believeth” are found 85-times in the Gospel of John; but the word “repent” is NOT mentioned even once. Clearly, the man who believes on Christ has repented. That is what Biblical repentance is...turning to God by faith in Jesus' name to be forgiven of one's sins.

Romans 4:5 plainly states... “But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is COUNTED for righteousness.” Did you read that? ... a man's faith is COUNTED for righteousness!!! This means that a person can be saved and continue living in sin. Before you get upset, you'd better stop and realize that the Bible is filled with believers who lived in horrible sin. Noah was a drunkard. Samson was a whoremonger. David was an adulterer and murderer. Rahab was a prostitute. Isaiah had a dirty mouth. Jonah ran from God. Peter denied and cursed the name of Jesus. Ananias and Sapphira stole from the church. The church at Corinth had a serious problem with church members committing fornication, fighting against each other, suing one another, and even showing up drunk at the Lord's Supper.

Jack Chick's Own Words Condemn Him
Jack Chick cites Acts 17:30 in support of his heresy. Carefully notice in Acts 17:30 that God COMMANDS all sinners to “repent” in order to be saved. Repentance is NOT optional. So “being willing” to repent is not enough! God orders us to REPENT!!! If repentance is merely being "willing" to turn from sin, as Jack Chick defines it, then salvation cannot occur. The Word of God plainly states that there can be no salvation without repentance. Yet, Jack Chick defines repentance as merely being "willing" to turn from sin (not actually doing anything about one's sins). Clearly, Jack Chick's definition of repentance is impossible, because how can you only be "willing" to do something that God absolutely requires you to do to be saved? Obviously Jack Chick is wrong on the Biblically meaning of repentance.

BEWARE: Another Gospel
Thank God—a believer's salvation is rooted in Jesus' righteousness, and not our own—because we have no righteousness of our own to offer God. 2nd Corinthians 5:21 states, "For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." Our only hope is in the precious blood of Jesus Christ. The following page is from the Chick Tract, This Was Your Life...
Chick Tracts seem to have a different answer than the Bible to the question, "What must I do to be saved?"



Surrender your life to Christ? That's Lordship Salvation!

On their website's statement of faith, they state concerning salvation:
"Salvation is the gift of God and includes the forgiveness of sins, the imputation of the Righteousness of Jesus Christ, and the gift of eternal life. Union with the triune God provides all blessings in this life and the life hereafter. Salvation is received by faith alone, apart from all good works and merit."
SOURCE: Statement of faith

Yet, Mr. Chick horribly contradicts himself in every tract he writes when he REQUIRES lost sinners to "Be willing to turn from sin" to be saved. No Sir! Why doesn't he state that in his statement of faith? This is deception! Jesus plainly said in Revelation 21:6... "I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life FREELY." Jesus said in John 7:28, "He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water."

It is false doctrine to require lost sinners to "be willing to turn from sin" as part of saving grace. Jesus shed His precious blood to pay for our sins, because our own self-righteousness could NOT save us. Isaiah 64:6 declares our own self-righteousness as "filthy rags" in the sight of God Almighty. Matthew 6:33 commands... "But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and HIS RIGHTEOUSNESS; and all these things shall be added unto you." To go to Heaven my friend, you need HIS RIGHTEOUSNESS, i.e., Jesus' righteousness. We read in Romans 10:3,4... "For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth." Jack Chick asks sinners to establish their own righteousness when he tells them they MUST "be willing to turn from sin" in order to have God's free gift of eternal life.

For years, I ignorantly supported Jack Chick's ministry, not realizing that he was teaching the Lordship Salvation heresy. After several months of conviction by the Holy Spirit, I decided I needed to do the right thing and stop distributing Chick Tracts. I speak the truth without apology. Say what you will about how much Chick Tracts get read... it makes them all that much more dangerous, especially to children. Jack Chick is wrong on salvation! As with Ray Comfort, John MacArthur and other Lordship Salvationists, Jack Chick speaks double-talk, i.e., he says one thing in his official doctrinal statement, and something completely different in his Chick Tracts. The doctrinal content in Chick Tracts is 100% contradictory to Mr. Chick's official doctrinal statement.

Most of the false prophets teaching the heresy of Lordship Salvation are from California (John Mac Arthur, Ray Comfort, Kirk Cameron, Jack Chick, et cetera). California is a hotbed of false prophets! Lordship Salvation is the teaching that a person must stop living in sin to be saved. In Jack Chick's case, he's a bit more subtle, teaching that it's not enough to admit one's sinnership to be saved; but a person must also be willing to stop living in sin to be saved. These are all damnable heresies that destroy the gift of God. You don't give up anything to be saved; Jesus gave up everything to pay for our sins. Jesus came into the world to SAVE SINNERS! If you want to be saved, then repent toward God by placing your faith in Jesus Christ, the Son of God, to forgive your sins. It's that simple. God will take care of the rest from there.

