Sandy hook kids still alive and well

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

chootchooot

Senior Member
Apr 23, 2012
223
7
18
#1
Since I already exposed both of these two frauds. No one was able to debunk or even come close to debunking the proof of them in their previous acting roles. I will go on to show that their child who supposedly died is still alive and well.

wheeler fam.png


wheeler kids.jpg



Here are both of them singing together at the super bowl can any of you guess which kid is supposed to be dead?

sandyhookchildrencompendsuperbwl2s-625x299.jpg
 
W

WarriorForChrist

Guest
#2
Ok they were actors? So what? Actors have things happen to them just like the rest of us. If a Pastor was to play a Pastor in a movie does that make him a fraud or a conpiracy? Get over it
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#3
this has been debunked many times before

chootchooot, yes this has been debunked before. You already know that. I will do it again in hopes of running you off this forum for a while.

First, I quickly searched beck for the last insane post you made about Sandy Hook titled; Newtown Police chief Resigns after Sandy hook investigation exposes cover up

My response to you kooky conspiracy involving porta potties;

More than one person has posted on this forum suggesting why it is a waste of time trying to convince a lunatic that they are wrong about most everything they post. There is no upside to it. I won't become even more rational by debating someone who is irrational and carefully showing them the folly of their belief.

Having said that, you are far too young to be overcome by a conspiracy obsession. You could easily spend ten hours a day watching kooks on youtube making bizarre claims with little or no evidence. But again, I'm explaining this to someone who is already knee deep into conspiracy theories that are totally unsupported by evidence.

Suppose you lived in Florida and you were constantly making phone calls to government agencies in Sandy Hook. Do you really think someone in Sandy Hook would contact your local police and ask them if they would mind driving over to your house and harassing you? Do you think that Florida police department official would take such a call and then try to get a field sergeant to order one of his men to go and bother a stranger they never met before and had no cause to even speak to? If you are a kook who calls officials in Sandy Hook each and every day to discuss portable toilets and is willing to hire some flunky attorney to get you a chance to speak in a public hearing, you are not going to allow yourself to be harassed without filing a complaint and a lawsuit, right? So it's rather obvious the guy is making this up.

Porta potty companies do not have classified information. He was never told this and he never provided evidence anyone said it, because they didn't. He might as well tell you he was visited by aliens. You'd probably believe him based solely on his word. Kooks should record every conversation they have with their contacts. No wait, then they would only prove they were making up things like he did.

I've been to shootings while working in law enforcement. Some were quite bloody. Guess how many times we called in a biohazard team to clean up the mess? Zero. You leave the crime scene alone while it is being processed. Even the bodies are left in place. I was watching the news a few weeks ago and saw there was a murder near where we live. The stabbing occurred in the street outside of where a party took place. Seven hours later the police were completing their initial investigation and they called in a city crew to hose the blood off the street. Nothing very complicated, just water and a brush. Maybe on television, on the NCIC series, they do it differently.

Helicopters? Really? How about drones? Should the police have sent in drones? They had an active shooting going on. Children were being killed. You have to get officers there ASAP, to divert the shooters attention away from the children. That was the priority. The arriving officers can block off streets to prevent the shooter from fleeing. Maybe on television, you can call 911 and 30 seconds later a helicopter is in the air approaching the scene. If Sandy Hook even had a helicopter, and if they had a pilot available, maybe they could get that helicopter in the air within an hour. To be able to afford a helicopter and a helicopter pilot, you'd need to be a large police force in a large city. I was an officer in Omaha and we didn't have a helicopter. So does that mean that all of our shootings were fake shootings? How preposterous.

I'm still unclear about the porta potties? Who cares? It is a kooks lame attempt to create a conspiracy. When I challenged the tin-hats here to provide evidence of a 9/11 conspiracy regarding the attack on the Pentagon, they would all fail to provide any real evidence. They just kept dodging the facts and repeating nonsense about missiles and lack of debris and complicated flight maneuvers. All silly stuff easily debunked. And now you are discussing toilets.

