Faith/Works...How much faith? How much works?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
Yet again, Romans 7:14-25. Paul describes both natures and the war between them. And 1 John 3:9 talks of the New Nature in Christ that does not sin nor can sin.

And in regard to not being able to stop sinning, name one person who has ever accomplished this.
The error in your argument is that you conflate not being sinless with being a slave to sin.

Christians are not sinless.

But..

NEITHER ARE THEY slaves to sin.

Paradoxical, but also biblical and also very true (being biblical)

If you had read Paul's epistles, you would know this.
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
Was Paul saved when he wrote what he did?



Yep. Just like when Paul wrote what he did. He never said he "was" those things (carnal, captive to the law of sin, evil being "present" in him, etc.) Paul said he "is" those things.
Apparently you stopped at chapter seven and did not go on and read chapter 8;)

Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free (no longer a slave ) from the law of sin and death.
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
Was Paul saved when he wrote what he did?



Yep. Just like when Paul wrote what he did. He never said he "was" those things (carnal, captive to the law of sin, evil being "present" in him, etc.) Paul said he "is" those things.
Not only did you not read Romans 8:2, but you missed a lot of chatper six too.

Romans 6:6- Knowing this, that our old manRp is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. (no longer slaves to sin)
.
Romans 6:12- Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof. (in other words, don't be a slave to sin)

Romans 6:14- For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace. (in other words, sin shall not be your master and you shall not be sin's slave. )

Romans 6:17 But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you. (in other words, we were the servants of sin, but no longer)

Romans 6:18- Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness. (In other words, you are free from sin and no longer a slave to it.)

Romans 6:20- For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness. (in other words, we were slavess to sin, but no more.)

Romans 6:22 But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life (free from sin means no longer a slave to it)

Paul said he "is" those things
He also said For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
Was Paul saved when he wrote what he did?



Yep. Just like when Paul wrote what he did. He never said he "was" those things (carnal, captive to the law of sin, evil being "present" in him, etc.) Paul said he "is" those things.
Are you saying Paul, when he wrote the book of Romans, had not yet appropriated the truth he wrote in chapter eight?

Paul is writing about sin's dominion in chapter seven, but it is showing the fall of sin's dominion in chapter eight.

Apparently, you stopped at chapter seven and never got to chapter eight
 

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
I've been around long enough in the " 'ol BDF" forum :)cool:), long enough, and have even been engaged myself, in flare ups, from time to time. And yes, they DO have a tendency to become quite HEATED. Tempers and "egos" CLASH! But, instead of "sharpening steel with steel", in hopes of edifying one another? It escalates (DE-scends), into personal attacks, where "character assassination", and "name calling" becomes the target for those involved, as well as any "other" "shooter/s", who wish to "join in!"

Here's the way I see it.
Matthew 13
7 And some fell among thorns; and the thorns sprung up, and choked them:
8 But other fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit, some an hundredfold, some sixtyfold, some thirtyfold.
9 Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.

Escalations occur, and not just in the 'ol BDF, when "thirty folders", become offended, with the knowledge of God, that the "sixty folders" have. The "sixty folders" become offended, with the knowledge of the "hundred folders."
So, one can imagine, how fervent the "discussion" may become, when "hundred folders" engage with "thirty folders!"

In these eyes? This "gift of Grace through faith", can, and does "reach a limit", in one's spiritual growth! (So?)
WHAT can it HURT, in one's ASKING for MORE Grace? So one can grow (even) MORE!

 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
Nope. He's just like you. A Judaizer.
All liars will have their part in the lake of fire. Repent therefore, Budman.

See how Budman is a false accuser? Here is proof that I am no Judaizer. And the president of the false accusers gave him a thumbs up. :ROFL:

Macabeus- Post 57 of Jesus in the Old Testament-
Jesus was born under the Law and fulfilled the Law, so we are no longer under the ceremonial commandments of the Law.

Plus , keeping the Law never saved anyone. By the Law is the knowledge of sin

The Law reveals we are dead. The Gospel raises us to life. We are dead to the Law through Jesus, to be joined to (Jesus) so that we might bring forth fruit to God. Romans 7

Telling gentiles that they have to be circumcised and become Jews to be Christians, is missing the point of the New Covenant, and tragically ignoring the distinctness of the covenants.
SO either Budman doesn't know what a Judaizer is, or he is being terribly dishonest
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
Nope. He's just like you. A Judaizer.
Budman is guilty of false accusation again, and anyone who listens to false accusers is foolish. Let's see. He called me a Judaizer. Let's see if his accusation is true or false.

