-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
He's the FAKE son of perdition.
All eyez on rome as usual, running interference for the whore.
When the real son of perdition comes he'll be 'saving' us from all the worldly problems including getting the guy out who so many think is the whore of babylon either by treaty (ecumenism) or by force.
Most catholics wont be up in arms coz they are already ecumenical to the core and the RCC has already signed off on the noahide laws which the false messiah is gonna enforce in his 'kingdom'.
All eyez on rome as usual, running interference for the whore.
When the real son of perdition comes he'll be 'saving' us from all the worldly problems including getting the guy out who so many think is the whore of babylon either by treaty (ecumenism) or by force.
Most catholics wont be up in arms coz they are already ecumenical to the core and the RCC has already signed off on the noahide laws which the false messiah is gonna enforce in his 'kingdom'.
A
yeah the food thing, we need to pray about that. most people don't even know their food has been tampered with or genetically engineered to produce more, to make it grow bigger, to make it grow without seeds, etc. Only God knows the long term effects of such man made manipulations. I like buying locally but even then if a factory or buisiness is not evironmentally concious the poison they dump can cause contamination and poison to be absorbed by the produce and eaten by the livestock. (even if they don't recognize it as poison but more waste from their factories and they consider it harmless but then they don't monitor what happens downstream either. there alots of cases where the effects of the people living near these business have become ill)
I think we need to pray and ask God what we can do about it all. I have a gut feeling there is something in junk food that cause kids not to be able to pay attention and absorb knowledge as they should and that an over exposure to it causes lasting brain damage. i think its more then just a sugar high causing the lack of attention but that is just a hypothesis. a scientific study would have to be made to verify anything, but I don't feel right experimenting on kids but I guess surveys asking how much junk food/ fast food meals versus how many home cooked meals you get might be revealing when compared in correlation to IQ or ability to learn and function in school.
though that wouldn't prove anything it might get people to eat healthier and spend the time eating meals with family that is vital to helping kids understand the importance of fellowship and breaking of the bread with one another.
I think we need to pray and ask God what we can do about it all. I have a gut feeling there is something in junk food that cause kids not to be able to pay attention and absorb knowledge as they should and that an over exposure to it causes lasting brain damage. i think its more then just a sugar high causing the lack of attention but that is just a hypothesis. a scientific study would have to be made to verify anything, but I don't feel right experimenting on kids but I guess surveys asking how much junk food/ fast food meals versus how many home cooked meals you get might be revealing when compared in correlation to IQ or ability to learn and function in school.
though that wouldn't prove anything it might get people to eat healthier and spend the time eating meals with family that is vital to helping kids understand the importance of fellowship and breaking of the bread with one another.
EUGENICS
According to Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, these vaccines contain aborted human fetus cells:
Merck vaccines
Priorix and Erolalix by GlaxoSmithKline
Varilix by GSK
Havrix and Twinrix by GSK
Avaxim and Vivaxim by Sanofi
Epaxal by Crucell/Berna
They are listed online at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute
Furthermore, there seems to be a correlation between the use of aborted human fetal cells with the coincidental rise of autism.
Several online articles corroborate that coincidence, e.g., Timing of Increased Autistic Disorder Cumulative Incidence - Environmental Science & Technology (ACS Publications) Timing of Increased Autistic Disorder Cumulative Incidence by Michael E. McDonald and John F. Paul, NHEERL/EPA, February 2010, Vol. 44, Environmental Science & Technology
According to Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, these vaccines contain aborted human fetus cells:
- Polio Vaccines, Pentacel, DT Polio Absorbed, Quadracel—all by Sanofi
- Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccines
Merck vaccines
Priorix and Erolalix by GlaxoSmithKline
- Varicella Vaccines for Chickenpox or Shingles
Varilix by GSK
- Hepatitis Vaccines
Havrix and Twinrix by GSK
Avaxim and Vivaxim by Sanofi
Epaxal by Crucell/Berna
- Rabies Vaccine
They are listed online at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute
Furthermore, there seems to be a correlation between the use of aborted human fetal cells with the coincidental rise of autism.
