Okay, belief in God's finished work for us by the death of Christ then comes the gift the new life in the resurrected Christ, was is only born again from God a gift to all that believe period
You are incorrect. We are born again to obey God's command. Christ died for our sins, but as sinners we must repent, confess and be baptized.
In Romans 6 said that after we obey a FORM of the work of Christ we are FREE from Sin.
The work of Jesus is the TUPOS or Type, a pattern intended to be obeyed.
ANTI-TUPOS is the instrumental means that Jesus gave us in order to be FREE FROM SIN. No one is said to be free from sin simply because they believe that Jesus existed.
Believeth is PISTIS which in the text means to trust in or COMPLY with what we believe.
Those who believe and trust by complying in baptism are those SAID TO BE SAVED.
Believeth not is APISTOS which means a person in revolt or treacherous. They say "I will NOT comply" because YOU cannot save me.
Those who are APISTOS and will not comply are DAMNED.
Christ the Spirit defined baptism in Acts 1 which is almost identical to Mark 16. The eunuch had with him an ISAIAH scroll and as soon as he knew that Jesus was that promised Messiah he REQUESTED to be baptized. A Dead Sea copy exists which might date a hundred or two hundered years before Christ.
ANTI means INSTEAD OF: we can obey the pattern to be imitated and be free from sin OR we can die on the cross for our own sins without any effect. That is why baptism is not a work of the law or work of self-righteousness. It pure grace.
The massed multitude which fights against baptism trust in their OWN "belief" as having power to let them reject the direct command of Jesus as his virtual last command.
Try this paragraph: I don't know how to make it clearer.
In Romans 6 said that after we obey a FORM of the work of Christ we are FREE from Sin.
The work of Jesus is the TUPOS or Type, a pattern intended to be obeyed.
ANTI-TUPOS is the instrumental means that Jesus gave us in order to be FREE FROM SIN. We are baptized FOR or in order to the remission of sins. No one is said to be free from sin simply because they believe that Jesus existed.
You said a bunch of stuff but what do you mean?
Acts 7:40 Saying unto Aaron, Make us GODS to go before us: for as for this Moses, which brought us out of the land of Egypt, we wot not what is become of him.
Acts 7:41 And they made a calf in those days,
and offered sacrifice unto the idol,
and rejoiced in the works of their own hands.
Acts 7:42 Then God turned, and gave them up to worship the host of heaven;
as it is written in the book of the prophets,
O ye house of Israel, have ye offered to me slain beasts
and sacrifices by the space of forty years in the wilderness?
......
The Israelites who were defacto Egyptians saved by grace through WHEN they were baptized unto Moses. They rejoiced in the works of THEIR HANDS which is the PATTERN for Rhetoricians, singers, instrument players, actors, craftsmen or STAFF. On the penalty of the Lake of Fire deny that what you call CHURCH (Kirke) did not work their little hearts out REFUSING to perform the ONE PIECE PATTERN of PREACHING the WORD (LOGOS) by READING the Word for Comfort and Doctrine.
we already know you are a madman. you don't have to get a jab in at Obama in the middle of this lol. but you know, medicare has been around a long time and it's much more 'socialist' than ... nevermind we don't need to be talking about this.
Besides that you EXTORTED money in the words of Paul by PERFORMING the Legalistic Act of threatening everyone into GIVING YOU their health care money Christ told them NOT to do in Isaiah 55.
Acts 7:43 Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch,
...... and the star of your god Remphan,
......figures which ye made to worship them:
......and I will carry you away beyond Babylon.
Acts 7:44 Our fathers had the tabernacle of witness in the wilderness, as he had appointed,
......speaking unto Moses, that he should make it
......according to the fashion that he had seen.
Acts 7:45 Which also our fathers that came after brought in
......with Jesus into the possession of the Gentiles,
......whom God drave out before the face of our fathers, unto the days of David;
Acts 7:46 Who found favour before God, and DESIRED to
......find a TABERNACLE for the God of Jacob.
Acts 7:47 BUT Solomon built him an house.
Acts 7:48 Howbeit the most High dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet,
Acts 7:49 Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool:
......what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest?
Acts 7:50 Hath not MY HANDS made all these things?
Acts 7:51 Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears,
......ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.
Acts 7:52 Which of the prophets have not your fathers persecuted?
......and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One;
......of whom ye have been now the betrayers and murderers:
Acts 7:53 Who have received the law by the disposition of angels, and have not kept it.
so you reject all the prophecies of Christ returning as King.... to "forever sit on the throne of David".Christ in the prophets warned about the Lying Pen of the Scribes in their writing about the Temple: He called the Scribes, hypocrites by quoting Ezekiel 33 who named self-speakers for hire (hirelings), singers and instrument players. ALL national histories would include the Civil-Military-Clergy complex in opposition to the Spiritual people taught by Christ in the Prophets but NEVER the kings. The Patriarchs or first born sons led the tribes until the fatal fall into instrumental idolatry at Mount Sinai; then and later God GAVE THEM KINGS IN HIS ANGER to carry out the captivity and death sentence. Those OF the world will use the Worship of the Starry host and reject the Creator of the Hosts. Sorry bout that.
