The norm ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Apr 11, 2015
890
1
0
#61
Ok I understand English isnt your first language so you dont understand my post. The verse is clear. They did not consummate the marriage UNTIL the birth of Christ. It doesn't matter what you think or if you disagree.Its what the Bible says. Your thoughts are irrelevant .

it is not what the Bible says - it is your interpretation - the Bible clearly says that the only reason Joseph married Mary was because he was an honourable man and on instructions to do so or did you miss it all and get all mixed up - it was all in English in my bible - wincam
 
Jan 25, 2015
9,227
3,208
113
#62
Jesus came to die,He had a mission. Mary did have children unless you twist and rewrite Scripture.No where is being celibate a commandment in the Bible.
God give us instruction to be fruitful and multiply... :)
 
Jan 25, 2015
9,227
3,208
113
#63
it is not what the Bible says - it is your interpretation - the Bible clearly says that the only reason Joseph married Mary was because he was an honourable man and on instructions to do so or did you miss it all and get all mixed up - it was all in English in my bible - wincam
You can't interpret what is not in the Bible. That is why we have denominations like the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Mormons. Stick to the Bible and what is there.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had half-brothers. So unless there was another virgin that gave birth to the Son of God it was Mary giving birth to the children of Joseph.
 
Apr 11, 2015
890
1
0
#64
Winny, how come your Holy Spirit tells you things contrary to the Scriptures? ;)

unlike most others playing at being Popes and infallible and even playing at being God and inspired by the HS I do not claim inspiration by the HS - wincam
 
Apr 11, 2015
890
1
0
#65
You can't interpret what is not in the Bible. That is why we have denominations like the Jehovah's Witnesses and the Mormons. Stick to the Bible and what is there.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had half-brothers. So unless there was another virgin that gave birth to the Son of God it was Mary giving birth to the children of Joseph.

no doubt Jesus had step brothers who were the sons of Joseph not the sons of Mary and not being blood relatives did not feel obliged to claim His body for burial or provide Mary who was not really their mother with a home - btw it is exactly because one can interpret what is not in the Bible and many do that we have many different Protestants, Jehovah's witnesses. Mormons etc and indeed many Bibles also - wincam
 
Jan 25, 2015
9,227
3,208
113
#66
no doubt Jesus had step brothers who were the sons of Joseph not the sons of Mary and not being blood relatives did not feel obliged to claim His body for burial or provide Mary who was not really their mother with a home - btw it is exactly because one can interpret what is not in the Bible and many do that we have many different Protestants, Jehovah's witnesses. Mormons etc and indeed many Bibles also - wincam
Ok so this is denomination 30,000 .... and 1

You just started your own thing. Well done for taking the initiative.
 

epostle

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2015
660
15
18
#67
Being a virgin is normal. Having a baby is normal. Having spousal relations is normal. What isn't normal is to be married and not have spousal relations.
Raising the Son of God isn't exactly normal either.
 
A

AboundingGrace

Guest
#69
Raising the Son of God isn't exactly normal either.
Jesus behaved no differently than any human baby / child. He was trained by his parents in the Hebrew culture of that day. He took Biblical education from youth, at age 12 he was found to be wise by the teachers of the law.

Suffice it to say that it was not until he was baptized by John the Baptist of the Holy Spirit, that he began to do mighty works that were unusual for even the Bible scholars of that day.

Jesus himself said that without the power of God he could do nothing extraordinary.
 

epostle

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2015
660
15
18
#70
A Protestant Defense of Mary's Perpetual Virginity

Interestingly, all the early reformers supported Mary's perpetual virginity. Denial of this is a modern invention. That means it is an unbiblical man made tradition and should be discarded. The fact that it is so late to appear on the scene tells us it is man made. But Protestants, especially the non-denoms and fundamentalists, can make up their own doctrines that conflict with the very reformers they sprang from.

If Mary had other children that would reduce the uniqueness of the Incarnation. That is why I call it a doctrine of demons. If a person can accept the numerous foreshadowing texts of Jesus in the Old Testament, but flatly deny foreshadowing texts of Mary?


The belief that Mary was always a virgin has been held since the earliest days of Christianity. Many of the early Church Fathers, including Athanasius, Jerome, and Augustine, expressed this belief. To give just one example, Augustine said in A.D. 411 that Mary was "a Virgin conceiving, a Virgin bearing, a Virgin pregnant, a Virgin bringing forth, a Virgin perpetual."

Another source that supports belief in Mary's perpetual virginity is the Protoevangelium of James . It was written around A.D. 120, when some of those who had known the apostles were still alive. It records that Mary was dedicated before her birth to serve the Lord in the temple, as Samuel had been dedicated by his mother (1 Sam. 1:11). This required perpetual virginity of Mary so that she could completely devote herself to the service of the Lord.

When the angel Gabriel tells Mary that she will bear a son, Mary asks, "How shall this be, since I have no husband?" (Luke 1:34). At this point, Mary was engaged to Joseph. Why would she then be so surprised at being told she would conceive? If she were planning on having children with Joseph in the usual way, it wouldn't make sense for her to ask how she would be able to have a child. This question makes sense only if Mary was already planning to remain a virgin.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#71
It seems that I must elaborate on my position. To be betrothed is to be engaged. Joseph and Mary did not live together as an engaged couple. She did not progressively "show" her pregnancy while they were still only engaged. She did not give birth while they were still only engaged.

No. That would have been by any social standard, disastrous. Jesus would have been considered a bastard, and she would have been considered a prostitute.

