We now have the complete word of God, we do not need any tongues or prophecies.
Last edited:
We now have the complete word of God, we do not need any tongues or prophecies.
Does your church have an interpreter?...[T]here should always be someone interpreting...
At some point it would be interesting to talk about the other 8 gifts of the Spirit and not always about tongues.
...power gifts
No and neither does yours.
If tongues have ceased so has the rest of the supernatural gifts.The other gifts? They got kicked out the back door into the parking lot. Dead denominations have no interpreter because the Holy Spirit left the building. Elvis is still there.![]()
Not according to the scriptures. Only three sign gifts have ended. 1 Cor 13:8If tongues have ceased so has the rest of the supernatural gifts.
[Does your church have an interpreter? ] No and neither does yours.
If tongues have ceased so has the rest of the supernatural gifts.
Okay, so what supernatural gifts have not ceased?Not according to the scriptures. Only three sign gifts have ended. 1 Cor 13:8
For the cause of Christ
Roger
No and your banter is shallow.Are you asking me to argue that you have gifts? Ac 2:16, 1 Co 14:1![]()
I wouldn't argue that either. But I certainly know how I would argue that Unicorns and tongues-speaking do not exist. It's not just about what I personally and directly see. There are a billion eyeballs all across the planet. The aforementioned iPhones and YouTubes.
So...how would you argue Unicorns don't exist? According to you, you have no way of doing that. You would have to ridiculously concede "oh well, maybe Unicorns exist. I would argue I have no way of concluding otherwise".
We're not talking about what's on the pages of Scripture just now. We're talking about what is or isn't actually going on out there in the world. But now that you've absolved yourself of defending your version of "Christian faith"...not sure what's left to discuss.
You are, of course, HUGELY contradicting yourself dozens of times...when you continually try to offer what you think is evidence (which is nothing more than anecdotal chit-chat)...then claim you're not obligated to offer evidence.
And all I am saying is...show me where these alleged individuals HAVE "recognized tongues". Simply show me an example.
And you're right - reality is NOT limited to my personal observations. It's limited to a world of billions of eyeballs and hundreds of millions of iPhones, video cams, and YouTubes.
The same goes for people who believe the moon landings were a hoax...or believe the earth is flat: There are ways of reaching far, far, far beyond the reach of my own eyeballs, contrary to your ridiculous assertion that one must observe all of this, personally and directly.
I do not have to have personally traveled to the Moon to conclude we have actually made successful trips to the Moon...nor must I have personally traveled into outer space and only then personally observe and confirm the spherical shape of the earth.
Your assertion that I need to have observed all 800 trillion pages of the Internet, all 800 million YouTubes, and have attended all 75 jillion church services all across the 2000 years of the Christian era, in order to properly conclude there is no longer any tongues-speaking...is an utter absurdity.
Once again, you're contradicting yourself. Breaking your own rules. You seem very conflicted. Alternately apologizing...then seething with animosity, disdain, and a tsunami of personal attacks.
Of course not, I am just looking for the evidence of the signs that are being claimed to be happening today.DJ2
Are you demanding to see a sign?
Good grief. The question alone reflects dishonesty, I have to say. You've tried this schtick on me a number of times. As though you don't understand the point of our position...that we're not SEEING any of these signs you claim exist. And so when we simply inquire as to where we might be able to observe these signs...you trot out your "stern confrontational" schtick...wagging a disapproving finger at us: "Oh ye of little faith". Ridiculous...and dishonest, essentially. It is the Pentecostals who require signs. Not me and DJ2.DJ2
Are you demanding to see a sign?
You wouldn't even have to "research" anything if there were still ongoing apostle-style and Jesus-style miracles. There would be uproar throughout the world, at this point, 2000 years in. There would be world famous 'celebrity' healers that everyone knew of...and who would perform staggeringly spectacular healings and resurrections just as they did in those early days.I don't see how it would do any good to research miracles for you..
