Surely does not mean plausibility just as correlation does not mean causation. Conceding one does not mean conceding the other.
is it possible for humans to conceive without a male counterpart? Why not? Animals, although in very rare and specify circumstances can do this. An example of this animal is a bee when facing extinction levels. Do I think its plausible? No. It's far more plausible for a Jewish mynx to tell a lie than for the laws of nature to have been suspended.
Same concept for the talking donkey, snake, etcetera. Te reason the story is not credible is because the story is not an original. The virgin birth, died for 3 days, and rose from the dead (and sometimes on a cross) is repeated over and over. Same with stories of talking animals and floods. It is far more plausible that these stories were purely astrological and relating to sun worship than anything literal in one book of hundreds.
."
You claim to be wise, yet your words prove otherwise....
You are not wise enough to take the metaphor of 'balls' into consideration, so due to your hate for the one who said it. You attack that sentence yourself in a tangent... Foolish
You are a child who lives in a cave, and an outsider tells you about the sun, the miracles it does, and the warmth it gives... But since you have never seen this you claim the man to be a lier... You do not take the logical way to solve this (For if you did you would be wise, but instead you cling to your foolishness)... The logical way would be to travel back where the traveler came from and see if his words are truth... But you sit in your darkness with others alike, and you say you are so wise... You proclaim you know so much about darkness and that anyone who challenges your words are fools...
The world pities you, they see you in your cave, your whole life hiding from the truth that is right before you... You are so scared, afraid, or maybe even mad at this sun that you will live your whole life in darkness. Instead of admitting you are a fool and coming to the light...
(This was a huge metaphor about God if you could not discern that)
Many people say that the intellectually inferior go and say that there is a God... I would agree with this statement for one reason, the intellectually inferior are already called moronic, illogical, and idiotic so what could it hurt them to find the sun... If they don't find it they are still idiotic, so they loose nothing. That is why all the illogical, the ones with no pride find the sun first...
The people like you are soo filled in your own pride that you refuse to admit there is a sun. Or even thoroughly search for it... You look for Henry Ford... but instead of reading books, or researching... You look at a single bolt from 2013 raptor and say" There is no Henry Ford, this bolt is too perfect, this bolt even out dates his name..."
I would love to talk to you on the premise that I just laid out, but I am afraid you will not see the metaphors in front of you and will attack the people of the caves, the sun, and Henry Ford. In order to prove a point that no matter what I say you can argue about it... I am also afraid that after reading that sentence I just wrote that you now will try to reverse the roles that I so clearly laid out, and you will say that I am in a cave and you have light... Look at the difference in the way we discern of the world, if you truly look at it you will see you are of a cave... Now I am semi confident that you will post according to the premise I laid out... (If you even read it, but I am pretty assured that you will look for a less lengthy post or a easier metaphor for you to debunk.)