It's disgraceful that someone can be so nuts that they don't care about the victims of this shooting and how much they suffered. They would spit in your face if they met you. Their children were murdered. How could someone be so blind to suggest there is no proof anyone was killed. The survivors all described the event. The families of the dead had funerals. The morgue was filled with victims. The police saw them shortly after they were shot. Pictures were taken of the victims. You are a monster for suggesting nobody was killed. Or you are so mentally impaired, you don't understand what you are saying and typing. Get help.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#4
why conspiracy kooks are hurtful and heartless

Why Sandy Hook Massacre Spawned Conspiracy Theories

Benjamin Radford, LiveScience Bad Science Columnist

January 16, 2013

https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-sandy...98.html?ref=gs












Connecticut School Shooting Victim Jack Pinto







One month after the Sandy Hook school shootings, the list of victims continues to grow. One man, Gene Rosen — who found six children and a bus driver in his driveway, brought them into his home, fed them and called parents to assure them that their children were safe — has been harassed by telephone, email and online by those who think he is lying about his actions, and is part of a conspiracy.
Rosen is not the first hero to be assaulted and insulted by conspiracy theorists with doubts. In 2002, when conspiracy theorist Bart Sibrel confronted astronaut Buzz Aldrin and called him a "coward and a liar" for faking the moon landings, the 72-year-old promptly punched Sibrel in the face.
A group called the Sandy Hook Truther movement has emerged from the dust and chaos over the past weeks to claim that the school shooting was all a staged event. Though many Americans are outraged and incredulous that anyone could doubt that the tragedy even happened, the Sandy Hook school shootings follow classic conspiracy thinking. Here are a few reasons why.
Poignant political implications
Shootings — even child murders — happen every day, several times a day, in America. According to UNICEF, America has the worst record of child abuse and homicide in the industrialized world, with an average of 27 children killed every week by their parents and caregivers. But those child murders don't have implications for enacting a national policy on gun control.
Most events producing conspiracy theories have important social and political implications, and the Sandy Hook shootings are no exception. No one, regardless of what side of the gun control issue they are on, can deny that guns played a key role in the Sandy Hook killings. So the conspiracy theorists must instead challenge the claim that the attack even occurred. They believe it's all a hoax to scare people into supporting more gun control and a step toward an outright repeal of the Second Amendment. [5 Milestones in Gun Control History]
'Holes' in the 'official story'
A common theme running through conspiracy thinking is that if you're smart enough, and just look closely enough at all the news coverage and available information, you can see lies and contradictions in accounts of the event. Truthers claim that they have found "absolute proof" that the shootings were a hoax, pointing to a 6-year-old girl named Emilie Parker, who was shot to death in the school massacre.
Or was she? They claim that the smoking-gun photographic proof that Emilie is still alive is that she was photographed after the shooting with President Obama during a visit with the families. The girl is actually Emilie's sister, wearing the same dress that Emilie wore in another photograph.
In the topsy-turvy world of conspiracy thinking, any little girl who resembles Emilie and is wearing the same dress as one she owned must be her. It could not possibly be her sister, who could not possibly be wearing either Emilie's dress or an identical one. Instead, it's obviously proof that the whole shooting was faked.
But this claim, even if it were true, raises more questions than it answers. For example, if Sandy Hook was indeed a "staged event" as claimed, with Emilie Parker alive and the president part of the conspiracy, why would the government be so careless as to release a photograph of Emilie, knowing that she had been reported dead in a carefully orchestrated national hoax? Is a widely published photo opportunity with the president of the United States really the best place to hide someone who is supposedly dead?
Conspiracy theorist websites offer dozens of other examples and pieces of evidence, ranging from real or perceived contradictions in eyewitness accounts to conflicting news reports. And indeed there are some contradictions. [The 10 Most Bizarre Conspiracy Theories]
The minds of conspiracy theorists
But what the conspiratorial mind sees as misinformation and lies, others see as merely perfectly ordinary incomplete and inaccurate information following a multifaceted tragedy. Especially in the hours and first days after such a chaotic and horrifying event, witnesses can be confused and mistaken. Police officers and reporters can misspeak, or be given incorrect information.

