The Saving results of the Death of Christ !

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
The merits of His Blood was before the cross. I just showed you PS 103:12

John Gill writes on that verse:
What a thing to teach that there's ' merit ' to Jesus s blood before Jesus actually sheds his blood . I'm always amazed how Augustine and John Calvin ever established the philosophy of the 5 points.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
I don’t understand the difference.
The person in the old testament would have sins remitted but not redeemed. Jesus redeemed all sins that were only remitted that needed redeeming at the cross.

hebrews 9.15
15And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the REDEMPTION of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

Rom 3 24Being justified freely by his grace through the REDEMPTION that is in Christ Jesus:
25Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
 
May 31, 2020
1,706
1,559
113
i think that Christ established a path that people can follow and receive salvation
i don't understand the big debate on the mechanics of how it transpired or how it applies, this seems like an infatuation with how a car engine works compared to where you want to drive to and go and visit. i do not know how my car engine works despite having some basic mechanical knowledge i can't claim to be an expert on it's function or all the expertise associated with it's design. But I can still drive it and go places and fix it with my rudimentary skills. Did God ever promise we would know how it all works in this life? I don't see that, i just struggle to understand how come more people don't question the point of trying to know things to an unknowable level of detail, without diluting Christ and his ability to save of course but that is also lost in overly technical debates so i'm just confused generally by many of the things on this forum that make no sense at all to me
calvinists are often very prideful and do a great deal of harm regarding the sharing of the Gospel. Some calvinists openly state there is nothing you can do to be saved if you are not one of the pre-selected chosen ones. Even if you have faith in Jesus Christ and proclaim Him Lord and Savior you are not saved if you are not one of “them”. That mindset goes entirely against the very words of God.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
Some people are going to die in their sins Jn 8:24 so their sins are not paid for. The wrath of God is on some for their sins Eph 5:5-7

For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. 6 Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. 7 Be not ye therefore partakers with them.
Ok your mashing up two completely separate verses there . One before the cross and one after .
 
May 31, 2020
1,706
1,559
113
The person in the old testament would have sins remitted but not redeemed. Jesus redeemed all sins that were only remitted that needed redeeming at the cross.

hebrews 9.15
15And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the REDEMPTION of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.

Rom 3 24Being justified freely by his grace through the REDEMPTION that is in Christ Jesus:
25Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
Thank you, brother.
 

brightfame52

Well-known member
Nov 21, 2020
6,334
557
113
Ok your mashing up two completely separate verses there . One before the cross and one after .
No difference Christ said if they don't believe in Him then. He had not died yet. They will die in their sins . That was not the case for believers in Him then. Their sins were given based on what He was going to do. Their sins had already been charged to Christ and not on them
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
Christs death accomplished/effected both Justification and Reconciliation for them He died for, His Elect Rom 5:9-11
not only for us, but for the whole world also -- this is what 1 John 2:2 says.

do you disagree? please, i took the time to show you. if you do not agree, you ought to take the time to explain; that's why we are in a discussion forum together, isn't it?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
No difference Christ said if they don't believe in Him then. He had not died yet. They will die in their sins .
Jesus healed a man so sick he could not rise from his cot in order to prove that He has authority to forgive sin ((Matthew 9)).
before He died.


there is no sacrifice in the law for adultery or murder, but David's sin was removed ((2 Samuel 12:13)).
before He was made flesh.


God isn't evidently constrained by time, in the way that we are, unless it's His good pleasure to insert Himself into it willingly.
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
No difference Christ said if they don't believe in Him then. He had not died yet. They will die in their sins . That was not the case for believers in Him then. Their sins were given based on what He was going to do. Their sins had already been charged to Christ and not on them
If they had died before the cross, they would have ' died in their sins ' . Thats what the bible says .
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,622
282
83
What a thing to teach that there's ' merit ' to Jesus s blood before Jesus actually sheds his blood . I'm always amazed how Augustine and John Calvin ever established the philosophy of the 5 points.
When and where did St Augustine "establish" the "L" of the TULIP?
 

