greatkraw I shouldn't have to ask ,just jump in. I wish to be amazed at your extensive knowledge and skill at distorting historical facts.
.
greatkraw I shouldn't have to ask ,just jump in. I wish to be amazed at your extensive knowledge and skill at distorting historical facts..
Pretrib rhetoric, ''no not at the coming of Christ at the other coming of Christ. The bible doesn't really mean what it says''. Your refusal to accept scripture for what it says is proof enough for me that you are wrong.no at the second coming of Christ. He touches down on earth. Here He stays in the clouds and we go up to Him two separated events, also the ones that are resurrected here are those that are asleep in Christ, on the second coming all the dead are raised. how can one not see this???
It has long been pointed out that pre-tribulationism is a relatively new doctrine. With one possible exception, there is no record of it being taught before the past century. Now this does not in itself mean that it is false, but it should raise some eyebrows. If Peter and Paul taught pre-tribulationism, then we would expect the early church to have been pre-trib. This challenge intrigued Grant R. Jeffrey so much that he searched for over ten years for evidence of pre-tribulationism before the 1800s.1 He found one person in the fourth century whom he claims was a pre-tribulationist.2 This person is called Pseudo-Ephraem.3 Since there had been no official translation of this work into English, Jeffrey had someone translate it for him.Thank You.
Ephraim the Syrian said, in 373 AD, "For all the saints and the Elect of God are gathered, prior to the tribulation that is to come, and are taken to the Lord lest they see the confusion that is to overwhelm the world because of our sins."
Ephraem of Nisibis was the most important and prolific of the Syrian church fathers and a witness to early Christianity on the fringes of the Roman Empire in the late fourth century. He was well-known for his poetry, exegetical and theological writings, and many of the hymns of the early Byzantine church. So popular were his works that in the fifth and sixth centuries he was adopted by several Christian communities as a spiritual leader and role model. This sermon is deemed to be one of the most interesting apocalyptic texts of the early Middle Ages. The translation of the sermon includes the following segment:
"For all the saints and Elect of God are gathered, prior to the tribulation that is to come, and are taken to the Lord lest they see the confusion that is to overwhelm the world because of our sins."
This text was originally a sermon called On the Last Times, the Anti-christ, and the End of the World. There are four existing Latin manuscripts (the Parisinus, the Augiensis, the Barberini, and the St. Gallen) ascribed to St. Ephraem or to St. Isidore . Some scholars believe this text was written by some unknown writer in the sixth century and was derived from the original Ephraem.
The sermon describes the events of the last days, beginning with the rapture, the Great Tribulation of 3 1/2 years duration under the Antichrist's rule, followed by the Second Coming of Christ. In Ephraem's book The Book of the Cave of Treasures, written about 370 A.D., he expressed his belief that the 69th week of Daniel ended with the rejection and crucifixion of Jesus the Messiah.![]()
Pretrib rhetoric, ''no not at the coming of Christ at the other coming of Christ. The bible doesn't really mean what it says''. Your refusal to accept scripture for what it says is proof enough for me that you are wrong.
huh...now you are saying that the Bible doesnt mean what it says??..what kinda christian are ya??!!
Pretrib rhetoric, ''no not at the coming of Christ at the other coming of Christ. The bible doesn't really mean what it says''. Your refusal to accept scripture for what it says is proof enough for me that you are wrong.
You as well as I both know I was quoting pretribers who claim the coming of Christ mentioned in 1st Thess 4:15 is not referring to the coming of Christ, and not saying that it was my own opinion that the bible doesn;t mean what it says. I am the type of Christian that actually believes that when scripture says at the coming of Christ it means at the coming of Christ. What kind of christian are you? Do you believe that 1st Thess 4:15 is referring to the coming of Christ or not?huh...now you are saying that the Bible doesnt mean what it says??..what kinda christian are ya??!!
I didn't say he's going to hell, but he is surely is doing satans work, God wrote about it in the O.T. If God didn't teach about it I wouldn't of said it. The reason they are doing satan's work is they are unwittingly leading others straight into the bed of satan. God told us speak out against those who teach his children to fly to save their souls. I provided scripture after scripture of God's word where He was telling us satan is coming first and that the whole world will be deceived. If he wants to believe the rapture is one thing, if he wants to try to lead others there then it's my business, because God wrote to us to make it our business. I don't hate Thaddaeus or anything but this is an evil work he is doing. I called him out only out of love.sheesh miktre, who made you the final authority on this issue or given you the authority codemn someone to hell, especially over a difference in doctrine concerning an issue which has absolutely nothing to do another's salvation?
