Young Earth Creation. Does it matter what you believe?
- Thread starter Preach2u
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Schweitzer's paper does not say she found DNA.
There is a big difference between "might be" and "is."
Here's another article of interest on the subject:
Mysteriously Intact T. Rex Tissue Finally Explained : Discovery News
Please note the following statement in the article:
"They've even found proteins that are chemically consistent with being DNA, though Schweitzer is quick to note that she hasn't proven they are really DNA."
She is quick to note what?
Nobody has found DNA in dinosaur bones.
There is a big difference between "might be" and "is."
Here's another article of interest on the subject:
Mysteriously Intact T. Rex Tissue Finally Explained : Discovery News
Please note the following statement in the article:
"They've even found proteins that are chemically consistent with being DNA, though Schweitzer is quick to note that she hasn't proven they are really DNA."
She is quick to note what?
Nobody has found DNA in dinosaur bones.
Who is a time-wasting nuisance?
How about popeye?
Remember what he did recently?
Like four pages of posts of just him quoting from some Dr. Dino propaganda.
Back to Neanderthals, my favorite subject.
(I recognize the danger that one of you YECs is going to suggest that I am one.)
It seems to me that the first question to answer is: When did Neanderthals walk the Earth?
Here is a recent research paper in a journal where the oldest Neanderthal fossil from which DNA has been extracted is dated at 130,000 to 170,000 years old:
The Neanderthal in the karst: First dating, morphometric, and paleogenetic data on the fossil skeleton from Altamura (Italy)
How about popeye?
Remember what he did recently?
Like four pages of posts of just him quoting from some Dr. Dino propaganda.
Back to Neanderthals, my favorite subject.
(I recognize the danger that one of you YECs is going to suggest that I am one.)
It seems to me that the first question to answer is: When did Neanderthals walk the Earth?
Here is a recent research paper in a journal where the oldest Neanderthal fossil from which DNA has been extracted is dated at 130,000 to 170,000 years old:
The Neanderthal in the karst: First dating, morphometric, and paleogenetic data on the fossil skeleton from Altamura (Italy)
Kennewick Man is not older than dirt, but he is older than 6,000 years.
DNA Links 8,500-Year-Old Kennewick Man to Native Tribes : Discovery News
DNA Links 8,500-Year-Old Kennewick Man to Native Tribes : Discovery News
Re: Study up...
You keep on shoplifting your material from answers-in-genesis.
Stop this....it really makes you look silly.
You are merely regurgitating what is said at their website without any comprehension of the implication or effort on your part.
If 'bara' and 'asah', two entirely separate terms, are used in close proximity to one another, it means two entirely different events. It does not Mean that they are synonyms of one another.
You are putting forth the very same argument as 'answers-in-genesis'.....and their clip was about 'asah' referring to an ancient earth....that is NOT my argument at all....remember, the verb used on 'Day 4' to represent that the sun and moon were created BEFORE 'day 4'.....
But....you lost control of your train of thought and are now fighting an 'old age' strawman....
You keep on shoplifting your material from answers-in-genesis.
Stop this....it really makes you look silly.
You are merely regurgitating what is said at their website without any comprehension of the implication or effort on your part.
If 'bara' and 'asah', two entirely separate terms, are used in close proximity to one another, it means two entirely different events. It does not Mean that they are synonyms of one another.
You are putting forth the very same argument as 'answers-in-genesis'.....and their clip was about 'asah' referring to an ancient earth....that is NOT my argument at all....remember, the verb used on 'Day 4' to represent that the sun and moon were created BEFORE 'day 4'.....
But....you lost control of your train of thought and are now fighting an 'old age' strawman....
Re: Study up...
And how is it used differently than in Gen 1..?
I already explained this to you, don't ignore it.
But...you can't answer that because 'answers-in-genesis' makes your same remark without ever elaborating, either...thus, this likewise will be a dead-end on your assertion as well, no doubt.
If the teleprompter is not in front of you...well, you just don't know what to say...
And how is it used differently than in Gen 1..?
I already explained this to you, don't ignore it.
But...you can't answer that because 'answers-in-genesis' makes your same remark without ever elaborating, either...thus, this likewise will be a dead-end on your assertion as well, no doubt.
If the teleprompter is not in front of you...well, you just don't know what to say...
T
You may not need them, but there are three great websites out there and one of them has a regular 30 minute YouTube show called "Creation: Live".
Creation Ministries International:
Articles - creation.com
Creation: Live (TV series)
https://www.youtube.com/user/CMIcreationstation/videos
Answers in Genesis:
https://answersingenesis.org/answers/
The Institute for Creation Research:
Resources | The Institute for Creation Research
Creation Ministries International:
Articles - creation.com
Creation: Live (TV series)
https://www.youtube.com/user/CMIcreationstation/videos
Answers in Genesis:
https://answersingenesis.org/answers/
The Institute for Creation Research:
Resources | The Institute for Creation Research
What's your source?
Pat Robertson says Ken Ham is an idiot:
Even Pat Robertson Thinks Ken Ham Is an Idiot
Pat Robertson says Ken Ham is an idiot:
Even Pat Robertson Thinks Ken Ham Is an Idiot
Since you have everything at ICR memorized for your YEC talking points, which you never can defend effectively, what is your critique of this article entitled "DNA in Dinosaur Bones" at ICR.
DNA in Dinosaur Bones? | The Institute for Creation Research
If it sounds familiar it should be, because this is where RachelBibleStudent got her spiel on the subject.
Is this a great article from one of your great websites?
Or is it full of distortions and misrepresentations and erroneous information?
DNA in Dinosaur Bones? | The Institute for Creation Research
If it sounds familiar it should be, because this is where RachelBibleStudent got her spiel on the subject.
Is this a great article from one of your great websites?
Or is it full of distortions and misrepresentations and erroneous information?
Re: Study up...
This is the YEC predicament.
They get their talking points from websites like AIG and ICR.
But their argument ultimately falls apart because they are relying almost exclusively on faulty information.
And then, in a hissy fit, they resort to calling people names like absolute morons and trolls and try to get people banned or go off in a huff back to hide under their 6,000-year-old rock.
And then another thread is started and the YECs post the same talking points, link to the same YEC websites, and say the same things no matter how many times they have been refuted effectively.
This is the YEC predicament.
They get their talking points from websites like AIG and ICR.
But their argument ultimately falls apart because they are relying almost exclusively on faulty information.
And then, in a hissy fit, they resort to calling people names like absolute morons and trolls and try to get people banned or go off in a huff back to hide under their 6,000-year-old rock.
And then another thread is started and the YECs post the same talking points, link to the same YEC websites, and say the same things no matter how many times they have been refuted effectively.