Astronauts Report Seeing Angels In Outer-Space/Hubble has pictures of Angels and White Floating City!

[biker]

Can you find the link to that? It would be nice to read.

Scientists and Belief | Pew Research Center


www.pewforum.org/2009/11/05/scientists-and-belief/


According to the poll, just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power; specifically, 33% of scientists say they believe in God, while 18% believe in a universal spirit or higher power.

There's another poll where they confirmed belief in Yahweh. I wonder if that one was removed?

 

[biker]

Sigh. The demonic mentality strikes again, that hoax has been around for ages. Nice try though. I see a lot of new age dogma appearing too these days and talk about sex, its everywhere, on car forums, here, on sewing forums, anything that makes something good is perverted . Roaming around this forum can be tiring at times, we sure have a supernatural war on our hands here.

It comes from linkedin so it's considered very reputable. I just copied/pasted from the 2 articles what I thought was the highlights of the article.

 

[biker]

that is definitely not a picture from the Hubble telescope

You can access the Hubble Image site:

They classify that as an angel as well.

 

[Lafftur]

LinkedIn Is Most Adopted and Credible Social Media Platform ...
www.linkedin.com/pulse/linkedin-most-adopted...
Sep 19, 2016 · The 2015 edition of Washington in the Information Age, research by the National Journal found that, among Washington Insiders, LinkedIn is the most popular, most credible and has the fastest ...

• The Hubble is a space telescope. This means it is placed beyond the atmosphere and operates from space. This makes it to work much better than ground based telescopes by eliminating the observatory problems that are created by the atmosphere.

Celestial city of New Jerusalem photographed by NASA’s Hubble ...
www.linkedin.com/pulse/celestial-city-new-jerusalem-photographed-nasas-hubble-vasko-nikolov-6076884986600968192


Outsiders ranked linkedin as most adopted and credible site platform.

My father worked at NASA during the Apollo missions to the moon and he would come home scared because there were even “aliens” on the moon. It was very secretive but, he knew the secrets.

He worked on the programming of the computers of NASA which were cards at that time.

He sits in a nursing home now with dementia unable to speak. I miss his voice.

 

[posthuman]

It comes from linkedin so it's considered very reputable. I just copied/pasted from the 2 articles what I thought was the highlights of the article.

well, no, it comes from the weekly world news. someone on linkedin reposted a tabloid article.

even linkedin says that linkedin is full of garbage, btw:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/whats-up-garbage-linkedin-public-service-announcement-caryn-starr

 

[biker]

This is classified as "Gateway to Heaven"

 

[azamzimtoti]

You can access the Hubble Image site:

They classify that as an angel as well.

I thought they had two wings. I found the pic on Nasa's website

https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/goddard/2016/hubble-frames-a-unique-red-rectangle

 

[biker]

My father worked at NASA during the Apollo missions to the moon and he would come home scared because there were even “aliens” on the moon. It was very secretive but, he knew the secrets.

He worked on the programming of the computers of NASA which were cards at that time.

He sits in a nursing home now with dementia unable to speak. I miss his voice.

That must have been traumatizing to know these things that were seen and captured and then you had to keep this information on the top shelf. The things your father knew about in my opinion is a gold mine of the unknown.

 

[biker]

I thought they had two wings. I found the pic on Nasa's website

https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/goddard/2016/hubble-frames-a-unique-red-rectangle

Agreed!

I am trying to debunk this information now myself.

I am on linkedin and it's full of attorneys, Scientists, psychiatrists, medical doctors, etc. I did not assume they were not legit.

 

[posthuman]

You can access the Hubble Image site:

if Hubble takes pictures of earth ((afaik it never has except for calibrating the wide-field camera by pointing at a very bright object, i.e., earth)) they would be very blurry, as Hubble's cameras are all optimized for long exposure under very precise & slow slewing to stay pointed at very distant objects as Hubble moves in orbit. it can't slew fast enough to get an image of the earth with any detail.

here's a short answer from quora, which is easily a more reputable platform for fact-finding than linkedin, too:

https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-photos-of-earth-taken-by-the-Hubble-Space-telescope

you'll notice there are some bad answers, but at least it's community-vetted. the nice thing about quora is that there are often very good answers written by people with actual qualifications to speak on the topic.

so there's no way that cgi earth-with-prismatic-aliens-invading image in the OP is a Hubble photograph.