Several online articles corroborate that coincidence, e.g., Timing of Increased Autistic Disorder Cumulative Incidence - Environmental Science & Technology (ACS Publications) Timing of Increased Autistic Disorder Cumulative Incidence by Michael E. McDonald and John F. Paul, NHEERL/EPA, February 2010, Vol. 44, Environmental Science & Technology
By Dr. Mercola
Former drug company scientist Helen Ratajczak recently created a firestorm of debate from all sides of the vaccine-autism issue when she published her comprehensive review of autism research. This is a massively important study, for more than one reason. One element brought to light that has managed to stay well below the radar is the use of aborted embryonic cells in vaccine production.
CBS News recently reported:
CBS News March 31, 2011
LifeSiteNews April 23, 2010
J Immunotoxicol Jan-Mar 2011
EWTN
Environ Sci Technol 2010
Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute
National Network for Immunization Information
LifeSiteNews February 7, 2005
Dr. Mercola Comments:
Priorix, Erolalix (GlaxoSmithKline)Varicella (Chickenpox and Shingles)Varivax, ProQuad, MMR-V, Zostavax (Merck)
Varilix (GlaxoSmithKline)Hepatitis AVaqta (Merck)
Havrix, Twinrix (GlaxoSmithKine)
Avaxim, Vivaxim (Sanofi)
Epaxal (Crucell/Berna)RabiesImovax (Sanofi)
Human DNA from Aborted Embryonic Cells in Vaccines Linked to Autism | Health Impact News
Former drug company scientist Helen Ratajczak recently created a firestorm of debate from all sides of the vaccine-autism issue when she published her comprehensive review of autism research. This is a massively important study, for more than one reason. One element brought to light that has managed to stay well below the radar is the use of aborted embryonic cells in vaccine production.
CBS News recently reported:
“Ratajczak reports that about the same time vaccine makers took most thimerosal out of most vaccines (with the exception of flu shots which still widely contain thimerosal), they began making some vaccines using human tissue.
Ratajczak says human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines. She discusses the increase in autism incidences corresponding with the introduction of human DNA to MMR vaccine, and suggests the two could be linked.”
Sources:Ratajczak says human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines. She discusses the increase in autism incidences corresponding with the introduction of human DNA to MMR vaccine, and suggests the two could be linked.”
CBS News March 31, 2011
LifeSiteNews April 23, 2010
J Immunotoxicol Jan-Mar 2011
EWTN
Environ Sci Technol 2010
Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute
National Network for Immunization Information
LifeSiteNews February 7, 2005
Dr. Mercola Comments:
Former drug company scientist Helen Ratajczak recently created a firestorm of debate from all sides of the vaccine-autism issue when she published her comprehensive review of autism research. However, her 79-page review contains one detail that could easily go unnoticed—five words that reveal one of the most shocking secrets Big Pharma has ever kept from you.
Setting aside, for the moment, unknown long-term health consequences of DNA contamination and religious beliefs about use of aborted fetal tissues—the ethics of nondisclosure are reprehensible. Drug companies and vaccine policy-makers should not be allowed to decide whether or not to share this information with you. This is information you should have received PRIOR to making a choice about whether or not to vaccinate.
Which Vaccines Might Be Produced Using Aborted Fetal Cell Lines?“…Grown in human fetal tissue.”
The line reads (page 70):
“An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue.”
If you are struggling to recall how you could have missed this important fact when signing your vaccine consent form, it wasn’t your error—because it wasn’t disclosed on any consent form. Most people are unaware that human cell cultures derived from aborted human fetuses have been used extensively in vaccine production for decades. And vaccine makers are happy that most of the public has remained ignorant of this fact, as awareness of it could blow up in their faces.
Setting aside, for the moment, unknown long-term health consequences of DNA contamination and religious beliefs about use of aborted fetal tissues—the ethics of nondisclosure are reprehensible. Drug companies and vaccine policy-makers should not be allowed to decide whether or not to share this information with you. This is information you should have received PRIOR to making a choice about whether or not to vaccinate.
