I continuously pray for wisdom and a calm temperament. Those are what I need most. Just saying.
Since there are about twenty spiritual gifts, we need to ask ourselves why Paul selected only the THREE gifts which are all related to Divine revelation and say that they would cease? Because he anticipated prophetically that Scripture would be completed by 90 AD, therefore Divine revelations would cease and that (not He who is perfect) which was perfect or complete -- the Bible -- would be completed.
The strongest evidence that those three gifts ceased is that there is no mention of tongues speaking by the Apostolic Church Fathers (1st and 2nd centuries). Clement of Rome, Ignatius, Polycarp, Papias did not mention the necessity or prevalence of tongues.
I try. The verses in acts speak from a historical fact of the coming of the Holy Spirit. The events in acts 8, 10 and 19 where recordet for to show to the jews, that gentiles, Samaritians and the disciples of John can get the same salvation and the same Holy Spirit like they received in acts 2. Otherwise the jews never would accept that God has also salvation through Jesus Christ for them. So God must gave Peter an extra expierience(acts 10) for that he could understand Gods Plan.
That is your argument to deny me the presence of God? The Holy Spirit lives in me today and bears witness with The Word of God.
You make me out for either a liar then. Or something worse.
I don't think anyone is trying to "deny you the presence of God"..... the Spirit lives in me, as well... just like all believers. But not all believers speak in tongues.
the lack of belief in tongue-speaking in today's world is not a rejection of God, or the Spirit. I truly believe that if the Spirit deems it necessary for a believer to be able to speak in tongues, then it will happen. I tend to believe that the tongue being spoken will be a known language, and it will be done for the purpose of showing God's power to an unbeliever.
Most of what I've seen portrayed as "tongues" is simply made-up babbling.
Anything that has to be "taught" in order to "receive" is NOT a gift of the Spirit. There is nothing miraculous in that. Spiritual "pig-latin", if you will.
Its going to happen till doomsday Demi. And it's too bad because the church would be a real force in the world. A lot of wasted years have occurred.
Tongues is very important to the individual believer.
But, there's outpourings happening everywhere in the world. And I'm excited!
Fact is that it aint on us if someone speaks in tongues or not and they are not ceased. I wish chancer was still around haha
Well have fun debating. Imma have some Dr Pepper
I guess chancer and I have never had the pleasure. Enjoy your pop. Or soda as my husband says. Tastes better though calling it pop.![]()
I'll debate anything. Lol
You make me out for either a liar then. Or something worse.
What are you trying to say here?
Does Book of Acts describe them speaking in tongues or doesn't it? Do you have a different Book of Acts to mine?
Are you calling people liars?
They spoke in tongues. Stop carrying on as if it isn't biblical.
First of all no one can be dogmatic about this, since there is very little revealed to us about the mechanics and the nature of speaking supernaturally in a foreign language by the power of the Spirit. But what we do know from Acts 2 is that those who heard the apostles and their companions speaking in tongues on the Day of Pentecost heard this:Tongues are not a revelation gift...
Chancer is veeery prophetically gifted. He was around here a lot until he felt like he should leave.
He could see the hearts of the posters at times?