throughfaith

Well-known member
Aug 4, 2020
10,467
1,593
113
When and where did St Augustine "establish" the "L" of the TULIP?
Start with any work written on Augustine . It starts with the T . Dr ken Wilson has a great study on this . " the foundation of Augustinian Calvinism'
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
Just like I said.side step.

he only wants to discuss with those who agree with him, disagree and you are taking over his discussion

no honesty or integrity or real discussion here
heck i agree with him about what Peter said. same thing as what Paul said. salvation is through faith by grace, worked by the atoning/propitiating blood of Christ shed at the cross. he wanted me to discuss 'post 435' so i did, and he calls that 'evasion' ??


come to think of it you may have been the one who pointed out 1 John 2:2 to me, EG... ? you probably don't remember either.
i was stuck on how it is that atonement is made but not applied; i saw it as though that would mean God has failed so i presumed that His atonement, in His omniscience, wasn't intended for those who wouldn't accept it.

but He died not only for His friends but His enemies also -- such great love! -- i don't think, anymore, that this particular point has anything to do with whatever disagreements we might have among ourselves of the implications of predestination & free will. it's about 'showing forth His righteousness' as Paul put it.

Christ would take the time to answer and reason with the pharisees even while they were looking for a way to kill him. He said, love your enemies -- what good is it if you only love those who love you? no better than the pagans. He calls Judas with Satan inside him, "friend" -- that's gotta be hot coals on his head, lol !!
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
if you do not believe that I AM, you will die in your sins.
(John 8:24)


How can Christ take away the sins of the whole world and be the propitiation of the sins of the whole world if those who do not believe in Christ die in their sins?


Wouldn't you neccessarily HAVE TO conclude that the 'whole world' must refer to the whole world of people who believe in Christ? People who don't exist yet, therefore are not the Lords Sheep, but people who will exist in the future and become the Lords Sheep. Or people who are born gentile but are brought into the fold by Christ. However you want to look at it.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11
well, 1 John 2:2 doesn't let me conclude that 'the whole world' refers to believers. John writes, not only ours, but all theirs also. in that letter he defines who 'ours' is -- those that believe. so i can't escape that His propitiation is sufficient for all, His blood given for all.

when John the Baptist says that He is the Lamb taking away the sin of the world, he doesn't say 'all the world' like John does in his little letter. so it think scripture is making a distinction between the sufficiency and the application of atonement.

something that came to mind last night while i was talking to @brightfame52 was how Christ wept over Jerusalem saying 'all day long I have held out my hands' to them. i thought, this is like the topic of the atonement being limited or unlimited. it's not as though He is unwilling; if they would turn, He would save them -- but many won't turn.

we're going to have to get into quantum physics eventually with this topic. superposition of states & the observer effect -- that's where nature testifies of free will & predestination; it's something not intuitive to us as humans living in our macro-world, but the cat in the box is both alive & not, and the photon is both particle-like & wave-like ---- or maybe we ought to say, it's something else entirely outside our ability to describe..

His omniscience demands that He has known for all time who it is that believes and who it is that doesn't. even among the disciples He Himself chose -- but He didn't turn them away, rather let them turn away themselves, and His willingness to let them sit at His feet and learn from Him even while He knew they would eventually reject & abandon Him is a testimony against them & a testimony of His great love, isn't it?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
if you do not believe that I AM, you will die in your sins.
(John 8:24)


How can Christ take away the sins of the whole world and be the propitiation of the sins of the whole world if those who do not believe in Christ die in their sins?


Wouldn't you neccessarily HAVE TO conclude that the 'whole world' must refer to the whole world of people who believe in Christ? People who don't exist yet, therefore are not the Lords Sheep, but people who will exist in the future and become the Lords Sheep. Or people who are born gentile but are brought into the fold by Christ. However you want to look at it.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11

IOW

yes it's hard and complex and who has known the mind of the LORD??

:)
 

brightfame52

Well-known member
Nov 21, 2020
6,334
557
113
not only for us, but for the whole world also -- this is what 1 John 2:2 says.

do you disagree? please, i took the time to show you. if you do not agree, you ought to take the time to explain; that's why we are in a discussion forum together, isn't it?
Rabbit trail !