Chicken pox vaccine is not the only vaccine manufactured in this way. According to Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI), the following 24 vaccines are produced using cells from aborted fetuses and/or contain DNA, proteins, or related cellular debris from cell cultures derived from aborted human fetuses:
PolioPolioVax, Pentacel, DT Polio Absorbed, Quadracel (Sanofi)Measles, Mumps, Rubella MMR II, Meruvax II, MRVax, Biovax, ProQuad, MMR-V (Merck)
Priorix, Erolalix (GlaxoSmithKline)Varicella (Chickenpox and Shingles)Varivax, ProQuad, MMR-V, Zostavax (Merck)
Varilix (GlaxoSmithKline)Hepatitis AVaqta (Merck)
Havrix, Twinrix (GlaxoSmithKine)
Avaxim, Vivaxim (Sanofi)
Epaxal (Crucell/Berna)RabiesImovax (Sanofi)
SCPI also lists cosmetics that are similarly produced from aborted fetal tissue cell lines, which I’ll discuss a bit later.
The Sordid History of Viral Vaccines
There are two primary cell cultures that have been growing in labs for more than 35 years and have been used to prepare hundreds of millions of doses of vaccines:
The NNII article explains some of the difficulties involved in producing “biological medications,” especially when it comes to growing viruses:
So, why don’t manufacturers avoid using human cells altogether and instead opt for less controversial methods? I suspect there is little incentive for vaccine manufacturers to develop and test new vaccines when they are already profiting from existing ones. Of course, when the truth becomes widely known about how these vaccines are derived, they may begin seeing their profits plunge and be forced to find new methodology.
One Particularly Egregious Example: Rubella Vaccine- WI-38: Originating in the U.S. in 1961, this line came from the lung cells of an intentionally aborted female human fetus of 3 months gestation.
- MRC-5: Originating in the U.K. in 1966, this line was derived from the lung cells of an intentionally aborted 14-week-old male human fetus.
The NNII article explains some of the difficulties involved in producing “biological medications,” especially when it comes to growing viruses:
“It is far more complex to manufacture biological medications (for example, vaccines, antibodies) than it is to produce chemical medications (for example, penicillin or aspirin). In addition, certain vaccines are more complex to make than others. The bacteria that go into bacterial vaccines can be grown in simple laboratory cultures. In contrast, the growth of viruses requires living cells.
Viruses cannot reproduce on their own. They require a living host in which to grow, such as chicken embryos, and cells from animals that are grown in culture. Vaccine manufacturers currently have few options for viral culture, because of valid pharmaceutical reasons and because of human safety concerns. For example, varicella (chickenpox) virus does not grow well in most cells derived from species other than humans. Also, human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people.”
It may be more difficult, but it IS possible to prepare viral vaccines without the use of human or animal cells, as today’s hepatitis B vaccine proves. The current version of the hepatitis B vaccine, used in the U.S. since 1986, uses yeast cells. Other virus vaccines use chicken embryos or monkey kidney cell lines.Viruses cannot reproduce on their own. They require a living host in which to grow, such as chicken embryos, and cells from animals that are grown in culture. Vaccine manufacturers currently have few options for viral culture, because of valid pharmaceutical reasons and because of human safety concerns. For example, varicella (chickenpox) virus does not grow well in most cells derived from species other than humans. Also, human cells are preferred because cells derived from animal organs sometimes may carry animal viruses that could harm people.”
So, why don’t manufacturers avoid using human cells altogether and instead opt for less controversial methods? I suspect there is little incentive for vaccine manufacturers to develop and test new vaccines when they are already profiting from existing ones. Of course, when the truth becomes widely known about how these vaccines are derived, they may begin seeing their profits plunge and be forced to find new methodology.
The rubella virus used in making rubella vaccine was originally derived from tissues from the aborted fetus of a rubella virus-infected mother. Babies born to rubella-infected mothers are at risk for serious birth defects.
According to Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center:
How can a person be pro-life and NOT object to the use of these vaccines?
The impact of the finding that many vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cell lines is potentially enormous, given the great number of people who define themselves as Pro Life. For someone who is Pro Life to discover that a vaccine contains the DNA from aborted fetuses is like a Muslim finding out that a vaccine is derived from pork.
