Works Complete Faith?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
^ What are you talking about?

"those who are perishing" is also speaking of "PLURALS" (and also "present tense" and here in the "middle voice" [not "passive" like the other]). It's not saying, suddenly they "are perishing" now at this moment (as if, suddenly falling into hell ATM).




But this still doesn't make the texts to be conveying something about "you [individual] BEING SAVED" (as an "ongoing PROCESS")... They simply do not say this, despite your insistence that they do. (Reading too many "books" can get us all confuddled!! lol)
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
^ What are you talking about?

"those who are perishing" is also speaking of "PLURALS" (and also "present tense" and here in the "middle voice" [not "passive" like the other]). It's not saying, suddenly they "are perishing" now at this moment (as if, suddenly falling into hell ATM).
Thanks for recapitulating my point.

But this still doesn't make the texts to be conveying something about "you [individual] BEING SAVED"... They simply do not say this, despite your insistence that they do. (Reading too many "books" can get us all confuddled!! lol)
It is referring to a group of individuals described as "being saved". Yes."
I, an individual believing the Gospel, qualify as part of the group "being saved".
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
Spot on analysis.

2Co 13:5
Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?

You do recognize that you are in fact saved, my apostleship is therefore fruit-bearing and legitimate.
Right! (y)



This is the point of Paul's argument...



... which many people miss (and thus mis-apply by reading something INTO it which is not there... and not at all the point he is conveying here in this text and context)
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
^ What are you talking about?

"those who are perishing" is also speaking of "PLURALS" (and also "present tense" and here in the "middle voice" [not "passive" like the other]). It's not saying, suddenly they "are perishing" now at this moment (as if, suddenly falling into hell ATM).




But this still doesn't make the texts to be conveying something about "you [individual] BEING SAVED" (as an "ongoing PROCESS")... They simply do not say this, despite your insistence that they do. (Reading too many "books" can get us all confuddled!! lol)
Thanks for recapitulating my point.


It is referring to a group of individuals described as "being saved". Yes."
I, an individual believing the Gospel, qualify as part of the group "being saved".
Put it this way: there is a group on a ship that is going somewhere.
I am on that ship. I am part of the group on a ship going somewhere.

There is no issue with me understanding I am an individual of that group "being saved".
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Right! (y)



This is the point of Paul's argument...



... which many people miss (and thus mis-apply by reading something INTO it which is not there... and not at all the point he is conveying here in this text and context)
Anyway, isn't this an attempt to debunk what I've asserted about justification--we were justified, but there is ongoing judgment and justification/condemnation, and a final judgment and justification/condemnation?

Why not deal with the issue directly? I've posted a lot on that.
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Irrespective the fact most who have interacted with me here, today, have disagreed, the conversations have been very edifying for me.
Thank you!
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
Why does Paul instruct us "rebuke, reprove" Christians? Because Christians repent without intervention ?
Wait a sec... are these folks being / to be "rebuked / reproved" actually "Christians" at this point? I mean, according to you, they've forfeited their salvation (because they obviously "sinned")... so why are you saying that these are "CHRISTIANS" who need "rebuked / reproved," because by your own explanations (in this thread), they can't actually be called "Christians" any more, at this point.


Do you really mean to be saying what you say here (in quote at top)?? :unsure:

:whistle:

:sneaky:

:rolleyes:

:cautious:


[... confuddled, alright, I say...]
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
Wait a sec... are these folks being / to be "rebuked / reproved" actually "Christians" at this point? I mean, according to you, they've forfeited their salvation (because they obviously "sinned")... so why are you saying that these are "CHRISTIANS" who need "rebuked / reproved," because by your own explanations (in this thread), they can't actually be called "Christians" any more, at this point.


Do you really mean to be saying what you say here (in quote at top)?? :unsure:

:whistle:

:sneaky:

:rolleyes:

:cautious:


[... confuddled, alright, I say...]
1. You've (intentionally?) misread/misrepresented me. Obviously, I don't think, "A single sin, and you're no longer a Christian!"

