Now I'm wondering.......if KJV is on ignore by Nehemiah.......how did Nehemish read my post to KJV?
It a MIRACLE!
It a MIRACLE!
You are either ignorant, or so proud you refuse to even see what is going on.you are too funny.......as you can see, when replying to a quote, it begins with WHO it is addressed to
You are either ignorant, or so proud you refuse to even see what is going on.
If you have a person on ignore. You can not see or read anything from them. If you do not believe me, Ask anyone who has other people on ignore. I am confused alot because people post to someone others have on ignore. And they do not understand what they are saying because they can not see the origional quote being responded to.
Your post was open ended. I did not see who you quoted. Because everything that dude quotes is hidden from me UNLESS I hit a little thing at the bottom of the page which says “show ignored content” or that post is the LAST post in the thread, at whcih case the person is seen, but the post is hidden (and then you can say show ignored content)
Which I did AFTER you said you did not respond to me, which is HOW i was able to see who it was you responded to
You need to sit for a bit and actually set your pride aside.. Your making yourself look bad.
Why be insulting just because I and others do not agree with you?
I see a lot of PRIDE on your end......pride of grace
Why put KJV or anyone on ignore? If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen.
So you never did say how that post of mine ended up that you could view it........since you had KJV on ignore. I don't understand how that works because I don't use any ignore tools. Seems to me that none of KJV's post from OR to him could be viewed.
Your post was open ended. I did not see who you quoted. Because everything that dude quotes is hidden from me UNLESS I hit a little thing at the bottom of the page which says “show ignored content” or that post is the LAST post in the thread, at whcih case the person is seen, but the post is hidden (and then you can say show ignored content)
Which I did AFTER you said you did not respond to me, which is HOW i was able to see who it was you responded to
Is this accurate? Can anyone provide something from history or somewhere to confirm the 45 days roman army withdrawing?Daniel says "blessed is he who keeps waiting and attains to the 1335th day. So once again I give you this information...receive it or not.
70 weeks = 1290 days to destruction of temple in Jerusalem
+ 45 days later the Roman army withdrew from Jerusalem and went back to Rome.
=1335 days end of conflict
Well 70 weeks (of years) - 490 years, not 1290 days.. soIs this accurate? Can anyone provide something from history or somewhere to confirm the 45 days roman army withdrawing?
I've always wondered WHAT are those EXTRA days. Anyone got an idea?
If it was literal weeks, it wouldnt match anything even close to Jesus' first coming.Well 70 weeks (of years) - 490 years, not 1290 days.. so
If we take the date of the command to restor jerusalem. And ad 69 weeks of years (using the jewish calendar) we would come up to the year and date jesus entered jerusalem riding on a donkey.If it was literal weeks, it wouldnt match anything even close to Jesus' first coming.
What if other prophetic things are like that too? That its always a day -> 365 days. That would be almost to the time of reformation for 1290 days.
Seems far fetched. Im not buying it.
I believe the 1335th day and 1290 days corrrelate with THE END OF HISTORY as we know it. Otherwise we would now be on overtime. "prophetic limbo" so to speak.
I would say 70 WEEKS would be a pretty good indicator of a failed interpretation. The week for a day in Ezekiel is TOTALLY unrelated to Daniel.
Ezekiel foreshadowed Jesus bearing the iniquity of Israel and Judah for 490 day, a little over a year. Daniel 9 is about how long Israel would exist as a nation. The two are not related whatsoever.
Ezekiel's "day for a year" doesn't make one day equal to a year, it gives the time of the ministry of Jesus to Israel and Judah.
abomination of desolation...........IS the army of Rome (harmonize Matt 24 with Luke 21 on Olivet Discourse)
I know bible reading is considered cheating when one should only use the Hal Lindsey theory
1. Jesus when talking about the end, referred people to Daniel (Abomination spoken of by Daniel) but one very key statement; 'let he that readeth understand'. This is like saying saying 'let he who has the wisdom crack it' because understanding basically requires wisdom.
A Roman army destroying property doesn't require anyone to have any understanding or any wisdom or read anything.
2. By the time the 70 AD war started, some of the gospel writers were still alive and yet non bothered to tell if the war was the fulfillment of that prophesy. It seems 21st century prophets are more knowledgeable.
3. It is arguable that by 70AD the gospels were still being written.
Your ideas are hereby dismissed.
Your attempts at insulting have no effect on my life, but they certainly say a lot about you.
Scripture is dismissed? Matt 24/Luke 21..........clearly proves the abomination of desolation is an army. You didn't even read it.
The seige did not begin in 70AD....it ended in 70AD with the destruction of the temple. The actual war ended with the fall of Masada.
Historical fact reveals when the gospels and the epistles were written. Revelation is not a "gospel".
Daniel's abomination of desolation was also an army
Lol. At no point in any time in the time of David or the time of Christ has the “abomination which makes desolate” ever been an armyYour attempts at insulting have no effect on my life, but they certainly say a lot about you.
Scripture is dismissed? Matt 24/Luke 21..........clearly proves the abomination of desolation is an army. You didn't even read it.
The seige did not begin in 70AD....it ended in 70AD with the destruction of the temple. The actual war ended with the fall of Masada.
Historical fact reveals when the gospels and the epistles were written. Revelation is not a "gospel".
Daniel's abomination of desolation was also an army
The truth of the bible is so far from what most Christians believe that most people think I'm a heretic lol.Now I'm wondering.......if KJV is on ignore by Nehemiah.......how did Nehemish read my post to KJV?
It a MIRACLE!
It's not an insult, just sound reasoning.
1. You need to let us know how an army desolating a place requires people to have wisdom or understanding when reading the prophesy (as per Jesus- those things require understanding).
2. Matt 24 and Luke are books that were arguable written after 70 AD. Paul's letters were also written around that time. Revelation was written after 70 AD. Some of these people (especially John) were still alive during the 70 AD siege yet non of them said it was the fulfillment of what Jesus said or what Daniel prophesied- surely someone must be lying.
Make me understand.
People are not ignored because we think they are heretics. (If that was the case, our ignore bins would be quite large) They are ignored for the way they treat people and the way they act.
Lol. At no point in any time in the time of David or the time of Christ has the “abomination which makes desolate” ever been an army
You have been given the interpretive defenitions of the words from multiple hebrew lexicons and dictionaries which prove this to be true.
If you can not get this basic FACT right. How can you expect to understand the rest of it?
Lol. Go for it. And while your at it, again, remove the log from your eye.That is a HOOT.....in that case you would be on permanent ignore.
The truth of the bible is so far from what most Christians believe that most people think I'm a heretic lol.