what if i give you a ticket to see a concert,
but you don't accept it; you throw it away.
then when you go to the venue without your ticket - what will you say to the gatekeeper?
won't he send you away without a ticket?
But you haven't included any ideals of justice, moral rights and wrongs nor punishment in this analogy. Thus it doesn't really address the issue in the context it is asked.
If I live in a small jungle setting, and lead a simple life; hunt, gather and feed my family and those of my tribe, and one day a missionary group comes and kills my mother and father, and tell me that if I don't convert to christianity that I will suffer death at their hands and burn in torment, then will I convert under the moral premises that God has seen fit to instill in my heart?
Certainly I won't. I'll die with my family.
And say the people in the village three miles away hear of this injustice and flee, and see civilizations, and become citizens of the law of that civilization, then they set up a group dedicated to opposing those who killed the families of the other tribe. They call it 'anti-christians unite'. What they are truly against is death and destruction, not necessarily christianity.
Yet, because of their experiences, they refuse to hear nor to accept the traditions, values nor beliefs of 'christians'. Are those people liable for hell, only for defending morality? They equate 'christianity' with immorality, death and destruction.
The same way, a young man goes to school in the modern day. A child, a child who has no preconceptions of religion. And he is taught in his school that the christians of the inquisition tortured people, and he is disgusted by it. Thus he decides there and then that the moralities of christianity are flawed and are evils. He makes a blanket assumption, yes. But he basis that decision on his own moral integrity; that it is wrong to kill, maim, torture and oppress.
Is he liable for hell then too?
If a man is born in Jewish Israel, a hundred years before the birth of Jesus, and he, as a child, sees the executions of those accused of unfounded accusations, and he is inwardly disgusted, by the morality which God has placed in his mind. He sees his family condone these killings and always he is against it. Then decides not to be 'jewish' and leaves home at 20, goes to India and encounters a group of Buddhists whom he sees feeding poor people and giving themselves up for the cause of others, and he joins this group because of their moralities, which sit well with his, and he dedicates his life to the cause of others, even though under a heading which is not 'jew', but rather 'buddhist', is he also liable for hell for that?
If a non-religious man walks into a church with guilt on his mind, and confesses to the pastor that he has sinned against his wife, and the pastor calms him and is fruitful and patient, and the next week he enters the same church and a man confesses his homosexuality, and the pastor and congregation condemn him with anger, then the man sees inconsistency in the morals of the church, and he walks from it. Is that man then also liable for hell, for following the morality which God has seen fit to bestow in him?
Similarly, if a man of compassion for the world, who has led his life by all the statutes of the law, and given of himself above and beyond it, sees one of these men come to him and say 'teacher, why is the world so hateful? Why do these Jews execute those accused of that which carries no evidence? And why does this pastor, who says that his eyes are open, have patience for one man and condemnation for another? And why have the men of the earlier years of that christian faith done such horrible things? And teacher, how is it that those whom those christians call heretics, 'the buddhists', have such compassion for others and yet those chrsitians do not see it? And how is it that those professing faith have killed this tribal man's family only because he was born in some other world away from all these faiths? Why is it so?'
Don't you think the teacher might have something greater to say than, 'it is so that all these people outside the consensus of faith can be shown the way to avoid eternal torment at the hands of their creator'?
There's more to it than buying a ticket and throwing it away.