I do not recall anyone saying baptism alone saves.
...but if one indicates that the water of baptism is the lynch-pin of salvation, then it's making it to be something the Bible does not teach.
I do not recall anyone saying baptism alone saves.
Okay. I'll take your word for it. I've been baptized by water and the Holy Spirit and Jesus is my lord so in that I am confident.God saves, but God uses water baptism as the means by which He saves, Christ's blood is accessed in water baptism, so that is why Peter could say water baptism doth also now save us.
I do not recall anyone saying baptism alone saves.
Water baptism saves becasue God has chosen water baptism as the means by which he saves:
In Rev 1:5 John said Christ "washed us from our sins in his own blood"
Christ's blood that washes away sins was shed in His death, Jn 19:34
So we must have a way into Christ's death to access that shed blood, and water baptism is what puts one into Christ's death..."Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:" Rom 6:3-5.
Mk 16:16 has two subjects; salvation and condemnation.
There are two requiremnts for salvation: belief and baptism
There is one requirement for condmenation: unbelief
One has nothing to do with the other. So if one desires to be saved he must believe and be baptized.
In Acts 2:38 Peter commanded BOTH repentance and baptism, not just repentance. And it is not until one is baptized are his sins remitted.
1 Pet 3:21 the OT type is saved by water, The NT antitype is saved by water baptism. THe word translated "atitype" does not mean that baptism is only a symbol, but the word means a mirror reflection.
I don't see water saving in Acts 10.47-48. Not bias to say so; it's plainly not the case.
A 'type' does not mean 'the same' or 'identical'.In Acts 2:38 Peter said to be baptized for remission of sins (salvation). In 1 Pet 3:21 Peter said baptism saves, so both verses speak of the one baptism of Eph 4:5 that saves, and they are both the human administered water baptism of the great commission.
OT type: saved by water
NT antitype: saved by water
Well, how were those 8 souls - 8 people saved? They were saved from the flood because they believed God and got on the ark. The Israelites believed God and walked through the 'walls' of the Red Sea. These both are symbolic of baptism - not as a ritual cleansing from sin but being saved as in passing from the old to the new.Peter said 8 souls saved by/through water. Peter did NOT say 8 souls saved in an ark, as many change verse 20 to say.
Yep water is used as the OT type - a type of what was to come - they were saved from destruction by water - we are saved by "living water" which represents the holy Spirit. Water does not 'create' that new creation' within a person - it is 'born' by the Spirit.The NT antitype (antitupos) is a mirror reflection of the OT type: they were saved by water > we are saved by water. So it cannot some "spirit baptism" under consideration for the world was not flooded by spirit, but by literal water. Again, the NT antitype: water is a mirror reflection of the OT type; water. No spirit here. No ark here.
It is impossible to please God in the flesh - so the washing of the filth of the flesh does no one any good. We must be cleansed from the inside out - the new birth; that new creation within the born again believer ONLY is what makes us children of God. It is that spirit within us that 'makes us perfect in every good work to do his will, working in us that which is wellpleasing in his sight through Jesus Christ' - all this can ONLY be done via the holy Spirit; the washing of water cannot do this.After Peter says baptism saves he say what baptism is NOT for, it is "not the putting away of the filth of the flesh". Obviously Peter is talking about water baptism, water being used to clean the filth of the flesh.
Repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ - water or Spirit? What baptism does Jesus Christ baptize with/in? The only way to have a good conscience toward God is to know who we are IN Christ Jesus. To know that he dwells within us via the holy Spirit, via the new birth. It is making Jesus our Lord, being baptized in the Spirit that makes us Christians - not any church we attend, being baptized in water, or doing good works that make us a Christian - unbelievers can do all these things. What makes us a Christian is being born again of the Spirit - and to be born again of the Spirit is to be cleansed with 'living water' given by Jesus Christ. How can dunking in water create that new creation in Christ within you? All it can do is symbolize something - it was and is a 'type' of the true baptism with and in 'living water' which is the holy Spirit.Peter then says baptism is "the answer of a good conscience toward God". In water baptism, sins are remitted where one can have a good conscience toward God. In Acts 2, Peter convicted his Jewish listeners of the sin of curcifying the Christ. Their guilty conscience lead them to ask Peter what shall they do. The "answer" Peter gave them for their guilty conscience of sin was to repent and be baptized for the remission of sins.....answer > be baptized., their appeal to God for a good conscience would come through water baptism. <snip>
because:
Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.
(John 4:10)
however i can't think of a scripture where Christ used "spirit" as a metaphor.
i wouldn't say "don't get baptized" -- i encourage it! we're flatly told to be baptized!
but baptism of water isn't where we place our faith: that is in Christ, from whom we receive true baptism unto salvation.
there is only one way into the Kingdom: Jesus.
why ascribe that glory to anything else? a bathtub is not the mediator between God and men.
...but if one indicates that the water of baptism is the lynch-pin of salvation, then it's making it to be something the Bible does not teach.