NO historic scholar failed to read Isaiah and Jeremiah to have the testimony of Christ that God did not COMMAND king, kingdom, temple, animal sacrifices or the Jacob-cursed and God-abandoned Levites as soothsayers to stand in ranks and warning people that they would be executed if they came inside the gates. Here is a more modern scholar who missed preach. Burton Coffman notes that.
The great Cambridge scholar, Henry McKeating, has the following comment on this passage from Hosea:
"Hosea is not only antagonistic to the northern kings but to the monarchy as such. The monarchy is powerless to save the nation. Israel was wrong to ask for a king. Her punishment was that she got what she asked." 7: Henry McKeating, Amos, Hosea, and Micah (Cambridge: University Press, 1971), p. 148.
Coffman: "We are aware that it is popular among many able commentators today to make apologies for Israel'smonarchy and to apply what the Scriptures plainly say about it to some specific monarch, Saul, for example, as did Dummelow, or to the kings of Northern Israel as did Hailey;
but it is the conviction of this writer that
Israel was totally and completely wrong in asking a king and that this rejection of God (that is what the text calls it) contained embryonically all of the later sorrows of the Chosen People. Throughout the whole history of Israel, there were very few monarchs who even tried to serve the Lord. Solomon was to be blamed for the division of the kingdom under his son, because the people simply rejected the excesses of Solomon; and yet, even after God took the monarchy away from them, the nation wanted nothing in heaven or on earth as much as they wanted the restoration of that scandalous Solomonic empire.
It was this, more than anything else,
that motivated theirrejection of God Himself,
finally and irrevocably,
in their rejection of God's Son, Jesus Christ the Holy One.
Go down the list of Israel's kings, David, the very best of all of them, was an adulterer and a murderer; and he also corrupted the worship of God by two sinful things:
(1) his initiating the events that led to the building of the temple (the den of thieves and robbers in Jesus' times); and
(2) his introduction of instruments of music into the worship of God.We do not have the space here to outline all of the misdeeds of Israel's shameful monarchy, but it is clear enough that God's disapproval of the monarchy was no late thing, applicable only to the phantom kings of Ephraim's final years, but it rested upon the monarchy from the very beginning of it as outlined in this chapter.
If God had ever approved of it, He would never have taken it away from them! Nevertheless, God accommodated to the sinful conduct of His people and in many specific instances blessed the kings of Israel,
Church with out instruments, Dull. The bible is about trumpets and harps and the psalms and drums and stringed instruments and singing. Man can mess things up. The longest book in the bible is a song book.
Instruments or not is not the issue, it is the state of the heart that is the issue. Is it a stony heart or a Godly heart that worship? Easy to test the heart. PRAY and ask God something.... ANYTHING... if you get what you ask, your heart is GODLY. If you do not get what you ask your hart is STONE.
God does not listen to the hearts of sinners (stone hearts) and God does not say no to the Godly hearts (His holy people). Same with worship as worship is His people gsayin THANK YOU LORD for what they have recieved.... That is all worship is... Giving God the glory of GODLY HEARTS.
Worship is: HOLY PEOPLE SAYING THANK YOU TO GOD and LIVING IN GOD'S WILL. It is a gathering of HOLY PEOPLE, saying thank you in holiness to a HOLY GOD. It is not a gathering of sinners seeking favour from God. I think this short verse should show you all what I try to show Scripture teach about worshipping... Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth.
Really, and other denominations claim this same fame, all preach Christ right, Then who is right and who is wrong, Man or God?
And please Scripture that says it is to be named the Church of Christ or any other name it is to be, specifically, when Chirst was clear he has no part of this world, his kingdom is not of this world?
SHow me in the Bible where it says using instruments to worship God is a sin.
Amen! I don't think something is evil and wrong to use in church just because it is not mentioned in the apostolic records of the New Testament. No church in the New Testament owned its own building, but met in homes or in other public places. No church in the New Testament had electricity or sound systems. The Bible never mentions whether any church service included a time of announcements or a Sunday School. We have all of these and I'm convinced they are acceptable. Musical instruments, if used with care, can enhance the singing of praise to the Lord.
any split from the Lords church does make them a denomination...That was seen by the Christian Church that split from the Church of Christ (I wonder if they consider them a denomination).
They were obviously considered a help to praise in the Old Testament and in heaven. It seems strange to say that something God thought was a blessing in the Old Testament and is considered a blessing in heaven is an evil in the New Testament church.