M
A Christian woman should not even be contemplating doing that, as abortion is a sin.
If she does not want to take care of the child there is always adoption available to give the child to one who will.
I know that their are situations like rape, and abuse, and so on, but the child should not pay for the other persons crime/sin.
If it is a matter of health, as in if the woman carries the baby to full term it would kill her. Then that is something they need to take in prayer to the Lord our God. For I can not answer that as one's life is not more valuable then another's.
It's unfair to dictate what pregnant women should and shouldn't think about or consider, nor to try to tell pregnant women how they should view a situation. Ideally, we'd live in a world where there was never a need for such things as abortion, but it isn't such a world we live in, so if a woman, regardless of her religion, decides that's what she will do I consider it her prerogative. It's a hard enough thing to consider and a harder decision to make, and I defer to her better judgement and right to autonomy regarding whichever course of action she decides upon.
It isn't between her and I that bones should be picked about it; it's between her and her own deliberations, or, from the Christian perspetive, between her and God. As much as I mightn't like it or you mightn't like it, it really has absolutely nothing to do with you and I what a woman decides to do.
You are a Christian or you are not. There's no degrees to Christianity. If you confess Christ you are a Christian. Period, end of sentence.
Is a woman less of a Christian if she gets an abortion?
You are not Christian so this is not for you to answer or criticize.
She was asking from a Christian perspective about abortion, not from a unbelievers perspective.
From a Christian perspective abortion is wrong because the bible says it is, as it is a sin to take an innocent life. To put an innocent baby to death is to inflict punishment and blame on that baby for what had happened. It was not the baby's fault, so why should it pay, and not let to live a full life. You call it dictate, but its called spare the life of an innocent.
Would you kill a whole group of people for the wrong doing of what 1 or 2 in that group did? If not, then why kill a baby for what it didn't do.
You can look at this the other way; why force a mother to give birth against her wishes to a rapist's child who raped her against her wishes? Isn't that wrong, too?
Yes, ideally, like I've said, there would be no abortions, I agree. However, what I am saying is that a woman should be (legally) able to choose, because abiding by Christian teachings must be a matter of choice, not a matter of force.
If a woman does not want to carry and give birth to a rapist's child I believe she should have the legal right to abortion, however, if she came to me and asked me 'what should I do?', I would present her with exactly the same argument as you've given me; ''Well, the child is just a child -- an innocent human being''. The raped woman was just an innocent human being, too, Kenneth, and neither forcing her to bear labour or aborting the innocent child make the situation any more right.
I can support a woman's right to choose her own path in circumstances like that, even if I harbour some aversion to the idea of abortion itself. And I can do so because I care about the innocent woman who has been put in that situation, and of course I care about the innocent child -- it saddens me to think of a child dying anywhere in any circumstances -- but it must be the woman's choice, otherwise we would be forcing women to bear children concieved against their wills and I think that is horrendous.
I think forcing them to bear those children is just as wrong as aborting the children; it's not an easy decision to make but women should have the right to make it themselves in such circumstances.
But once again she wanted a view point from a Christian perspective.
And as in a Christian perspective that is not forcing a woman to save an innocent baby's life, it is about showing love to the baby and not forcing punishment on it by taking its life for it was not at fault.
The baby did not rape her, but yet it still pays the consequence. That is not right, if she can not stand to look at the baby for what it would symbolize in bringing up the memory. Then give it up for an adoption, and let it still live a good life.
And I am sorry but if it is for like some reasons that woman are doing it now, and that is just for a job. Then specially no way. They have prison time for people to murder, but a woman can get away with murder just because it has not been born yet. That is just ridiculous, for it is still a living life inside them.
Two wrongs don't make a right human...we're talking about an innocent baby that has done nothing wrong. Why does the baby have to pay for the parent(s) mistake? Being raped and pregnant is s tragedy...but you can't sacrifice 9 months out of your whole life to give it up to a couple who would live to have a baby....how selfish...instead let's just kill it,much easier...People always use the lame excuse "well if she was raped", what does that have to do with the price of tea in China??? You don't murder babies,regardless of the circumstances...
Let's be realistic...most woman get abortions because it's an inconvenience...not Because of rape..
No woman should be forced to carry a foetus to term if she doesn't wish to. However, terminations should be carried out in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy unless the circumstances are exceptional.
No doctor should be forced to kill a chid because the mum likes opening her legs too much and doesn't want to spoil her figure. That's the other end of this coin and that's why I think guidelines on restricting abortion are important, as well as, of course, condoms, contraception and trying to promote personal responsibility for pregnancies.
However, I'm pro-choice (see my previous posts). I just like to see things from all angles and make weighted conclusions.
No offense intended.