were you a satanist?
Why did you leave Satanism? That should be a difficult thing to speak on one's testimony, is it?
This isn't my testimony, brother. Why don't you begin my testimony for me?
were you a satanist?
Why did you leave Satanism? That should be a difficult thing to speak on one's testimony, is it?
Brother, you need to calm down and stop utilising political psychology to judge me to hold to a snowflake ideology. I genuinely don't hold your concern in any more regard than recognising your right to express it. That is a matter between you and the Lord. It is your obedience and so praise the Lord. Just expect to have to give an account from the Lord - as I must do also.
No, brother, you are asking that I yield to yourself. I have already said plainly I won't do it. And for the record I have stated five times on this forum what my condition was when I was found by Christ in 1984. My profile is available for you or anyone to read along with the entirety of what I have posted. God bless.
first, off they are the only question you can answer and God knows.This isn't my testimony, brother. Why don't you begin my testimony for me?
so telling the truth is yielding to me? LOL. Here is what we know 1. you have said you were a satanist in post 476 of the "Tongues is a precious gift from God".
2. You have never publically stated why you were a Satanist.
3. You avoid the very question when asked
4. You have yet to provide one thread that is not critical of the church yet give the Occult a pass. Unless it is mocking and scoffing The gifts of the Holy Spirit.
Pondering Revival of the saints.
Your Historical accounts are leaving out the Druid influence in religion during that time, and even still today. IYour OP sounds familiar to Druid writings. That is why I asked what church group you belong to.
I have read several of your Threads, and what I find glaringly missing is:
The Holy Trinity
Jesus is fully God
The indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit
Salvation by grace through faith...........belief in Jesus as the Christ.
Spiritual enrichment and growth to become mature in Christ and the Gospel thus enabling us to be Sanctified believers
Jesus FULFILLED the Law of the 1st Covenant, rendering it waxed and passed away
Jesus established the New Law FAITH! Through the spilling of His precious blood which is the cleansing power that makes ALL WHO BELIEVE to become worthy to be called the Children of the Living God.
What I see from you are a lot of Historical muses that appear to mix Christian beliefs with worldly ideologies as if the two are one. Nothing could be further from the Truth IMO.....
Well you do like to change the boundaries around. First you ask me if I have ever been a Satanist and when I won't answer you - you quietly inflect a different meaning - and then when I say I have already given my condition when I was saved you then tell me that I have said that I was a Satanist @#476. Yet now you tell me that I have never stated publicly why I was a Satanist. Are we going to give glory to the enemy of our souls? Or to Christ? In the same thread @#539 I speak of having been an occult theosopher with satanic predications and finally, @#806 I also say that I was one time a satanist - only in that instance it was with a reference to the Hebrides - which is part of this post - only now it is in context of three well tested to and well documented revivals.
Take the dress off and put your pants back on, brother.
Well you do like to change the boundaries around. First you ask me if I have ever been a Satanist and when I won't answer you - you quietly inflect a different meaning - and then when I say I have already given my condition when I was saved you then tell me that I have said that I was a Satanist @#476. Yet now you tell me that I have never stated publicly why I was a Satanist. Are we going to give glory to the enemy of our souls? Or to Christ? In the same thread @#539 I speak of having been an occult theosopher with satanic predications and finally, @#806 I also say that I was one time a satanist - only in that instance it was with a reference to the Hebrides - which is part of this post - only now it is in context of three well tested to and well documented revivals.
Take the dress off and put your pants back on, brother.
You too should go back and read their OP and without bias. Especially that which may be inclined to accepting another's poor judgment of the OP content.what I find strange about this post is how the subtle dismissal of revival and blame on the church for places that suffered after experiencing "revival".
Here are some things that jumped out and are not fully true.
- Revival is a term that many saints hold to, to look for an answer to their own lives,
- how that way of looking at recovery is either helpful or else entirely accurate if we believe that revival is a panacea for the saints and society.
- When we examine the lives of the past saints after revival and restoration – also how society was changed after improvement
- We must be honest, and we must look. It is essential that when we do this, we also realise that the revivals that we can examine do not speak of the condition of today.
There is much more, this is more than enough. The attack on Revival in this thread doesn't look at the cause and effects of two things that the word of God shows as normative from Genesis to Revelation.
1. God always responds to repentance and humbleness
2. People forget the move of God and sin seen over and over again in the word of God
3. people turn a move of God into a movement instead of following God and HIS moving.
The reason revival is so important is because it is an acknowledgment of God who is making dead people alive again.
Jesus said in Luke chapter 4:18-19
18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,
19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
This is revival. Everywhere Jesus went HE revived people as HE does today through the Gospel message and the Holy Spirit.
Jesus said mARK 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.
Revival is a move of God from a Christian perspective. What it seems like to me is revisionist casting blame on the church for a lost and fallen world because places, where God moved, can be and do become dead.
Your Historical accounts are leaving out the Druid influence in religion during that time, and even still today. IYour OP sounds familiar to Druid writings. That is why I asked what church group you belong to.
I have read several of your Threads, and what I find glaringly missing is:
The Holy Trinity
Jesus is fully God
The indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit
Salvation by grace through faith...........belief in Jesus as the Christ.