Conclusion
Jack Chick is a false prophet! Stop trying to force people to live right by corrupting the simple plan of salvation! I realize that Mr. Chick has done MUCH to promote other ministries and Christian authors who are diligently fighting against the evils of Catholicism, Wicca, et cetera (and I can appreciate that); BUT, I cannot sit back as a God-fearing believer and remain silent while Jack Chick is telling millions of people that they MUST "be willing to turn from sin" to be saved. Mr. Chick fails to explain what he means in his tracts by the phrase, "be willing to turn from sin." The only reasonable conclusion that a person can assume is that they cannot be saved unless they are willing to cease from their sinful living (which is untrue!).
I recently received a letter from a gentleman, who told me that for many years he was reluctant to get saved, because he had read aChick Tract and genuinely thought God wouldn't save him unless he was willing to stop living in sin. The man expressed his frustration that he would have died and went straight to Hell because of Jack T. Chick, if it weren't for a dear saint of God, who explained to him from the Bible that eternal life is a free gift of God which is NOT conditioned upon a lifestyle change or willingness to clean up one's life. Jack Chick is teaching heresy and should be avoided by all soulwinning ministries. My recommendation is to write and draw your own Gospel tracts. People will look at your pictures just as eagerly as they will Mr. Chick's.

I am not happy to expose Jack Chick as a false prophet. In fact, it pains me. I realize most professed "Christians" today are phonies. Certainly, genuine repentance should result in a drastic change within the soul of the believer (2nd Corinthians 5:17). However, the change comes as a RESULT of genuine repentance; and NOT as a prerequisite to salvation itself. Jack Chick requires a willingness to change (i.e., turn from sin) as a requirement to be saved. This is damnable heresy and a road to Hell, because it is self-righteousness! Hebrews 12:8 tells us that God will chastise His children if they live in sin. Although no believer can live in sin without Holy Spirit conviction, many believers do live horribly sinful lives (as evidenced by king Solomon in the Bible).

To be saved, a person must become GUILTY before God (Romans 3:19), realizing one's condemnation under God's Holy Law, and justly deserved penalty in Hellfire—turning by faith to Jesus Christ for forgiveness. The precious blood of Jesus Christ is what washes our sins away forever... "Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot" (1st Peter 1:18,19). Jesus paid a debt He did not owe; because we owed a debt we could not pay. Oh how foolish it is for anyone to require lost sinners to be willing to depart from their sins to be saved.

According to Chick Tracts, it's not enough to admit you're a sinner to be saved, you must also be willing to turn from those sins. Jack Chick needs to either change his tracts to accurately reflect his website's statement of faith; or else rewrite his statement of faith to backup the Lordship Salvation he's teaching in his tracts. To continue to teach both is contradictory, confusing, and deceitful. Don't you tell me that you believe salvation is the free gift of God, and then contradict yourself by saying that sinners must be willing to turn from their sins to be saved. No Sir! You are 100% wrong. What a Gospel Tract should tell people who want to be saved is:

1. Admit you are a GUILTY sinner, under the condemnation of God's Law, deserving of Hellfire (Romans 3:19,23; 6:23).
2. Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, Whose redeeming blood will wash away your sins (Acts 16:31; 1st Peter 1:18,19).

The change (i.e., the FRUIT of a believer's faith) that genuine repentance brings is not a requirement to be saved. It is a separate issue. We must not confuse the ROOT of a believer's faith with the FRUIT of a believer's faith (See: Are We Justified by Faith and Works?).
 
M

Married_Richenbrachen

Guest
#10
If true, the above is sad. I remember reading some of Chick's comics, and being a little dubious about "be willing to turn from sin". I know it is God who changes our hearts once He saves us. Perhaps I was naive about Chick. :|
 

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#11
Oh no argument there. I'm just talking about the part where it talks about tract saturation. Just suggesting that people don't use chick publications tracts as they are often just filled with hate propaganda

No they are not.

That is a lie. A total lie.

What Chick Gospel tracts contain is the Biblical Gospel.

And if you consider the Biblical Gospel "hate literature," well then shame on you.


I recommend you watch this video by brother David Daniels as he discusses how Chick Tracts are not hate literature at all.


[video=youtube;j4pFKnVhTO4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4pFKnVhTO4[/video]


It takes true love to warn lost people about the reality of Hell. And that in order to escape the horrible damnation of an eternal burning Hell and Lake of Fire, one has to repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ for their salvation.


So Chick Tracts are actually love literature when you really consider how that Jack Chick and other Bible believers like him care about lost souls who are on their way to a burning Hell. If you have love for people, then you are going to warn them about the horrors of Hell. Period.
 

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#12

We know it's not going to happen--your consistent promotion of false teachers like Ruckman, Riplinger, and now Jack Chick is obscene and demonic.
:mad:
Wrong.


Pastor Peter S. Ruckman is a Bible believing preacher who defends God's perfect and inerrant word, which is the Authorized King James Bible.

Peter S. Ruckman studies the Book. And he rightly divides the Book. He is a phenomenal Bible believing preacher and teacher of the word of God.

