I see we are still talking about loyaldisciple. If ya have nothin in relation to the op why continue?
This is So true!And when I read the last posts of this thread about what and how is reactet to loyaldisciple I ask myself where is the love? He has an different meaning then the major of this thread. And he trys to teach what he understands from the word of God.What is wrong ? Is this a reason for to make him verbal finnish? Only because you not agree with?
Yes, this thread should be closed. The answer of the OP question is already given.
Has nothing to do with being any misogynist. Just look at the recent posts in the last few pages. I don't see any men on her tossing out threats at anybody. It is only a few of the women doing this, not any of the men so it is showing to be a fact. If I was against all women in any way I would have said "all women" instead of "some women". It is clear I was not referring to all women but only some women, which is exactly what I said. Some women have been sitting behind a computer tossing out threats, so I said some women are arrogant. It is a fact. If you don't want to believe it that is fine. But by you accusing me of being a misogynist for stating fact about only the women who did this that is yourself making a false accusation.
And when I read the last posts of this thread about what and how is reactet to loyaldisciple I ask myself where is the love? He has an different meaning then the major of this thread. And he trys to teach what he understands from the word of God.What is wrong ? Is this a reason for to make him verbal finnish? Only because you not agree with?
Yes, this thread should be closed. The answer of the OP question is already given.
Or It is that you have no argument against what he has put forth so you resort to attacking his person.It isn't his use of the term "little lady" on it's own that makes it offensive. His whole tone is off.
All we have to do is agree to disagree and let it drop. Is this fellow willing to do that? I mean without labeling us all feminists (to which I object profusely) and calling down fire & brimstone on our uppity heads?
No, your comment oozes patronizing superiority. And your attitude extends also to men who disagree with you. You keep trying to claim innocence "I was just quoting scripture". You have not been just quoting scripture, you have been spitting it at people as an attempt to silence discussion.
You quote scripture with your own opinion of it and try to grind it into people with a clumsy boot.
You haven't read the thread obviously.Or It is that you have no argument against what he has put forth so you resort to attacking his person.
I see we are still talking about loyaldisciple. If ya have nothin in relation to the op why continue?
It isn't his use of the term "little lady" on it's own that makes it offensive. His whole tone is off.
All we have to do is agree to disagree and let it drop. Is this fellow willing to do that? I mean without labeling us all feminists (to which I object profusely) and calling down fire & brimstone on our uppity heads?
I haven't attacked you. I have defended myself. Perhaps you are accustomed to bullying people into submission and you are shocked that it doesn't work everywhere?WRONG. My comment oozed no superiority towards myself whatsoever. What it oozed was the SUPERIORITY of God and His word. If you don't like what HE has said, I recommended you take that up with HIM. The comment was not about me at all.
The fact is that when you don't like scripture, you wish to attack the one who provided it. This is internet, I can't grind in anything. All I can do is place the print on the page. When I put scripture on the page which you don't like then you attack me because you don't want to go by the scripture. If you don't like the word of God, then you are free not to go by it. But that is no good reason to attack the messenger.
Who tossed a threat at you? Are you talking about the joke about a knuckle sandwich? Maybe you could grow up a little bit?
It isn't his use of the term "little lady" on it's own that makes it offensive. His whole tone is off.
All we have to do is agree to disagree and let it drop. Is this fellow willing to do that? I mean without labeling us all feminists (to which I object profusely) and calling down fire & brimstone on our uppity heads?
Because my Lord has made me a fierce lion and I WILL NOT let this man abuse women ,and just act like he isn't, trying to browbeat, beat down, minimize and harm them mentally or emotionally.
He has to face the fact that a lot of people in here do not agree with his...total lack of exegesis or thought or even just a willingness to deal with the things that seem to conflict. If he wants the thread to stop he needs to stop trying to beat women down with his words and arrogance and just accept that some don't agree with him, maybe even the majority. But don't expect the thread to stop if he keeps posting women can't talk, teach and preach when others don't agree with him and don't want to see others harmed.
This did not spiral down into longterm silly joking until he got himself cranked back up again and started calling out taunts and "little womans." So don't act like he didn't bring the ridicule on himself because I'm so sick of that kind of passive-aggressive bull I could just scream.
Still speaking of him and not the topic.Because my Lord has made me a fierce lion and I WILL NOT let this man abuse women ,and just act like he isn't, trying to browbeat, beat down, minimize and harm them mentally or emotionally.
He has to face the fact that a lot of people in here do not agree with his...total lack of exegesis or thought or even just a willingness to deal with the things that seem to conflict. If he wants the thread to stop he needs to stop trying to beat women down with his words and arrogance and just accept that some don't agree with him, maybe even the majority. But don't expect the thread to stop if he keeps posting women can't talk, teach and preach when others don't agree with him and don't want to see others harmed.
This did not spiral down into longterm silly joking until he got himself cranked back up again and started calling out taunts and "little womans." So don't act like he didn't bring the ridicule on himself because I'm so sick of that kind of passive-aggressive bull I could just scream.
Do you think it is showing love to someone to let them carry on in extreme arrogance? To call people little woman? Honestly, he claims I was threatening him because of a joke but he has been more violent to women than any of them have been to him. He gave me a taunt that was akin to saying: come out from behind your computer and lets see, brave woman. And "Little woman" was not used in love to lucy - it was used derogatorily. Actually, I'm helping him the only way I know how.
And if you want the thread closed, hit the report button as many times as you can on us and the mods will come in and take a look.
Years ago.