Is Dr. Dino (Kent Hovind) a total joke?

[popeye]

We have seen thousands of changes within the created kinds but that is not evolution.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903025232/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQmisc13.jsp

 

[popeye]

Your question is confusing. All major branches of science were started by creationists.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903024756/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQscience1.jsp

 

[popeye]

Please don’t accuse me of being against science. I am only against the false teaching of evolution as science.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903024756/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQscience1.jsp

 

[popeye]

Let me first explain how carbon dating works and then show you the assumptions it is based on. Nothing on earth carbon dates in the millions of years, because the scope of carbon dating only extends a few thousand years. Willard Libby invented the carbon dating technique in the early 1950’s. He calculated the amount of carbon-14 in the atmosphere today (about .0000765%), and assumed there would be the same amount found in living plants or animals since the plants breathe CO2 and animals eat plants. Carbon 14 is the radio-active version of carbon. Radiation from the sun strikes the atmosphere of the earth all day long. This energy produces radioactive carbon 14. This radioactive carbon 14 slowly decays into normal, stable carbon 12. Extensive laboratory testing has shown that about half of the C-14 molecules will decay in 5730 years. After another 5730 years half of the remaining C-14 will decay leaving only 1/4 of the original C-14. It goes from 1/2 to 1/4 to 1/8, etc. In theory it would never totally disappear, but after about 5 half lives the difference is not measurable with any degree of accuracy. This is why most people say carbon dating is only good for objects less than 30,000 years old.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903024811/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQscience3.jsp

 

[popeye]

Since sunlight causes the formation of C-14 in the atmosphere, and normal radioactive decay takes it out, there must be a point where the formation rate and the decay rate equalizes. This is called the point of equilibrium. Let me illustrate. If you were trying to fill a barrel with water but there were holes drilled up the side of the barrel, as you filled the barrel it would begin leaking out the holes. At some point you would be putting it in and it would be leaking out at the same rate. You will not be able to fill the barrel past this point of equilibrium. In the same way the C-14 is being formed and decaying out simultaneously. A freshly created earth would require about 30,000 years for the amount of C-14 in the atmosphere to reach this point of equilibrium because it would leak out as it is being filled. Tests indicate that the earth has still not reached equilibrium. This would mean the earth is not yet 30,000 years old! This also means that plants and animals that lived in the past had less C-14 in them than do plants and animals today. Just this one fact totally upsets data obtained by C-14 dating.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903024811/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQscience3.jsp

 

[RachelBibleStudent]

To be honest you've shown very clearly who the real joke is over and over and it's not Kent Hovind. He is a real Christian trying to lead people to Christ, you are trying to cause conflict within the body.

just because you think one of hovind's opponents is being a jerk doesn't mean you should automatically endorse hovind...

the fact is that hovind -is- a tax cheat and a fraud and a false teacher...even other creationists like me accept those fact...

 

[popeye]

The carbon in the atmosphere normally combines with oxygen to make carbon dioxide (CO2). Plants breathe CO2 and make it part of their tissue. Animals eat the plants and make it part of their tissues. When a plant or animal dies it stops taking in air and food so it should not be able to get any new C-14. The C-14 in the plant or animal will begin to decay back to normal C-12. The older an object is, the less carbon-14 it contains. One gram of carbon from living plant material causes a Geiger counter to click 16 times per minute as the C-14 decays. A sample that causes 8 clicks per minute would be 11,460 years old (the sample has gone through two half lives) and so on.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903024811/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQscience3.jsp

 

[popeye]

Although this technique looks good at first, carbon-14 dating rests on two simple assumptions. They are obviously assuming the amount of carbon-14 in the atmosphere has always been constant, and its’ rate of decay has always been constant. Neither of these assumptions is provable or reasonable. An illustration may help. Imagine you found a candle burning in a room. You could measure the present height of the candle (say, seven inches) and the rate of burn (say, an inch per hour). In order to find the length of time since the candle was lit we would be forced to make some assumptions. We would obviously have to assume that the candle has always burned at the same rate, and the initial height of the candle. The answer changes based on the assumptions. Similarly, scientists do not know that the carbon-14 decay rate has been constant. They do not know that the amount of carbon-14 in the atmosphere is constant. Present testing shows the amount of C-14 in the atmosphere has been increasing since it was first measured in the 1950’s. This may be tied in to the declining strength of the magnetic field.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903024811/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQscience3.jsp

