Very confused about Methuselah

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
T

Tintin

Guest
#41
You completely missed the point of Angela's post but I'm not surprised.
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
#43
And your resources are?
I would rather trust the bible than wikipedia. I meant, he bible has been around for a long time.
Hi Kerry,
The source is ancient Sumerian. Archeologists have known about this material for decades. Just pointing out a possible source for the biblical material.



The Sumerian King List (SKL) [CDLI Wiki]

This is a photo of one of the king lists. I believe it may have been found in Ur where according to the Bible Abraham originated. He may have been familiar with the stories of the great ages of kings. In fact it may have been common belief among the Sumerians that people of the distant past lived a very long time. Hence the Israelites may similarly have had a Bronze Age tradition of their sacred ancestors living an equally long time. This doesn't mean that we in the modern age must believe the Bronze Age claims that people lived 900 plus years.
 
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
#44
Hi Kerry,
The source is ancient Sumerian. Archeologists have known about this material for decades. Just pointing out a possible source for the biblical material.



The Sumerian King List (SKL) [CDLI Wiki]

This is a photo of one of the king lists. I believe it may have been found in Ur where according to the Bible Abraham originated. He may have been familiar with the stories of the great ages of kings. In fact it may have been common belief among the Sumerians that people of the distant past lived a very long time. Hence the Israelites may similarly have had a Bronze Age tradition of their sacred ancestors living an equally long time. This doesn't mean that we in the modern age must believe the Bronze Age claims that people lived 900 plus years.
History channel night before last I believe...excellent memory, I would let you shine my shoes but only while they are on my feet
 
D

didymos

Guest
#45
History channel night before last I believe...excellent memory, I would let you shine my shoes but only while they are on my feet
So it was on History Channel? Well, it must be true then. :rolleyes:

 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
#46
The age was actual because it is the Word of God.
Some would say it is the word of those who wrote it. For example in Numbers 22:28 it may say, "Then the LORD opened the donkey's mouth...", but I would contend it is not God who is saying "Then the LORD opened the donkey's mouth", but the human author of the text who wrote those words. Similarly in Genesis a human author is recording the old oral tradition that people of the past lived longer lives. I am only asking you to examine the cultural context that this text was composed within. The author of the king list recorded a tradition of their kings in the distant past having reign of many hundreds of years. The earlier dates are of many thousands of years, but closer to the contemporary author of the king list the age of the kings is comparable to the age of people in historical times. Did you see that the reign of one king was said to be 36,000 years! Examine the ages on the list. Sumerian King List - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the beginning there was no disease and after the fall the creation was starting to die because of the sin that infested it. People lived a long time in the beginning but gradually due to disease, famine and other ills the average life span has been drastically reduced.
Anthropologists studying human remains from the past commonly find signs of trauma (from war) and disease. I am not going to take the time to find the sources but I have read that even some Neanderthal remains display evidence of disease (including arthritis, abscessed teeth, and so on). You are simply talking through your hat, as my mother would say. I would ask you to examine the anthropological evidence. There is absolutely no evidence that people of the past lived disease free lives of hundreds of years. If you think this is so then try to find the physical evidence. There is none, but there is plenty to show you that the opposite was true. People lived shorter lives in the distant past.
 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
#47
Didymos, it may have slipped both yours and Jag's notice, but I wasn't quoting from the History Channel, and yes they broadcast a lot of nonsense that they try to pass off as history.
 
Last edited:
D

didymos

Guest
#48
Didymos, it may have slipped both yours and Jag's notice, but I wasn't quoting from the History Channel, and yes they broadcast a lot of nonsense that they try to pass off as history.

It was only a comment on Jag's post. You're right about HC, it used to be a good channel though.

 
Aug 25, 2013
2,260
10
0
#49
Didymos, thanks for clarifying. You're right. It was good at one time, but conspiracy theory attracts more viewers than legitimate documentaries.
 
Nov 2, 2013
1,380
6
0
#50
DDFW.jpg

Yet the answer means where ever anything may do it fit
 

nl

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2011
933
22
18
#51
...We have hyperbaric oxygen tanks where patience stay for a time each day and healing happens. I had an ulcer 2 1/8" around and to the bone, so amputation of my leg was suggested as it would not heal. Two hours a day for 45 days in one of these chambers healed it....
I once heard someone else express hope in a hyperbaric chamber as a potential source for healing.

Thank you for that testimony. I am glad that you were healed.
 

