It Is satanic Heresy to Deny Eternal Security

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
16,201
375
83
even then you still have to hold fast till the end there is no letting go.
How can one that sees to the end, that god has shown to you as shown to Paul? Do we think God has favor, ot has respect of persons?
God while we all were and are deep in debt, a debt so big that no one pay it back. So one needs Mercy and not sacrifice, you think? Just saying you think?
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
A common interpretation, "continue to sin." But I don't buy it, and there is no word "continue" in the Greek. I take it that 1 John speaks of the New Human Nature (vs our Old Man) which cannot sin, as it is begotten of God. The present tense "continually" theory is erroneous. Take the present tense, "In many things we all stumble" (James). Who would claim that this means that Christians continually sin without let up? But stop dwelling on passages which are not about how to get eternal life or salvation; nor making statements on those subjects.
Don't buy it then, if you believe you cannot sin fine by me. It will not be the first lie you believe. we all make mistakes.
Clearly the New Human Nature can sin. I am asking you since you were born again have you ever sinned.
The whole purpose of Christ is for us to have salvation unto eternal life so what scripture is not connected directly or indirectly
1 John 1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

1 John 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

1 John 2
King James Version (KJV)

2 My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
Romans 6:14-16
King James Version (KJV)


[SUP]14 [/SUP]For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
[SUP]15 [/SUP]What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?


Romans 5:21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
1 John 3:14-16
[SUP]14 [/SUP]We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.


[SUP]15 [/SUP]Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.
 

homwardbound

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2012
16,201
375
83
There is more to it now. -"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life."-JC

according to the first use of "believing in God" we immediately see that it meant "believing what He said to be true." We cannot take this verse to mean only itself. This verse automatically takes us beyond these words to the words He has said.
Yes to change from being born creators and creating as if we are Gods, which in the flesh we are knowing right and wrong, and choosing right fro selfish reasons as if we are right and steal, kill and destroy others to save the self here on earth, do we not as in the carnal nature do these things when the going gets tough we have the tendency to act like that person in Luke 16

So choose today are we the creators are the creation? Do we respond to the Love and Mercy from God, or create by going tom our place of fellowship and feel so good about self?
 

Bookends

Senior Member
Aug 28, 2012
4,225
99
48


This is a very important passage, which is not about unsaved persons; these are Paul's little children; persons He led to the Lord who became born again.
Yes, which makes me ponder why Paul would be fearful for them. Either they or some didn't have a born again experience or they had and lost it. Then Paul goes on to explain that he had give birth to them again, so that they would be filled with Christ. The language Paul uses here makes me question what I always believed.
 
Mar 18, 2011
2,540
22
0
Yes to change from being born creators and creating as if we are Gods, which in the flesh we are knowing right and wrong, and choosing right fro selfish reasons as if we are right and steal, kill and destroy others to save the self here on earth, do we not as in the carnal nature do these things when the going gets tough we have the tendency to act like that person in Luke 16

So choose today are we the creators are the creation? Do we respond to the Love and Mercy from God, or create by going tom our place of fellowship and feel so good about self?
Loved all of it but the bold

I can respond to love and mercy from God AND go to a place of fellowship and feel good about myself. :) I can enjoy my life because Jesus is with me :) He shares this moment. I am never alone. Praise God :)

I'd better honor this body. Jesus is in it. :)
 
Mar 28, 2014
4,300
31
0
How can one that sees to the end, that god has shown to you as shown to Paul? Do we think God has favor, ot has respect of persons?
God while we all were and are deep in debt, a debt so big that no one pay it back. So one needs Mercy and not sacrifice, you think? Just saying you think?
You don't have to believe me brother read the word... If you don't want to hold firm to the end my friend I can't make you but I encourage you to do so

  • Hebrews 3:6 But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.
    2 Thessalonians 2:14-17
    [SUP]14 [/SUP]Whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.