 

[popeye]

In addition to the above assumptions, dating methods are all subject to the geologic column date to verify their accuracy. If a date obtained by radiometric dating does not match the assumed age from the geologic column the radiometric date will be rejected. The so-called geologic column was developed in the early 1800’s over a century before there were any radiometric dating methodshttp://web.archive.org/web/20000903024811/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQscience3.jsp

 

[popeye]

Laboratories will not carbon date dinosaur bones (even frozen ones which could easily be carbon dated) because dinosaurs are supposed to have lived 70 million years ago according to the fictitious geologic column. An object’s supposed place on the geologic column determines the method used to date it.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903024811/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQscience3.jsp

 

[popeye]

By the way, Darwin’s only degree was in theology yet he is often called a great scientist in textbooks today. Who and what determines who gets to be called a "scientist" and why don’t these scoffers put the same effort into correcting textbooks that call "Reverend" Darwin a scientist?http://web.archive.org/web/20000903025232/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQmisc13.jsp

 

[popeye]

I don’t understand their logic but evidently they think this somehow discredits me.http://web.archive.org/web/20000903025232/http://www.drdino.com/FAQs/FAQmisc13.jsp

 

[popeye]

I took courses at several Bible colleges in my spare time. I finished my Masters (1988) and Doctorate (1991) degrees in education from Patriot University. At the time it was small Christian university in Colorado Springs that offered an extension program for people involved in full time ministries.Creation Science Evangelism

 

[popeye]

There are about 7 or 8 radioactive elements that are used today to try to date objects. Each one has a different half-life and a different range of ages it is supposed to be used for. No dating method cited by evolutionists is unbiasedCreation Science Evangelism

 

[popeye]

"One part of the Vollosovitch mammoth carbon dated at 29,500 years and another part at 44,000.
--Troy L. Pewe, Quaternary Stratigraphic Nomenclature

 

[popeye]

"One part of Dima [a baby frozen mammoth] was 40,000, another part was 26,000 and the "wood immediately around the carcass" was 9-10,000.
--Troy L. Pewe

 

[RachelBibleStudent]

I have no idea who Kent Hovind is. But the fact that he has not only sinned but has done it in such a way that he has been put in prison, does not make him a worse sinner than you and me. It just means that he was caught in a public sin. If he has truly repented he has been forgiven. If so his standing before God is therefore equal with mine. I will not point the finger lest my other four point back at myself.

all indications from the publicized statements hovind has made while in prison are that he has -not- repented...he continued to claim that there was nothing illegal about the financial transactions that he tailored specifically to deceive the IRS...and he and his supporters continue to claim that the government was simply persecuting him for operating a young earth creationist ministry...in spite of the fact that not a single other young earth creationist personality has been landed in prison...

...which probably has something to do with the fact that -they all paid their taxes-!

 

[popeye]

"The lower leg of the Fairbanks Creek mammoth had a radiocarbon age of 15,380 RCY, while its skin and flesh were 21,300 RCY.
--In the Beginning Walt Brown

 

[popeye]

The two Colorado Creek mammoths had radiocarbon ages of 22,850 670 and 16,150 230 years respectively."
--In the Beginning Walt Brown

 

[popeye]

"A geologist at the Berkeley Geochronology Center, [Carl] Swisher uses the most advanced techniques to date human fossils. Last spring he was re-evaluating Homo erectus skulls found in Java in the 1930s by testing the sediment found with them. A hominid species assumed to be an ancestor of Homo sapiens, erectus was thought to have vanished some 250,000 years ago. But even though he used two different dating methods, Swisher kept making the same startling find: the bones were 53,000 years old at most and possibly no more than 27,000 years— a stretch of time contemporaneous with modern humans."
--Kaufman, Leslie,