Do you believe in Cessationism or Continuationism? (poll)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Are you a cessationist or a continuationist?


  • Total voters
    35
D

Depleted

Guest
POLL: Are you a cessationist or a continuationist?

Exerts from:
http://www.gotquestions.org/continuationism.html

"Continuationism is th
e belief that all the spiritual gifts, including healings, tongues, and miracles, are still in operation today, just as they were in the days of the early church. A continuationist believes that the spiritual gifts have “continued” unabated since the Day of Pentecost and that the demonstration of “signs, wonders, and miracles” (2 Corinthians 12:12), as witnessed in the apostolic era, should be a hallmark of today’s church as well."

Cessationism: "The contrasting viewpoint is called cessationism, which teaches that some of the gifts “ceased” and are no longer in operation today. The question in cessationsm is not whether there are gifts still being given but which ones. Cessationists point to verses such as 1 Corinthians 13:10 and the fact that the miraculous gifts seem to be closely tied to the ministry of the apostles and the verification of God’s revelation (Acts 2:22; 14:3; 2 Corinthians 12:12) as evidence that the miraculous gifts of the Spirit have ceased.

As with any doctrine, there are extremes on either side. Some cessationists believe that all spiritual gifts ceased with the end of the apostolic age."

Please explain the "but..." part if you choose these options, in the comments below.
I can't answer. You didn't give enough choices.

I don't think it's just gifts, but is offices and ministries too. Apostle, by
definition, had to cease. (Eyewitness to Christ on earth, so the only other choice would be one really annoyed ooooooooooooold man. lol)

The gift of healing? I've never heard of someone really with this gift. Sure, I've known people who laid hands on people and the person was healed, (God's used me for that, but I never healed anyone, he did -- he merely surprised me by using me lol), but God will gift someone for a task, if someone doesn't have that office in that church, and I've never known someone to have that office. And sure, I know of the circus-tent "healers," but every time I've seen them in action, all the person "healed" has to do is believe and then accept it wholeheartedly for the next X years, despite the evidence it didn't work, until it works, if it ever works, which, of course, means announcing the person, (and if you want to call the person God, that's fine -- that's expected. That's marketing), "healed" you, and poof! You're "instantly" healed. (Really kills the very definition of "instantly healed," but let's not get technical.) And if it doesn't work, you pretty much feel like a schmuck because you're the only person it didn't work for, so something must be wrong with you, (which, frankly, ought to be a "duh now!" moment, since that's why you went to a "healer" in the first place), so you're too ashamed to say you weren't healed. I don't recall any of that happening in the Bible, so, no I don't see healers as an office now, even though I do see God using people to heal still.

Preaching? I still think there are preachers and evangelists for today, but they're drowned out by thousands of voices proclaiming they are, but aren't. Want examples? Read one dozen posts on this board, and you'll see most of them are neither preachers nor evangelists, but the ones not asking questions or simply giving their opinion are just that -- people who think they are preachers and evangelist, but aren't. And again, we're not suppose to speak up, because that's
a. Impolite.
b. Squelching God in some kind of way.
c. Negative.
d. Speaking against a man of God.
e. etc.

So, it's really hard to pick out true gifts and true offices in a sea of wannabes.

So, I can't really answer. Seems to me the answer is
E. None of the above.

At least one office is really gone, the one gift everyone wants to talk about but doesn't mean much is mired in a sea of who-cares. Isn't-used-for-intended-purposes-anyway (tongues) and this question just keeps getting batted around by wannabe preachers and teachers who simply aren't, but we're supposed to listen to them anyway.

Is gifts really doctrine anyway? I thought it was a side issue. Did it just eveate to doctrine so this discussion/argument/let's see how polite we can be now can continue on for pages and sound important?

But, in the end, everyone, included me, will have our say anyway and call it another day on BDF.
 