And Gail Riplinger has done a lot of good with her defense of the King James Holy Bible.

Jack Chick has also done a lot of good. He exposes the Catholic and Jesuit propaganda which has infiltrated America and also many, if not all of America's Seminaries. I suggest you read their materials. Because what you will find is that they all honour and magnify the precious word of God. Which is the Authorized King James Holy Bible.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#14
Im sure he has...and all his recruits probably became KJV only cultists who worship a book more than a savior. Why dont you quit fighting to make us worship the kjv and just go pray to ruckman and chick already?
 

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#15
Im sure he has...and all his recruits probably became KJV only cultists who worship a book more than a savior. Why dont you quit fighting to make us worship the kjv and just go pray to ruckman and chick already?

What they become are Bible believers. A Bible believer is a Chrisitan who believes in the inerancy and infallibility of the word of God. And we King James Bible believers worship God and honour and reverence His holy word.


Now Nautilus, do you believe that the Bible is the inerrant word of God? If you say yes, then could you please tell me which Bible it is that you profess to believe in?


Or is the bible that you believe in just a mystical, phantom bible? You know, like the one that James White and Doug Kutilek have.


And will you stop attacking Peter S. Ruckman, that man has done plenty for the Lord and he is still serving the Lord today, and praise God for that.

Now Peter Ruckman has his own flaws, but again, the man has done a lot for the Lord and he is a great defender of the King James Bible.

Jack Chick also has done a lot for the Lord. Jack Chick is not perfect, as he also has his own flaws, but he defintiely does the best he can to get the Gospel out there.

And he also exposes the false religions such as Mormonism, Catholicism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, and so forth.
 
Jul 25, 2005
2,417
34
0
#16
His Global Warming tract was one of the funniest things I've ever seen.
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#17
Yeah Ruckman is a great man of God...

Ruckman believes a fetus does not become a living soul until it is born and takes its first breath.[SUP][20][/SUP] He believes in Unidentified Flying Objects and aliens, specifically blue aliens with blue blood, black aliens with green blood, and gray aliens with clear blood.[SUP][21][/SUP] Ruckman believes the Central Intelligence Agency has implanted brain transmitters in children, old people, and African-Americans and that the agency operates underground alien breeding facilities.[SUP][22][/SUP]
In 1984, Ruckman wrote, "Negroes have to be carried. Where they are left to themselves they resort to mugging, rape, slavery, dope traffic, and eventually cannibalism.[SUP][23][/SUP] In 1994, he wrote that "no matter how much integration is carried out, the IQ of blacks is always lower than whites."[SUP][24][/SUP] In 1997, Ruckman claimed that Attorney General Janet Reno had drawn up a list with his name on it and predicted that the "Government Mafia" would make a hit on him during "the next two or three years."[SUP][[/SUP]
 
Jul 25, 2005
2,417
34
0
#18
My favorite was the bit about Janet Reno.
 

ChosenbyHim

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2011
3,343
114
63
#19
Yeah Ruckman is a great man of God...

Ruckman believes a fetus does not become a living soul until it is born and takes its first breath.[SUP][20][/SUP] He believes in Unidentified Flying Objects and aliens, specifically blue aliens with blue blood, black aliens with green blood, and gray aliens with clear blood.[SUP][21][/SUP] Ruckman believes the Central Intelligence Agency has implanted brain transmitters in children, old people, and African-Americans and that the agency operates underground alien breeding facilities.[SUP][22][/SUP]
In 1984, Ruckman wrote, "Negroes have to be carried. Where they are left to themselves they resort to mugging, rape, slavery, dope traffic, and eventually cannibalism.[SUP][23][/SUP] In 1994, he wrote that "no matter how much integration is carried out, the IQ of blacks is always lower than whites."[SUP][24][/SUP] In 1997, Ruckman claimed that Attorney General Janet Reno had drawn up a list with his name on it and predicted that the "Government Mafia" would make a hit on him during "the next two or three years."[SUP][[/SUP]


Did I say that he was perfect?

I understand that Peter Ruckman has his flaws, just as we all do. But I can assure you that he has done a lot for the cause of Christ and for His holy word. And yes, Peter S. Ruckman is an excellent Bible preacher and teacher. He has written many books, and plenty of commentaries on the Bible. And in his books and commentaries, he always honours and magnifies the text of the Holy Bible. He never casts doubt upon the text of the Holy Bible. He always exalts the Scriptures and builds belief and strengthen's faith in the word of God.

He also has produced many Chalk Talk sermons which cover just about every subject there is out there regarding the Christian faith (Rapture, Second Coming of Christ, Eternal Security, Dispensational Truth, The Judgment Seat of Christ, The Great White Throne Judgment, and many others). And again, he exalts the text of the Holy Scriptures in his chalk talk teachings and sermons.
 
Last edited:

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#20
he is also clearly insane and a racist...being able to string together some good words about God don't negate that.