Why Daniel's 70th week must be in the future

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jun 9, 2021
1,871
425
83
More Jews TODAY are accepting Christ than Gentiles are!

The End of the Gentile Reign is long gone and over with!
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,222
1,981
113
Tell me - do you believe that anyone living during the millennium will commit sin?
one sin
any sin
?
Keep in mind that the Dan9:24-27 prophecy is concerning "upon THY [Daniel's] people, and upon THY [Daniel's] holy city"





[Rom11:27 / Isa27:9,12-13 , etc...]
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
But I do believe in Future Events to come.
I just know from the literal Hebrew Tanakh, the Language which Daniel wrote in, he said the AoD was the End of Daily Sacrifice. The KJV would have us believing something else.
Which is false!

The prophecy was given in Daniel 9:27 and was quoted by the Lord in Matt.24:15, which means that this event had not yet taken place and was yet future. Then you have no fulfillment of the characteristics of those events mentioned in between the time that Jesus quoted Daniel up to the destruction of the temple. Since all scriptures must be fulfilled, then there must be a future temple, sacrifices and a setting up of an abomination.

Those events regarding the abomination of desolation is speaking a future fleeing from Jerusalem and Judea, which is mentioned in both Matt.24:15-22 and Revelation 12:6, 14. In the middle of the seven years, after the dragon/Satan and his angels are finally cast out of heaven, the dragon/Satan will pursue the woman/Israel, who will flee out into the wilderness where she will be cared for 1260 days, which is that last 3 1/2 years of that seven year period mentioned in Daniel 9:27. It is at the beginning of that last 3 1/2 years when the anichrist/beast/man of lawlessness, will set up that abomination which is what causes Israel to flee out into the wilderness. At the end of that 3 1/2 years is when the Lord returns to the earth to end the age and establish His millennial kingdom. This is another reason why Daniel 9:27 could not have already have taken place, because the seven years ends with Christ returning to the earth to end the age and regardless of what the Amills believe, that has not yet happened.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,116
3,973
113
mywebsite.us
The KJV does not use the Hebrew at all. it uses the Greek Translation called the Septuagint. So we know Daniel wrote in Hebrew/Aramaic. It only makes sense to use the Hebrew, not the Greek to Latin to English. so much is missed that way. And it's clearly obvious throughout this thread!
Totally incorrect!

The KJV was translated directly from the Hebrew/Aramaic (OT) and the [Koine] Greek (NT).

No latin. No Septuagint.
 
Jun 9, 2021
1,871
425
83
Which is false!

The prophecy was given in Daniel 9:27 and was quoted by the Lord in Matt.24:15, which means that this event had not yet taken place and was yet future. Then you have no fulfillment of the characteristics of those events mentioned in between the time that Jesus quoted Daniel up to the destruction of the temple. Since all scriptures must be fulfilled, then there must be a future temple, sacrifices and a setting up of an abomination.

Those events regarding the abomination of desolation is speaking a future fleeing from Jerusalem and Judea, which is mentioned in both Matt.24:15-22 and Revelation 12:6, 14. In the middle of the seven years, after the dragon/Satan and his angels are finally cast out of heaven, the dragon/Satan will pursue the woman/Israel, who will flee out into the wilderness where she will be cared for 1260 days, which is that last 3 1/2 years of that seven year period mentioned in Daniel 9:27. It is at the beginning of that last 3 1/2 years when the anichrist/beast/man of lawlessness, will set up that abomination which is what causes Israel to flee out into the wilderness. At the end of that 3 1/2 years is when the Lord returns to the earth to end the age and establish His millennial kingdom. This is another reason why Daniel 9:27 could not have already have taken place, because the seven years ends with Christ returning to the earth to end the age and regardless of what the Amills believe, that has not yet happened.
Christ Prophesied Daniel before his Death around 33 A.D.
70 A.D. is the FUTURE when Christ Prophesied!
 
Jun 9, 2021
1,871
425
83
Totally incorrect!

The KJV was translated directly from the Hebrew/Aramaic (OT) and the [Koine] Greek (NT).

No latin. No Septuagint.
People also ask


Did the King James translators use the Septuagint?


The KJV translators consulted original language printed texts for OT and NT; older English translations including Tyndale, Coverdale, Great, Geneva, Rheims, and the Latin Vulgate; as well as a version of the Septuagint for the Apocryphal books and many sections of the Old Testament.

^
NOTICE:
No mention of Hebrew but it claims it used Latin Vulgate and Septuagint!
 
Jun 9, 2021
1,871
425
83
Was the KJV translated from the Latin Vulgate?
Did the Latin Vulgate have influence on the KJV? Yes. The Geneva Bible was translated only from Hebrew OT and Greek NT in 1560

^
NOTICE:
Only Bible mentioned to use Hebrew is the Geneva Bible for its Old Testament!
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
More Jews TODAY are accepting Christ than Gentiles are!

The End of the Gentile Reign is long gone and over with!
God is going to deal with the unbelieving nation of Israel during the tribulation period as the fulfillment of that last seven years. During that last 3 1/2 years is when the antichrist will sit in the temple proclaiming himself to be God. So No! The times of the Gentiles is not over with!