Judaizer- , "Judaizers" refers to Jewish Christians who sought to induce Gentiles to observe Jewish religious customs: to "judaize." It appears that these individuals agreed with much of the apostolic kerygma but sought to regulate the admission of Gentiles into the covenant people of God through circumcision and the keeping of the ceremonial law. Insisting that "Unless you are circumcised … you cannot be saved" ( Acts15:1 ), these "believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees" ( Acts 15:5 ) posed a serious threat to the gospel of grace and the uNIVersality of the Christian mission.

https://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/judaizers/
Here is proof that I am no Judaizer. Take particular note to the parts in red.

Post 57- Jesus in the Old Testament-
Jesus was born under the Law and fulfilled the Law, so we are no longer under the ceremonial commandments of the Law.

Plus , keeping the Law never saved anyone. By the Law is the knowledge of sin

The Law reveals we are dead. The Gospel raises us to life. We are dead to the Law through Jesus, to be joined to (Jesus) so that we might bring forth fruit to God. Romans 7

Telling gentiles that they have to be circumcised and become Jews to be Christians, is missing the point of the New Covenant, and tragically ignoring the distinctness of the covenants.
Budman lied. And he keeps saying we are slaves to sin, because he wants to excuse and justify his lies. He thinks he can't help but lie, and therefore believes that Jesus died not only to provide propitiation for our sins, but also to provide indulgences to sin.
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
He asked me to stop replying to you. That is why I said what i did.
clarification... GB9 told me not to reply anymore and they (Bud and DC) would leave me alone. I merely said that it didn't work last time, no reason to think "not replying anymore" will work this time.

If you guys would read the surrounding posts, you might have better comprehension.

Bud is obsessed with trying to prove that Christians are slaves to sin to justify habitual lying.

Post 455-Macabeus quoted - As far as lying, no person can be a frequent liar unrepentantly and think he or she is right with God.

Bud's reply And yet you sin in other ways every single day, Mac.
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
Bud is obsessed with trying to prove that Christians are slaves to sin to justify habitual lying.

Post 455-Macabeus quoted - As far as lying, no person can be a frequent liar unrepentantly and think he or she is right with God.

Bud's reply And yet you sin in other ways every single day, Mac.
So according to Bud, it is ok for a Christian to be a habitual liar, because after all, we sin in other ways every day.

Antinomianism at it's worst.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,788
6,356
113
clarification... GB9 told me not to reply anymore and they (Bud and DC) would leave me alone. I merely said that it didn't work last time, no reason to think "not replying anymore" will work this time.

If you guys would read the surrounding posts, you might have better comprehension.

Bud is obsessed with trying to prove that Christians are slaves to sin to justify habitual lying.
just to be clear, I advised you to ignore them, then budman responded to what you had said BEFRORE you and I spoke about it.
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
just to be clear, I advised you to ignore them, then budman responded to what you had said BEFRORE you and I spoke about it.
But I told you I was ignoring him before and he was still shooting off false accusations from the hip
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
just to be clear, I advised you to ignore them, then budman responded to what you had said BEFRORE you and I spoke about it.
You can go back to the posts and see how long I ignored Bud and then he started yacking again. I don't have time right now. Got to go back to work.
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
just to be clear, I advised you to ignore them, then budman responded to what you had said BEFRORE you and I spoke about it.
And why should I ignore a slanderer who falsely called me and another poster (oyster) Judaizers (see post 667)

It would be nice if people would follow the rules. But since Bud's an antinomian, I guess he doesn't have to.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
My brother was whining the other day......he needed this HAHHAHA
 

Melach

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2019
2,026
1,512
113
The error in your argument is that you conflate not being sinless with being a slave to sin.

Christians are not sinless.

But..

NEITHER ARE THEY slaves to sin.

Paradoxical, but also biblical and also very true (being biblical)

If you had read Paul's epistles, you would know this.
i believe this is solved by the two natures

the new man in Christ thats sinless and doesnt want to sin
the previous man in adam thats sinful and does what the new man does not want to do


so its a battle
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,788
6,356
113
And why should I ignore a slanderer who falsely called me and another poster (oyster) Judaizers (see post 667)

It would be nice if people would follow the rules. But since Bud's an antinomian, I guess he doesn't have to.
alrighty them. carry on with your tantrum.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
i believe this is solved by the two natures

the new man in Christ thats sinless and doesnt want to sin
the previous man in adam thats sinful and does what the new man does not want to do


so its a battle
Exactly what PAUL writes about, what SAMSON, DAVID, PETER and others suffered from.......but hey.....when one goes to seed on something.....like a field over run with weeds and thorn bushes.........tunnel vision....
 
Dec 27, 2018
4,170
876
113
i believe this is solved by the two natures

the new man in Christ thats sinless and doesnt want to sin
the previous man in adam thats sinful and does what the new man does not want to do


so its a battle
I never denied the dual nature of the believer. (old nature and new nature.)

What I denied was that a believer can be a slave to both. Apparently, Budman and DC believe we can serve two masters.