Total Depravity

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,474
455
83
Certainly the love of God constrains us and propels us in this life, and probably the next. But I was thinking more of the love that brings salvation, and not sanctification.
In Jude, some come as a result of fear. God knows how to draw perfectly.
Sanctification is a part of what salvation entails. If you are thinking salvation is merely getting an unsolicited "Get out of hell free" card via unilateral regeneration, your understanding of the biblical use of salvation and its cognates is greatly stunted.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,474
455
83
But, nine times before the cock crowed?
If someone makes a new years resolution to give up chocolate for the year, and I say to them,
"You will eat your way through 200 grams of chocolate before Jan 14, what am I actually, communicating to them? And if they eat 500 grams of chocolate before Jan 14, was I wrong in my prediction?
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
19,206
6,608
113
62
Sanctification is a part of what salvation entails. If you are thinking salvation is merely getting an unsolicited "Get out of hell free" card via unilateral regeneration, your understanding of the biblical use of salvation and its cognates is greatly stunted.
So, taking a singular post with a directed answer about an aspect of salvation is evidence of biblical stuntedness? I reckon by that standard your understanding of salvation is equally stunted.
 
Mar 23, 2016
7,021
1,673
113
if God wants to predict an event he can use His omnipotence to make it make a certain thing happen, but unless He uses His omniootence to intervene and cause events then they are uncertain probabilities. And the only way God cpuld know all future evenys is if He is using His omnipotence to conform all events to a programmed plan, which eould make God the cause/origin of all evil. I don't believe God is that.
omnipotence is the quality of having unlimited power.
omniscience is the capacity to know everything.

God is omnipotent and God is omniscient.

God knowing that evil will occur is not the same as God doing the evil He knows will occur. God allows the evil within certain parameters He determines. Job is an example. Did God cause the evil which came on Job? No ... Scripture makes clear that satan was the cause. Did God limit satan's ability in bringing evil upon Job? Yes ... Scripture makes clear that satan was limited (Job 1:12). Job never blamed God for the evil that came upon him ... In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly (Job 1:22).


When the Lord Jesus Christ was born, magi came from the east to honor the King of the Jews. The magi visited Herod the king and asked where they could find Him that is born the King of the Jews. Herod sent the magi to Bethlehem after he questioned them about the timing of their having seen signs in the heavens. Herod also requested that the magi come back and give him information about Jesus. The magi brought their gifts to Jesus and went back home without returning to Herod because God had warned them in a dream that they should not return to Herod (Matt 2:12).

After the magi left, God warned Joseph to flee to Egypt because Herod would seek to kill Jesus (Matt 2:13).

Herod waited for the magi and when they did not return, Herod slew all the children in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men. When God warned Joseph to flee to Egypt so Herod could not kill Jesus, this was fulfillment of prophecy (Matt 2:15).

God warned the magi not to return to Herod ... God warned Joseph to flee to Egypt ... these warnings were given because God in His omniscience knew what Herod was going to do. That does not mean God caused Herod to seek to slay Jesus ... nor does it mean God caused Herod to slay all the children. God did spare Jesus ... but God not sparing the children in Bethlehem and surrounding areas did not equal God having killed those children. Herod killed the children ... and, according to Matt 2:17-18, this was fulfillment of prophecy.




PaulThomson said:
God can declare an end from a beginning amd make that end happen
But that is a long way from the claim that God declares all ends from all beginnings, which would make all evil God's intention for creation.
your conclusion is incorrect, PaulThomson. God knowing evil will occur is not the same as God causing the evil.

as Genez stated: "He is the Originator of what produces those evils. But, not evil itself."

God knew I would be born ... God knew I would sin ... does that equal God causing me to sin? No. I am solely responsible (and guilty) for my own sin.

God, in His great grace, mercy, and lovingkindness did not judge me right on the spot the first time I sinned – which should have resulted in my condemnation to death (and rightly so).

God reaches out to mankind and gives each person his or her lifetime to respond to times of His reaching out. God always makes the first move in reaching out to mankind and God has determined that He will reach out to mankind through the preaching of the gospel ... those who believe will reap the blessing of having trusted God and believing Him ... those who do not believe will reap the consequence of not having trusted God and not believing Him.
.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
2,931
419
83
If someone makes a new years resolution to give up chocolate for the year, and I say to them,
"You will eat your way through 200 grams of chocolate before Jan 14, what am I actually, communicating to them? And if they eat 500 grams of chocolate before Jan 14, was I wrong in my prediction?
God always knew you would choose to say that.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,474
455
83
omnipotence is the quality of having unlimited power.
omniscience is the capacity to know everything.
Does God know how much the Ring of Power weighs? Does God know how tall the person was who forged it? Does God know how many litres of water will exist on Dune?

God is omnipotent and God is omniscient.
I agree. God knows everything that is real as it truly is.

God knowing that evil will occur is not the same as God doing the evil He knows will occur.


Ironically, this statement relies on ascribing to God a knowledge that is the same kind as human knowledge: something I have been accused of doing and have been told is unwarranted. I am told that because God is a different order of being, we should not ascribe to Him a human kind of knowing: which would be in this case one that does not cause the thing known to be so.

