United Nations Agenda 21

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Silverwings said:
[This all belongs to the conspiracy forum you loon/QUOTE]

It is not a conspiracy and I am not a loon :mad:
Click to expand...

Can you name one conspiracy loon who ever once introduced himself as a conspiracy loon?

I'm sorry. What I meant to ask was;

Can you name one conspiracy loon who ever once introduced himself as a conspiracy loon?
Click to expand...
 
Whats the big deal. Conspiracies happen all the time. A conspiracy is when two or more persons devise a plan and take an action in furtherance of the plan.
 
Sinnerman said:
Silverwings said:
Can you name one conspiracy loon who ever once introduced himself as a conspiracy loon?

I'm sorry. What I meant to ask was;

Can you name one conspiracy loon who ever once introduced himself as a conspiracy loon?
Click to expand...

nday, 04 June 2012 00:00[h=2]Alabama Adopts First Official State Ban on UN Agenda 21[/h]Written by Alex Newman



Alabama became the first state to adopt a tough law protecting private property and due process by prohibiting any government involvement with or participation in a controversial United Nations scheme known as Agenda 21. Activists from across the political spectrum celebrated the measure’s approval as a significant victory against the UN “sustainability” plot, expressing hope that similar sovereignty-preserving measures would be adopted in other states as the nationwide battle heats up.
The Alabama Senate Bill (SB) 477 legislation, known unofficially among some supporters as the “Due Process for Property Rights” Act, was approved unanimously by both the state House and Senate. After hesitating for a few days, late last month Republican Governor Robert Bentley finally signed into law the wildly popular measure — but only after heavy pressure from activists forced his hand.
Virtually no mention of the law was made in the establishment press. But analysts said the measure was likely the strongest protection against the UN scheme passed anywhere in America so far. The law, aimed at protecting private property rights, specifically prevents all state agencies and local governments in Alabama from participating in the global scheme in any way.