If you believe that these things have already taken place, then When did the two witnesses bring plagues upon the earth for 3 1/2 years and were killed with their bodies left in the streets of Jerusalem and then resurrecting and ascending up into heaven after 3 1/2 days? When did this happen? The time of their prophecy takes place during the first 3 1/2 years of that seven year period. When did that happen? The answer is that it hasn't happened and it is a part of the events which take place during that seven years.

It also states that the beast will be given power over the saints on the earth during the great tribulation period to make war and conquer them. When did that happen? The answer is that it hasn't happened yet and is therefore still future.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,503
12,954
113
Did the King James translators use the Septuagint?
The King James Translators had access to everything listed, and then some. The Septuagint is a corrupted form of the Old Testament so even though they had access to it , it made no difference. They went directly to Jacob ben Chayyim's printed Great Rabbinic Bible( Mikra'ot Gedolot) based on the Masoretic Text.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,116
3,973
113
mywebsite.us
But I do believe in Future Events to come.
I just know from the literal Hebrew Tanakh, the Language which Daniel wrote in, he said the AoD was the End of Daily Sacrifice. The KJV would have us believing something else.
No it wouldn't. That is exactly what happened in 167 B.C.

AoD in Daniel 11 & 12 - not in 9.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,222
1,981
113
Christ Prophesied Daniel before his Death around 33 A.D.
70 A.D. is the FUTURE when Christ Prophesied!
But Jesus (in His Olivet Discourse) prophesied about both "near-future" [70ad] AND "far-future" [7-yr Trib & His "RETURN" to the earth] events, see (and NOT as "double-fulfillment" but AS DISTINCT!)
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
Christ Prophesied Daniel before his Death around 33 A.D.
70 A.D. is the FUTURE when Christ Prophesied!
True! However, you have no fulfillment of the events mentioned by Daniel and quoted by Jesus. There was no seven year covenant made with Israel and no abomination was set up. And since Jesus returns to the earth to end the age at the end of that seven years, then this is another reason why those events have not yet take place. I hope you're not going to tell me that Jesus has already returned to end the age when the temple was destroyed! All of these events must take place in order to have fulfillment, yet none of those events have been fulfilled.

All of these events and more will take place after the church has been gathered during the seven year period which follows.
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,222
1,981
113
AoD in Daniel 11 & 12 - not in 9.
Yes, but Dan11 is the A4E one (past, to us); the Dan12:11 is the far-future one, with the "DAYS" referred to in that verse ASSOCIATED with Daniel being told he WILL [FUTURE] "stand in thy lot" at the END of the "DAYS" being referred to!;) (that did NOT happen in 167bc, see ;) )
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,116
3,973
113
mywebsite.us
Yes, but Dan11 is the A4E one (past, to us); the Dan12:11 is the far-future one, with the "DAYS" referred to in that verse ASSOCIATED with Daniel being told he WILL [FUTURE] "stand in thy lot" at the END of the "DAYS" being referred to!;) (that did NOT happen in 167bc, see ;) )
No - the D12 mention is a reference to the D11 mention.

Only one AoD, according to prophecy.
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
Yes, but Dan11 is the A4E one (past, to us); the Dan12:11 is the far-future one, with the "DAYS" referred to in that verse ASSOCIATED with Daniel being told he WILL [FUTURE] "stand in thy lot" at the END of the "DAYS" being referred to!;) (that did NOT happen in 167bc, see ;) )
Agreed! Daniel 11 is in reference to the 2,300 days when Antiochus IV Epiphanes defiled the temple in 164 BC. While Daniel 9:27 is referring to the future event of the antichrist setting up an abomination in the holy place of the future temple.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I think you're thinking of something else because nowhere does Daniel claim it ends their sin, it only claims it ends their Daily Sacrifice.

I've googled, did a couple other search engines, biblehub, and a few other things like Strongs and Youngs Concordance and it states NOWHERE about ending their sins after 70 weeks.
yeah, end of transgression (sins) does not mean hat it says it does

come back tome when you learn to read with an open mind.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Tell me - do you believe that anyone living during the millennium will commit sin?

one sin

any sin

?
Context my friend context

daniel was praying about the sin f his people the sin that caused their punishment

it is THAT sin he is talking about,
 

Ahwatukee

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2015
11,159
2,373
113
I think you're thinking of something else because nowhere does Daniel claim it ends their sin, it only claims it ends their Daily Sacrifice.

I've googled, did a couple other search engines, biblehub, and a few other things like Strongs and Youngs Concordance and it states NOWHERE about ending their sins after 70 weeks.
Well, here ya go then:

"Seventy weeks (of years) are decreed for your people (Israel) and your holy city (Jerusalem) to stop their transgression, to put an end to sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy Place."
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
18,450
7,256
113
Well, here ya go then:

"Seventy weeks (of years) are decreed for your people (Israel) and your holy city (Jerusalem) to stop their transgression, to put an end to sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy Place."
Yes, furthermore to put an end to THE sin of rejecting their Messiah, which the entire nation will do at the yet future 70th week GT period per.....

Matt 23:37-39
Zech 12:10-14
Hos 5:15, 6:1,2

Somebody tell AandW (he is on ignore) that the entire nation Israel did not receive their Messiah Jesus at 70 A.D. Somebody tell GaryA too. And Dino.