CALLING ALL ATHEISTS TO A CHALLENGE!!!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
May 5, 2011
25
0
0
Ramon you say you searched and found god but you say that I should not trust what men say because they lie. So how do I know if you are lying or not? Or more likely how do I know that you are not mistaken? Why should I trust what has been written or said about god? Why should I trust your delusion over anyone else's?
 
T

Timofree

Guest
whats the difference saying athesist saying we have more faith to belive we came from nothing when christian belive god came from nothing its pretty much the same thing
I believe God always was.....and I know if any atheist reading this now, repented of their sins, and genuinely trusted Jesus as their Lord and Saviour.......there would be absolutely no doubts in their mind.
 
R

Ramon

Guest
Ramon you say you searched and found god but you say that I should not trust what men say because they lie. So how do I know if you are lying or not? Or more likely how do I know that you are not mistaken? Why should I trust what has been written or said about god? Why should I trust your delusion over anyone else's?
Well search, duh!! LOL. No seriously. If you take it from people all the time you might end up being a hypocrite. I didn't learn the Truth from church. I went to many churches but never knew the Truth. So I decided to put people aside. And it turned out Jesus was not what many people make him out to be. And that God is not how many people see him. And like I said to the other guy, I haven't yet seen a person who could even stand in the presence of God without fear and trembling. Once you know then you know, and you will end up like me, trying to tell people what you have witnessed. But they just will not listen. Still, we can't go around forcing people to believe can we?
 
May 5, 2011
25
0
0
Why would one fear and tremble in the presence of god if he is such a swell guy? So is Jesus another god or just another name for god? It seems from what Jimmy Digs says that you can't see god because he is immaterial. Photons only seem to work with matter. So I don't see how you can see something that is not made of matter. I don't think I want to end up like you Ramon, babbleing about immaterial things that can't be seen. If it is so important to find god why does it make it so hard? why not just show it's self and quit with all of the games of hide and see? It makes more sense that it does not exist and you are just making it up because of some fear of death or some need to feel special or you are just too lazy to learn of how the universe really works because it would require an understanding of science and math. And science and math are just too darn hard to comprehend for some.
 
W

wolfywolfs

Guest
I believe God always was.....and I know if any atheist reading this now, repented of their sins, and genuinely trusted Jesus as their Lord and Saviour.......there would be absolutely no doubts in their mind.
right then why cant i say the universe always was here. this may be what you belive but what make u think if an atheist read that and accepeted jesus they wont question anything i read that and questioned how do you know god always was why do you belive that if you say "thats just what i belive i dont need anything to support that" thats not gona help anyone that doesnt give a reason for some1 to belive in what you saying if your reason was different and had something good to back it up then maybe will see your point as to why u belive god always was and may have a different opinion on the matter.
 

Red_Tory

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2010
611
17
18
right then why cant i say the universe always was here.
Well if you're at all concerned about science, logic or proof then you should realise that there are many in the scientific community who say that the universe isn't eternal. I'm not sure how the concept of a universe that has "always been here" fits into the metric expansion of space, i.e. the universe is expanding; if it has been here forever, why has it not expanded to an infinite size (or more accurately why is there not an infinite amount of distance between points in space)?
 
Last edited:
W

wolfywolfs

Guest
Well if you're at all concerned about science, logic or proof then you should realise that there are many in the scientific community who say that the universe isn't eternal. I'm not sure how the concept of a universe that has "always been here" fits into the metric expansion of space, i.e. the universe is expanding; if it has been here forever, why has it not expanded to an infinite size (or more accurately why is there not an infinite amount of distance between points in space)?
i wasnt saying this is what i belive i was just using that as an example there may be people out there that belive that its like people say something cant come from nothing yet they belive in god that came from nothing
 

Red_Tory

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2010
611
17
18
i wasnt saying this is what i belive i was just using that as an example there may be people out there that belive that its like people say something cant come from nothing yet they belive in god that came from nothing
Well that's the point... Natural things don't typically "come from nothing", hence you look to the supernatural, an object or being not bound by these constraints which we see in life. That, I believe, is what we would refer to as "God" (people will have different opinions, but that's mine).
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
i wasnt saying this is what i belive i was just using that as an example there may be people out there that belive that its like people say something cant come from nothing yet they belive in god that came from nothing
It is true, God came from nothing. How could God come from nothing? He never "came" to be of anything.

1) That which begins to exist must have a cause
2) God did not begin to exist
3) God does not require a cause
 

Red_Tory

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2010
611
17
18
It is true, God came from nothing. How could God come from nothing? He never "came" to be of anything.

1) That which begins to exist must have a cause
2) God did not begin to exist
3) God does not require a cause
Looks like a fallacy to me, if you're arranging them as universal syllogisms... But I'm nitpicky and stupid :3
 
W

wolfywolfs

Guest
It is true, God came from nothing. How could God come from nothing? He never "came" to be of anything.