    [SUP]15 [/SUP]Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
    [SUP]16 [/SUP]Now our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God, even our Father, which hath loved us, and hath given us everlasting consolation and good hope through grace,
    [SUP]17 [/SUP]Comfort your hearts, and stablish you in every good word and work.

 
A

Alligator

Guest
I give them eternal life; and they shall never perish.

Atwood, you keep posting this passage , let me give you my take. This verse assumes that we understand it is to be taken in
context with passages like Rev. 2:10. We do not have eternal life yet. We have it in promise. We will have it in actuality at the resurrection. I see nothing in this scripture to support you cannot call from grace. Once we have eternal life in actuality then yes, we will never perish.
Alligator do you belief God's promise? Does God lie? So what would be ones response, knowing god does not lie?
To believe God or not right? only thing Christ never died for is unbelief?
What kind of a crazy question is that?

HE died for THE SINS OF MANKIND
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
What kind of a crazy question is that?

HE died for THE SINS OF MANKIND
If he died for your sins, then the price has been paid.
All you need do is trust Him now with your eternal destiny.

John 6:37
All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.

And who has also put his seal on us and given us his Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee.

Romans 11:29
For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Yes, which makes me ponder why Paul would be fearful for them. Either they or some didn't have a born again experience or they had and lost it. Then Paul goes on to explain that he had give birth to them again, so that they would be filled with Christ. The language Paul uses here makes me question what I always believed.
Bookends,

The Christian can go back and forth between sinning in carnality and walking by the Spirit. In many things we all stumble. You can expect Christians to sin every day and be confessing sins every day. But they don't get lost and saved every day. We may have the Christ-mophe or the Old Man morphe, like putting on different suits of clothing. Is it really rocket science to understand that Christians sin and Christians also do miraculous good works, unselfishly loving even their enemies?

I wouldn't go to pot on some figure of speech Paul uses for the Galatians. As Peter says, some things in Paul are hard to understand. There are plenty of clear passages that tell a man how to become saved, like:

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you shall be saved.

And there are plenty of clear passages that tell us Christians sin and need correction.

Philippians 1:6

And I am sure of this, that he who began a good work in you will bring it to completion at the day of Jesus Christ.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Don't buy it then, if you believe you cannot sin fine by me.[/quote

Nonsense, NewB.

Clearly the New Human Nature can sin.
What is your proof of that?

I am asking you since you were born again have you ever sinned.
More nonsense. Look at my posts on this subject -- surely you already read them. Christians have 2 natures, Old & New. They have the Old Man flesh lusting vs the Spirit. On the other hand Christians have a New Nature, begotten by God. They may walk by the Spirit and enjoy the production of the fruit of the Spirit.

The whole purpose of Christ is for us to have salvation unto eternal life so what scripture is not connected directly or indirectly
What leads you to suppose that man's salvation is the whole purpose of Christ instead of one purpose of Christ? Going off on tangents and bringing in objections (from verses off topic) to the clear revelation of eternal security is putting the blinders on and obfuscating.

If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
So what else is new?

[SUP]
14 [/SUP]For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.
[SUP]15 [/SUP]What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid. [sic, for "let it not be so"]
[SUP]16 [/SUP]Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?
Good verses, having nothing to do with eternal security, certainly no opposed to that truth.

That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
Great verse. Indeed eternal life comes by the grace of our Lord Jesus. And in context righteousness comes from the Christian's connection to Christ, not from his good works.

1 John 3:14-16
[SUP]14 [/SUP]We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.
Nothing to do with eternal security. Yes, the ability to love is an indicator that one has received eternal life, but not a condition of receiving it.

[SUP]
15 [/SUP]Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.
[SUP]16 [/SUP]Hereby perceive we the love of God, because he laid down his life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.
So if you really don't love, unselfishly seek the good of others, that indicates you do not have eternal life; but loving is not the cause of eternal life; it is the result of being saved.

Focus on what the word says on how one obtains eternal security, instead of other subjects.