God allows the evil within certain parameters He determines. Job is an example. Did God cause the evil which came on Job? No ... Scripture makes clear that satan was the cause. Did God limit satan's ability in bringing evil upon Job? Yes ... Scripture makes clear that satan was limited (Job 1:12).
We agree on this.

Job never blamed God for the evil that came upon him ... In all this Job sinned not, nor charged God foolishly (Job 1:22).
Job had not sinned or charged God foolishly... yet. But hey, it's only Chapter 1. But as the book proceeds,Job does not fare so well.
Job accuses God of attacking him with terrifying violence (16:9–14) for no reason (9:17). Job names God an amoral tyrant who destroys everyone regardless of moral character (9:22), who laughs at good people when they suffer disaster (v. 23), and deliberately frustrates the execution of justice in the world (v. 24; see further 12:13–25). In Job’s horrifying new vision of the universe, God is a moral monster, and his creation a kind of inner city ghetto, filled with the unanswered screams of the innocent (21:7–34). (This list I have lifted from https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/how-did-job-speak-rightly-about-god/#:~:text=Much in contrast, Job accuses,when they suffer disaster (v.


Job did speak rightly in finally confessing that he was in the wrong to accuse God ignorantly. But he certainly wasn't in the right throughout the book.

When the Lord Jesus Christ was born, magi came from the east to honor the King of the Jews. The magi visited Herod the king and asked where they could find Him that is born the King of the Jews. Herod sent the magi to Bethlehem after he questioned them about the timing of their having seen signs in the heavens. Herod also requested that the magi come back and give him information about Jesus. The magi brought their gifts to Jesus and went back home without returning to Herod because God had warned them in a dream that they should not return to Herod (Matt 2:12).
After the magi left, God warned Joseph to flee to Egypt because Herod would seek to kill Jesus (Matt 2:13).

Herod waited for the magi and when they did not return, Herod slew all the children in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men. When God warned Joseph to flee to Egypt so Herod could not kill Jesus, this was fulfillment of prophecy (Matt 2:15).

God warned the magi not to return to Herod ... God warned Joseph to flee to Egypt ... these warnings were given because God in His omniscience knew what Herod was going to do.
God could easily have known what Herod was plotting to do from past and present knowledge. He did not need to know it from eternity past.

That does not mean God caused Herod to seek to slay Jesus ... nor does it mean God caused Herod to slay all the children. God did spare Jesus ... but God not sparing the children in Bethlehem and surrounding areas did not equal God having killed those children. Herod killed the children ... and, according to Matt 2:17-18, this was fulfillment of prophecy.[/QUOTE.
We agree on this.

your conclusion is incorrect, PaulThomson. God knowing evil will occur is not the same as God causing the evil.['QUOTE]
I agree.

as Genez stated: "He is the Originator of what produces those evils. But, not evil itself."
I agree.

God knew I would be born ... God knew I would sin ... does that equal God causing me to sin? No. I am solely responsible (and guilty) for my own sin.
Did He know from eternity past, before He created the world in which all these things He knew would happen happen? If yes, then that kind of knowledge is not the same as human kind of knowledge. If I know someone is going to try to assassinate a president and I supply the assassin with weapons and training and access, but I do not pull the trigger myself, am I culpable for the attempt on his life, or not?
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,474
455
83
Job had not sinned or charged God foolishly... yet. But hey, it's only Chapter 1. But as the book proceeds,Job does not fare so well.
Job accuses God of attacking him with terrifying violence (16:9–14) for no reason (9:17). Job names God an amoral tyrant who destroys everyone regardless of moral character (9:22), who laughs at good people when they suffer disaster (v. 23), and deliberately frustrates the execution of justice in the world (v. 24; see further 12:13–25). In Job’s horrifying new vision of the universe, God is a moral monster, and his creation a kind of inner city ghetto, filled with the unanswered screams of the innocent (21:7–34). (This list I have lifted from https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/themelios/article/how-did-job-speak-rightly-about-god/#:~:text=Much in contrast, Job accuses,when they suffer disaster (v.


Job did speak rightly in finally confessing that he was in the wrong to accuse God ignorantly. But he certainly wasn't in the right throughout the book.[/QUOTE]

42 Then Job answered the Lord, and said,

2 I know that thou canst do every thing, and that no thought can be withholden from thee.

3 Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? therefore have I uttered that I understood not; things too wonderful for me, which I knew not.

4 Hear, I beseech thee, and I will speak: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me.

5 I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee.

6 Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes.

7 And it was so, that after the Lord had spoken these words unto Job, the Lord said to Eliphaz the Temanite, My wrath is kindled against thee, and against thy two friends: for ye have not spoken of me the thing that is right, as my servant Job hath.

The thing that is right was -

"2 I know that thou canst do every thing, and that no thought can be withholden from thee.

3 Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? therefore have I uttered that I understood not; things too wonderful for me, which I knew not.