1) That which begins to exist must have a cause
2) God did not begin to exist
3) God does not require a cause
well why if god did not begin to exist does he exist at all if he doesnt require a cause again why
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
Looks like a fallacy to me, if you're arranging them as universal syllogisms... But I'm nitpicky and stupid :3
God has always existed, has he not?


ReasonbleFaith said:
So consider the "what caused God?" question. Recall that Dennett himself affirms that only things which have a temporal origin have causes. It follows that since the Creator of the universe has no temporal origin it has no cause. Now you're right that this conclusion doesn't follow from the premises of the kalam argument alone, but from Dennett's own additional assumption. What we can say on the basis of the kalam argument alone is that whereas the universe must have a cause, no reason has been given to think that the Creator must have a cause. Ockham's Razor, which enjoins us not to postulate causes beyond necessity, will therefore shave away any further causes. Given Ockham's Razor, we are justified in positing only such causes as are necessary to explain the effect. Therefore it would be unjustified to postulate a plurality of causes. The ball is then in the opponent's court: he has to give good reasons to think that even timelessly existing entities must have causes—an assumption which is, as Dennett discerns, highly implausible and widely rejected by metaphysicians, whose ontologies often include uncaused, eternal entities like abstract objects.
Reasonable Faith: Question 131 - God as the Cause of the Universe <--- click
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
well why if god did not begin to exist does he exist at all if he doesnt require a cause again why
Maybe I don't understand the question you are asking, but is not the asking of "Why?" still demanding a cause?
 
W

wolfywolfs

Guest
Maybe I don't understand the question you are asking, but is not the asking of "Why?" still demanding a cause?
to cause to me asking why is because your giving me answers without reasons so again why is there no need for a cause for god and is your reason for that is because god did not begin to exist (which makes no logical sense) then again why did he not begin to exist. if he doesnt exist how did he become the cause of the universe what made him exist

if this is still hard to understand im basically asking why do you belive

2) God did not begin to exist
3) God does not require a cause
 

Red_Tory

Senior Member
Jan 26, 2010
611
17
18
God has always existed, has he not?
Aye, but that's not the point (I don't even think there is one...)

If you put it in the order of:

1) That which begins to exist must have a cause
2) God did not begin to exist
3) God does not require a cause


You essentially get:

1) All things which begin to exist are things that require a cause
2) God is not a thing which began to exist
3) Therefore God is not a thing that requires a cause

Which, put in simpler terms is:

1) All A's are B's
2) Object C is not an A
3) Therefore object C is not a B

It may make some kind of sense in practical terms, but the argument pattern is invalid...




For a further example, the classic postbox problem:

1) All mail boxes are red (this was from the old UK where they were indeed red)
2) The red balloon is not a mail box
3) Therefore the red balloon is not red!




Either way it's a rather silly point that I just raised out of interest... No real significance.
 
R

Ramon

Guest
Why would one fear and tremble in the presence of god if he is such a swell guy? So is Jesus another god or just another name for god? It seems from what Jimmy Digs says that you can't see god because he is immaterial. Photons only seem to work with matter. So I don't see how you can see something that is not made of matter. I don't think I want to end up like you Ramon, babbleing about immaterial things that can't be seen. If it is so important to find god why does it make it so hard? why not just show it's self and quit with all of the games of hide and see? It makes more sense that it does not exist and you are just making it up because of some fear of death or some need to feel special or you are just too lazy to learn of how the universe really works because it would require an understanding of science and math. And science and math are just too darn hard to comprehend for some.
Well, you really do underestimate God. You say he cannot be seen but he surely can. But in order to go from the natural things to the Spiritual things, it takes a 2nd pair of eyes. But this is far too much for you, since, even seeing the natural proof of him, you still can't believe. You still avoid the question as to how you know things in those text books are credible to you since you haven't seen them with your own eyes.

You keep giving yourself excuses, but you only have one lifetime to find out. And that would only be the beginning, because once you find out he is real, then you have to obey him. As for Jesus, it might sound even more foolish since you deny God. But if you must know. Jesus is the Son of God who was sent from heaven. Since people have gone and messed up the purpose for life, and started a chain of sin that ends in death, as you see the world hurrying toward the end of that chain, there had to be a counteraction that would put an end to death.

Here is the deal, you messed up, God had to fix your mess. However alongside this, since the creation of God has grown so rebellious to him, even so far as denying his existence, we hardly see the miracles. Because it takes faith. I am telling you this. God has the power to raise the dead. Can science do this?
 
W

wolfywolfs

Guest
let me ask ramon do belive the world will start to end this year on may 21st
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
Tory, is there anything that would invalidate this reasoning as with the red balloon?

1) All things which begin to exist are things that require a cause
2) God is not a thing which began to exist

3) Therefore God is not a thing that requires a cause
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
It seems from what Jimmy Digs says that you can't see god because he is immaterial. Photons only seem to work with matter. So I don't see how you can see something that is not made of matter.
I don't think I personally said God cannot be seen. God isn't bound by natural laws. That's because he is, supernatural.