One doesn’t need to hear and believe the gospel to be saved ?The proliferation of the gospel is one of the means God uses to bring about salvation. This is the usual means that God employs. But not necessary for God to save someone.
One doesn’t need to hear and believe the gospel to be saved ?The proliferation of the gospel is one of the means God uses to bring about salvation. This is the usual means that God employs. But not necessary for God to save someone.
Can God save a baby in the womb?One doesn’t need to hear and believe the gospel to be saved ?
Your words say otherwise.I don't believe Jesus paid for sins universally.
What does this have to do with the question?Can God save a baby in the womb?
Because you don't understand what I'm saying, you make up what you want. It's really not that hard. What does a fallen individual need to be reconciled to God?Your words say otherwise.
Your comments have no bounds hence universalism.
If God can save someone who doesn't possess the ability to hear or understand, then hearing and understanding are not necessary for salvation.What does this have to do with the question?
Your words seem to be rather disingenuous.
If God can save someone who doesn't possess the ability to hear or understand, then hearing and understanding are not necessary for salvation.
Can God save someone who can't hear or understand?
Conversely, can God save anyone without providing a blood sacrifice and perfect righteousness?
What is God's requirement for salvation (GRFS)?
You are simply spewing out metaphysical religious jargon.Because you don't understand what I'm saying, you make up what you want. It's really not that hard. What does a fallen individual need to be reconciled to God?
1. A blood atonement
2. Perfect righteousness
Where are these 2 things found?
It's not sleight of anything. I shared with you what is necessary and told you why. Because God has chosen to predominantly save through His word doesn't make His word a requirement for salvation. He merely employs His word as a means to affect salvation. The same is true of faith.The issue is not "can" God save but "does" God save.
It is this verbal sleight of hand that makes you seem disingenuous.
The OP is about what are the requirements for salvation in order to be among the chosen few. (Matthew 22:14)
I don't believe Jesus paid for sins universally.
The limits are determined by God. He provides or He doesn't.You are simply spewing out metaphysical religious jargon.
Again, what are the limits or bounds of "a blood atonement" or "perfect righteousness"?
Your unwillingness to address this matter speaks much.
I believe gentiles get saved. I do believe in a limited atonement.So, you don't believe that "people" in HB 2:17 includes the Gentiles as stated in EPH 2:11-20?
And you think Paul lied by saying in 1TM 2:3-6, "God our Savior wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people."
Wow!
You should be careful to ascribe belief to others that they haven't ascribed to themselves.So, you don't believe that "people" in HB 2:17 includes the Gentiles as stated in EPH 2:11-20?
And you think Paul lied by saying in 1TM 2:3-6, "God our Savior wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people."
Wow!
You should be careful to ascribe belief to others that they haven't ascribed to themselves.
There you go again...jumping to conclusions. I'm neither a Calvinist or a follower of Augustine. And there's nothing in the scriptures you shared that I disagree with. Your understanding of them, however, I do find fault with.And YOU should be careful that you do not disagree with the clear teaching of Scripture in 1TM 2:3-6, "God our Savior wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people."
Paul did NOT say Christ died for only some people, but rather for ALL people. He is the mediator between God and mankind, NOT only some of humanity.
IOW, Paul's Scripture trumps Calvin's misinterpretation of it, following the wrong lead of Augustine of Hippo.
And YOU should be careful that you do not disagree with the clear teaching of Scripture in 1TM 2:3-6, "God our Savior wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all people."
Paul did NOT say Christ died for only some people, but rather for ALL people. He is the mediator between God and mankind, NOT only some of humanity.
IOW, Paul's Scripture trumps Calvin's misinterpretation of it, following the wrong lead of Augustine of Hippo.
Lol brother you do fantastic loops while avoiding any real content.Can God save a baby in the womb?
Do you believe that an unborn child doesn't need a Savior? Doesn't need to be born from above?Lol brother you do fantastic loops while avoiding any real content.
What does the unborn baby need to be redeemed from ? Excuse me “ saved from “
Brother you continually answer any simple point that you don’t want to just say “ yes “ to lol with a circle back to unrelated topicDo you believe that an unborn child doesn't need a Savior? Doesn't need to be born from above?