Not every single statement about what occurred, from dozens of different people in different places at different times, will agree in every detail. Three different witnesses to a minor car accident will often give three slightly different accounts of what they saw, so it's unrealistic to expect dozens of people who were involved in a chaotic school massacre to report exactly the same things.
Part of the reason that conspiracy theories linger is that any contradictory evidence — no matter how conclusive or compelling — can just be dismissed by claiming that it's part of the cover-up. There is ultimately no evidence that would satisfy most conspiracy theorists. Those who distrust the government will use any excuse to support their beliefs, logical or not. Conspiracy theorists prefer complex mysteries over simple truths, and find mystery where none exists.
Research has shown not only that a person who believes in one conspiracy theory is likely to support others, but also contradictions don't deter conspiracy theorists.


The idea that the Sandy Hook massacre was faked is not only absurd, but also an insult to the victims of the tragedy. The victims are really, provably gone; they are not safely hidden away somewhere until the Sandy Hook shooting has served its ultimate goal of taking away America's guns. The bullet holes are there. The children and adults are dead. Toxic conspiracies, however, will live on.
Benjamin Radford is deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer science magazine and author of six books, including "Media Mythmakers: How Journalists, Activists, and Advertisers Mislead Us." His website site is www.BenjaminRadford.com.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#5
why conspiracy kooks are hurtful and heartless

Since I already exposed both of these two frauds. No one was able to debunk or even come close to debunking the proof of them in their previous acting roles. I will go on to show that their child who supposedly died is still alive and well.

View attachment 155715


View attachment 155717



Here are both of them singing together at the super bowl can any of you guess which kid is supposed to be dead?

View attachment 155719

Let's make this perfectly clear, chootchooot. You are well aware of the fact that this conspiracy theory has been thoroughly debunked, even recently on this very forum, with you commenting about it. Here is one of your comments:

Originally Posted by chootchooot
This is just the tip of the Iceberg when it comes to proof this thing was a hoax I haven't even touched on the many actors who played their roles in this and much more. Sometimes I think I am wasting my time with this.....
Did you hit your head and forget the comments you made back in May? You are simply repeating the same nutty arguments that have been proven false. You posted a picture of the older brother of a boy that was murdered and are trying to convince us (again) that since the older brother is alive, the younger brother who was murdered is alive. So to you, JFK was never murdered because his younger brother was seen alive in the following days. Doesn't that seem particularly crazy for someone to believe that?

How much proof does a conspiracy kook need before he moves on to another conspiracy?

'The worst I've seen': Autopsies that moved veteran medical examiner to tears as report reveals each tiny body had been pumped with between THREE and ELEVEN bullets



  • Connecticut chief medical examiner H. Wayne Carver II, MD, said that each victim had from three to eleven bullets in them
  • Said victims had gunshot wounds in their heads, torsos, and extremities
  • Seasoned medical professional called it the 'the worst I've seen'
  • Carver will personally conduct autopsies of shooter Adam Lanza and his mother, Nancy Lanza, on Sunday



Read more: Sandy Hook shooting: Autopsy report reveals 26 victims shot three to eleven times EACH | Daily Mail Online


chootchooot, does it bother you, even just a little, that you are saying very hurtful things about people who lost loved ones? Is that your intention?
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#6
Sandy Hook Final Report

http://www.ct.gov/csao/lib/csao/Sand...nal_Report.pdf

Sandy Hook Final Report

What is required for someone to believe the Sandy Hook massacre never happened? A person would have to believe members of numerous law enforcement agencies got together and agreed to hide the truth. The media that arrived at the scene in the hundreds, would all have to agree to cover up the truth. The parents of the murdered children would have to have hidden their children so they could somehow pretend they never had kids. The pictures of their kids would have to have been fakes. The school yearbooks would have to have been fakes. The childrens birth certificates would have to have been fakes. The neighbors of the victims would have to be silenced from saying they knew these children. The six adults that were murdered would somehow have to be explained. Their spouses and relatives would have to be silenced. Plus their neighbors and friends. Plus all their history of being alive. Their social security, pay stubs, utility bills, car registration, income tax returns, photo id's, etc., etc.