K

keepitsimple

Guest
i'm sorry... was this wise? Ben, if i were your momma i'd ask what you were thinking??
of course, you have every right to make whatever thread and poll you like, and yet...

this forum has been so very volatile lately, i wonder was it wise to make it a poll?

i know firsthand the Lord still moves; miracles still happen...

but to take a topic that's polarizing by nature and make it a thread, much less a poll.... was that wise?

forgive me if i offend. i thought it best to say this in public.

i pray this isn't the beginning of 30 pages of heated bickering, for Jesus' sake, amen.
I think that your point is somewhat insulting . Cannot one post a thread and just have those respect the post and not answer to it or stay in context.
I think you completely missed Ellie's point (I know you did). If you knew her like Ben (the OP) does, you would have had no cause to be insulted. I didn't answer Ben's poll either ... not out of "respect" for his post but out of concern for those weaker in the faith who might think less of themselves (and question their faith) if they themselves do not receive one of God's miraculous signs and wonders during a difficult period in their own lives. The very nature of this thread can't help but cause division in Christ followers today because as you yourself well know, there are two camps. Those who look for signs and wonders as proof that God is same yesterday, today and tomorrow and those who believe that the signs and wonders served a specific purpose in the apostolic age regarding the unbelieving Jews of that era. The twelve apostles were instructed to go to the Jews. They were also instructed not to go to the Gentiles nor any town or city in Samaria. The gospel was preached first to the Jews and later to the Gentiles thru Paul. So yes ... God had a specific time, plan and purpose in mind and it is not ours to question Him. In Rev.12:14, we are told that the New Heavenly Jerusalem has twelve foundations with the names of the twelve apostles inscribed upon them. This is no coincidence. This is God's doing. We are also told that Pentecost was the fulfillment of Joel's prophecy (Acts 2:16). Again, it is no coincidence that the Jews present from every nation and tongue (language) heard the gospel preached in their own native languages. This was God's plan and purpose fulfilled. Yet today, we have those who believe in new apostles today .. and tongues as a heavenly language etc. etc. My point is this. It seems clear to me that we will always have these two differing camps on this matter. Be that as it may. But if it is unity in Christ that we seek and if it is our hope and desire to see those who are lost come to the saving knowledge of Jesus Christ and the cross for the forgiveness of our sins, is it wise for any of us to go about this quest by bringing up the most obvious point of contention amongst Christians today ? This was and is Ellie's point and contention ... and it is both valid and concerning if we truly care about those in need of our Saviour. As Angela wisely pointed out, it is ours to point to Jesus Himself rather than the miracles He has done in the past or may yet do in the future if He so chooses. Jesus saved us by His blood shed on the cross. Not thru His miracles that He chose to perform for God's purpose. Interesting to note is that Jews of His day sought a sign. And Jesus told them that the only sign they will see will be the sign of Jonah ? God's way. Not our way or what we might hope to see. The righteous shall live by faith (in Jesus). Not ... the righteous shall live by faith when they see My miracles. God never changes. But His methods may as evidenced by Christ's atoning sacrifice on our behalf. Most Jews didn't understand it then and most still don't accept it today. They want what they want. God gives them and us what He chose to give. He gave Himself. This is the greatest miracle .. and blessing. That we so undeserving should be loved as we are by Him. This is what needs to be spoken of to those who hunger. And if this is our hearts desire, neither camp will have cause to be insulted by the other. This was and is Ellie's point. It is most unfortunate that you, a moderator on this forum found cause to be insulted by her words and most loving heart. Please delete my account as well. I seek greener pastures.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
1 Corinthians 13:8 (NASB)
[SUP]8 [/SUP] Love never fails; but if there are gifts of prophecy, they will be done away; if there are tongues, they will cease;
if there is knowledge, it will be done away.

I guess when knowledge is done away with, so will these other ones mentioned in the same passage.

Maybe there is more to this then we see with just one verse. It's kind of like this scripture below. If we just went by that one scripture - we would all be in deep trouble because we have all sinned.

Exodus 32:33 (NASB)
[SUP]33 [/SUP] The LORD said to Moses, "Whoever has sinned against Me, I will blot him out of My book
.
sigh I guess you lack knowledge of what the verse is saying. Another convenient evidence of how the scripture is improperly applied to allow for gifts that ended to be misused.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
K

keepitsimple

Guest
Before I take my leave, I'll answer the OP's question. I believe and trust in Jesus the Christ.
 