"The State of Alabama and all political subdivisions may not adopt or implement policy recommendations that deliberately or inadvertently infringe or restrict private property rights without due process, as may be required by policy recommendations originating in, or traceable to 'Agenda 21,' " the law states, adding a brief background on the UN plan hatched at the 1992 “Earth Summit” in Rio de Janeiro.
The people of Alabama acting through their elected representatives — not UN bureaucrats — have the authority to develop the state’s environmental and development policies, the official synopsis of the law explains. Therefore, infringements on the property rights of citizens linked to “any other international law or ancillary plan of action that contravenes the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Alabama” are also prohibited under the new measure.
Of course, as the law points out, the UN has enlisted a broad array of non-governmental and inter-governmental organizations in its effort to foist Agenda 21 on the world — most notably a Germany-based group called ICLEI, formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives. But the new measure takes direct aim at that problem, too: “the State of Alabama and all political subdivisions may not enter into any agreement, expend any sum of money, or receive funds contracting services, or giving financial aid to or from” any such entities, as defined in Agenda 21 documents.
“This bill, that would bar the state from taking over private property without due process, is intended to shelter Alabamians from the United Nations Agenda 21, a sustainable development initiative that some conservatives see as a precursor for the creation of a world government,” explained Alabama GOP Executive Director T.J. Maloney when announcing that it had been signed into law. The Republican National Committee (RNC) adopted a resolution earlier this year blasting the global scheme and urging policy makers to oppose it, and state parties have followed suit.
Public support for the Alabama law was overwhelming and bipartisan as citizens who had been terrorized by Agenda 21-linked schemes targeting their private property spoke out. But according to analysts and state Republican Party officials cited in press reports, Gov. Bentley was originally hesitant to sign the bill — almost certainly due to concerns over the potential loss of some federal funding.
The U.S. Senate, of course, has never formally ratified Agenda 21. But the executive branch — in conjunction with accomplices at the international, state, and local levels — has for two decades been quietly attempting to impose the plan on Americans by stealth, mostly using deceptive terms like “Smart Growth” and “Green.” And proponents of the global scheme consistently threaten that states seeking to protect citizens from the UN plot could end up losing some federal funds.
“Every time you take a dollar of federal money, there’s strings attached,” explained Ken Freeman, chairman of the Alabama-based group Alliance for Citizens Rights (ACR), an organization that fought hard to ensure that the Governor signed the bill into law. “We were originally walking soft on this issue, to tell you the truth, because when things were going our way, why change anything?”
But when Gov. Bentley did not immediately approve the bill, Freeman told a reporter, ACR turned the activism up a notch, urging citizens to contact the Governor’s office and express their support for the measure. The grassroots pressure paid off: Alabama became the first state to be officially shielded by law from UN-linked anti-property rights scheming.
“It seems that Agenda 21 does actually bring people together in communities — just not in the way the U.N. had hoped for,” remarkedJustice Gilpin-Green in a column for the conservative site Townhall, citing Freeman and other instrumental supporters of the effort. “Hopefully other states can mirror Alabama’s determined nature in passing their anti-Agenda 21 legislation. It was citizen awareness and direct action that finally brought about the needed changes last week and that same awareness and action will be needed for the future of every other state.”
Legislative analysts said the bill, sponsored by GOP state Sen. Gerald Dial, was extremely well crafted: protecting citizens and individual rights from UN decrees in a simple, straightforward manner that Agenda 21 advocates would have a hard time criticizing. Liberty-minded organizations and lawmakers are already examining the measure for potential use as a model in other states currently struggling to expel the global scheme and its myriad tentacles.
“Alabama House Bill 618 [SB 477] is a large step towards protecting Alabamians against UN meddling. It protects the due process rights of Alabamians. It keeps Constitutional Law above International Law,” noted Jason Baker, a Montgomery-based conservative pundit with the Examiner. “Now state after state awakens to the threat it poses to freedom and sovereignty.”
Across America, Tea Party groups, liberty-minded Democrats, libertarians, and a broad coalition of activists have been turning up the heat on Agenda 21. Tennessee, for example, adopted a bipartisan state resolution slamming the UN scheme as an “insidious” and “socialist” plot that is completely at odds with American traditions of limited government, individual freedom, private property, and self-governance under the Constitution. Numerous other states are pursuing similar measures.
A bill similar to Alabama’s seeking a complete ban on Agenda 21 and unconstitutional UN “sustainability” efforts in Arizona wasapproved overwhelmingly in the state Senate. The legislation died in the state House even after clearing several hurdles, however, when the legislative session ended before a final vote could be taken. New Hampshire is reportedly working on a bill to ban Agenda 21 that sailed through the state House last month.
Meanwhile, local governments across America — under intense pressure from citizens and activist groups — are slowly awakening to what critics call the “dangers” of the UN scheme. Dozens of cities and counties have withdrawn from ICLEI in recent years, and as awareness continues to grow, that trend is expected to accelerate.
The UN, however, is doubling down on its controversial plan. In June, governments from all over the world will be meeting in Rio de Janeiro for the so-called “Conference on Sustainable Development” — known as Rio+20 for short. According to official documents released by the global body, the summit, headed by Chinese Communist Sha Zukang, will be seeking to dramatically transform human civilization under the guise of environmentalism.
Production, education, consumption, individual rights, and even people’s thoughts will all be targeted under the global plan to create a so-called “green economy,” the UN admitted. But with the tidal wave of opposition in America growing stronger every single day, analysts expect fierce U.S. opposition — if not from the Obama administration, at least from the increasingly outraged citizenry.
Related articles:
Arizona Bill Would Ban UN Agenda 21 Within State
Tennessee Passes Resolution Slamming “Socialist” UN Agenda 21
Kansas Lawmakers Seek Resolution Against “Insidious” UN Agenda 21
EPA's Plans for Implementing UN's Agenda 21
What are the UN's Agenda 21 and ICLEI?
Texas City Withdraws From ICLEI, UN “Agenda 21”
UN Report for Rio+20 Outlines Top-down “Green” World Order
Click to expand...
 
[h=2]Tennessee Passes Resolution Slamming “Socialist” UN Agenda 21[/h]Written by Alex Newman





Even as the United Nations prepares to massively expand its "sustainable development" agenda at the upcoming sustainability summit in Rio de Janeiro, lawmakers in Tennessee approved a joint resolution blasting the global body's controversial Agenda 21 - adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit - as an "insidious" socialist plot. All across America, opposition to the UN schemes is building quickly.