JesusLives

Senior Member
Oct 11, 2013
14,551
2,173
113
#52
So, apparently it says that Methuselah died at the age of 969... Has this been mistranslated? Or can anyone give me a logical explanation? lol
I think you have to remember that Adam and Eve were created perfect before they sinned and I would imagine that God intended for them to live forever had they not sinned. They were eating the perfect diet and did not have all the pollution and chemicals that we have to deal with thousands of years later. When you read the Bible man's life shortened dramatically after the flood when meat eating was introduced to our diet. We have so many different problems now heart problems, diabetic issues, liver failure... and on and on till we are only allotted about 70 years now to live.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
#53
So, apparently it says that Methuselah died at the age of 969... Has this been mistranslated? Or can anyone give me a logical explanation? lol
If you suggest it is illogical, please prove the illogic.

If you add up the genealogy years in Genesis 5 you learn that it indicates that Methuselah died in the year of the flood! That raises the question, did Methuselah drown in the flood? He could have died the same year. Assuming direct descent, his father Enoch was raptured before then.
 
K

Kerry

Guest
#54
Ancient aliens guy, Please, he can't even get a haircut. Much less talk about stuff.
 

nl

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2011
933
22
18
#55
Jakob check out the Sumarian King list: Sumerian King List - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia .

These great ages are mythological and demonstrate the connection with Babylonian legend. The most ancient mention of the great flood, for example, is from this region. Note that Abraham is said to have come from the city of Ur which was likely that capital city at that time. He may have brought these traditions with him. The king list gives ages very similar to those appearing in Genesis. It also gives ages much older -- for example, in the thousands of years.
The Bible and the Sumerians are not alone in speaking of longer life spans among ancients. Why assume what is correct and incorrrect?
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
#56
If you suggest it is illogical, please prove the illogic.

If you add up the genealogy years in Genesis 5 you learn that it indicates that Methuselah died in the year of the flood! That raises the question, did Methuselah drown in the flood? He could have died the same year. Assuming direct descent, his father Enoch was raptured before then.
Methuselah means "when he dies, it will be sent".
Assuming that his prophetic name came true, he died just before the Flood came.
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
#57
Methuselah means "when he dies, it will be sent".
Assuming that his prophetic name came true, he died just before the Flood came.
Thanks for the comment, Ukorin.
Of course it seems to presuppose that Methuselah is a Hebrew word. I don't know any reason to suppose that Enoch spoke Hebrew when he named Methuselah. I suppose we could postulate the Moses gave a translated version of his name. Also, I don't know how to account for the U in the name with that meaning.
 
U

Ukorin

Guest
#58
Thanks for the comment, Ukorin.
Of course it seems to presuppose that Methuselah is a Hebrew word. I don't know any reason to suppose that Enoch spoke Hebrew when he named Methuselah. I suppose we could postulate the Moses gave a translated version of his name. Also, I don't know how to account for the U in the name with that meaning.
I would assume the same.
I'm better at Greek than Hebrew. I was just researching the name after posting, because I realized that I was simply spouting what I had been told, when I said what his name meant.

There are some who disagree with the name meaning entirely.
 
Nov 19, 2012
5,484
27
0
#59
So, apparently it says that Methuselah died at the age of 969... Has this been mistranslated? Or can anyone give me a logical explanation? lol
I believe that the patriarch 'ages' are provided for another reason, and do not directly translate to our years as we know them.

YEC's, however, fall in love with them, and end up trying to sum them together to arrive at a date for creation.

Then, they invent 'no death at all before sin' and 'canopy theories' and other such things in an attempt to explain death and decay....albeit death and decay have always existed in the Universe since the very beginning.

Silly...
 

Atwood

Senior Member
May 1, 2014
4,995
53
48
#60
I believe that the patriarch 'ages' are provided for another reason, and do not directly translate to our years as we know them.
Do you mean by "believe" speculation?

YEC's, however, fall in love with them, and end up trying to sum them together to arrive at a date for creation.

Then, they invent 'no death at all before sin' and 'canopy theories' and other such things in an attempt to explain death and decay....albeit death and decay have always existed in the Universe since the very beginning.

Silly...
I don't see anything silly here. How could there be death without sin? As to the canopy theory, I suppose it is an attempt to use the data about "firmament" and the abundance of rain implied by the text. And I note how some attempt had been made to do real science based on the canopy hypothesis (as I would call it).

How do you know that death existed since the very beginning? Such a POV requires life to have existed since the very beginning. Since none of us was around at the very beginning, I would hesitate to dogmatize about it too much.

Was you dere?