J
RE: Appeal to Charismatic Friends
John McArthur : An Appeal to Charismatic Friends (John MacArthur) Strange Fire Conference - YouTube
It was suggested on one of the threads I check out this man. I
went to the link given, and it was another speaker, but topic was
about Charismatics. I listened to a little and did not follow through.
The purpose I was told to go to the link on YouTube was to show
me the error of Charismatic movement.
I recall telling the person I had come to Christ just around the time
of the movement. I also had no problem with it. At the time I spoke
with this poster I also had nothing horribly bad to say about it, but
I did find error in the movement over the years. I think it made me
more cautious of 'word of faith', tongue speaking, and healing ministries.
I discovered on my own that 'naming it, claiming it' was very erroneous.
Now this evening I went to YouTube for something totally different and
as I was logging out, I saw John McArthur and the title of his teaching
at a conference, "Appeal to Charismatic Friends." I nearly bypassed it
but instead thought, maybe I should listen to what he does have to say.
After all I do believe some of the 'full gospel' teachings.
I am so discouraged because I have experienced much of what he preaches
against. I don't feel God is angry with me for going along with the
charismatic movement in the sense of believing prophecy and healing is
still for today. I don't think God is angry with me for not 'naming and
claiming' it. After all He was the one who showed me it was erroneous.
What does trouble me is, if I understood McArthur correctly, I should not
believe God can give me impressions when I am praying for someone or
something. Or He shows me in the spirit someone is having issues they
need prayed for. That troubles me because I feel like as McArthur said,
it splits the Church. I agree with him when he says the music of today
is not reverent. Or not enough reverence in action, word or deed and
dress attire, maybe?
I know this groups are divided here. I have no place to share this 'new'
confusion, so I bring it here for discussion ~
John McArthur : An Appeal to Charismatic Friends (John MacArthur) Strange Fire Conference - YouTube
It was suggested on one of the threads I check out this man. I
went to the link given, and it was another speaker, but topic was
about Charismatics. I listened to a little and did not follow through.
The purpose I was told to go to the link on YouTube was to show
me the error of Charismatic movement.
I recall telling the person I had come to Christ just around the time
of the movement. I also had no problem with it. At the time I spoke
with this poster I also had nothing horribly bad to say about it, but
I did find error in the movement over the years. I think it made me
more cautious of 'word of faith', tongue speaking, and healing ministries.
I discovered on my own that 'naming it, claiming it' was very erroneous.
Now this evening I went to YouTube for something totally different and
as I was logging out, I saw John McArthur and the title of his teaching
at a conference, "Appeal to Charismatic Friends." I nearly bypassed it
but instead thought, maybe I should listen to what he does have to say.
After all I do believe some of the 'full gospel' teachings.
I am so discouraged because I have experienced much of what he preaches
against. I don't feel God is angry with me for going along with the
charismatic movement in the sense of believing prophecy and healing is
still for today. I don't think God is angry with me for not 'naming and
claiming' it. After all He was the one who showed me it was erroneous.
What does trouble me is, if I understood McArthur correctly, I should not
believe God can give me impressions when I am praying for someone or
something. Or He shows me in the spirit someone is having issues they
need prayed for. That troubles me because I feel like as McArthur said,
it splits the Church. I agree with him when he says the music of today
is not reverent. Or not enough reverence in action, word or deed and
dress attire, maybe?
I know this groups are divided here. I have no place to share this 'new'
confusion, so I bring it here for discussion ~