I don't mind discussing / debating controversial issues but when a person begins to point the finger at others and accusing them of being in league with Satan, whether you arer right or wrong in the discussion no longer matters, you have abandoned any and all humility by exalting your feeble belief system over the souls of others. That is nothing more than text book self righteousness. I pray that you are able to realize this for yourself.
sheesh miktre, who made you the final authority on this issue or given you the authority codemn someone to hell, especially over a difference in doctrine concerning an issue which has absolutely nothing to do another's salvation?
I don't mind discussing / debating controversial issues but when a person begins to point the finger at others and accusing them of being in league with Satan, whether you arer right or wrong in the discussion no longer matters, you have abandoned any and all humility by exalting your feeble belief system over the souls of others. That is nothing more than text book self righteousness. I pray that you are able to realize this for yourself.
I agree but of course, I'm wrong and everyone else is right. lol
For your pride and stubbornness you are leading people straight to hell, Thaddaeus. Woe unto you. You are doing satans work, nothing less.
Actually God called it vanity and lying divination is why people teach the rapture. I certainly don't understand why you insist to cling on to nothing. So yeah God said to speak out against those who teach rapture, do you not think God would know of this controversy? This lie from satan? I would rather be nice and call it stubbornness but thats not right I need to call it for what it is =vanity.Judge not lest you be judged first.![]()
Actually God called it vanity and lying divination is why people teach the rapture. I certainly don't understand why you insist to cling on to nothing. So yeah God said to speak out against those who teach rapture, do you not think God would know of this controversy? This lie from satan? I would rather be nice and call it stubbornness but thats not right I need to call it for what it is =vanity.
The rapturist believes and has judged themselves special above other believers. It's clear if there was a rapture not all would go, and I've heard them all say this. You can't get away from the word when tells us that a remnant will be here, yet they have judged themselves special amongst men that they will be gone yet other believers who are not as special as they are will remain. Don't you think God could use you during the tribulation? He already told us He wanted to use us to testify before the rulers of the world.
Actually God called it vanity and lying divination is why people teach the rapture. I certainly don't understand why you insist to cling on to nothing. So yeah God said to speak out against those who teach rapture, do you not think God would know of this controversy? This lie from satan? I would rather be nice and call it stubbornness but thats not right I need to call it for what it is =vanity.
The rapturist believes and has judged themselves special above other believers. It's clear if there was a rapture not all would go, and I've heard them all say this. You can't get away from the word when tells us that a remnant will be here, yet they have judged themselves special amongst men that they will be gone yet other believers who are not as special as they are will remain. Don't you think God could use you during the tribulation? He already told us He wanted to use us to testify before the rulers of the world.
I thought you were referring to the stubbornness comment. Telling someone that they are leading people to hell is not judging a man, no more if I said he was leading them to wal-mart it's merely acknowledging one's actions. I no not his heart but God said the reason they teach rapture is because of vanity.My post was in response to how you were telling Thaddeus that he was leading people to hell and that he was doing Satan's work. How you manage to twist it into something else to attack me is beyond understanding.
I thought you were referring to the stubbornness comment.
Telling someone that they are leading people to hell is not judging a man, no more if I said he was leading them to wal-mart it's merely acknowledging one's actions. I no not his heart but God said the reason they teach rapture is because of vanity.
God said specifically that those who taught rapture were vain not me. I don't have an inside track when God clearly stated what would happen in the endtimes.My quote on what you said is very clear. How you manage to think I was referring to only one part of your quote and not the other parts is very interesting.
Your quote was far from clear.
Telling someone that they are leading people to hell may or may not be judgmental. Telling people that teaching the rapture is because of vanity may or may not be judgmental. However, it certainly is what the Nicolaitans and the Pharisees were doing - behaving in such a manner as if they had an inside track to God that no one else had and that God had specially appointed them to do certain things like wake others up.
This is interesting indeed not you changed your mind and want to call the stubbornness remark judgemental and not the leading them to hell bit, LoL
The problem is that when the endtimes come if he is alive at that time and the people he teaches rapture are still alive, then he will have led them straight into satans bed. Not everyone that says Lord, Lord.........I dont think thaddeus is leading anyone to hell unless he's not preaching Jesus and that's certainly not true.