C

coby2

Guest
cessationism and latter rain
first it all ceased and in the last days God raises His people up again.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
I'm a Functionalist. If Jesus tells us to heal the sick, we should function at a level that brings healing to the sick. If the Bible tells us we are to cast out demons, we should function at a level that enables us to cast out demons. If Paul tells us to speak responsibly in tongues and prophesy, we should function with the freedom to responsibly speak in tongues and prophesy. But if we proclaim that God is all powerful, and then chip away at His power by adding not here, not now, not these - then we limit the Holy Spirit’s ability to bear fruit in us as Jesus intends.
Okay. Now I can answer. I'm a functionalist. :D
 
Sep 30, 2014
2,329
102
0
Nice post Angela, I have talked to a man as he cried me the story over the phone, this man is an architect, he died (bad car wreck back when cars were metal crushing his face into a metal dash board), came out of his body and floated over himself at hospital before going to visit heaven. Then to come back and stun all the doctor's and nurses because they did not know how to reconstruct his lower face (mouth area). He came back with the knowledge himself and drew the blueprint of the reconstruction. Pretty amazing story, very nice man.
I have permission to say his name, if anyone would like to look him up. His name is Dean Jones in California. Yesterday was his birthday, God bless
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
I am in the Cessationist camp. I believe those gifts were given to, and used by, the Apostles - to verify and spread the gospel message. But now that we have the complete scriptures, they are no longer necessary.
Is healing given as proof of a concept, or because satan inflicted man with sickness?

We will need healing as long as men are sick.

We will need wisdom and knowledge for as long as man sees thru the glass darkly.

We will need tongues for as long as man is spiritually mute.

God's not into proving Himself to be true. He's into providing man with antidotes to the fall.
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
sigh I guess you lack knowledge of what the verse is saying. Another convenient evidence of how the scripture is improperly applied to allow for gifts that ended to be misused.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Roger! Good to see ya!

I was going to be nice, but since you're attacking others oh why not:

***

Mark 11:23

Truly I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in their heart but believes that what they say will happen, it will be done for them.

Matthew 12:21

Jesus replied, "Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and it will be done.

Originally Posted by notuptome :
You are not going to move mountains with your faith.
Roger


*******

Mark 16:8 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them

Originally Posted by notuptome
So you believe in taking up deadly serpents? Drinking deadly poisons?
Roger


*******

1Co 14:4 Anyone who speaks in a tongue edifies themselves, but the one who prophesies edifies the church.


Originally Posted by notuptome
What possible reason would one have to speak in an unknown tongue to God?
Roger

*******

1 Corinthians 14: 5 I would like every one of you to speak in tongues.
1 Corinthians 14: 39 Therefore, my brothers and sisters, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues.

Originally Posted by notuptome :
Paul was not encouraging tongues
Roger


********

1Timothy 4:1 The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.

Originally Posted by notuptome :
Why would anyone desire to renounce eternal life for eternal condemnation?
Roger

***

Again, my friend, it is YOU who improperly applies scripture due to lack of knowledge.

And I say that to provide guidance, not attack.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Roger! Good to see ya!

I was going to be nice, but since you're attacking others oh why not:

***

Mark 11:23

Truly I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in their heart but believes that what they say will happen, it will be done for them.

Matthew 12:21

Jesus replied, "Truly I tell you, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and it will be done.

Originally Posted by notuptome :
You are not going to move mountains with your faith.
Roger


*******

Mark 16:8 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them

Originally Posted by notuptome
So you believe in taking up deadly serpents? Drinking deadly poisons?
Roger


*******

1Co 14:4 Anyone who speaks in a tongue edifies themselves, but the one who prophesies edifies the church.


Originally Posted by notuptome
What possible reason would one have to speak in an unknown tongue to God?
Roger

*******

1 Corinthians 14: 5 I would like every one of you to speak in tongues.
1 Corinthians 14: 39 Therefore, my brothers and sisters, be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues.

Originally Posted by notuptome :
Paul was not encouraging tongues
Roger


********

1Timothy 4:1 The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.

Originally Posted by notuptome :
Why would anyone desire to renounce eternal life for eternal condemnation?
Roger

***

Again, my friend, it is YOU who improperly applies scripture due to lack of knowledge.

And I say that to provide guidance, not attack.
You remain void of understanding and wisdom.

Jas 4:3 Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it upon your lusts.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

abcdef

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
2,809
111
63
Brothers and Sisters,

This is my personal opinion, I will only speak for myself.

I don't know if the "gifts" completely ceased or not.

We weren't there in 100 ad, or 200 ad, or 300 ad, etc., over 1500 yrs ago.

I believe in the power of faith, and prayer, and especially God's love.


I cannot judge anyone who is a Christian, as to their salvation, the love of Jesus is able to save every one who comes to Him.

I worked with many good (THE BEST) Christian people who believed in the "gifts" and talked in tongues.

But,

It's not for me.

For you, if that is a manifest of God to you, who am I to judge?

I pray that we all shall see His face and be with Him forever.


