How the Pre-Trib Rapture Became Popular in the Modern Church

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
Do you guys believe that Luke 21 is a parallel passage of the same Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24?
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
5,020
1,268
113
I just state the truth

You are trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill. You claim what happen in AD 70 has nothign to do with the olivet discourse. YOUR WRONG.
No, I'm not wrong. You're wrong.

The whole conversation was a continuing one. You deny that.
The facts are that Christ said all he had to say about the destruction of temple BEFORE they ever got to the mount. He was clearly done speaking of that since he never mentions temple one time during the Olivet Discourse.


And I say this because of all the conversations you and I have had not just this one. They all end the same way.
With you slinging Ad Hominems no doubt.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Do you guys believe that Luke 21 is a parallel passage of the same Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24?
Many believe they were on the mountain looking down at the temple. Even while they were walking until they found a spot to sit and talk.

Hence the whole conversation is the olivet discourse.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
No, I'm not wrong. You're wrong.



The facts are that Christ said all he had to say about the destruction of temple BEFORE they ever got to the mount. He was clearly done speaking of that since he never mentions temple one time during the Olivet Discourse.




With you slinging Ad Hominems no doubt.
WHEN WILL THESE THINGS BE

Thats verse 3 my friend

Plue even while they were walking, they were ON THE MOUNTAIN

He did not have to mention it, the DISCIPLES DID.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
The Destruction of Jerusalem
20 “But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then know that its desolation is near.21 Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those who are in the midst of her depart, and let not those who are in the country enter her. 22 For these are the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. 23 But woe to those who are pregnant and to those who are nursing babies in those days! For there will be great distress in the land and wrath upon this people. 24 And they will fall by the edge of the sword, and be led away captive into all nations. And Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.

This was fulfilled in 70 AD

the gentiles have been trampling jerusalem since then, and will continue to trample it until the return of Christ.
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
5,020
1,268
113
Many believe they were on the mountain looking down at the temple. Even while they were walking until they found a spot to sit and talk.

Hence the whole conversation is the olivet discourse.
Clearly not:

Mat 24:1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
Mat 24:2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

This was said right outside of temple Christ just exited. His disciples come to him at that same temple. This clearly happening at temple complex not on the mount. They still have to walk about an hour to reach the mount of Olives.
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
5,020
1,268
113
I answered this before as though ewq wrote it - "sorry" to both of you...
Nothing to apologize for. This is a public forum and anyone can answer or address anything posted.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Clearly not:

Mat 24:1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.
Mat 24:2 And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.

This was said right outside of temple Christ just exited. His disciples come to him at that same temple. This clearly happening at temple complex not on the mount. They still have to walk about an hour to reach the mount of Olives.
And you were there to know this?

Luke 21

5 Then, as some spoke of the temple, how it was adorned with beautiful stones and donations, He said, 6 “These things which you see—the days will come in which not one stone shall be left upon another that shall not be thrown down.”

7 So they asked Him, saying, “Teacher, but when will these things be? And what sign will there be when these things are about to take place?”
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
5,020
1,268
113
And you were there to know this?
Stop attacking me. None of us obviously were there. This is a non-valid question designed to haraass me.

The text is clear that Christ was at temple where his disciples came to meet him when he spoke about it. At mount of Olives Jesus did not mention temple one single time.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Stop attacking me. None of us obviously were there. This is a non-valid question designed to haraass me.

The text is clear that Christ was at temple where his disciples came to meet him when he spoke about it. At mount of Olives Jesus did not mention temple one single time.
No the text was not clear

it says they had left the temple. And as they were walking.

In Luke’s account of the same conversation. It appears it is all one conversation.

Either way, the destruction of jerusalem and the scattering of the jews happened in 70 AD. Along with the destruction of the temple. So Jesus DID answer their question about the temple
 

Yahshua

Senior Member
Sep 22, 2013
2,915
817
113
You guys type so fast. What are you using: computers or phones? This is me with replies

watson-typing-slow-gif.gif
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
5,020
1,268
113
it says they had left the temple. And as they were walking.
That's not what it says. It says Christ alone was exiting temple and disciples came to him. That's a meeting place right at temple. Christ gives a prophecy and then they will walk to mount as a group.

Mat 24:1 And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple.

Mat 24:3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?

On the mount they ask, "Tell us, when shall these things be?" Read carefully because Christ does not answer this question. He never says when anything takes place. He only answered about the signs of his coming and end of the word plus he gives signs that come prior to start of the Great Tribulation. He never says when any of this takes place, presumably based on something related to Mat_24:36 .
 

ewq1938

Well-known member
Oct 18, 2018
5,020
1,268
113
everytime you call me a liar you attack me

Don‘t tell me to stop talking to you and doing what you are doing to me.

I never called you a liar. You are the only one between us that did any Ad Hominem, personal attacking.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,834
4,320
113
mywebsite.us
Says the one who employs Ad Hominem as a discussion tactic. Lowering yourself down to this childish behavior means you have nothing valid to discuss here and have chosen to personally attack instead which is cowardly.
Both of you can be pretty hard-headed... :censored:

However, both of you have your good side, too! (y)

ewq - I agree with you that it would be reasonable to define the OD as the discourse on the mount

eg - I agree with you that there are things in the OD that have come to pass in history

I was just hoping we could all not have to watch y'all argue over this for the next 3-5 pages...

Perhaps y'all could agree to disagree?

The "peacemaker" will now kindly step out of what he probably should not have "stepped into" in the first place - and let-you-have-it...

Argue-away!

I will stay out of it.