 

[biker]

well, no, it comes from the weekly world news. someone on linkedin reposted a tabloid article.

even linkedin says that linkedin is full of garbage, btw:

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/whats-up-garbage-linkedin-public-service-announcement-caryn-starr

Interesting, but it does not specify which articles are garbage. It's just a general warning. That's about as good as putting ice on a stove and hoping it doesn't melt

 

[posthuman]

Interesting, but it does not specify which articles are garbage. It's just a general warning. That's about as good as putting ice on a stove and hoping it doesn't melt

linkedin is specifically a site for professionals to network with each other in order to help each other find employment in their specialized fields.

so a re-blog of a tabloid article most certainly qualifies as garbage in the context. i'm not sure what context reblogging the weekly world news is ever not garbage, tbh

 

[Lafftur]

I thought they had two wings. I found the pic on Nasa's website

https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/goddard/2016/hubble-frames-a-unique-red-rectangle

Ezekiel 1...... there are cherubim with 4 wings but, they cover with two and fly with the other two....

 

[biker]

if Hubble takes pictures of earth ((afaik it never has except for calibrating the wide-field camera by pointing at a very bright object, i.e., earth)) they would be very blurry, as Hubble's cameras are all optimized for long exposure under very precise & slow slewing to stay pointed at very distant objects as Hubble moves in orbit. it can't slew fast enough to get an image of the earth with any detail.

here's a short answer from quora, which is easily a more reputable platform for fact-finding than linkedin, too:

https://www.quora.com/Are-there-any-photos-of-earth-taken-by-the-Hubble-Space-telescope

you'll notice there are some bad answers, but at least it's community-vetted. the nice thing about quora is that there are often very good answers written by people with actual qualifications to speak on the topic.

so there's no way that cgi earth-with-prismatic-aliens-invading image in the OP is a Hubble photograph.

Astronomer Phil Plait would agree that Hubble takes several blurred pictures.



Surprisingly, yes. Hubble's cameras have been calibrated by taking (blurred) pictures of Earth. But the telescope cannot slew fast enough to compensate for the speed of its orbit so taking sharp photos of objects on the Earth is not possible.

From astronomer Phil Plait

 

[posthuman]

Astronomer Phil Plait would agree that Hubble takes several blurred pictures.



Surprisingly, yes. Hubble's cameras have been calibrated by taking (blurred) pictures of Earth. But the telescope cannot slew fast enough to compensate for the speed of its orbit so taking sharp photos of objects on the Earth is not possible.

From astronomer Phil Plait

did you read what you posted?

Phil's saying that the images taken during calibration are not sharp -- exactly what i said, and exactly the opposite of what the cgi image in the OP claims to be.


more from Mssr. Plait ((quoted in the quora post, with reference link))


In space there aren't any flat fields you can use, but we do have one right here: the Earth. To calibrate WFPC2, sometimes Hubble is pointed straight down at the Earth. As the terrain (or water or whatever) streaks across the field of view it forms a very crude flat field image. The image is called a “streak flat”, and looks really weird. Trees, houses, all sorts of objects blur across the image. It takes a lot of sophisticated computer processing to turn this into a real flat field for Hubble to use… [1]


stick your camera out your car window while you're going 100mph and try to take a 15sec exposure photograph of the guardrail. that's the kind of image you get from Hubble pointed at the earth.

 

[Lafftur]

That must have been traumatizing to know these things that were seen and captured and then you had to keep this information on the top shelf. The things your father knew about in my opinion is a gold mine of the unknown.

And all the info is buried in his brain in silence. I would love to ask him about the aliens on the moon...

 

[biker]

What a joke.
Probably placed there to see how gullible some Christians can be.

Maybe so.

Who would think that top Hubble Engineer John Pratchett would risk his entire reputation over a hoax

Researchers were especially interested in a series of photos made on Earth’s orbit. One could see seven luminous objects on them. John Pratchett, an engineer of Hubble project, said that he had seen those creatures himself.

According to him, they were live objects up to 20 meters tall, and their wing spread could be comparable to the length of a modern jetliner. It was also said that US astronauts on board NASA’s space shuttles also encountered angel-like creatures.

 

[biker]

did you read what you posted?

Phil's saying that the images taken during calibration are not sharp -- exactly what i said, and exactly the opposite of what the cgi image in the OP claims to be.


more from Mssr. Plait ((quoted in the quora post, with reference link))


In space there aren't any flat fields you can use, but we do have one right here: the Earth. To calibrate WFPC2, sometimes Hubble is pointed straight down at the Earth. As the terrain (or water or whatever) streaks across the field of view it forms a very crude flat field image. The image is called a “streak flat”, and looks really weird. Trees, houses, all sorts of objects blur across the image. It takes a lot of sophisticated computer processing to turn this into a real flat field for Hubble to use… [1]


stick your camera out your car window while you're going 100mph and try to take a 15sec exposure photograph of the guardrail. that's the kind of image you get from Hubble pointed at the earth.

I did read it before I posted to confirm your post.

 

[biker]

And all the info is buried in his brain in silence. I would love to ask him about the aliens on the moon...

I wonder if he saw them in photos or on film?

 

[biker]

Sad, that John Pratchett would toss his reputation out the window like this!