Spiritual enrichment and growth to become mature in Christ and the Gospel thus enabling us to be Sanctified believers
Jesus FULFILLED the Law of the 1st Covenant, rendering it waxed and passed away
Jesus established the New Law FAITH! Through the spilling of His precious blood which is the cleansing power that makes ALL WHO BELIEVE to become worthy to be called the Children of the Living God.
What I see from you are a lot of Historical muses that appear to mix Christian beliefs with worldly ideologies as if the two are one. Nothing could be further from the Truth IMO.....
that is your opinion which is no more true than mine. I have laid it out from the very first post. You can make assertions too, I care less.You too should go back and read their OP and without bias. Especially that which may be inclined to accepting another's poor judgment of the OP content.
This is what limits the church. People have an attitude that coincides with their personal belief as to what the Gospel means to them and them alone.
And this even overshadows the actual scriptures in the Bible.
And when someone comes along that is more learned, or shows a different perspective on, in this case Revival, the limited one's assail what they first believe is being challenged in their personal set of beliefs because they didn't fairly and with open hearts read what was in this case offered in the OP.
There is no way someone can read the OP and make the claims that are coming against it by you and some other here if, if you had released your personal prejudices and read it with an open heart.
Here's a thought some don't like to consider. YOU could be wrong.
When ego and pride refuse to see that, such afflicted folk shall never see through a clear lens what is brought for correction and for our own good.
first off if our opinion is skewered so is yours. I take you are not agreeing with the Trinity Concept? The very fact the person will not be clear why they left Satanism or why they became a satanist IS not a hard thing to answer.Your opinion is skewered. Our God is one. If you feel obligated to ignore people that know that you'll never truly read people who know more than you do.
As to the druid and pagan influences? How would you know those things in order to claim to identify them in someone's writings? And then presume to take issue because those things in your judgment appear in their writings?
As to the other member who focuses on "Satanism", they need reminding. Whomever my brother was formerly is now dead and no longer relevant when they found Christ.
first off if our opinion is skewered so is yours. I take you are not agreeing with the Trinity Concept? The very fact the person will not be clear why they left Satanism or why they became a satanist IS not a hard thing to answer.
That's not true or you wouldn't have cared to make your posting condemning my opinion.that is your opinion which is no more true than mine. I have laid it out from the very first post. You can make assertions too, I care less.
You were a fan of Pee Wee Herman weren't you? "I know I am but what are you?"first off if our opinion is skewered so is yours. I take you are not agreeing with the Trinity Concept? The very fact the person will not be clear why they left Satanism or why they became a satanist IS not a hard thing to answer.
I never mentioned Oness, you did. what a joke. And I'm sure he can speak for himself. Please you and I are done. If telling why you left a former belief system is too hard for you. I will accept it is none of my business but don't go and give a long-drawn-out allegorical essay. Yes I know I am not mature, blah blah blah. Fine.Ay, but I didn't express any opinions other than where it was a matter of personal opinion. But you say I should have spoken of myself. And you now say that the brother is a Oneness Pentecostal. I'll bet he will be roaring with laughter at that. Father, Son and Holy Spirit, One God indivisible in three persons. Stop looking for bogey men evangelist.
You were a fan of Pee Wee Herman weren't you? "I know I am but what are you?"
Your opinion is skewered. Mine just brought that to your attention. That doesn't make it wrong. That makes me observant and candid.
You don't know the basics about our faith.
Let me assist you. The old is done away, behold the new has come.
Whoever you were before you say you came to Christ no longer exists nor matters. If you accept that then you can in no wise claim it doesn't apply to other Christians.
No one has to meet your demands to revive the dead to your satisfaction!
Further, and lastly, Jesus Christ never taught the trinity! And God himself in the Old Testament tells you he is one and beside him there is no Savior. If you use that God given truth and go to the New Testament you'll read God's angel sent unto Mary told her when she delivered her son, begat upon her by God himself, she was to name him Emmanuel. Meaning, GOD WITH us!
When God is in all that he has created, all things are of and from God, it is PAGANISM to insist there is one God appearing in three persons. Because that is not Biblical! And God himself proves that.
If you can't get past your obsession with our brothers past life that is no longer relevant under Christ's grace, that's your issue! It isn't of God nor the Gospel.
And I'd recommend to my brother in Christ @Rhomphaeam ,don't let such a 1 vex you further. They're not interested in learning what you have to share. They're limited in their understanding. It is up to God to open their heart and mind. It is not, clearly, anything we are able to achieve.
Not only are you immature you're woefully ignorant of what it means to be reborn in Christ.I never mentioned Oness, you did. what a joke. And I'm sure he can speak for himself. Please you and I are done. If telling why you left a former belief system is too hard for you. I will accept it is none of my business but don't go and give a long-drawn-out allegorical essay. Yes I know I am not mature, blah blah blah. Fine.
That's not true or you wouldn't have cared to make your posting condemning my opinion.
Here's a thought for you and the other one to consider. Ready? If you don't agree with someone'sApologetic,apologetics why not move on? That's the mature thing to do.
And the excuse, "we're to address false doctrine!" , doesn't wash when you can't prove someone's teaching is false when you take it personally and go after the brother personally.
There are some things you don't know about the Bible and the message. Same with me. Be open to learning something rather than deeply and beratingly oppose . Because that doesn't prove you're pov is right. This goes for PR as well.
Rather, it proves you're not mature, Nor open to the leading of God's indwelling spirit in order to stay quiet and learn something that you might consider our Lord has intended to your attention. Because it is something you don't know.