I would anticipate that many of the people who object to use of aborted fetal tissues for scientific research are going to be shocked and outraged when they learn that their children have been secretly injected with vaccines containing DNA, proteins, or related cellular debris from cell cultures derived from aborted human fetuses.
This is not a small portion of the population!
The two largest religious preferences in the U.S. are Catholic and Evangelical, representing 50 percent of the population. And those are not the only two groups who typically share Pro Life views. Given these numbers, you could extrapolate that more than one of every two people receiving vaccines might have opted out of them based on religious beliefs alone, had they been given truthful and complete information about how the vaccines were produced.
The Catholic Church objects to “formal cooperation” with abortion. However, in terms of its vaccine policy, there are more gray areas than mandates.
The Vatican states it’s your “grave responsibility” to use alternative vaccines when available, i.e., vaccines not derived from aborted human fetuses. It also states that those with moral problems should make conscientious objections. However, the Vatican dictates it’s within your right to make your own choice about whether or not to use these vaccines. It takes the position that, in the absence of alternatives, the health of the population as a whole must be considered, stating these vaccines may be utilized “to avoid a serious risk not only for one’s own children but also, and more specifically, for the health conditions of the population as a whole—especially for pregnant women.”
For more details on the Catholic Church’s stance on this issue, the National Catholic Bioethics Center has a section of their website devoted to Q & A about vaccines derived from fetal cells. If you are Catholic and confused about this issue, you may want to discuss it with your priest.
If you are Pro Life for religious or other reasons, you owe it to yourself to take a serious look at this information before consenting to be vaccinated. Catholics and others who share a Pro Life point of view may play an important role in the future of vaccine policy by pressuring the vaccine industry and policymakers to adopt alternative strategies for vaccine research and production.
Shocking Examples of Aborted Fetal Cells Used by the Food and Cosmetic IndustryAccording to Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center:
“The rubella vaccine currently used in the U.S. and in most countries was developed after an American researcher at the Wistar Institute cultured rubella virus from a fetus aborted because the mother was infected with rubella. This vaccine is called RA 27/3 because the rubella virus was isolated from the 27th aborted fetus sent to the Wistar Institute in the 1964 rubella outbreak. Researchers were unable to culture rubella from the tissues of the first 26 fetuses sent to Wistar, which had been aborted by doctors because the mothers had rubella during pregnancy.”
A recent study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has led to a question of whether there is a correlation between the abrupt rise in American autism rates with the introduction of fetal cells for use in vaccines (1988). This correlation has prompted researchers to ask the question about how aborted fetal DNA could be causing, or contributing to, the development of autism disorders in children. Thus far, there have been no proposed theories of a mechanism. However, it’s a significant correlation that should at least be investigated. If you care about what you put into your body, and into your child’s body, and you are outraged by this information, you are not alone.
How can a person be pro-life and NOT object to the use of these vaccines?
The impact of the finding that many vaccines are derived from aborted fetal cell lines is potentially enormous, given the great number of people who define themselves as Pro Life. For someone who is Pro Life to discover that a vaccine contains the DNA from aborted fetuses is like a Muslim finding out that a vaccine is derived from pork.
I would anticipate that many of the people who object to use of aborted fetal tissues for scientific research are going to be shocked and outraged when they learn that their children have been secretly injected with vaccines containing DNA, proteins, or related cellular debris from cell cultures derived from aborted human fetuses.
This is not a small portion of the population!
The two largest religious preferences in the U.S. are Catholic and Evangelical, representing 50 percent of the population. And those are not the only two groups who typically share Pro Life views. Given these numbers, you could extrapolate that more than one of every two people receiving vaccines might have opted out of them based on religious beliefs alone, had they been given truthful and complete information about how the vaccines were produced.
The Catholic Church objects to “formal cooperation” with abortion. However, in terms of its vaccine policy, there are more gray areas than mandates.
The Vatican states it’s your “grave responsibility” to use alternative vaccines when available, i.e., vaccines not derived from aborted human fetuses. It also states that those with moral problems should make conscientious objections. However, the Vatican dictates it’s within your right to make your own choice about whether or not to use these vaccines. It takes the position that, in the absence of alternatives, the health of the population as a whole must be considered, stating these vaccines may be utilized “to avoid a serious risk not only for one’s own children but also, and more specifically, for the health conditions of the population as a whole—especially for pregnant women.”
