You are dealing with scripture that are before and after Christ has risen. The gift of tongues has nothing to do with the O.P.
Since the ability to speak is a gift that was given to man by the Spirit[Holy Ghost], then if you don't know or reject the gospel by claiming that man has the natural ability to speak by virtue of his physical body then you obviously don't know that unless a human being as a child isn't spoken to and actively engaged in speaking with another person then that child will never develop the ability to communicate using the spoken word.
Remember Adam hearing the voice of the LORD walking in the garden?
Which is to say that if you had a child and I offered you 100 million dollar so that for the first four years of that child's life you could have any interaction you wanted except you couldn't speak to that child or allow anyone else to engage in any type of verbal communication, which would also be that which man would have been in if they evolved from non-speaking primates.
So if man's ability to speak is natural, then there is no reason that once those four years were over that your child could immediately begin to start teaching her to speak and with a 100 million dollars have some of the best teachers in the world doing the teaching. And if that child was taught how to speak then what I am saying would be absolutely false, without question. However, I have the feeling that you really don't see that how it would be relevant because your belief that throught Christ all things are possible.
Well, i did homework for you and thankfully that type of research project is prohibited since it is known that the child would never be able to develop any form of communciation skills much less communicate using the spoken word. How is it known? From events in the past where children were either subjected to such isolation abuse from the parent(s) and cases where children were lost at a young age and able to survive without human contact. They are called ferrell children.
You have to ask yourself why you would challenge scripture.
What? you trying to faith shame me?
Kinda ironic that you didn't suggest I ask Jesus why, but then again people don't ask others to do something that they don't normally do or at least have a person knowledge about. Would you care to guess why I am suggesting that maybe you need to ask Jesus why you believe it would be better for me to ask myself that question than him, since it is not your that speaks but the Holy Ghost. P.S. while you asking him tell him thanks for me, I needed that one.
Let's just say i am the only thing I am challenging is your prophesy of scripture.
Remember when Jesus asked Peter who do you say that I am? Peters response was what? And where did it come from according to Jesus? Not doing your homework for ya
Yes an I remember Jesus called Peter Satan so it must have came from Jesus since he and his Father are one.
I also remember reading that Peter denied he knew Christ so does that make him an anti-christ?
I also remember Jesus said if any man tells you here is Christ or lo there is Christ believe them not.
And I also remember that devils always knew he was the Christ and they are going to burn in hell.
I also remember Jesus saying all men are created equal plus other things.
Remember that Jesus was raised according to Paul's gospel. And Paul himself wrote that if the glory of God abounded more throught his lie then why should you judge him a sinner. I also recall that Paul made the comment "Christ being dead in vain" yes Gal 2:21
"for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain." So what law was he referring unto, the law of truth?
So you honestly don't think you are taking are a man and twisting him into your imaginary God. If the God of truth can't prove himself then why should I believe he can prove me.[/QUOTE]