End of Rom 8:
And we know that to them that love God all things work together for good, even to them that are called according to his purpose. For whom
he foreknew,
he also foreordained to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren: and whom
he foreordained, them
he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom
he justified, them
he also glorified.


31 What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who is against us? 3He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not also with him freely give us all things? Who shall lay anything to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth; who is he that condemneth? It is Christ Jesus that died, yea rather, that was raised from the dead, who is at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or anguish, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? Even as it is written,
For thy sake we are killed all the day long;
We were accounted as sheep for the slaughter.

Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
The history of OSAS:
The doctrine of OSAS. or eternal security, . . . Augustinianism. . . .
John Calvin, . . . Stanley . . . the early Church Fathers. . . 1 Clement . . . 2 Clement [& O My Darling Clementine] . . . Polycarp [the citation of whom said nothing against eternal security]. . . Irenaeus . . .
Again, Cassian you started by just up and saying things with no proof. I already posted how a bunch of early so called "church" fathers taught universalism, which implies eternal security -- not that it makes any difference; for it is the Word of God which matters, not the select group of writers that the RCC preserved and called "ch fathers."

Finally Cassian got around to some scripture.

Rev 2:5 Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent.
Irrelevant. The impermanence of a local church saying nothing about the eternal security of a man who trusts Christ as Savior.

Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
The text says nothing about a man who trusts Christ as Savior not having eternal security. Likewise other gross sinners indicate they were never saved; fornicators and liars go to the Lake of Fire.

Heb 3:12 Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.
Indeed, beware lest there be in anyone an evil heart of unbelief in the Savior, who has an evil heart that cannot trust the Lord Jesus with His destiny. As Hebrews goes on to say:

And we see that they were not able to enter in because of unbelief. Let us fear therefore, lest haply, a promise being left of entering into his rest, any one of you should seem to have come short of it. For indeed we have had good tidings preached unto us, even as also they: but the word of hearing did not profit them, because it was not united by faith with them that heard. For we who have believed do enter into that rest; even as he hath said,
As I sware in my wrath,
They shall not enter into my rest:
although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.

This is the rest of faith, when a man gives up trusting in his self-righteousness and trusts the Lord Jesus with His life and destiny.

Next comes Cassian in Wonderland:

Besides not being found in scripture here are some things that it denies....
The purpose of God creating man.
It denies the purpose of man's existence.
The way God planned to save mankind and to offer eternal life to all.
It denies a mutual, loving relationship with God by man.
The purpose appears to have been to manifest the grace of God; man is a sinful undeserving race, for whom the Lord has shown unmerited favor. This is quite consistent with eternal security. (Meditate on Ephesians 1.)

It hardly denies God's universal offer of salvation. And Cassian, why do you scorn it and not receive it?

Nothing I have stated here is new.
Actually what looks new is that Cassian actually quotes some scripture and attempts to prove something from the Word of God instead of just his own saying it. I commend him for that.

Meanwhile, we must not forget:

I give them eternal life, and they will never perish
 
P

phil112

Guest
................................Irrelevant. The impermanence of a local church saying nothing about the eternal security of a man who trusts Christ as Savior.....................................
Cut the foreskin off your heart, ears, and eyes. That is the same garbage all OSAS people quote - "He was talking about the church, not people"..........Tell me, oh wise one, what exactly IS the church, if not people?????

And when they were come, and had gathered the church together
According to you and the foolish doctrine you endorse, they gathered a bunch of buildings together? Very, very clearly the church is people. A building cannot slide into apostasy. Of course Christ was talking about christians.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Cut the foreskin off your heart, ears, and eyes. That is the same garbage all OSAS people quote - "He was talking about the church, not people"..........Tell me, oh wise one, what exactly IS the church, if not people?????


According to you and the foolish doctrine you endorse, they gathered a bunch of buildings together? Very, very clearly the church is people. A building cannot slide into apostasy. Of course Christ was talking about christians.
A local church is a mixture of saved and lost even from early establishment. Over time, it is possible for a given congregation to end up totally unregenerate. The local church in Ephesus had a danger of having its witness removed. Today, so far as I know there is no local church in Ephesus. This has nothing to do with the eternal security of the one who trusts Christ as Savior. Neither in the statement about removing the lampstand, does the term eternal life occur nor salvation. You are off topic.