For more details on the Catholic Church’s stance on this issue, the National Catholic Bioethics Center has a section of their website devoted to Q & A about vaccines derived from fetal cells. If you are Catholic and confused about this issue, you may want to discuss it with your priest.
If you are Pro Life for religious or other reasons, you owe it to yourself to take a serious look at this information before consenting to be vaccinated. Catholics and others who share a Pro Life point of view may play an important role in the future of vaccine policy by pressuring the vaccine industry and policymakers to adopt alternative strategies for vaccine research and production.
With a little further probing, you’ll discover the practice of using aborted fetal cell lines extends far beyond vaccines. Biotech companies are using these cell lines in the research and development of products ranging from soup to anti-aging skin creams. For example, a San Francisco cosmetics company, Neocutis Inc., acknowledges that the key ingredient in its anti-aging skin care line, PSP, was developed from an aborted and donated male fetus. The use of fetal tissue in anti-wrinkle creams certainly crosses moral and ethical boundaries for most consumers, especially when companies choose to HIDE this information. But it gets worse…
Cells from an aborted fetus may have been used to create flavor enhancers for your soup or soft drink. Yes, you read that right.
PepsiCo, Kraft Foods, and Nestle are reported to have partnered with a biotech firm called Senomyx, which uses human embryonic kidney cells taken from an electively aborted fetus (HEK 293) in their product testing to find flavors that will positively affect human taste receptors.
When this news leaked, Campbell soup responded to an outraged public by severing all ties with Senomyx. However, PepsiCo has maintained their relationship with the company, saying the collaboration is necessary for creating low-calorie, tasty products for their consumers.
REALLY? Must they really use human fetal cells just to make soda pop taste good?
This makes me wonder how many companies out there are engaging in such practices that we haven’t yet discovered. If they’ve been doing this with vaccines, cosmetics and food, I wonder what else they might be doing.
Take Action Now!Cells from an aborted fetus may have been used to create flavor enhancers for your soup or soft drink. Yes, you read that right.
PepsiCo, Kraft Foods, and Nestle are reported to have partnered with a biotech firm called Senomyx, which uses human embryonic kidney cells taken from an electively aborted fetus (HEK 293) in their product testing to find flavors that will positively affect human taste receptors.
When this news leaked, Campbell soup responded to an outraged public by severing all ties with Senomyx. However, PepsiCo has maintained their relationship with the company, saying the collaboration is necessary for creating low-calorie, tasty products for their consumers.
REALLY? Must they really use human fetal cells just to make soda pop taste good?
This makes me wonder how many companies out there are engaging in such practices that we haven’t yet discovered. If they’ve been doing this with vaccines, cosmetics and food, I wonder what else they might be doing.
NVIC has provided a webpage to educate you about vaccine contamination that could harm your health. There is also a Vaccine Ingredients Calculator on NVIC’s website that helps you learn about what kinds of human protein, DNA, chemicals and other ingredients are in vaccines. NVIC publishes a Vaccine E-newsletter regularly with alerts about vaccine policy and law updates that you can subscribe to, free of charge.
NVIC supports and defends your right to make fully informed, voluntary decisions regarding pharmaceutical products, including vaccines. This includes the right to know EXACTLY what is in vaccines and how vaccine ingredients could affect your health.
Included on the page are clear steps for how you can take action, plus many useful resources.
For more information about vaccines, I also invite you to visit my vaccine news page.
Full Article Here: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/10/this-shocking-fact-is-never-disclosed-on-any-vaccine-informed-consent-form.aspxNVIC supports and defends your right to make fully informed, voluntary decisions regarding pharmaceutical products, including vaccines. This includes the right to know EXACTLY what is in vaccines and how vaccine ingredients could affect your health.
Included on the page are clear steps for how you can take action, plus many useful resources.
For more information about vaccines, I also invite you to visit my vaccine news page.
