Religious bigots and your understanding

[VARob]

The Revised Standard Version, Catholic Edition (RSV-CE) is a Bible translation approved for use by the Catholic Church

How is that relevant? The RSV is not the REV.

You need to be more careful in digging for your dirt.

 

[Lanolin]

Can you all just stick to one Bible translation
Then it wouldnt be confusing.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

How is that relevant? The RSV is not the REV.

You need to be more careful in digging for your dirt.

Catholics

[T]he Revised Standard Version of 1946–1957 was becoming established and, in 1966, was accepted by Catholics

 

[VARob]

Catholics

[T]he Revised Standard Version of 1946–1957 was becoming established and, in 1966, was accepted by Catholics

Again, how is that relevant?

 

[Lanolin]

Just pick ONE and stick to it please.

KJV, REV, NIV, CEV whatever just choose ONE

so we can follow

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

it says the revised english version is a Catholic Bible

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

it says both Catholic and Episcopals.

any Episcopals using the Revised English Bible?

 

[VARob]

it says the revised english version is a Catholic Bible

It says the Revised STANDARD Version is a Catholic Bible.

You are confusing the Revised Standard Version (RSV) with the Revised English Version (REV).

They are two different translations.

 

[Lanolin]

yea RSV is not the same as REV

You can go online and see they are different. But if you going to discuss or argue something from scripture how bout you both use the same translation?

Simple?

 

[VARob]

it says both Catholic and Episcopals.

any Episcopals using the Revised English Bible?

...and the Revised English Bible (REB) is yet ANOTHER translation.

Please try and pay attention to things.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

ok, so, of every Bible out there that has basically the SAME TRANSLATION, you choose the 2 that changes Verse 13?

 

[Lanolin]

How bout you both use the KJV and stick to it.

 

[VARob]

yea RSV is not the same as REV

You can go online and see they are different. But if you going to discuss or argue something from scripture how bout you both use the same translation?

Simple?

I'm willing to use the KJV.

Lets see if The_Watcher can figure things out...

 

[Lanolin]

is should be easy and KJV is widely available online and in print format.

 

[Lanolin]

Im waiting to see how this goes...I will come back and see if you both come to the same conclusion when you use the same translation.

 

[VARob]

ok, so, of every Bible out there that has basically the SAME TRANSLATION, you choose the 2 that changes Verse 13?

Watcher, there is a LOT more to this than one verse, especially if the verse can be translated in different ways. Don't build a theology on one verse.

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

search revised English Version: it says it's a part of REB and the other i listed.

so, if it's part of those Bibles why say it's not?

 

[The_Watchers_2017]

Watcher, there is a LOT more to this than one verse, especially if the verse can be translated in different ways. Don't build a theology on one verse.

this is the Verse that is being debated, is why.

if 100 translations has it one way but a lone wolf has it another way, why would YOU CHOOSE the one that is different?

 

[VARob]

search revised English Version: it says it's a part of REB and the other i listed.

so, if it's part of those Bibles why say it's not?

The REV is not associated with the REB or the RSV in any way.

You need to PAY ATTENTION to the words you read. You're shooting from the hip, shotgun style.

 

[VARob]

this is the Verse that is being debated, is why.

if 100 translations has it one way but a lone wolf has it another way, why would YOU CHOOSE the one that is different?

It has to fit with the rest of scripture.