So of course Joseph soon married Mary before she began to "show". They did not consummate the marriage until after she'd given birth.
she was considered an adulterer or at least a fornicator.

And jesus was considered a bastard child.

I am not sure when they were "married" or if they lived together while she was pregnant or not. I do not think the bible is quite clear.

What we do know by scripture, is that they did not consummate the marriage until after he was born. A jewish custom in the OT how did it say they were arried? And the man went into (knew) the woman and he made her his wife..

Joseph knew Mary after the birth of her firstborn, and made her his wife.

Thats the way I see it, But I could be wrong about when they were married. and not even sure it matters, what matters is God in his word said they did consumate their marriage and mary had other children. period.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#72
it is not what the Bible says - it is your interpretation - the Bible clearly says that the only reason Joseph married Mary was because he was an honourable man and on instructions to do so or did you miss it all and get all mixed up - it was all in English in my bible - wincam
The bible also said he did not know his wife UNTIL..

it means he knew his wife.. It did not say UNTIL she died (a popular romanistic argument) it says he did not know her until she gave birth. Mary and joseph lived as husband and wife for many years after that.


You can not pick and chose what part of the bible to read.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#73
A Protestant Defense of Mary's Perpetual Virginity

Interestingly, all the early reformers supported Mary's perpetual virginity. Denial of this is a modern invention. That means it is an unbiblical man made tradition and should be discarded. The fact that it is so late to appear on the scene tells us it is man made. But Protestants, especially the non-denoms and fundamentalists, can make up their own doctrines that conflict with the very reformers they sprang from.

If Mary had other children that would reduce the uniqueness of the Incarnation. That is why I call it a doctrine of demons. If a person can accept the numerous foreshadowing texts of Jesus in the Old Testament, but flatly deny foreshadowing texts of Mary?


The belief that Mary was always a virgin has been held since the earliest days of Christianity. Many of the early Church Fathers, including Athanasius, Jerome, and Augustine, expressed this belief. To give just one example, Augustine said in A.D. 411 that Mary was "a Virgin conceiving, a Virgin bearing, a Virgin pregnant, a Virgin bringing forth, a Virgin perpetual."

Another source that supports belief in Mary's perpetual virginity is the Protoevangelium of James . It was written around A.D. 120, when some of those who had known the apostles were still alive. It records that Mary was dedicated before her birth to serve the Lord in the temple, as Samuel had been dedicated by his mother (1 Sam. 1:11). This required perpetual virginity of Mary so that she could completely devote herself to the service of the Lord.

When the angel Gabriel tells Mary that she will bear a son, Mary asks, "How shall this be, since I have no husband?" (Luke 1:34). At this point, Mary was engaged to Joseph. Why would she then be so surprised at being told she would conceive? If she were planning on having children with Joseph in the usual way, it wouldn't make sense for her to ask how she would be able to have a child. This question makes sense only if Mary was already planning to remain a virgin.
this proves nothing.

All it does is this man still followed a pagan romanistic doctrine of the queen of heaven and her son translated into christianity as mary and her son.


Thanks but no thanks..
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,783
3,686
113
#74
It seems that I must elaborate on my position. To be betrothed is to be engaged. Joseph and Mary did not live together as an engaged couple. She did not progressively "show" her pregnancy while they were still only engaged. She did not give birth while they were still only engaged.

No. That would have been by any social standard, disastrous. Jesus would have been considered a bastard, and she would have been considered a prostitute.

So of course Joseph soon married Mary before she began to "show". They did not consummate the marriage until after she'd given birth.
Sure, she progressively showed her pregnancy in that her stomach grew.
By some, Jesus was considered a bastard...

Luk 2:5 To be taxed withMary his espoused wife, being great with child.

Joh 8:41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, evenGod.
 
I

Is

Guest
#75
Can't understand why it's so important to see Mary as a perpetual virgin.
 
A

AboundingGrace

Guest
#76
Sure, she progressively showed her pregnancy in that her stomach grew.
By some, Jesus was considered a bastard...

Luk 2:5 To be taxed withMary his espoused wife, being great with child.

Joh 8:41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, evenGod.
I don't know who would have actually seen Jesus as a bastard, that would involve God in something highly impure because He chose Mary to carry the only begotten Son of God in her womb.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#77
it is not what the Bible says - it is your interpretation - the Bible clearly says that the only reason Joseph married Mary was because he was an honourable man and on instructions to do so or did you miss it all and get all mixed up - it was all in English in my bible - wincam

That wasnt the point at all. We are talking about the word UNTIL and whether Mary was a virgin all her life. THAT was what we were talking about.
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
#79
Can't understand why it's so important to see Mary as a perpetual virgin.

Because Catholics put Mary on the same stature as Christ,a deity. So they twist the Bible to make Mary sinless,which she wasn't.Its a heresy that they've perpetuated for years.
 

Jon4TheCross

Senior Member
Oct 19, 2012
1,864
7
38
#80
well, it's not part of the Bible, but in some writings I have read....

Mary was tested by those watching...to know if she had been adulterous or not.

[h=1]Numbers 5:21-28King James Version (KJV)[/h]21 Then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman, The Lord make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the Lord doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell;
22 And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen.
23 And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall blot them out with the bitter water:
24 And he shall cause the woman to drink the bitter water that causeth the curse: and the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter.
25 Then the priest shall take the jealousy offering out of the woman's hand, and shall wave the offering before the Lord, and offer it upon the altar:
26 And the priest shall take an handful of the offering, even the memorial thereof, and burn it upon the altar, and afterward shall cause the woman to drink the water.
27 And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people.
28 And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed.