Well Lynn incest is against the law (both secular and religious), against progress of civilization, and would surely not be accepted by any right minded person of any religion.
And if Christianity claims morality as its domain and the Bible as the only guide, any contradictions should be explored before anyone considers your religion.
And finally, it seems almost clumsy to make two people without thought of the future of the species other than incest. Why not make many people at once rather than cause so much obvious confusion and discussion?
Thank you for your reply
Myometrium,
Your question was okay. She's an angry person. Very much so. I pray for her.
Okay, now just think if you and your brothers and a couple of sisters are the only children.
You go hunting and fishing with your father. You don't really know your sisters as sisters. They are just there. Kinda like. They don't have cooties, but you don't have any thoughts.
You and brothers have seen your sisters from time to time, bathing, etc. Why? Because you all are living together. You grew up not so modestly. No big deal. Plus there is no pornography, no Hollywood, no makeup. No ugly. No beauty. No perversion.
Any sex between the sibling will probably be much different than say between today's husband and wife.
You mention brother and sister sleeping together.
I don't think it was so much like that. Easiest way for me to describe it, kinda like breeding. Nothing more.
Incest no. That came later.
Have you stopped to wonder why the writer of Genesis didn't write or cover for himself concerning the sibling offspring?
The bible is unlike any other book. It is credible.