"This is extremely dangerous to our Democracy".......You'd better believe it is!
- Thread starter cv5
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Bob if you haven't read this link that I posted on the other thread....Here it is again.
www.influenzavirusnet.com/1918-flu-pandemic/mortality.html
Now THAT is a pandemic. The hysteria now is mostly tommyrot, inflamed far far out of proportion by endless MSM mind-control propaganda and gaslighting. This of course serves a purpose not the least of which is to steal the election if possible.
www.influenzavirusnet.com/1918-flu-pandemic/mortality.html
Now THAT is a pandemic. The hysteria now is mostly tommyrot, inflamed far far out of proportion by endless MSM mind-control propaganda and gaslighting. This of course serves a purpose not the least of which is to steal the election if possible.
-
1
- Show all
I never favored or voted for Joe Biden. Never, I thought Trump was unfit for the job for at least 3 years. After some investigation, I've been suggesting evoking the 25th amendment and letting Mike Pence step in. I've posted it repeatedly so, back off! With his christian conservative values, meek demeanor and ability to speak and sound like a highly educated and experienced public speaker he could have beaten Slow Joe.
I can easily and logically believe that C19 was manufactured by the Chinese Communist's, in order to hobble the free world. That dosn't make it any less threatening or real! Stop stoning the messenger. I've been saying it for years. It's like if I don't favor Trump I'm some kind of Communist. Guess what my grandson is a fourth generation, in a row, member of the US Armed forces. I take after my Dad, my Son takes after me and his Son takes after him. We are not Communists.
I can easily and logically believe that C19 was manufactured by the Chinese Communist's, in order to hobble the free world. That dosn't make it any less threatening or real! Stop stoning the messenger. I've been saying it for years. It's like if I don't favor Trump I'm some kind of Communist. Guess what my grandson is a fourth generation, in a row, member of the US Armed forces. I take after my Dad, my Son takes after me and his Son takes after him. We are not Communists.
-
2
- Show all
Biden Transition Official Believes the First Amendment Has a 'Design Flaw' -- His Remedy Is to Curb Free Speech ***SO IT BEGINS***
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...aw-his-remedy-is-to-curb-free-speech-n1144746
Stengel wrote last year in a Washington Post op-ed that the freedom of speech must be restricted, for “all speech is not equal. And where truth cannot drive out lies, we must add new guardrails. I’m all for protecting ‘thought that we hate,’ but not speech that incites hate.”
What kind of speech “incites hate”? As far as Stengel is concerned, the answer is any speech that Muslims find offensive. He wrote: “Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?”
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...aw-his-remedy-is-to-curb-free-speech-n1144746
Stengel wrote last year in a Washington Post op-ed that the freedom of speech must be restricted, for “all speech is not equal. And where truth cannot drive out lies, we must add new guardrails. I’m all for protecting ‘thought that we hate,’ but not speech that incites hate.”
What kind of speech “incites hate”? As far as Stengel is concerned, the answer is any speech that Muslims find offensive. He wrote: “Even the most sophisticated Arab diplomats that I dealt with did not understand why the First Amendment allows someone to burn a Koran. Why, they asked me, would you ever want to protect that?”
-
1
- Show all
Calm down - have a dra-mie.
Because this is what your posts scream out in no uncertain terms.
So you have never heard of a "laptop from hell"? Prima facie evidence of kickbacks to "the big guy" Biden who was caught red handed selling his office? Using his crackhead pedophile son as a mule to do his dirty international deals?
S
Actually they are owned by Sinclair Broadcasting (and not some shadowy " central committee Ministry of truth propaganda outlet") and they are reading a corporate script distributed to all the new stations they own. Just because the one who put the video together saw something sinister does not make it so. Sinclair wanted to get this message out in an attempt to convince people to stop spreading made up conspiracy theories that they don't fact check.
The "main point" here is that someone created a video and insinuated that there was some sinister group behind the "influence" on these reporters. It is called Sinclair Corporate Headquarters and if they want to ask their stations to air a "public service announcement" hoping to curb ignorance in the nation they have that right and I say "well done Sinclair Broadcasting." Tpo bad people are so stupid they turned it into another unfact checked conspiracy, the very thing you were hoping to avoid. That is what is so ironic about it. Classic example that will always make me laugh and shake my head at the ignorance I am surrounded by in this world.
The "main point" here is that someone created a video and insinuated that there was some sinister group behind the "influence" on these reporters. It is called Sinclair Corporate Headquarters and if they want to ask their stations to air a "public service announcement" hoping to curb ignorance in the nation they have that right and I say "well done Sinclair Broadcasting." Tpo bad people are so stupid they turned it into another unfact checked conspiracy, the very thing you were hoping to avoid. That is what is so ironic about it. Classic example that will always make me laugh and shake my head at the ignorance I am surrounded by in this world.
-
1
- Show all
This deserves one Dramie and one Vladimy
-
1
- Show all
Of couse that is absolutely obvious. It's undoubtedly a script everyone was reading.....provided by the central office.
Far from derying the point that I'm making it proves it beyond the shadow of a doubt.
What is the point that I am making????
That these local news agencies are not even so much is CAPABLE of refusing to participate in these demands to disseminate propaganda statements! Which is exactly what that statement was! That statement was a issue of propaganda period end of story. These individual news agencies could not turn it down and did not turn it down based on their own conscience or due diligence. On the contrary they were forced to reiterated it over and over and over again. Their opinion did not matter they simply took orders from the central office. THIS IS WRONG!
What's worse that statement on its face is in defiance of 1st Amendment rights, That being for people to determined by themselves FOR themselves what they think is newsworthy true factual and valuable.
A statement like that would be considered normal coming from Pravda. Not EN MASSE from independent journalists in the United States!
Far from derying the point that I'm making it proves it beyond the shadow of a doubt.
What is the point that I am making????
That these local news agencies are not even so much is CAPABLE of refusing to participate in these demands to disseminate propaganda statements! Which is exactly what that statement was! That statement was a issue of propaganda period end of story. These individual news agencies could not turn it down and did not turn it down based on their own conscience or due diligence. On the contrary they were forced to reiterated it over and over and over again. Their opinion did not matter they simply took orders from the central office. THIS IS WRONG!
What's worse that statement on its face is in defiance of 1st Amendment rights, That being for people to determined by themselves FOR themselves what they think is newsworthy true factual and valuable.
A statement like that would be considered normal coming from Pravda. Not EN MASSE from independent journalists in the United States!