But, I will be honest with you,

it scares the "Hades" out of me, Ha Ha.


I'm more of a, speak five words of understanding, person.

If we couldn't speak a word, God will "hear" our spirit call out. (constant prayer)

Speaking words that you don't understand, is not for me.


So I'm not sure what box you would put me into,

I guess you forgot one that would say, I don't know.

Brother John
 
B

bikerchaz

Guest
No but's Just His Spirit.
 
P

psalm6819

Guest
I've seen miracles, (Tom walks, talks, ect and the doctors sent him home with pain meds to die), a total stranger stopped once took me to a gas station took me back to my car then filled the tank for me. ( forgot my purse when I picked up mydaughter from the hospital which is about 40 miles) My son-in-law got fired-we prayed, called his boss back and he was rehired at increased hours.

I pray in tongues at home but I've been in churches where there has been a message in tongues and someone else has the interpretation.

I don't limit God or try to fit Him within the confines of what my little brain comprehends.

He's a giver not a taker so why would He take back gifts that are for our edification?
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,065
1,501
113
POLL: Are you a cessationist or a continuationist?

Exerts from:
http://www.gotquestions.org/continuationism.html

"Continuationism is th
e belief that all the spiritual gifts, including healings, tongues, and miracles, are still in operation today, just as they were in the days of the early church. A continuationist believes that the spiritual gifts have “continued” unabated since the Day of Pentecost and that the demonstration of “signs, wonders, and miracles” (2 Corinthians 12:12), as witnessed in the apostolic era, should be a hallmark of today’s church as well."

Cessationism: "The contrasting viewpoint is called cessationism, which teaches that some of the gifts “ceased” and are no longer in operation today. The question in cessationsm is not whether there are gifts still being given but which ones. Cessationists point to verses such as 1 Corinthians 13:10 and the fact that the miraculous gifts seem to be closely tied to the ministry of the apostles and the verification of God’s revelation (Acts 2:22; 14:3; 2 Corinthians 12:12) as evidence that the miraculous gifts of the Spirit have ceased.

As with any doctrine, there are extremes on either side. Some cessationists believe that all spiritual gifts ceased with the end of the apostolic age."

Please explain the "but..." part if you choose these options, in the comments below.
None of the above. I do not want anyone to feel that one of the controversial fruits of the spirit is necessary for one to be saved. God equips His children as necessary to reach the lost.
 

BenFTW

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2012
4,834
981
113
33
None of the above. I do not want anyone to feel that one of the controversial fruits of the spirit is necessary for one to be saved. God equips His children as necessary to reach the lost.
You're speaking of tongues, aren't you? lol :D None of the gifts are necessary to be saved, but they are used to edify others and ourselves. Every single believer has a gift or gifts, residing inside of them for service within the realm of their circle (who they come in contact with). VVhat gifts? That is up for the Holy Spirit to decide and for you to inquire of Him. Then, if you want other gifts you can seek them from Him with the right intent of the heart (the edification of others and self).
 
D

Depleted

Guest
You're speaking of tongues, aren't you? lol :D None of the gifts are necessary to be saved, but they are used to edify others and ourselves. Every single believer has a gift or gifts, residing inside of them for service within the realm of their circle (who they come in contact with). VVhat gifts? That is up for the Holy Spirit to decide and for you to inquire of Him. Then, if you want other gifts you can seek them from Him with the right intent of the heart (the edification of others and self).
In your OP you said it was doctrine. As in whatever we believe has to fit the doctrine of God or we are wrong. Did I get that meaning right, or did I miss something? Do you think this is a doctrinal debate? Because I honestly don't think our stance of gifting affects the sovereignty of God or is so important, if we get it wrong we can't be Christians.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,189
113
Both sides bring up interesting points.


But I think to be a cessationist you kind of have to have the type of arrogance that atheists have.

How can a person say for sure that something definitely doesn't exist? Or can't exist? Isn't that Gods Position and ONLY Gods Position?

I guess I don't have enough proof to be a continuationist, either. But, like Blain, I keep an open mind and have faith that God can do all things.
 

BenFTW

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2012
4,834
981
113
33
In your OP you said it was doctrine. As in whatever we believe has to fit the doctrine of God or we are wrong. Did I get that meaning right, or did I miss something? Do you think this is a doctrinal debate? Because I honestly don't think our stance of gifting affects the sovereignty of God or is so important, if we get it wrong we can't be Christians.
I'm not sure I understand you. This is a poll for people to reveal their stance. :confused:
 
D

Depleted

Guest
I'm not sure I understand you. This is a poll for people to reveal their stance. :confused:
POLL: Are you a cessationist or a continuationist?