The final report involved hundreds of people who took part in the investigation. They would somehow have to be part of the conspiracy. The mortuary and coroner had to be part of the conspiracy. Everyone who attended the funerals and viewed the dead children and adults were part of the conspiracy. The shooter and his dead mother would have to be explained away. The mothers car was at the school. The firearms she purchased were at the school. Her dead son was at the school, dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Is Adam Lanza in hiding with his mother? There are thousands of pictures that were taken at the crime scene, of the victims and the shooter. Their are hundred of children and school staff that survived and gave statements of what happened. Are they are lying?

But there is one kook who made a few youtube videos suggesting a number of things that didn't add up. All of those things were fully explained, including porta potties that were on dash cam being delivered to the school parking lot. No serious, intelligent, mentally stable person has suggested any conspiracy took place. The only people willing to climb on the conspiracy theory train, are lunatics who have spent years embracing any and all conspiracy theories they view while seeking them out on bizarre conspiracy web sites. Spherical, Ladybug, and ChootChooot are just three of them that frequent this site. All have a proven history of embracing conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason and they all refuse to provide evidence of their insane claims. They all refuse to acknowledge when their theories have been thoroughly debunked. They all display similar characteristics of obsession and denial. Ladybug - "I don't post anywhere close to 50 posts per day on this site" Shortly afterwards, someone tried to point out to her that she is averaging 48.7 posts per day, closing in on 40,000 posts. Obsession and denial. Spherical has made predictions of military attacks in Europe that failed to happen, then in typical fashion, he refused to acknowledge his false claim and instead doubled down and stated WWIII had already begun. Sure, it's all somewhat entertaining. Like watching circus monkeys. But we are actually watching disturbed people who have an actual illness that will likely lead them further into isolation. I suppose confronting them will only lead them to depart from this site and find other sites to share their conspiracy theories with. Then move on again when they are confronted there. Because we don't know them personally, and live near them, there is little anyone can do to get them help. I don't know the answer. I find it painful viewing what they post. Particularly this thread that is so disrespectful to the young children who were murdered, and their loving parents.
 

chootchooot

Senior Member
Apr 23, 2012
223
7
18
#7
Again you seemed to fail to see that the kid that supposedly died is alive and well singing during the Superbowl. I really shouldn't even be responding to you since you have the maturity level of a 12 year old when instead of talking about the facts you resort to all kinds of various insults. Did you take a look at the pictures? Did you seen the pictures of both David and Francine wheeler in the last post of them in their acting jobs? I can even post the video of them in their previous acting jobs if you need more proof. So there are tons of stories of teachers saying held the dying children in their arms as they bled out. Now again I will drop everything if you are able to find me one person from that day of the sandy hook massacre that had just one drop of blood on their clothes. This last post is the same junk post you copied and pasted a few months ago and you probably didn't even read it yourself. I will go on to post more pictures of the sandy hook kids that are still alive. Personally will keep talking about it till these crooks are put in jail.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#8
go to sandy hooks facts . com for the truth

Sandy Hook David Wheeler plays FBI Agent DEBUNKED

Sandy Hook David Wheeler plays FBI Agent DEBUNKED

Sandy Hook David Wheeler plays FBI Agent DEBUNKED

Factual research into the facts of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting tragedy.

Hoaxers move from fraudulent meme to fraudulent meme as their "evidence" Sandy Hook was a "hoax".


