Mike Winger's "Why I think Calvinism is Unbiblical"

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,163
2,177
113
It just occurred to me exactly why the explative, "G-d-mn-e"
the real question that needs to eb asked is whether this faith/belief that saves a person comes from within man or is granted to man as a gift as seen in the verses below?

Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,

Php 1:29 For to you it has been granted on behalf of Christ, not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for His sake,

Act 18:27 And when he desired to cross to Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him; and when he arrived, he greatly helped those who had believed through grace;
this has been gone over... what's the term?... oh yea, ad nauseum.
 

maxamir

Active member
Mar 8, 2024
696
86
28
Okay then, do you agree that unless you are a true Calvinist, you are cursed?
only by the definition of Calvinism as being the biblical doctrine of salvation belonging to the Lord and not to the choice of men. I do not follow Calvin I follow Christ but am prepared to wear any label thrown at me if it is biblical.

1716171401311.jpeg
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,163
2,177
113
Unfortunately, faith and belief, are the same word in the Koine Greek, pistis.

It may not be possible to apply two different translations to pistis.
This only makes me wonder why the translators felt the need to use different words for the same Greek. :unsure:
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,163
2,177
113
It just occurred to me exactly why the explative, "G-d-mn-e"
this has been gone over... what's the term?... oh yea, ad nauseum.
I wondered where the post went that I originally began to formulate and now I see I attached my reply to maximir to it... my apologies for any confusion this might have caused :oops:
 

maxamir

Active member
Mar 8, 2024
696
86
28
It just occurred to me exactly why the explative, "G-d-mn-e"
this has been gone over... what's the term?... oh yea, ad nauseum.
if you choose to not answer the question or are unable to do so then I pray the Lord will humble you to see His truth according to His will.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,163
2,177
113
if you choose to not answer the question or are unable to do so then I pray the Lord will humble you to see His truth according to His will.
the proud Calvinists in hell, would have been revealed as false Calvinist? yes?
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,163
2,177
113
Anyway, as I started to share a thought that occurred to me but I'm not sure this is the right place in order to keep it relevant to the topic...
but on further thought, it is relevant...
If I had not known up until now exactly why it occurred to me exactly why saying anything like, "g*d--mned such and such" would be offensive toward God where it might not seem that it should be if indeed God had damned any such and such.

would it be more 'politically' (my repertoire in vocabulary has great needs) correct to fight against these erroneous expletives by expressing such thought as, "no, but bob- (or Joe or Sue) damned it." That is, self-damned people.
 
N

NEWTOCHRISTIANITY

Guest
I'm sorry, but having done some more research on Calvinism, on the Internet, I must say that Calvinism does sound rather Unbiblical!
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,479
455
83
No idea where you got that idea. It's not accurate. 99% of the arguments against reformed doctrine (which I prefer to call it) are Strawmen.
You got that backwards. 99% of Calvinist/reformed/Doctrines of grace arguments against non-calvinist theologies are strawmen.
 

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,163
2,177
113
the real question that needs to eb asked is whether this faith/belief that saves a person comes from within man or is granted to man as a gift as seen in the verses below?

Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,

Php 1:29 For to you it has been granted on behalf of Christ, not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for His sake,

Act 18:27 And when he desired to cross to Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him; and when he arrived, he greatly helped those who had believed through grace;
Okay, even though you offered psuedo-answers to my question, which you here escape by implying it was a fake question, which is somewhat insulting to me, I'll answer your 'real' question... because I believe the truth is worth repeating.

re: Eph 2:*
Firstly, I've been saved by grace, in which a gift is characteristically given. Nobody ever says of anyone, "he graciously allowed me to pay for my meal."
Secondly, that is through this, faith. And that is, that I have been saved, and that not of myself; it is the gift of God.

re: Php 1:29 is letting believers know that suffering with Him will accompany believing in Him and this is granted on behalf of Christ as much as your righteousness is also granted on His behalf, as Abraham's righteousness is, through faith.

re: Act 18:27 those who had believed through grace, are seen as those who believed in the grace of God that would go as far as to extend salvation to them through faith in Christ.
 

selahsays

Well-known member
May 31, 2023
2,796
1,484
113
then please prove by using the Bible that what Calvin said was unbiblical. Failure to do so will and correct those you believe are in error will prove that the love of God is not yet in you (1 Jn 3:17).
Hello. I don’t believe in unconditional election. I believe it’s conditional.

For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.

- Romans 8:29
 

selahsays

Well-known member
May 31, 2023
2,796
1,484
113
I also don’t believe in limited atonement.

"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. "For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

- John 3:16-17
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
17,131
3,689
113
Hello. I don’t believe in unconditional election. I believe it’s conditional.

For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.

- Romans 8:29
Who does God foreknow? At what point does God "know" a man?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,044
8,376
113
the real question that needs to eb asked is whether this faith/belief that saves a person comes from within man or is granted to man as a gift as seen in the verses below?

Eph 2:8 For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,

Php 1:29 For to you it has been granted on behalf of Christ, not only to believe in Him, but also to suffer for His sake,

Act 18:27 And when he desired to cross to Achaia, the brethren wrote, exhorting the disciples to receive him; and when he arrived, he greatly helped those who had believed through grace;
Right. Everyone who:

-responds in repentance to the call of the Lord
-and everyone who asks
-and everyone who is thirsty and drinks freely
-and everyone who calls on the Name of the Lord
-and everyone who picks up their axe head

is appointed to the gift of salvation and gift of saving faith through the gift of grace.
Because God is omnibenevolent, good, always good and gives good gifts even to the undeserving and unjust and unbelieving.

Mat 5:44
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Mat 5:45
That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

Rom 5:10
For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

Just to let you know, your perception of time, your perception of cause and effect, your perception of sequence and motion as regards events.....

Does not necessarily apply to the Lord God Who is outside of time and created time.
 

NightTwister

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2023
2,105
793
113
65
Colorado, USA
You got that backwards. 99% of Calvinist/reformed/Doctrines of grace arguments against non-calvinist theologies are strawmen.
The first rule of debate is to restart your opponents argument in your own words and ask "Is that correct?" Your failure to do that is on you, not us.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,479
455
83
The first rule of debate is to restart your opponents argument in your own words and ask "Is that correct?" Your failure to do that is on you, not us.
Where is that rule of debate in the Bible, Mr. Sola Scriptura. Or where is that rule of debate anywhere stated.

This is what comes up when I Google "What is the first rule of debate?"

He who asserts must prove. In order to establish an assertion, the team must support it with enough evidence and logic to convince an intelligent but previously uninformed person that it is more reasonable to believe the assertion than to disbelieve it. Facts must be accurate. So, what you asserted, can you prove?

NightTwister said:
No idea where you got that idea. It's not accurate. 99% of the arguments against reformed doctrine (which I prefer to call it) are Strawmen.