Human DNA from Aborted Embryonic Cells in Vaccines Linked to Autism | Health Impact News
The Tonka Report
Real News In A Changing World
Bill Gates And Eugenics: Using Vaccinations To Reduce Population
leave a comment »
March 6, 2010: F. William Engdahl / Financial Sense - March 4, 2010
Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy—population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.
Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!.”
Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares,
“First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”1 (author’s emphasis).
Bill Gates And Eugenics: Using Vaccinations To Reduce Population The Tonka Report
Real News In A Changing World
Bill Gates And Eugenics: Using Vaccinations To Reduce Population
leave a comment »
March 6, 2010: F. William Engdahl / Financial Sense - March 4, 2010
Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy—population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.
Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!.”
Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares,
“First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”1 (author’s emphasis).
Bill Gates And Eugenics: Using Vaccinations To Reduce Population The Tonka Report
VIRAL THIS - PUBLIC LAW 105-85 Bio Warfare & Population Reduction against YOU
VIRAL THIS - PUBLIC LAW 105-85 Bio Warfare & Population Reduction against YOU - YouTube
URGENT VIRAL THIS -PROOF_ PUBLIC LAW 105-85, Bio Warfare & Population Reduction funded by the Dept. of Defense against ALL US Citizens, Our Government considers us LAB RATS
Original Title:
PROOF! PUBLIC LAW 105-85, bio warfare or population reduction funded by the Dept. of Defense
VIRAL THIS - PUBLIC LAW 105-85 Bio Warfare & Population Reduction against YOU - YouTube
URGENT VIRAL THIS -PROOF_ PUBLIC LAW 105-85, Bio Warfare & Population Reduction funded by the Dept. of Defense against ALL US Citizens, Our Government considers us LAB RATS
Original Title:
PROOF! PUBLIC LAW 105-85, bio warfare or population reduction funded by the Dept. of Defense
A
many of the CHRISTIAN Doctors I know would NEVER approve of the use of human fetal cells to make vaccines.
I'll have to research and pray about the information but wild speculations do not help anyone.
you more than most know about propaganda wars are about. If you can't pervert or convert them then try and discredit them and their judgment. its an age old tactic of Satan we should not be ignorant of.
but like I said I'll look into it further. thanks Zone for calling the issue to my attention.
I'll have to research and pray about the information but wild speculations do not help anyone.
you more than most know about propaganda wars are about. If you can't pervert or convert them then try and discredit them and their judgment. its an age old tactic of Satan we should not be ignorant of.
but like I said I'll look into it further. thanks Zone for calling the issue to my attention.
Last edited:
Michael Crichton on Politicized Science and the Eugenics Movement
April 27, 2010 by PDS _
Michael Crichton has written one of the best short articles on the eugenics movement I have read:
April 27, 2010 by PDS _
Michael Crichton has written one of the best short articles on the eugenics movement I have read:
Its supporters included Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Winston Churchill. It was approved by Supreme Court justices Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis, who ruled in its favor. The famous names who supported it included Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone; activist Margaret Sanger; botanist Luther Burbank; Leland Stanford, founder of Stanford University; the novelist H. G. Wells; the playwright George Bernard Shaw; and hundreds of others. Nobel Prize winners gave support. Research was backed by the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations. The Cold Springs Harbor Institute was built to carry out this research, but important work was also done at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and Johns Hopkins. Legislation to address the crisis was passed in states from New York to California.
These efforts had the support of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, and the National Research Council. It was said that if Jesus were alive, he would have supported this effort.
. . .
As Margaret Sanger said, “Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty … there is not greater curse to posterity than that of bequeathing them an increasing population of imbeciles.” She spoke of the burden of caring for “this dead weight of human waste.”
Such views were widely shared. H.G. Wells spoke against “ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens.” Theodore Roosevelt said that “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind.” Luther Burbank” “Stop permitting criminals and weaklings to reproduce.” George Bernard Shaw said that only eugenics could save mankind.
. . .
Eugenics research was funded by the Carnegie Foundation, and later by the Rockefeller Foundation. The latter was so enthusiastic that even after the center of the eugenics effort moved to Germany, and involved the gassing of individuals from mental institutions, the Rockefeller Foundation continued to finance German researchers at a very high level. (The foundation was quiet about it, but they were still funding research in 1939, only months before the onset of World War II.)