2. You might be trying to be "smart", but you're not doing a bang up job. Are you also denying Christians are sometimes in need of being told "repent"? That they don't always automatically repent!? You must be disagreeing with such a basic truth just because it's coming from someone with whom you have disagreed. Don't show partiality like that. If I said "Jesus is Lord" would you disagree with that too just because it came from me?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
^ in response to your post #509, I'll answer with your own words:

"Is he condemned for his "sin" or not?"

[Romans 14:23--in which verse, you mean, "condemned by God"]







Romans 14 - 22The faith that you have, keep to yourself before God. Blessed is the one not judging himself in what he approves. 23But the one doubting has been condemned if he eats, because it is not of faith; and anything that is not of faith is sin.e
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
^ in response to your post #509, I'll answer with your own words:

"Is he condemned for his "sin" or not?"

[Romans 14:23--in which verse, you mean, "condemned by God"]







Romans 14 - 22The faith that you have, keep to yourself before God. Blessed is the one not judging himself in what he approves. 23But the one doubting has been condemned if he eats, because it is not of faith; and anything that is not of faith is sin.e
Uh... He is a Christian who has sinned and whom God therefore righteously condemns.

How is it that you find ways to see mutual exclusivities where they don't exist?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
^ the text says, "IF HE EATS" (the minute he eats, he has "sinned"--he has committed this "sin")
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,113
113
^ So what you are now saying, is... that once a believer commits a "sin" they are immediately "condemned" by God (thus forfeiting salvation).








It seems to me as if you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

Which is it? (in your view)
 
Sep 23, 2023
847
76
28
^ So what you are now saying, is... that once a believer commits a "sin" they are immediately "condemned" by God (thus forfeiting salvation).








It seems to me as if you are speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

Which is it? (in your view)
I haven't changed!
The Christian who sins affects his standing negatively, and he may acknowledge his sin and repent and be forgiven!
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,475
13,419
113
58
1. Except that Romans 2 judgment can result in being "repaid... eternal life", and it is based on works (and Gentile believers are cited as examples of men who are "doers of the law" and will be "repaid... eternal life"), which is contrary to your theology.
Although scripture clearly teaches that obtaining salvation is not on the basis of works (Romans 4:2-6; 11:6; Ephesians 2:8,9; Galatians 2:16; Philippians 3:9; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9 etc..) God's judgment is on the basis of man's deeds whether good or bad. (John 5:28-29; Romans 2:5-11; 1 Corinthians 3:8; 2 Corinthians 5:10 etc..). In Romans 2:5-11, Paul describes the deeds of two distinct groups: the redeemed/everyone who does good and the unredeemed/everyone who does evil.

We reap what we sow, yet salvation is a gift received by grace through faith and not by works. (Ephesians 2:8,9) In Romans 4:4-6, we read - Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works. Those who teach salvation by works typically confuse 'descriptive' passages of scripture with 'prescriptive' passages of scripture. The natural man cannot understand. (1 Corinthians 2:14)

In regard to "doers of the law" in Romans 2, context is important. Paul was talking to the Jews (Romans 2:17-24) about their judging of the Gentiles and then points them to their own law (standard of judgment) and hypocrisy and tells them that the doers of the law will be justified before God (v. 13). That leaves them out, along with everyone else. (Romans 3:22-28; Galatians 2:16; Philippians 3:9) The standard they wanted to measure up to was the law. Paul was telling them that the doers of the law will be justified. So, obey the law, obey all of it, but if you don’t obey all of it, you failed! He tells them that the Gentiles who didn't have the law according to the knowledge of the Jews were instinctively doing the things of the law (verse 14) and will be judged accordingly. How much more so the Jews?