The latest meme claims: "Sandy Hook parent has been caught playing the part of a FBI Agent" at Sandy Hook. The claim has been not only debunked, but exposed as a fraud. The hoaxers, yet again, deliberately withheld information by snipping the complete footage that would have proven the meme false.




The claim itself is absurd on it's face. David Wheeler, father of Benjamin Wheeler, a first grader who was killed during the Sandy Hook Shooting, is purpotedly not really a parent, but actually an actor who plays both "David Wheeler" and an FBI SWAT Sniper. Why the FBI would use an actor to portray a FBI agent is never quite explained by the insane, abusive conspiracy theorists:


The fraud was exposed when the SWAT/Sniper was identified as Special Agent William Aldenberg of the New Haven Division of the FBI.






Wolfgang Halbig, who fancies himself an "investigator" and an "expert" that people should "trust" who has reportedly raised over $80,000 this year, is one of the biggest pushers of the false "Wheeler- FBI" claim. Wolfgang Halbig posts the meme nearly every day as part of his fundraising scheme. For example, in this post Halbig calls Oath Keepers, NRA, and gun owners cowards for not "helping" (read that: give him money) while Halbig is using the false, slanderous meme. The meme is his current center piece to lining his pockets with hoaxer cash:











Lenny Pozner is not the only Sandy Hook parent Florida Atlantic University Professor James Tracy actively targets; David Wheeler is also viciously attacked on Tracy's blog with this slanderous claim. Tracy's blog features the video of the "Wheeler-FBI Agent" claim prominently on all of his Sandy Hook pages:








In reality, it's impossible for Special Agent Aldenberg to be Dave Wheeler - the ears have it:











The first person to debunk the claim and actually name the agent came via CaliberHitter's "AlexJonesIsBillHicks.com" channel. Keith Johnson put together a compilation of that research in this video:








The fact the hoaxers hid from their viewers is that there is footage of this FBI agent getting geared up upon his arrival to Sandy Hook, and he is quite obviously not David Wheeler:



Screen looCapture of the agent, on the right, getting dressed


Sandy Hook parent David Wheeler

Agent Aldenberg getting dressed is bald and obviously not David Wheeler.​




The original footage:
http://www.wsj.com/video/children-evacuated-from-school-to-nearby-firehouse/9765508C-4E46-4EA7-9D8A-51AED89D6675.html

The agent is bald as shown here (the space between his strap and his helmet):





The agents name can be seen printed on the back of his vest here and this photo is further evidence the agent is bald:




Confirmed from image here:
http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/arrives-at-sandy-hook-school-shortly-after-shooting-on-news-footage/158655384






The FBI agent is William "Bill" Aldenberg, a well known Connecticut Special Agent who has been responsible for pursuing several high profile cases.


Special Agent Aldenberg can be seen in a video interview here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/without-a-trace-50051236/




Special Agent William Aldenberg was recognized for his Sandy Hook Response at the award Ceremony by Connecticut State Police:
http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014/07/08/more-than-300-honored-for-help-in-aftermath-of-sandy-hook-shootings/

William Aldenberg is also mentioned in the Sandy Hook Final Report: document 00251204.pdf







That report most likely describes the scene published in several news photos and videos:



Special Agent Aldenberg is rear - center





After the identity of the agent was released, Mick West, of Metabunk published this comparison:



David Wheeler can be seen speaking at Connecticut's Gun Safety Task Force in January 2013 here
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/01/31/the-most-powerful-gun-control-speech-father-of-sandy-hook-victim-speaks-out-video/
David Wheeler is obviously not a bald FBI Agent:



Mr. and Mrs. Wheeler did bury their son. And for that, they remain continuous targets of vicious, false claims by James Tracy and Wolfgang Halbig's Sandy Hook Hoaxers". Worse, both Halbig and Tracy actively seek donations on pages where this meme is their "evidence of hoax".​






 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#9
Re: go to sandy hooks facts . com for the truth

Sinnerman, please be more watchful of what you post. Once again there is profanity in what you've posted. :/
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#10
Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

The Huffington Post


Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

Conspiracy theories surrounding the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have reached a new level with a viral “truther” video that has been viewed by millions of people in just one week. However, experts in conspiracy theory have debunked the video as a mere marketing trade on questions, not answers.

