Do You Hate Trump so Much You're Willing to let Biden/Harris Destroy America?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113

JayBird

Active member
Aug 15, 2024
521
46
28
I think I can tell the wrong sort for myself, thanks.
I see that as concerning at the very least, especially when his own people are fessing up to it. That, plus his whole "Build the Wall" scam is enough for me to conclude that he's not trustworthy and quite likely pretty dangerous.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113
I see that as concerning at the very least, especially when his own people are fessing up to it. That, plus his whole "Build the Wall" scam is enough for me to conclude that he's not trustworthy and quite likely pretty dangerous.
Bannon or Trump?
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
20,556
7,656
113
Trump Jr. says it would be good to have RFK Jr. at an agency to ‘blow it up’

Trump Endorsement? RFK Jr To "Address The Nation" Friday Morning

New CIA boss RFK, Jr?
"I would love that endorsement because I've always liked him" Trump said.

Then when asked if he would also consider adding him to the administration, Trump responded that "I like him a lot I respect him a lot uh I probably would if something like that would happen... He's very different kind of a guy, very smart guy, and yeah I would be honored by that endorsement certainly."

"He's a brilliant guy he's a very smart guy I've known him for a long time I didn't know he was thinking about getting out but if he is thinking about getting out certainly I'd be open to it"
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113
I see that as concerning at the very least, especially when his own people are fessing up to it. That, plus his whole "Build the Wall" scam is enough for me to conclude that he's not trustworthy and quite likely pretty dangerous.
Bannon and Trump are both very dangerous. Lawrence Taylor and Dick Butkus were also very dangerous and you wouldn't want your daughter dating either one. But if you wanted to win football games and have a dominant defense you would want both on your team.

The entire US constitution is set up to protect against one powerful person taking over. That doesn't mean we don't want powerful people, it simply means we want powerful people in every position.

Given the choice I would much rather have a dangerous person at president than a dottering old fool with dementia or a cackling kindergarten teacher.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113
Bannon, whose associate in the scam already pleaded guilty last year to fraud and tax charges, and was sentenced to 4 1/2 years in prison back in April.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/banno...ced-fraud-over-trumps-border-wall-2023-04-26/
I believe that Bannon is the modern day Mordecai, the deep state is Haman and "Q" is this queen Esther. Time will tell.

Interesting side note, Mordecai was descended from King Saul and he was dealing with the generational curse put on his family because Saul failed to obey to wipe out the Amalekites. Haman was an Amalekite. So yes, you better believe that Bannon (Mordecai) is dangerous to the Amalekites.
 

JayBird

Active member
Aug 15, 2024
521
46
28
Bannon and Trump are both very dangerous. Lawrence Taylor and Dick Butkus were also very dangerous and you wouldn't want your daughter dating either one. But if you wanted to win football games and have a dominant defense you would want both on your team.

The entire US constitution is set up to protect against one powerful person taking over. That doesn't mean we don't want powerful people, it simply means we want powerful people in every position.

Given the choice I would much rather have a dangerous person at president than a dottering old fool with dementia or a cackling kindergarten teacher.
They're both frauds. Trump had his charity and "university" shut down due to fraudulent practices for example.

Not someone I can give my vote to.
 

JayBird

Active member
Aug 15, 2024
521
46
28
I believe that Bannon is the modern day Mordecai, the deep state is Haman and "Q" is this queen Esther. Time will tell.

Interesting side note, Mordecai was descended from King Saul and he was dealing with the generational curse put on his family because Saul failed to obey to wipe out the Amalekites. Haman was an Amalekite. So yes, you better believe that Bannon (Mordecai) is dangerous to the Amalekites.
Obviously I disagree. He's a fraud, scammer, and apparently has been working with white supremacist groups to recruit members and incite violence.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113
They're both frauds. Trump had his charity and "university" shut down due to fraudulent practices for example.

Not someone I can give my vote to.
That is your right. But no way I am voting for someone pushing abortion the way Harris is.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113
Obviously I disagree. He's a fraud, scammer, and apparently has been working with white supremacist groups to recruit members and incite violence.
Wow, so how many hours listening to his podcast before you came to that judgment?

I have been listening to him since 2021 and I never picked that up.

According to the word of God we must first hear a person before judging them. So I would really like to know how much time you spent listening to Steve Bannon before coming to this judgment. Thanks.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113
It's in the article I posted to you, coming from his own people.
You have passed judgment on Steve Bannon without first hearing from him? Are you serious? That is in direct contradiction to the word of God, you are asking to be deceived.
 