Exerts from:
http://www.gotquestions.org/continuationism.html

"Continuationism is th
e belief that all the spiritual gifts, including healings, tongues, and miracles, are still in operation today, just as they were in the days of the early church. A continuationist believes that the spiritual gifts have “continued” unabated since the Day of Pentecost and that the demonstration of “signs, wonders, and miracles” (2 Corinthians 12:12), as witnessed in the apostolic era, should be a hallmark of today’s church as well."

Cessationism: "The contrasting viewpoint is called cessationism, which teaches that some of the gifts “ceased” and are no longer in operation today. The question in cessationsm is not whether there are gifts still being given but which ones. Cessationists point to verses such as 1 Corinthians 13:10 and the fact that the miraculous gifts seem to be closely tied to the ministry of the apostles and the verification of God’s revelation (Acts 2:22; 14:3; 2 Corinthians 12:12) as evidence that the miraculous gifts of the Spirit have ceased.

As with any doctrine, there are extremes on either side. Some cessationists believe that all spiritual gifts ceased with the end of the apostolic age."

Please explain the "but..." part if you choose these options, in the comments below.
Doctrine, according to Merriam-Webster, definition #2b : a principle or position or the body of principles in a branch of knowledge or system of belief : dogma

Doctrine all Christians must believe, or they're not Christians:
-- God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. If you don't believe in the triune God, you're not a Christian.
-- Jesus is God. Jesus came down as a man to atone for whosoever's sin. Don't believe Jesus was both God and man, you're not a Christian. (Who he came to save is worth a good debate, but isn't doctrine.)
-- Salvation is through Christ alone. Don't believe that and you're not a Christian. (Think you choose God to save you you are still a Christian, even if there is disagreement on that part.)
-- No one is sinless. Believe that and you're a Christian. Don't believe it and you're not.

Doctrine is a core set of dogma all Christians agree with, Don't believe the core, and you're not a Christian.

Whether women wear pants, whether tongues are for today, whether prophecy is for today, whether you're pre-, post-, a-, pro- or anti-End Times, evolutionist vs. creationist, (although I do not understand how someone disregards the first chapter but accepts the rest of the book, it's still not doctrinal, just what confounds me), or whether you're secessionist, continuationist, or it-all-comes-out-in-the-washist really isn't doctrine.

I'm just checking if you get that or not. And, if you get it, are you really saying those who disagree with you aren't Christians?
 

BenFTW

Senior Member
Oct 7, 2012
4,834
981
113
33
Doctrine, according to Merriam-Webster, definition #2b: a principle or position or the body of principles in a branch of knowledge or system of belief :dogma

Doctrine all Christians must believe, or they're not Christians:
-- God is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. If you don't believe in the triune God, you're not a Christian.
-- Jesus is God. Jesus came down as a man to atone for whosoever's sin. Don't believe Jesus was both God and man, you're not a Christian. (Who he came to save is worth a good debate, but isn't doctrine.)
-- Salvation is through Christ alone. Don't believe that and you're not a Christian. (Think you choose God to save you you are still a Christian, even if there is disagreement on that part.)
-- No one is sinless. Believe that and you're a Christian. Don't believe it and you're not.

Doctrine is a core set of dogma all Christians agree with, Don't believe the core, and you're not a Christian.

Whether women wear pants, whether tongues are for today, whether prophecy is for today, whether you're pre-, post-, a-, pro- or anti-End Times, evolutionist vs. creationist, (although I do not understand how someone disregards the first chapter but accepts the rest of the book, it's still not doctrinal, just what confounds me), or whether you're secessionist, continuationist, or it-all-comes-out-in-the-washist really isn't doctrine.

I'm just checking if you get that or not. And, if you get it, are you really saying those who disagree with you aren't Christians?
Oooooh, okay. haha No, I think I made it clear in the post you even quoted of me in your previous post (before this one) that having certain gifts don't save a person. No, I am not saying those that disagree on cessationism or continuationism are not Christian.

As far as doctrine, your definition isn't what most people consider doctrine. Doctrine can be any truth you subscribe to in scripture, though it may not be one of the tenets of the faith (foundational doctrines such as the ones you listed).

I do think this doctrine is important though, very important in terms of edifying the body of Christ and being used by God for His purposes.