On Jan. 7, the video titled “The Sandy Hook Shooting - Fully Exposed” was posted to the YouTube channel ThinkOutsideTheTV, where it garnered more than 8.6 million views in just nine days. The 30-minute video uses news clips to point out “inconsistencies” in the Sandy Hook coverage.

The video opens with a disclaimer: “This is a simple, logical video. No aliens, holigrams [sic], rituals or anything like that, just facts.”

“The video begins with something that really everybody can accept — ‘We are just raising questions,’” Benjamin Radford, author of “Media Mythmakers” and deputy editor of the Skeptical Inquirer, told The Huffington Post. “The whole subject is framed like, ‘Don’t look at us, we’re not saying this crazy stuff, we’re just asking questions.’”

But that’s all the video is — just questions.

“All they offer are tantalizing ‘could be’s,” Radford said.

“The classic conspiracy theorist sees the hidden hand in everything. Nothing is as it seems,” he added. “There’s something bigger that’s going on. They dont know where it is, but they are willing to tantalize people and throw out any number of suggestions, which are oftentimes contradictory.”

David Mikkelson, founder of myth-bunking site Snopes.com, agrees.

“In any kind of disaster or tragedy like this, if you go through things with a fine-toothed comb, you will find a number of contradictory statements,” Mikkelson told HuffPost. “Of course, most of them are cleared up within a few days of the initial reporting, but it’s not something you’re going to see in these [conspiracy] videos.”


Some questions posited by ThinkOutsideTheTV include:
  • How Adam Lanza’s AR-15 rifle got locked in his trunk (later proven to be an extra shotgun);
  • If grieving Newtown citizens are really just “crisis actors” (targeted hero Gene Rosen is actually a retired psychologist);
  • Why memorial websites were seemingly set up before the shooting on Dec. 14 (“Google search result entries are imprecise and do not always accurately reflect the date on which the reference material first appeared on the web,” notes Mikkelson on Snopes).
In addition, truthers have claimed that the victims’ parents didn’t express the proper level of grief. However, by cherry-picking certain portions of certain news clips, evidence to such claims becomes “beneath worthless and is actually misleading,” Robert Blaskiewicz, writer for the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and co-editor of the blog Skeptical Humanities, said in an email to HuffPost. “Doing that means ignoring (or simply rejecting) vast quantities of evidence that doesn’t support their conclusion.”

View the conspiracy video (Story continues below)


Some truthers went as far as saying 6-year-old Emilie Parker, a victim of the shooting, later appears in a photo with the president.

“They’ll see things that have double meanings,” Radford said. “What the rest of us see [in that photo] is Emilie Parker’s sister, but they’re looking at the exact same photograph and they are interpreting it very differently.”

“You can get a lot of mileage out of vague physical similarities,” Mikkelson added.

Compiled together, this “evidence” not only addresses a theory, but also a much larger issue: Most conspiracy theorists have a very specific agenda, the experts said.

ThinkOutsideTheTV, for example, points to the notion that Sandy Hook could’ve been a scheme to disarm the American public and destroy the Second Amendment.

“What I think we are looking at in the video is an attempt to find evidence to fit a preexisting narrative, that the government is or is quickly becoming a tyranny and that the only thing stopping the government from terrorizing the nation is that the populace is armed,” Blaskiewicz said.

Blaskiewicz added that such a diseased investigative process is almost always guaranteed to fail.

“The only possible answer at the end of that process of investigation is some sort of omnipotent puppet master who controls everything. In this case, it’s the government, but it’s often Jews, the New World Order, the other political party, the Illuminati, Masons, or even inter-dimensional mind-controlling reptilian space aliens who impersonate political leaders.”