JayBird

Active member
Aug 15, 2024
521
46
28
You have passed judgment on Steve Bannon without first hearing from him? Are you serious? That is in direct contradiction to the word of God, you are asking to be deceived.
Are you saying that unless someone confesses to wrongdoing, we can never conclude that they're guilty of doing it?
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113
Are you saying that unless someone confesses to wrongdoing, we can never conclude that they're guilty of doing it?
Oh my bad, I guess you are unfamiliar with the gospel of John where Nicodemus asks if it is right to condemn Jesus without first hearing him and pointing out that in the law you are not allowed to judge someone without first hearing from them.
 

JayBird

Active member
Aug 15, 2024
521
46
28
Oh my bad, I guess you are unfamiliar with the gospel of John where Nicodemus asks if it is right to condemn Jesus without first hearing him and pointing out that in the law you are not allowed to judge someone without first hearing from them.
So you just go by whatever Bannon says?
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
34,557
6,134
113
So you just go by whatever Bannon says?
If I am going to judge someone I will listen to them first. Generally I hate the idea of "judging someone", so I wouldn't even do that with regard to Bannon, or anyone else. But you need discernment as to whether or not to listen to a newscast. That is why I no longer listen to MSNBC, CNN, NY Times or many others that have knowingly lied to me with the intent to deceive. I can still quote them, just like you would call out a liar in a court of law. But my time is valuable and so I don't waste it on useless drivel. I skim through Bannon's show to see if there is anything I want to listen to but because politics is a big agenda for him, I haven't listened for a few months.

Other than the fact I will still listen to Bannon's news broadcast after finding cause to cross so many other channels off the list I don't know what your question is asking. It seems like a non sequitor. You judged Bannon and yet you didn't listen to him. To me that seriously harms your credibility to me and ironically raises Bannon's credibility a little bit because he has all the right enemies.
 

JayBird

Active member
Aug 15, 2024
521
46
28
If I am going to judge someone I will listen to them first. Generally I hate the idea of "judging someone", so I wouldn't even do that with regard to Bannon, or anyone else. But you need discernment as to whether or not to listen to a newscast. That is why I no longer listen to MSNBC, CNN, NY Times or many others that have knowingly lied to me with the intent to deceive. I can still quote them, just like you would call out a liar in a court of law. But my time is valuable and so I don't waste it on useless drivel. I skim through Bannon's show to see if there is anything I want to listen to but because politics is a big agenda for him, I haven't listened for a few months.

Other than the fact I will still listen to Bannon's news broadcast after finding cause to cross so many other channels off the list I don't know what your question is asking. It seems like a non sequitor. You judged Bannon and yet you didn't listen to him. To me that seriously harms your credibility to me and ironically raises Bannon's credibility a little bit because he has all the right enemies.
Ok, thanks for explaining.

I find Bannon's own staff showing how they've (and Bannon) been working with white supremacists to recruit and incite terror to be at the very least concerning. But I guess we'll just have to disagree.
 

Cameron143

Well-known member
Mar 1, 2022
17,310
5,982
113
62
Ok, thanks for explaining.

I find Bannon's own staff showing how they've (and Bannon) been working with white supremacists to recruit and incite terror to be at the very least concerning. But I guess we'll just have to disagree.
His parting shot is always...they are racist. Tell me that isn't right out of the lefty playbook.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
25,724
13,583
113
I find Bannon's own staff showing how they've (and Bannon) been working with white supremacists to recruit and incite terror to be at the very least concerning.
Using "white supremacists" as a slur always helps to maintain Leftist hatred. Today White Supremacists are probably a handful of people. So all this talk is just to falsely accuse conservatives and Christians.

So let's talk about "inciting terror".

Obama and Biden sent at least 100 billion dollars to Iran, knowing full well that Iran is engaged in state-sponsored terrorism. So do you know where some of that money went?

To Islamist terrorists Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. And do you know that Hamas engaged in an unprovoked terrorist attack on Israel on October 7, 2023? And that since then the Houthis have been destroying ships in the Red Sea bound for Israel, as well as all international shipping, and that Iran has its own ships there to support the Houthis. So who is ultimately responsible for this terrorism? Is it not Obama and Biden.

As long as Trump was president, Iran was not allowed to have any cash or engage in any terrorism or build its nuclear arsenal. It all started with Biden. And what about the illegal criminal migrant invaders who are terrorizing innocent American citizens, raping and killing young girls, etc.? Of course none of this bothers you because you simply love the Democrats.