4 Hear, I beseech thee, and I will speak: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me.

5 I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee.

6 Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes."
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
I did not use quantum mechanics to prove anything. @posthuman introduced claims about quantum mechanics in his attempt to disprove my position.
you introduced into the thread the idea of de Broglie waves as descriptive of the future of the universe, which is a quantum mechanical argument:

Omniscience means knowing all truth. If the future is a series of probability functions that only collapse into certainty when they become the present, that is how God would know the future: as uncertain possibilities. God does not know things as true that are not now true. But since God is perfectly good and powerful, I can trust Him, even if the future is largely uncertain to Him. Of course, anything God determines ahead of time to make happen, he can bring to pass by applying His omnipotence and ingenuity to circumstances.

you employed this as an attempt to explain that God cannot know the future because the actions of free will beings are unpredictable.

as though, life is a dice game and God can only guess how it turns out. He can load the dice, you say, and He is really good at guessing because He is pretty smart, but overall it's impossible for Him to know the future, all He can do is force certain futures to come about -

rather, He can try to, but you leave open the possibility that clever human and angelic will can overcome His plans, because they are unknowable.

the open theism position effectively has a god who is trapped in time just like humans, a creator who is enslaved by his own creation.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,474
455
83
you introduced into the thread the idea of de Broglie waves as descriptive of the future of the universe, which is a quantum mechanical argument:




you employed this as an attempt to explain that God cannot know the future because the actions of free will beings are unpredictable.

as though, life is a dice game and God can only guess how it turns out. He can load the dice, you say, and He is really good at guessing because He is pretty smart, but overall it's impossible for Him to know the future, all He can do is force certain futures to come about -

rather, He can try to, but you leave open the possibility that clever human and angelic will can overcome His plans, because they are unknowable.

the open theism position effectively has a god who is trapped in time just like humans, a creator who is enslaved by his own creation.
I never mentions de Broglie, If God is omnipotent no one can prevent Him from ensuring an event happens that He has determined will happen. So, no, if God is unwilling to let a human or angelic will overcome a particular plan of His, no human or angelic will can overcome that particular plan. People vary in their opinions on just how many particular plans God makes and just how many of those, and for how long, He is willing to allow men and angels to divert off the original course.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
I never mentions de Broglie, If God is omnipotent no one can prevent Him from ensuring an event happens that He has determined will happen. So, no, if God is unwilling to let a human or angelic will overcome a particular plan of His, no human or angelic will can overcome that particular plan. People vary in their opinions on just how many particular plans God makes and just how many of those, and for how long, He is willing to allow men and angels to divert off the original course.
de Broglie is the man who introduced the idea of physical/temporal events or states being described by probability functions, an idea you appealed to.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
Not your words. God's knowing.
Psalms 139:16​
Your eyes saw my substance, being yet unformed.
And in Your book they all were written,
The days fashioned for me,
When [as yet there were] none of them.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,774
113
For all of God's beginningless existence, God knew I was going to say that? That makes my words and myself eternal.
No it just makes you sound silly. You really have no clue about this.
 

Genez

Junior Member
Oct 12, 2017
2,931
419
83
That does not excuse being silly about spiritual things.
We are exhorted to be sober and vigilant.

I said that only trying to balance things out, since some here would make you wonder....
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,835
13,558
113
If someone makes a new years resolution to give up chocolate for the year, and I say to them,
"You will eat your way through 200 grams of chocolate before Jan 14, what am I actually, communicating to them? And if they eat 500 grams of chocolate before Jan 14, was I wrong in my prediction?
God's pretty good with words.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,474
455
83
Psalms 139:16​
Your eyes saw my substance, being yet unformed.
And in Your book they all were written,
The days fashioned for me,
When [as yet there were] none of them.
GaLMiY (My unformed substance)
Ra"U (Qal perfect , did see, 3 common pl. )
'eYNeyK (your eyes , common dual construct)
W-'aL (and in)
SiPhRKa (your book)
KoL-aM (all)
YiCTheBU (Niphal imperfect , were being written)
YoMiYM (days/daily ,common masculine plural)
YeTsRU (Pual perfect 3 common Plural , had been predetermined)
W-Lo" (and not)
"eChaD (one , common masc. s. absolute)
BaHeM (among them , 3 masc. pl.)

Your eyes did see my unformed substance, and in your book the days were being written; and not one of them [days] had been predetermined.

The Hebrew says the days were being written (imperfect) as they occurred, not that they had already been written (perfect) before they occur. The Hebrew says to me that God was noting days as they were occurring in the womb in real time and remembering them (this noting and remembering expressed poetically as recording them in a book). It also says to me that not one of the days was predetermined, but to God they were all fascinating and novel in their detail as He watched my DNA guide my body's growth in the womb.

Blue letter Bible

YaTsaR -
TWOT reference 898
... C. (Pual) to be predetermined, be preordained.
 

PaulThomson

Well-known member
Oct 29, 2023
3,474
455
83
No it just makes you sound silly. You really have no clue about this.
When did God start thinking about your life and knowing every detail of your life, according to your present theological position?

Is history more real to God now, as it unfolds in time, that it was before the world was made and He was just imagining it in His mind.