If you keep Lev 15:22, how do you go about doing it?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#41
Indeed the command mean what it says and says what it means but some bound to not get it.
Come out from them and be separate, says the Lord.
Touch no unclean thing, and I will receive you.
Come out of her my people. Do not share in her sins.
The unclean thing for the NT believer is sin.
 
C

chubbena

Guest
#43
The unclean thing for the NT believer is sin.
Perhaps reading the whole conversation would help understand what we are talking about.
 
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#44
Yes, pretty much need the community, I think... If one wants to keep that law physically, which is what I understand you mean by legalistically... So I wonder then, for Christians who want to keep this law physically, do they live in a separate community?
From the books I read about it, yes it had to have two necessary ways---it had to be within a community and it had to include more than just the legalistic or only physical without any spiritual involvement.

The lady who became a protestant believer incorporated many rituals in her day to day living without the entire community, but she found a group to share these ideas with her. Also, she never used any of these ideas as an end in itself. She worked on the principle that taking on the mind of Christ was the important thing, but it should not be separated from how she lived day to day. For instance, instead of washing hands being only a matter of physically being clean, she allowed it to also have a spiritual meaning of cleaning herself spiritually, the ideas were related and could not be separate.
 
C

chubbena

Guest
#45
Does it have Bible 19:17?
It's in QEV as in Queen Elin Version. Now enough mocking. Let's get serious...or less serious.....
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#46
And Isaiah 26:17-19 As a pregnant woman about to give birth writhes and cries out in her pain, so were we in your presence, Lord. We were with child, we writhed in labor, but we gave birth to wind. We have not brought salvation to the earth, and the people of the world have not come to life. But your dead will live, Lord; their bodies will rise—let those who dwell in the dust wake up and shout for joy—your dew is like the dew of the morning; the earth will give birth to her dead.

This is indeed a great mystery: but Paul speaks concerning Christ and the church, like Isaiah spoke concerning Israel and the gentile nations when Israel was supposed to be the light.
"The earth gave birth to her dead" when Israel was restored after the exile.

And the great mystery Paul speaks of would be the Church is the wife and body of Christ
in the two-in-one enfleshement of the marital union (Eph 5:31-32).
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,742
3,670
113
#47
Indeed the command mean what it says and says what it means but some bound to not get it.
Come out from them and be separate, says the Lord. Touch no unclean thing, and I will receive you.
Come out of her my people. Do not share in her sins.
Depends what is unclean . Did you keep all the commandments before the Lord 'received you'?

Colossians 2:19-23 And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.
Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,
(Touch not; taste not; handle not;
Which all are to perish with the using) after the commandments and doctrines of men?
Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.

But in disobedience to the New Covenant there are those here who demand us to be 'alive' to the Mosaic Covenant...

Romans 7:4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.

...thus making Christ's death of non effect.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#48
It's all good. Sometimes likes and rep points distract our focus on His Word and
more importantly His reward. :)
You see them as that important. . .and powerful.

Interesting. . .
 
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#49
But not to forget Christ is the Word of God who spoke through Moses.
He came not to abolish what He spoke through Moses but to fulfill, as in clarifying and to complete.
In Mark 9:7, the Father tells us we have the Word of God coming in the flesh so we may listen to Him in first person instead of the spokesperson.
"To complete" as in to finish.
 
C

chubbena

Guest
#56
Depends what is unclean . Did you keep all the commandments before the Lord 'received you'?

Colossians 2:19-23 And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.
Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,
(Touch not; taste not; handle not;
Which all are to perish with the using) after the commandments and doctrines of men?
Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.

But in disobedience to the New Covenant there are those here who demand us to be 'alive' to the Mosaic Covenant...

Romans 7:4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.

...thus making Christ's death of non effect.
Don't understand why you keep asking these questions that were answered by law/sabbath keepers. Like I said, drag those who don't believe salvation in Christ and stone them!
 
C

chubbena

Guest
#57
"The earth gave birth to her dead" when Israel was restored after the exile.

And the great mystery Paul speaks of would be the Church is the wife and body of Christ
in the two-in-one enfleshement of the marital union (Eph 5:31-32).
Only if one does not consider Israel served as an example for Christians.
 
Mar 4, 2013
7,761
107
0
#58
Some forget that Paul was a scholar of the law. Even though we like to claim his letters as writings which are against the law, one must conciser that he was rightly defining the viewpoint we as Christians should have toward the law. He was known as a heretic because the Jews claimed he was preaching against the law. Today, the anti law people say that he was doing the same thing in order to justify a doctrine that Paul never really endorsed. The law is not anti Christ!! The law has no threat for true beleivers in Christ. In fact the law is an asset to Christains when understood through the Spirit of God, and Paul understood.

Acts 24:5-21
5 For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes:
6 Who also hath gone about to profane the temple : whom we took , and would have judged according to our law.
7 But the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took him away out of our hands,
8 Commanding his accusers to come unto thee: by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him.
9 And the Jews also assented , saying that these things were so.

10 Then Paul, after that the governor had beckoned unto him to speak , answered , Forasmuch as I know that thou hast been of many years a judge unto this nation, I do the more cheerfully answer for myself:
11 Because that thou mayest understand , that there are yet but twelve days since I went up to Jerusalem for to worship .
12 And they neither found me in the temple disputing with any man, neither raising up the people , neither in the synagogues, nor in the city:
13 Neither can they prove the things whereof they now accuse me.
14 But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets:
15 And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow , that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.
16 And herein do I exercise myself, to have always a conscience void of offence toward God, and toward men.
17 Now after many years I came to bring alms to my nation, and offerings.
18 Whereupon certain Jews from Asia found me purified in the temple, neither with multitude, nor with tumult.
19 Who ought to have been here before thee, and object , if they had ought against me.
20 Or else let these same here say , if they have found any evil doing in me, while I stood before the council,
21 Except it be for this one voice, that I cried standing among them, Touching the resurrection of the dead I am called in question by you this day.
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#59
Elin said:
"The earth gave birth to her dead" when Israel was restored after the exile.

And the "great mystery" Paul speaks of would be the
Church is the wife and body of Christ in the two-in-one enfleshement of the marital union (Eph 5:31-32, 1:22-23).
Only if one does not consider Israel served as an example for Christians.
Where is what you are referring to called a "great mystery?"

You didn't even read Eph, did you?

You don't know the NT very well, do you?
 
Last edited:
Jan 19, 2013
11,909
141
0
#60
Some forget that
Paul was a scholar of the law. Even though we like to claim his letters as writings which are against the law, one must conciser that
he was rightly defining the viewpoint we as Christians should have toward the law.
Yes, Paul set the law on a right basis, subordinate to the law of grace.