Of course local churches die. That says nothing about the regenerated men in that local church. Christ was addressing a local church and it being eliminated. That says nothing about saved persons in that local church not having eternal security.

Now come up with a verse that says that eternal life is temporary life or that persons once having it some time stop having it (oxymoron). You simply cannot. And your scripture says nothing about salvation whatsoever. A local church can be shaken out of existence. But not the kingdom that believers receive.

Wherefore, receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us have grace, whereby we may offer service well-pleasing to God with reverence and awe:

Phil, you need to trust the Lord Jesus with your eternal destiny. Otherwise you are lost forever, and no light ever came from you.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
Augustine was greatly influenced by his former faith, Manicheanism. He was also a student of Neo-Platonism. Manicheanism was a religion developed in the 2nd century whereby the founder, Mani, took parts of several of the religions of that day including Gnosticism and Christianity.
So then, are you arguing that Augustine's position on eternal security should be rejected because it was mediated to Christian doctrine by Augustine to whom it was taught it by the Neo-platonists, Manicheanism, and Gnosticism?

Now I would like to see some proof of such a claim. But I have to tell you that once you prove this, then your argument is destroyed. For if Augustine's position on eternal security is wrong, then your position is also wrong; for Augustine rejected eternal security! I read him years ago for myself. To me Augustine is a strange combo of predestinationism with rejection of eternal security! So do you now admit you are wrong on your rejection of eternal security because the rejection of eternal security is a heresy injected into Christianity by Augustine from Neo-platonists, Manicheanism, and Gnosticism?

Augustine in his debates with Pelagius developed a whole new theory to offset the teaching of Pelagius which has become known as the theory of Original Sin. He also incorporated the idea of Predestination into Christianity. Both of these theories remained mostly dormant.
Now how could you know that? Original Sin and Predestination are clearly taught in Romans. Thus they are not theories, but facts. And your claim that these ideas remained mostly dormant requires proof that you have no way of obtaining; as you do not have the minutes of centuries of church meetings all over Europe, Asia Minor, and North Africa (let any congregations begun by Doubting Thomas in India) -- thousands of churches, with millions of meetings, and you can say what was dormant?

At any rate, since you seem to like the select "church fathers" which have been preserved for us by the RCC and EO denominations, I thought I would add my 2 cents worth in on Augustine, not that it makes a whit of difference, since I have no evidence that Aug was any prophet.

But the evidence for eternal security is profound and conclusive from God's Word.

The Lord has
"put his seal on us and given us his Spirit in our hearts as a guarantee. "


Moreover, "the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. "
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
I don't know about you, but as for me:

I know Whom I have believed and am persuaded that He is able to keep that which He has committed to me[SUP]1[/SUP]
against that day.


-------
[SUP]1[/SUP]Literally, my deposit.
 

know1

Senior Member
Aug 27, 2012
3,100
180
63
Greetings Know1, very clever screen name.
Thanks. The name I took was the same name I heard, but it was originally going to be, No1, but when my son set me up on Christian chat, he said that it says, number 1, not no one. I was thinking more along the lines of, 'I am no one without Christ', but to keep the name I heard in my ear, not knowing what way it was intended to be, I changed it to know1.

However, we do not receive all of our blessings in this life.
We have to wait on the Lord.
Yes, we have to wait on God for some things, but if you never received what you asked for, then your waiting was in vain. God said, 'according to your faith, be it unto you'. If you don't believe you already have it, then you don't, and you will never get what you have been waiting on God for.