Since the 1920s, American eugenicists had been jealous because the Germans had taken leadership of the movement away from them. The Germans were admirably progressive. They set up ordinary-looking houses where “mental defectives” were brought and interviewed one at a time, before being led into a back room, which was, in fact, a gas chamber. There, they were gassed with carbon monoxide, and their bodies disposed of in a crematorium located on the property.
These efforts had the support of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, and the National Research Council. It was said that if Jesus were alive, he would have supported this effort.
. . .
As Margaret Sanger said, “Fostering the good-for-nothing at the expense of the good is an extreme cruelty … there is not greater curse to posterity than that of bequeathing them an increasing population of imbeciles.” She spoke of the burden of caring for “this dead weight of human waste.”
Such views were widely shared. H.G. Wells spoke against “ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens.” Theodore Roosevelt said that “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind.” Luther Burbank” “Stop permitting criminals and weaklings to reproduce.” George Bernard Shaw said that only eugenics could save mankind.
. . .
Eugenics research was funded by the Carnegie Foundation, and later by the Rockefeller Foundation. The latter was so enthusiastic that even after the center of the eugenics effort moved to Germany, and involved the gassing of individuals from mental institutions, the Rockefeller Foundation continued to finance German researchers at a very high level. (The foundation was quiet about it, but they were still funding research in 1939, only months before the onset of World War II.)
Since the 1920s, American eugenicists had been jealous because the Germans had taken leadership of the movement away from them. The Germans were admirably progressive. They set up ordinary-looking houses where “mental defectives” were brought and interviewed one at a time, before being led into a back room, which was, in fact, a gas chamber. There, they were gassed with carbon monoxide, and their bodies disposed of in a crematorium located on the property.
. . .
After World War II, nobody was a eugenicist, and nobody had ever been a eugenicist. Biographers of the celebrated and the powerful did not dwell on the attractions of this philosophy to their subjects, and sometimes did not mention it at all. Eugenics ceased to be a subject for college classrooms, although some argue that its ideas continue to have currency in disguised form....
crichton > http://www.michaelcrichton.net/essay-stateoffear-whypoliticizedscienceisdangerous.html
crichton > http://www.michaelcrichton.net/essay-stateoffear-whypoliticizedscienceisdangerous.html
Vaccine Ingredients -
Formaldehyde, Aspartame,
Mercury, Etc
Vaccine Ingredients - Formaldehyde, Aspartame, Mercury, Etc
Formaldehyde, Aspartame,
Mercury, Etc
Vaccine Ingredients - Formaldehyde, Aspartame, Mercury, Etc
from FDA
Thimerosal in Vaccines
Thimerosal in Vaccines
See also "Mercury in Plasma-Derived Products"
~
Google Scholarly Articles
Thimerosal human fetal tissue
Thimerosal in Vaccines
Thimerosal in Vaccines
See also "Mercury in Plasma-Derived Products"
~
Google Scholarly Articles
Thimerosal human fetal tissue
Last edited:
The great thimerosal cover-up: Mercury, vaccines, autism and your child's health
Thursday, September 22, 2005 by: Dawn Prate
Learn more: The great thimerosal cover-up: Mercury, vaccines, autism and your child's health
Thursday, September 22, 2005 by: Dawn Prate
Learn more: The great thimerosal cover-up: Mercury, vaccines, autism and your child's health
IN THE SHADOW OF THE COUNTERCULTURE REVOLUTION:
Radical Change & Counterculture: Huxley, Esalen & Human Potential Movement
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]NARCO-HYPNOSIS / NARCO STATE [/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]The shadow of the social revolution still casts its long shadow back from the future. The 60s were a topsy-turvy time where nearly every aspect of society was converted into its opposite, precisely according to the blueprint of the Tavistock Agenda and the machinations of its allies -- CIA, RAND and SRI. Together they created an ersatz utopia with a heavy dark side much like Huxley's dystopian novel Brave New World. It is the forerunner of the New Age and Conspiracy cultures. Counterculture and subculture became new buzzwords which sprung up like Flower Children to describe the morphing social landscape. Human freedom was actually under pharmacological attack, disguised as a quest for chemically-induced happiness.[/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]"...Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience. In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World." --From a letter to George Orwell, dated 21 October 1949; from Letters of Aldous Huxley, ed. Grover Smith; Harper & Row, 1969. [/FONT]
Videos: The Ultimate Revolution by Aldous Huxley (sample) - YouTube
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=5995 [/FONT]
Aldous Huxley: The Mike Wallace Interview
The Mike Wallace Interview
Aldous Huxley, 1958
Aldous Huxley, social critic and author of Brave New World, talks to Wallace about threats to freedom in the United States, overpopulation, bureaucracy, propaganda, drugs, advertising, and television.