D.J. Grothe, president of the James Randi Educational Foundation, does note that truthers shouldn’t be immediately dismissed as raving lunatics, however.

“Political conspiracy theorists are completely wrong [in their conclusions], but they’re not crazy,” he told HuffPost. “The leading conspiracy theorists ... are right on many of their initial factual claims. Depending on what the theory is, they might even be correct in all of their claims. Where they are wrong is connecting the dots that aren’t there.”

“We are hardwired to seek order in chaos, make meaning out of data noise, and it is paradoxically comforting to imagine that great tragedy is not just time and chance, but a function of some nefarious, pre-planned grand design,” he added.

[h=4][/h]

 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#11
Re: Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

Once again, I reported your post for it's profanity..
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#12
Re: go to sandy hooks facts . com for the truth

Sinnerman, please be more watchful of what you post. Once again there is profanity in what you've posted. :/
I quickly read through it and didn't see any profanity. I just put on my reading glasses and still didn't find it. These are very long articles and I am trying to review them. I did skip past proof reading the articles that were previously posted on this site and merely copied them and posted them from the May thread. Sorry again to anyone foolish enough to read anything posted on the conspiracy forum.
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#13
Re: Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

Once again, I reported your post for it's profanity..
Of course you did. I would expect nothing less from you. Besides, I'm helping you keep up your 48.3 posts per day. You should be thanking me.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#14
Re: go to sandy hooks facts . com for the truth

I quickly read through it and didn't see any profanity. I just put on my reading glasses and still didn't find it. These are very long articles and I am trying to review them. I did skip past proof reading the articles that were previously posted on this site and merely copied them and posted them from the May thread. Sorry again to anyone foolish enough to read anything posted on the conspiracy forum.
It's in the FB posts in between the two paragraphs about Wolfgang Halbig and Lenny Pozner..
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#15
Re: Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

Of course you did. I would expect nothing less from you. Besides, I'm helping you keep up your 48.3 posts per day. You should be thanking me.

Thanking you for copy pasting profanity? I don't think so. Would you rather have people read the S word?
 
Oct 16, 2015
824
12
0
#16
Re: go to sandy hooks facts . com for the truth

It's in the FB posts in between the two paragraphs about Wolfgang Halbig and Lenny Pozner..
I was not able to read it, even with my reading glasses on. I did blow it up several times larger font and was finally able to read the profane word. How in the world did you read that tiny print without enlarging it?
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#17
Re: go to sandy hooks facts . com for the truth

I was not able to read it, even with my reading glasses on. I did blow it up several times larger font and was finally able to read the profane word. How in the world did you read that tiny print without enlarging it?
Because the font in the first FB post is slightly larger and the same profane word is also in the 2nd FB post..
 
W

WarriorForChrist

Guest
#18
I won't even read all this copy and pasting.
 

chootchooot

Senior Member
Apr 23, 2012
223
7
18
#19
Re: Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

Hey why is it that Sandy Hook is the only school shooting that is classified by the FBI? Columbine shooting happened a long time ago and I can very very easily prove that it happened. If you told me columbine was a hoax I could easily shut you up in seconds. Why are you not able to prove Sandy Hook was real? Columbine happened a long time ago and it was very real. But why is it that Sandy hook was so current and with all the camera phones etc you can't prove anything. Why can't you just shut me up for good? All you need to do is show one picture of a child or adult with one drop of blood on their clothes. Even show a picture of someone in a body bag. Where the teachers lying when they said they held a bloodied child in their arms as he/she died? You say you were in law enforcement and you don't find this a bit odd? Can tell you def weren't a detective.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,920
9,669
113
#20
Re: Sandy Hook Conspiracy Theory Video Debunked By Experts

Sinnerman seems to think I'm this nutty conspiracy theorist. How often has anyone ever seen ME post a conspiracy theory in here? NEVER, that's how often..lol.. I think Sinnerman has his own delusions, since this seems to be the ONLY forum he posts on whenever he's online.. lol