The body decays with age. When you are 60, you will not run like you did when you were 20 years old.
I am still working on having my youth renewed like the eagle!
Deu 34:7 And Moses was an hundred and twenty years old when he died: his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated.
God creates the fruit of your lips, and if you are going to continue to walk in the natural, rather than by faith, then you will have as you believed and spoke.
Know it or not, but you are putting Mark 11:23 to work against you. God has given us both blessings and curses, then He told us to choose. You have chosen to have the curse of the law work on your flesh instead of being redeemed from it. Decay, is one of the curses of the law of sin. You're not redeemed from the things you fail to take by faith.
Sickness is another. We are redeemed from this curse as well, when we receive it by faith, and you cannot do that if you are looking at the natural all the time. What you look at the most, you will believe, and what you really believe, you will act on, and when you act on it, it is yours, then you will have it in the natural. Whether it is for healing or sickness, it will be yours, even as you believed.


You will not go to a hospital, say "be healed" and run the hospital out of business, putting limbs back on amputees. Can one find someone with a missing leg and prove a theory of healing by causing a new leg to pop out?
Yes, though it's not as simple as that, 'cause the person being healed needs to have faith as well. Jesus healed living people that had faith, those that didn't have faith, remained the same. You need to teach people that God has healed them, that being the child of God, before they start believing it, as faith comes by hearing. Then God WILL heal them, when they act on His word in faith. You must believe you have received the thing you asked for from God, before it manifests in the natural.
Mat 13:12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
Mar 11:24 Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye [have already] receive[d] them, and ye shall have them.



That is not to deny that the Lord sometimes heals persons.
In many cases, we have to accept thorns in the flesh and know that His strength is made perfect in weakness and that His grace is sufficient for me.
I understand that this is not the running topic of this thread, but what you are now saying is not in the scriptures, but you are speaking from personal experience, and what you have been taught. This is what I was trying to get at. Everyone has their eyes on the natural, in other words, being carnally minded, and not walking by faith nor in the Spirit.
God's strength is not made perfect in your sickness or infirmity, because you are not making use of His strength by getting bashed over the head by the devil and doing nothing about it. While God's children are saying that His strength is made perfect in their sickness, they are dying. Some strength that is. God's strength is in the power of His word. If you do nothing with it, you are not making use of His strength.

We may have to take No for an answer.
No where in scripture has God said He wouldn't heal or that His answer is, 'no', except to the wicked or unrighteous.
If there are those of us who get all their prayers answered because they act on the truth of God's word, and then there are those who say, 'God says no', and their prayers don't get answered, what do you suppose the problem is? Are we any more special to God than you? No! But if God is answering our prayers and not your, then why prey tell, are you not interested in listening? Why do you continue to choose sickness over healing or being a partaker of the divine nature of God and walk in health, free from sickness, disease, and other things in this natural world?
God did not tell Paul, no, but gave him the answer to his question. We are not to ask God to take care of the devil for us. He told us to resist the devil, and to cast the stench out, in His name. That is where His power is made perfect. Faith in Him and His word. When we fail to act on, or by not being a doer of the word of God, we deceive ourselves, and that is one of the sorry things that has happened to so many Christians in these last days. They fail to believe what God said in His word, and have believed a lie that they have seen, felt, heard, and experienced, not knowing how the kingdom of God works.

 

Cassian

Senior Member
Oct 12, 2013
1,960
7
0
Atwood,

Again, Cassian you started by just up and saying things with no proof. I already posted how a bunch of early so called "church" fathers taught universalism, which implies eternal security -- not that it makes any difference; for it is the Word of God which matters, not the select group of writers that the RCC preserved and called "ch fathers."
Historical record is proof. I understand your need to denigrate history, deomonize it so that modern man can elevate their own teachings.

However, the only person that I know of that taught what is known as Universalism was Origin. Later that concept was declared heretical. The Church Fathers did not determine what the Church believed. If the Church Father was faithful to the gospel they were accorded as correct or faithful to the teachings of the Church.