Paul was showing the self-righteous Jews who judged the Gentiles that they were not able to measure up to the perfect standard of the law. They were hypocrites. This is why Paul tells us in the very next chapter in Romans 3:28 that we are justified by faith apart from the works of the law. *No one was able to perfectly obey the law (except for Jesus Christ). If you fail even once (stumble in one point), then you become guilty of all. James 2:10, "For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles in one point, he has become guilty of all."

Galatians 3:10, For as many as are of the works of the law are under a curse; for it is written, "Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them." The Jews can be justified before God by keeping the Law, but he or she has to be 100% perfect. A person can’t fail even once--ever. But all have failed (Ecclesiastes 7:20; Romans 3:23; 6:23; 1 John 1:8-10), that is why man is justified before God by faith and not by the works of the law. (Romans 3:22-28, Galatians 2:16; Philippians 3:9 etc..)

"2. The Galatians lost their foundation (Gal 5:4).
That is speculative at best. The present tense of the word "justified" implies that these Galatians were contemplating justification by the law. They were getting side tracked by legalistic teachers. "You who are trying to be justified by the law have fallen away from grace," but had they fully come to that place yet? Galatians 3:3 reads: Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh? The middle voice implies "making yourselves perfect" by means of self effort. The present tense indicates that the action is in progress and that there is still time to correct the error.

If these Galatians lost their salvation and it was a done deal, then why didn't Paul simply say you "lost your salvation" and I'm done with you? Instead, in verse 10, he said - I have confidence in you, in the Lord, that you will have no other mind; but he who troubles you shall bear his judgment, whoever he is. Why would Paul have confidence in these Galatians if they lost their salvation and it's all over for them? In verse 12, Paul uses hyperbole, As for those agitators, I wish they would go the whole way and emasculate themselves!

Paul tells the Corinthians to "test yourselves see if you are in the faith".
I don't grant the foundation is immovable.
There are too many verses to the contrary.
2 Timothy 2:19 - the solid foundation of God stands, having this seal: “The Lord knows those who are His,” and, “Let everyone who names the name of Christ depart from iniquity.” Those who believe the gospel are sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, who is the guarantee of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, to the praise of His glory. (Ephesians 1:13-14) Movable foundations are based on the wrong foundation. Namely, works righteousness instead of Christ.

In regard to 2 Corinthians 13:5, for those who demanded proof that Christ was speaking through Paul, he turned their challenge around and asked them to test themselves to see whether they are in the faith. Paul trusts that they will discover that we have not failed the test. Sadly though, there are genuine Christians and there are "nominal" Christians. There are genuine believers and there are make believers mixed together throughout various churches and on various Christian forum sites.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,475
13,419
113
58
The opposite is also true: honing in on, and reading "justified by faith" in a vacuum makes you guys deny everything else Scripture teaches on the subject. You aren't even curious. I guess it's just a grace from God to be curious when someone sees their current understanding doesn't agree with all of Scripture.
I don't deny everything else scripture teaches on the subject and I properly harmonize scripture with scripture before reaching my conclusion on doctrine, just as I did for example with Romans 4:2-6 and James 2:14-26 in multiple posts.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,475
13,419
113
58
"I can't actually make a dent in the things he says using logic and reason, so I'll go ahead and attack his name instead."

You guys are bad examples.
I was speaking in general. I said we need to always watch out for "such folks" (in general). I did not spell out any specific names. You sound very defensive and sensitive. Your arguments are not irrefutable. You also sound puffed up.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
22,993
8,368
113
I haven't changed!
The Christian who sins affects his standing negatively, and he may acknowledge his sin and repent and be forgiven!
A negative standing in terms of salvation? As in condemned? He "lost it"? Again? And if he does not repent, then the state of condemnation persists until further notice? Three strikes and you are out?

BTW I would be very careful when brandishing that "condemnation" term that you hurl around with such abandon.
If in fact you even understand what it actually means.

1Ti 3:6
Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.
Tit 3:10
A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject;
Tit 3:11
Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.