Russia release news of new "super nuke" called the 'Satan 2'

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
This is solely the responsibility of the current administration. Trump will just be more of the same. Hillary will be tougher than that. We need to reestablish respect for the U.S. It's not happening now and will not be happening if Trump is elected.
 
Desdichado said:
And it is designed to out-fox missile shields. Like the one we agreed to remove from Eastern European NATO countries.

Funny how we were more vigilant in the days when we were not debating about what gender we are.
Click to expand...

We've grown soft. Funny thing, we need a woman to get us back where we rightfully belong. We don't need more of that soft stuff we have now. The Russians doesn't respect us now.
 
Susanna said:
We've grown soft. Funny thing, we need a woman to get us back where we rightfully belong. We don't need more of that soft stuff we have now. The Russians doesn't respect us now.
Click to expand...

What on earth makes you think the woman responsible for the "reset button" is going to be of any help in this regard?
 
They don't respect us because of Hillarys policies! And the Obama administration, not sure if you are just naive or messing with me lol. But you have it perfectly backwards lol
 
I'm dubious toward the notion that Donald Trump will get us truckloads of respect either.

This is just another area where the American people are left with two very sub-par choices.
 
None of them are good for the country, but I for sure don't want four more years of the current foreign policy. That is what Trump will be giving us.
 
Susanna said:
None of them are good for the country, but I for sure don't want four more years of the current foreign policy. That is what Trump will be giving us.
Click to expand...

And how do you reckon Hillary Clinton would provide a break from the norm when she was a vital part of it during the first administration?
 
Susanna said:
None of them are good for the country, but I for sure don't want four more years of the current foreign policy. That is what Trump will be giving us.
Click to expand...

Why ain't Obama out campaigning for Trump?

I'll have some of what you're smoking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AuntieAnt
And....obama is gonna have to flee the country to a place without extridition if trump is president.
 
Desdichado said:
What on earth makes you think the woman responsible for the "reset button" is going to be of any help in this regard?
Click to expand...

Not to mention that this administration is threatening Russia with cyberwarfare and the democrats are accusing Russia of hacking their emails to score political points with their dumbed down base.
 
I am not sure, what does "respect" (very favourite word in USA) have to do with the Russian technology and development....


BTW, this bomb is more experiment/demonstration, the end of the world can come by 11 000 nuclear warheads already in use today.

If there will be any nuclear war between nuclear powers (not talking about North Korea or Iran, but about real powers), no "antinuclear shield" will help anyone. You must breath the planetary air, no matter if the bomb will be dropped on your head or on Mexico.

And these powers know it. The real danger are terrorists using "dirty bombs", not Russia, IMHO.
 
Last edited:
Desdichado said:
And how do you reckon Hillary Clinton would provide a break from the norm when she was a vital part of it during the first administration?
Click to expand...

Maybe we should start analyzing the first term? Far as I know the president has a say when the country is being challenged by a foreign power. More so, I think we all know what relationship the SOS and the POTUS had back then. Probably hasn't changed much, but in times like this I guess principles aren't worth the effort. Obama sidelined her effectively and he centralized foreign policy like Nixon.
 
Susanna said:
Maybe we should start analyzing the first term? Far as I know the president has a say when the country is being challenged by a foreign power. More so, I think we all know what relationship the SOS and the POTUS had back then. Probably hasn't changed much, but in times like this I guess principles aren't worth the effort. Obama sidelined her effectively and he centralized foreign policy like Nixon.
Click to expand...

The challenge exists because of the girl that would be president...and Hillary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back