B
If I was to include the RCC I no doubt would see such corruption which ironically leads to the choosing of the 66 Books of our own Canon. But I am discussing Disciples of Apostles and their Disciples. Many which are not remotely connected to the RCC.I am looking at church history, Which in the end, Was formed and maintained by the catholic church.
Are you Trinity or Oneness?Do tell?
Can you prove your accusations?
Here is my specific Arguments for Church fathers vs not.I was raised a baptist. And one thing I have learned is that when we get outside of scripture. We are risking being followers of men and not followers of God.
When the reformation happened. Many of the pagan beliefs were disavowed. Sadly. Many of the other false doctrines came with them.
When we try to use history to prove those doctrines are right. Instead of using the word of God, we risk believing in a false theology.
Now if you want o risk that, thats fine. But to tell me because I chose to do what the word of God says, to study to shew myself approved, and to test all spirits.. Well forgive me, I was stuck in my denomination, until I actually started to study. I praise God I did this, or I would still be stuck in some issues which are not from God.
I asked a legitimate question which you refused to acknowledge and instead chose
to falsely accuse me. Now you play the victim card and think you are justified.
FYI? Falsely accusing people of things they did not do is not kindness.
Yet you repeatedly do it while crying about lack of kindness.
Sorry dude but that is weak.Sorry, but your attitude is such that you'll be added to my block list. What a shame.
YepMore cagey obfuscation. I asked a question.
You did not just disagree, you stated history proved me wrong, I asked you to use inspired proof.I stopped talking to you but you kept engaging me. Disagreement isn't mocking.
Let's refresh your memory eh?
Yours was post # 2 on the thread. See below
Your right it’s not, yet you brought it up.This thread isn't about dispensationalism.
I never called the martyred apostles paganCalling the martyred saints pagan is however mocking.
If this is true, You know NO ONE WHO IS SAVED (this must include yourself)
Your the one who said it. If you made a mistake please confess and rephrase. But it is your claim. Own up to it.
If I was to include the RCC I no doubt would see such corruption which ironically leads to the choosing of the 66 Books of our own Canon. But I am discussing Disciples of Apostles and their Disciples. Many which are not remotely connected to the RCC.
I do not follow creeds, I follow the word of GodAre you Trinity or Oneness?
The Creeds are all Triune.
The Gospel of Christ is SIMPLICITY itself.
Look inside bro,Take care, Lucy. I'm not interested in such hatred.
You said you know no one who k own the gospel truthWhen did I ever say that I am not saved? You said those words . . . not myself.
Please . . . I respected you. Let's stop this "way" with each other, for it does not reflect the Mind of Christ.
Look inside bro,
don’t be a hypocrit
Sorry dude but that is weak.
I didn't say Apostles that's more dishonesty from you. I said saints. And the saints that I referenced were martyred and you did call them pagan.I never called the martyred apostles pagan
get your facts straight dude