Even as the United Nations prepares to massively expand its "sustainable development" agenda at the upcoming sustainability summit in Rio de Janeiro, lawmakers in Tennessee approved a joint resolution blasting the global body's controversial Agenda 21 - adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit - as an "insidious" socialist plot. All across America, opposition to the UN schemes is building quickly.
The popular measure (HJR 587) in Tennessee was passed by a bipartisan 72-to-23 landslide in the state House of Representatives last month. And on Tuesday, it was overwhelmingly approved in the Senate with 19 in favor and 11 against.
A broad coalition of activists from across the political spectrum came together to support the resolution, urging lawmakers to stand firm in the face of attacks to protect the people of Tennessee. And the efforts paid off: Supporters celebrated its passage Wednesday as another small victory for liberty, private-property rights, and national sovereignty.
Despite being non-binding, analysts said legislators in Tennessee sent a powerful message by recognizing the “destructive and insidious nature” of the controversial UN scheme. The resolution, among other points, urges the public and policymakers to reject Agenda 21, which it describes as “a comprehensive plan of extreme environmentalism, social engineering, and global political control.”
Echoing a similar measure adopted earlier this year by the Republican National Committee (RNC), the resolution approved in Tennessee cites the UN’s own documents to expose the global plan. Agenda 21 policy describes “social justice,” for example, as “the right and opportunity of all people to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment,” lawmakers observed.
Such a “radical” vision would have to be accomplished by what the resolution describes as “socialist” and “communist” means — “redistribution of wealth” from U.S. taxpayers to governments around the world. Meanwhile, the legislation points out, Agenda 21 considers national sovereignty to be a “social injustice.”
In other words, if the UN has its way, Americans would be forced to submit to global authorities as opposed to governing themselves under the framework established by the Constitution. And everything would have to change — education, the economy, policies, taxes, consumption, production, and more.
“This United Nations Agenda 21 plan of radical so-called ‘sustainable development’ views the American way of life of private property ownership, single-family homes, private car ownership and individual travel choices, and privately owned farms all as destructive to the environment,” the resolution explains. “We hereby endorse rejection of its radical policies and rejection of any grant monies attached to it.”
While the 20-year-old global plan has never been formally adopted by the U.S. Senate — which must ratify all treaties — it is still being implemented across the nation by stealth. “The United Nations Agenda 21 is being covertly pushed into local communities throughout the United States of America,” the measure notes.
Aside from the federal executive branch, one of the main forces working to foist the scheme on Americans is a global organization named ICLEI (formerly known as the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives). And it uses a variety of innocent-sounding terms — “Smart Growth” and “Green,” for example — to advance the controversial agenda, the resolution states. As such, the legislature of Tennessee resolved to warn America about the “dangerous intent” of the plan.
Facing a tidal wave of anti-Agenda 21 activism, an assortment of extremist pro-UN groups and tax-funded propagandists haveattempted to downplay the significance of the global agenda, portraying it as a harmless environmental initiative. But experts and lawmakers were not convinced, and opposition to the schemes continues to grow.
State Sen. Mike Bell, a Republican who sponsored the Senate resolution in Tennessee, held up the UN’s Agenda 21 in a thick folder for all to see. “There is over 300 pages, like I said, contained in this document,” he explained, noting that the state resolution would send a “message” to Congress. “I can best describe this as zoning rules on steroids.”
Some Democrats, however, did not see it that way. “It seems to me that planning and forethought and trying to preserve our Tennessee way of life is exactly what we should be doing,” State Sen. Andy Berke was quoted as saying. It was not immediately clear why he opposed the resolution because it merely condemns Agenda 21 and UN schemes — not planning, forethought, or the preservation of the state’s way of life.
Still, despite support from some pro-UN Democrats, opposition to the global organization and its “sustainable development” schemes largely transcends party lines. In the Tennessee House, for example, at least half-a-dozen Democratic lawmakers joined with the GOP majority to approve the anti-Agenda 21 resolution.
Activists who backed the measure come from both sides of the aisle, too. “Let's be sure to thank those elected officials who have the courage to brave ridicule and disinformation in order to bring UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development out of the shadows and into the light,” noted the group Democrats Against U.N. Agenda 21 in a statement urging the Tennessee Senate to approve the resolution. “We can do it. We're getting stronger every day, and it's because you are speaking out.”
Of course, the growing alliance seeking to preserve individual liberty and private property in the face of UN plans also includes a wide range of conservative and libertarian organizations. Diverse groups such as the Tennessee Eagle Forum, local Tea Party chapters, The John Birch Society, the American Policy Center, and even the Republican National Committee all played a role in getting the joint resolution passed.
Meanwhile, another piece of legislation on the agenda in Tennessee would do more than simply condemn the UN plan using strong language — it would completely prohibit the adoption or implementation of any part of the global scheme within the state. If passed, the law would ensure that local governments and state agencies would not be able to financially support or work with the vast array of “shadow organizations” seeking to “surreptitiously implement ‘Agenda 21’ around the world.”
Beyond Tennessee, legislators and policymakers at the state and local level all across America are working hard to stop the agenda as well. Several states are already considering similar legislation. And scores of city governments are dropping their controversial membership in ICLEI — with the trend expected to accelerate faster than ever this year.
The UN, however, is moving full-speed ahead toward achieving its goals. Several official documents released in recent weeks revealed that the global body plans to use this June’s UN Conference on Sustainable Development (UN CSD) to amass wide-ranging new powers and literally re-shape civilization under the guise of environmentalism. Even people’s thoughts and lifestyles are in the crosshairs.
The upcoming global summit — known as Rio+20 because it marks the 20th anniversary of the Earth Summit which adopted Agenda 21 — will seek to transform humanity toward what its leaders describe as a “green economy.” It will be chaired by UN CSD Secretary General Sha Zukang, who served as a senior diplomat for the Communist Chinese dictatorship before taking on his high-level "sustainability" post at the UN.
Related articles:

Tennessee Lawmakers Pass Resolution Blasting UN Agenda 21
UN Seeks New Powers to Remake World at Rio Sustainability Summit
UN Report for Rio+20 Outlines Top-down “Green” World Order
UN Bosses Secretly Plot Global Govt Through “Green Economy" for Rio+20
Ocean County, New Jersey, Blasts UN Agenda 21 in Resolution
Texas City Withdraws From ICLEI, UN “Agenda 21”
What are the UN's Agenda 21 and ICLEI?
Your Hometown & the United Nations’ Agenda 21
Agenda 21 and the Movement Toward a One-World Govt
New Strategies in the Fight to Stop Agenda 21
2011 Was an Incredible Year as Agenda 21 Becomes a Major Issue
UN Demands $76 Trillion for “Green Technology”
Obama Signs Agenda 21-Related Executive Order
Ambitious UN Sustainability Conference in Rio to Avoid Climate Talk
Exposing the Green World Order
UN Plans $45 Trillion Cost for "Going Green"
Texas GOP Blasts United Nations Agenda 21

 
It is a conspiracy if they plan to do evil. States taking precautions to prevent a conspiracy is news. UN publishing Agenda 21 is news. I think the discussion began in the right forum.
 
Silverwings said:
Control of food #1 Priority

America 2050: The Agenda 21 Depopulation of Rural Areas Has Begun
Click to expand...
The Source is suspect, at best. About - OSNet Daily

I live in one of those "mega areas." I grew up in Jersey -- The Garden State. 21 million people live there and yet Jersey tomatoes and peaches are still legendary.

I got lost in Jersey a couple of days ago. I couldn't pull over to ask for directions because trees, streams, fields, and crops do NOT give directions. Very frustrating.

When I came home, I told hubby what road I was on and then asked him if I'd ever get back into civilization. (He was an HVAC mechanic in Jersey, so he knows the terrain.) He laughed. Yes, I would. In an hour! This is the mega area your questionable source is talking about. Yeah, we're tripping all over each other.

You really need to make yourself at home in the Conspiracy Theory forum.

This is the News Forum.
 
If states are passing laws against it, it is news. That is not a conspiracy, that is called legislation. i don't understand why this is hard for people to understand.
It seems on this site, that just about everyone who does not like or agree with something says this source is suspect.
 
I hate to burst some bubbles here, but depopulation of rural areas began in the early 1950s. The suburbs began to expand around the same time. In the area where I grew up and still live most of the farm land has been consolidated into about a dozen mega farms. The remainder is small residential farms where the owner works at an off farm full time job and has planted the farm in Timber. All of these small farms have more than one family living on them, and were subdivided among the children of the original owner. This demographic change has nothing to do with agenda 21. It is the result of mechanization of farming and the massive growth in the manufacturing economy. Today that economy is being mechanized, and exported. We are now in another transitional period that has not completely defined itself yet.

Agenda 21 was produced by the UN in 1992. Need I say more. Read it if you must, but realize that it has been overtaken by climate change and weapons proliferation agendas. Americans should just consider the source, and let them die. What's the UN going to do. Send a peacekeeping force here to monitor our actions. What country in it's right mind would supply troops to that force?
 
This is how we can expect Silverwings to operate in the future. He will read headlines and stories on his nutty alternative internet web site and then pass them on to everyone here, as if they are important. One of his stories says that Seal Team Six did not kill Bin Laden, but rather the Seal Team was killed and Bin Laden lives on. That is the kind of insanity his online news site is disseminating.

In regards to his concerns about the U.N. suggesting people around the world take better care of the environment, as part of what is called Agenda 21, he fails to put the 1992 story to rest. The U.N. says all sorts of stupid things. They went all in on global warming and hired a bunch of cheats and liars to spread hysteria about the worlds climate.

Silverwings needs to read deeper into the groups of people he supports. In 2012, a birther activist told Republican state senators in Georgia that President Barack Obama and the UN were using mind control to implement Agenda 21 in the United States. Opponents have claimed that the program could force people to live in urban areas and bring an end to golf, scuba diving, and floor and ceiling tiles. There are a lot of kooks out selling fear and panic. Don't do them a favor and spread their nonsense on this site.

Tell us, Silverwings, do you also believe Bin Laden is still alive and Seal Team Six was killed, as your "reliable" alternative news site says?

One more thing. Do you plan to keep using the bright red lettering as though anything you post has super duper importance? Cuz it doesn't and you come across like a grade school kid sending text messages to others about seeing some girls underwear out on recess.
 
Last edited:
Sinnerman said:
and Seal Team Six was killed, as your "reliable" alternative news site says?
Click to expand...

Hey bro, Seal Team Six was killed. You know that right? Are you asking if it was conspiratorial or are you denying that 22 members of ST6 were killed?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back