It matters a lot what the faithful Church Fathers wrote. Several of those listed were taught directly by the Apostles and were first generation followers. That is wholly more reliable than a man, like yourself, 2000 years later, who has never been taught the Gospel, to determine what a text might mean. It is what the Word of God matters, and the Church, the faithful Church Fathers have much more authority than you and even Calvin of only 500 years ago. And historical record also shows that he got the idea from Augustine who got the idea from his former pagan religion. Hardly Gospel Truth.

True to form you dismiss scripture altogether if it does not have your 1 or two texts that seemingly support predestination. However, notwithstanding your false teachings, scripture is quite clear that both predestination and its tenet of OSAS has never been a teaching of scripture. History is repleat with evidence that it is NOT scriptural, as well as repleat as to where it does originate.

In the last several pages in this thread you have consistantly redefined scripture within the bias of predestination. It does not fit, will never fit. YOu believe a myth and have turned scripture upside down with the false teaching. YOu have actually denied most of scripture in lieu of a few texts that you have isolated to support predestination/OSAS.

Three false aspects of your view....
assumption that one is actually saved upon entrance into Christ absolutely, finitely, rather than a possession.Satisfaction theory of Atonement.
Assumption that one does not need to attain eternal life which was the purpose of Christ saving mankind from death and sin as well as the original purpose of God creating man. Predestination
It creates an arrangement where God is the sole active agent in having eternal life, and man becomes a mere passive inert object. Predestination.

In other words it destroys scripture and the God/man relationship for which all men were created to have with God, freely.
YOur view only can exist in a framework of Predestination as formulated by Calvin originally but nuanced by several men since, but the bottom line has never changed.
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
Yes, which makes me ponder why Paul would be fearful for them. Either they or some didn't have a born again experience or they had and lost it. Then Paul goes on to explain that he had give birth to them again, so that they would be filled with Christ. The language Paul uses here makes me question what I always believed.
We do have eternal security in Jesus Christ. And that is what the bible tells us. But, what OSAS try (or at least it seems to me that they are trying) to say that we cannot reject Jesus. This is where we disagree.

We are eternally secure in Jesus. But we can reject Jesus. Now, there is a verse that says, "[SUP]4 [/SUP]For in the case of those who have once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit, [SUP]5 [/SUP]and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, [SUP]6 [/SUP]and then have fallen away, it is impossible to renew them again to repentance, since they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to open shame. [SUP]7 [/SUP]For ground that drinks the rain which often falls on it and brings forth vegetation useful to those for whose sake it is also tilled, receives a blessing from God; [SUP]8 [/SUP]but if it yields thorns and thistles, it is worthless and close to being cursed, and it ends up being burned.(Heb. 6:4-8).

But there is also a verse that says, "[SUP]10 [/SUP]According to the grace of God which was given to me, like a wise master builder I laid a foundation, and another is building on it. But each man must be careful how he builds on it. [SUP]11 [/SUP]For no man can lay a foundation other than the one which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. [SUP]12 [/SUP]Now if any man builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw, [SUP]13 [/SUP]each man’s work will become evident; for the day will show it because it is to be revealed with fire, and the fire itself will test the quality of each man’s work. [SUP]14 [/SUP]If any man’s work which he has built on it remains, he will receive a reward. [SUP]15 [/SUP]If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss; but he himself will be saved, yet so as through fire.(1 Cor. 3:10-15)

At this point in time, I believe that we are told that we must remain in Jesus Christ and that, if we choose, we can leave Him and the eternal security that He provides. But as long as we are in Him, even if our work is lacking, we will be saved, but we will suffer loss. As to exactly what the loss is, I don't know. Maybe it is what is lost to the kingdom of God, in our failing to bring others to Christ. Maybe it will be a lesser reward in Heaven. Either way, we must stay in Jesus to obtain salvation. And to say that we can't loose our salvation by rejecting Jesus Christ is not true. But as dc likes to say, it is not a back and forth thing with each sin and request for forgiveness. That is not how it works either, in my opinion.
 

Timeline

Senior Member
Mar 20, 2014
1,826
17
38
By work you are not saved, but work you must:)!