Okay. I'll take your word for it. I've been baptized by water and the Holy Spirit and Jesus is my lord so in that I am confident.
pardon me;
just reading thread titles.![]()
Water baptism is NOT a prerequisite to salvation. It is not required nor necessary as a prior condition to salvation. (Acts 10) 'born of water' is NOT water baptism - but relates to your first birth as in v6 - That which is born of the flesh is flesh; [born of water] and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
to "be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ" is to be baptized in holy spirit - the holy spirit penetrates and permeates the entire person. "Born again" shows that God is the Father of the Christian and when a person is saved something is actually "born." "Born again" is not just a metaphor; it describes a spiritual reality. God the Father puts his nature inside each saved person via spiritual birth. The "child" of God gets the divine nature of the Father. Christians are "holy", not because of their behavior but because of their holy spiritual nature.
No but the life raft floating on the ocean of sin you are drowning in does. Seriously tho....baptism in the name of the father son and Holy Spirit is a public expression of Jesus lordship over your life. The old man goes under and the new man emerges.
There is just "one baptism" in effect today, Eph 4:5, that one baptism being the human adminstered water baptism of Christ's great comission (Mat 28:19,20; Mk 16:15,16) that saves, makes one a disciple, is commanded, that is to be taught, that lasts till the end of the world.
Title: "Does water baptism save us" or "Water baptism alone saves us"?
God didn't chose water baptism to get saved, He chose the rebirth made possible by the blood of Jesus.
saved1975 said:The ay into Christ's death, Is through dying to self at the rebirth.
One has to be saved before they can be baptised in water.
As for Rom 6: 3--5. One has to be saved before they can be baptised into Jesus death.
saved1975 said:As for Mk 16: 16, And Acts 2: 38, One has to believe and get born again before they can be baptised.
saved1975 said:Water baptism is identifying who you are baptised into, But you have to be in Christ before you can be baptised as you witness as to belonging to Him.
A 'type' does not mean 'the same' or 'identical'.
OT type: sins "covered" by water once a year which brought their sins to their conscience [remembrance] each year [Hebrews 10:3]
NT antitype: saved by 'living water' ONCE AND FOR ALL [Hebrews 7:27] John 4:10,11 - Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water. The woman saith unto him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep: from whence then hast thou that living water?
John 7:37-39 In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink. He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water. (But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive:; for the holy Spirit was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)
Well, how were those 8 souls - 8 people saved? They were saved from the flood because they believed God and got on the ark. The Israelites believed God and walked through the 'walls' of the Red Sea. These both are symbolic of baptism - not as a ritual cleansing from sin but being saved as in passing from the old to the new.
Yep water is used as the OT type - a type of what was to come - they were saved from destruction by water - we are saved by "living water" which represents the holy Spirit. Water does not 'create' that new creation' within a person - it is 'born' by the Spirit.
It is impossible to please God in the flesh - so the washing of the filth of the flesh does no one any good. We must be cleansed from the inside out - the new birth; that new creation within the born again believer ONLY is what makes us children of God. It is that spirit within us that 'makes us perfect in every good work to do his will, working in us that which is wellpleasing in his sight through Jesus Christ' - all this can ONLY be done via the holy Spirit; the washing of water cannot do this.
Repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ - water or Spirit? What baptism does Jesus Christ baptize with/in? The only way to have a good conscience toward God is to know who we are IN Christ Jesus. To know that he dwells within us via the holy Spirit, via the new birth. It is making Jesus our Lord, being baptized in the Spirit that makes us Christians - not any church we attend, being baptized in water, or doing good works that make us a Christian - unbelievers can do all these things. What makes us a Christian is being born again of the Spirit - and to be born again of the Spirit is to be cleansed with 'living water' given by Jesus Christ. How can dunking in water create that new creation in Christ within you? All it can do is symbolize something - it was and is a 'type' of the true baptism with and in 'living water' which is the holy Spirit.
THe problem with your exegesis is that you are going to a remote context where water is being used figuratively then try to apply that remote context to the immediate one in Jn 3:5.
Does the remote context of Jn 4:10 make water figurative in Jn 3:23 also?
Title: "Does water baptism save us" or "Water baptism alone saves us"?
we must then examine the baptism as it is necesary but to keep in mind and firstmore it is the grace of our Lord jesus but if one dares to say teach to refuse the baptism then one could be deemed not saved my answer it is vitaly nesesary but it is not the source of salvation .it is part of our faith it is necesary like every other commandment by our Lord or it would of not been said at all
It seems quite a few people who preach water salvation take John 3 out of context and misapply the (water) physical birth to baptism.....which has nothing to do with biblical salvation as that is based upon faith and not works of righteousness of the which Baptism is!
Mk 16:16; Acts 2:38; Rom 6:3-5; Col 2:12-14 among many other verses tell me baptism saves for God has chosen water baptism at the means,the point where Christ's blood wshes away sin.
Rom 6:3ff says baptism is the way into Christ's death.
Noting the order of verses like Mk 16:16 and Acts 2:38 both put baptism BEFORE salvation/remission of sin, not AFTER.
Neither verse says "Be born again thenbe baptzed" for water baptism is the new birth.
The bible tells us water baptism is symbolic of the death, burial and resurrection of Christ, one does not walk in newness of life until he goes through this process, Rom 6:4. Yet the bible does not ever say water baptism is only symbolic and nothing more, for the bible also says baptism saves, Mk 16;16; Acts 2:38; 1 Pet 3;21.
Gal 3:27 baptism is what puts one in Christ, so one cannot be in Christ until they are baptized.
1 Cor 12:13 "...baptized into one body..." water baptism is what puts on in Christ's body, the church.