My experience in this thread is that you are utterly uninformed about the entire topic of "wolves in sheep's clothing"...and you tipped your hand when you tried to condescendingly lecture me and made the unintentionally hilarious remark that "runic is the name for alphabets". You don't have the foggiest idea what you're talking about. But...you want to turn tables because you're getting frustrated about the actual topic at hand. The malice is apparent.I don't know much about Michael W. Smith's relationship with the Lord.
That's a dishonest dodge. I didn't claim we WERE discussing mythical beasts. It's simply an analogy. A tool for helping two parties come to a better understanding on the issue. But you don't want a better understanding...particularly since this Unicorn analogy exposes your error.We aren't talking about mythical beasts.
Wait a minute - that's YOUR twist - LOL! This is a very simple scripture, with a very simply message and a very simply application...and you utterly butcher the passage in your quest to dodge the application it has to your "tongues-speaking" claims.You twist stuff. We are all supposed to be 'ready to give an answer for the hope...
Yes, I usually have fistfights once or twice a week.You never answered my question as to whether you have had conversations in your adult life that ended up in fist fights or people calling you names? Does this happen to you, and if so, how often does it happen?
God never played hide-and-seek with miracles back during the days when they were happening. If you pulled aside a believer back then and asked him about evidence of miracles, he wouldn't say "shhhh - I'll slip you a secret note after the Sunday service". Your "PM" proposal is nonsense and, in fact, yet more evidence of non-straightforwardness. The behavior of 'snipe hunting' pranksters.I could give you a contact through a PM
That is such a ridiculous statement as to be intentionally dishonest...your M.O. unfortunately, from my experience. I haven't "bothered" to look any of this up? Do I seem like a guy who doesn't spend much time on the Internet - LOL? Pure baloney. Intentional baloney.evidence for healing and miracles that you don't bother to look up.
Jesus' miracles didn't require "further investigation" - LOL. We wouldn't even need YouTube videos if this stuff was actually still going on. Each and every city in America would have at least one church where the "Spirit of God was working" (the way Pentecostals would describe it, I guess). I could drive across town and see for myself...which, BELIEVE ME, I would love to experience.I've seen plenty of videos that offer evidence worthy of further investigation
What...in THE world...are you aimlessly chit-chatting about? I am flabbergasted at how much effort you put into elaborate non-answers. You completely dodged the point of my two analogies. I guess I can understand why. But...wow.I was born after the moon landings and accepted the offical story growing up. I saw one of those conspiracy theory videos about it. Most of the evidence was hard to follow and didn't really seem to make much of a case, but there were a few things. 'Facts' in this videos on YouTube could be false facts, not what really happened. But the fact that it was easier, cheaper, etc. to fake the moon landings than to actually do them, that there was a military motivation to do so is reason enough for me to keep an open mind to a conspiracy theory. It doesn't effect my daily life, so I have no real motivation to research the details of the missions.
Fella, read this very slowly and carefully: There is...nothing to "reject". I'm not rejecting anything. Good grief - this is both hilarious and sad. If I go on YouTube right now and type in "tongues speaking" (and/or a number of phrase variations)...what comes up is a horror show. Even you would be aghast, I suspect (or hope). If you want to categorize that as "bold rejection"...yes, you nailed it.No, I'm saying that you shouldn't be so 'bold' about rejecting something
I'm not "limiting" anything. It's just that nothing is happening. The world is devoid of these miracles...as far as my billions of eyeballs can see. You claim you have video evidence but will now not let me know where to find them. Great. Thanks much.The problem is you are trying to limit what the Spirit will do
I have not the foggiest idea what you're talking about. I have no "condition". Who in the world would have PM'd you about my "condition"?I apologized because someone emailed me and told me that you had posted about coming out of the hospital for a certain condition that I had asked you about previously. I didn't know about your medical situation.
What a coincidence: I want to see you repent. So, now what?I want to see you repent