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]The "Case Officer" for Britain's Opium War was [/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Aldous Huxley[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]. He spearheaded Tavistock's plan for pharmaceutical control with LSD's mindbending results which led to the counterculture, the dialectical response to culture on the way to a totally controlled society. Those who thought they were creating a new society were unwittingly "sleeping with the enemy" by essentially brainwashing themselves and paying for the priviledge with their hearts and minds. [/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Thus, Tavistock channeled and directed youth dissent and rebellion, and disabled the anti-war movement. Youth culture became distracted and disengaged from practical reality and political activism. The revolution was definitely not televised but it was psychoelectric shock treatment. The movement was induced from the top down via CIA-Tavistock agendas and agents of influence. Socially-engineered 'hippies' dropped out of the sociopolitical loop. Psychotropic warfare came to the homefront in the world's biggest social experiment.[/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]In 1936 Aldous Huxley wrote "Propaganda and Pharmacology" - a more detailed prediction of mind-control drug technology than the "soma" found in his 1932 novel "Brave New World". Huxley predicted: The propagandists of the future will probably be chemists and physiologists as well as writers." Moksha - Writings on Psychedelics and the Visionary Experience 1931-1963" Aldous Huxley, Penguin, 1983, p.38[/FONT]
~
anyways.....i'll leave this thread and try to find the one i made in Miscelleanous awhile back.
SAME FAMILES, PEOPLE!
Radical Change & Counterculture: Huxley, Esalen & Human Potential Movement
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]NARCO-HYPNOSIS / NARCO STATE [/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]The shadow of the social revolution still casts its long shadow back from the future. The 60s were a topsy-turvy time where nearly every aspect of society was converted into its opposite, precisely according to the blueprint of the Tavistock Agenda and the machinations of its allies -- CIA, RAND and SRI. Together they created an ersatz utopia with a heavy dark side much like Huxley's dystopian novel Brave New World. It is the forerunner of the New Age and Conspiracy cultures. Counterculture and subculture became new buzzwords which sprung up like Flower Children to describe the morphing social landscape. Human freedom was actually under pharmacological attack, disguised as a quest for chemically-induced happiness.[/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]"...Within the next generation I believe that the world's leaders will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience. In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World." --From a letter to George Orwell, dated 21 October 1949; from Letters of Aldous Huxley, ed. Grover Smith; Harper & Row, 1969. [/FONT]
Videos: The Ultimate Revolution by Aldous Huxley (sample) - YouTube
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]http://wideeyecinema.com/?p=5995 [/FONT]
Aldous Huxley: The Mike Wallace Interview
The Mike Wallace Interview
Aldous Huxley, 1958
Aldous Huxley, social critic and author of Brave New World, talks to Wallace about threats to freedom in the United States, overpopulation, bureaucracy, propaganda, drugs, advertising, and television.
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]The "Case Officer" for Britain's Opium War was [/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Aldous Huxley[/FONT][FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]. He spearheaded Tavistock's plan for pharmaceutical control with LSD's mindbending results which led to the counterculture, the dialectical response to culture on the way to a totally controlled society. Those who thought they were creating a new society were unwittingly "sleeping with the enemy" by essentially brainwashing themselves and paying for the priviledge with their hearts and minds. [/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]Thus, Tavistock channeled and directed youth dissent and rebellion, and disabled the anti-war movement. Youth culture became distracted and disengaged from practical reality and political activism. The revolution was definitely not televised but it was psychoelectric shock treatment. The movement was induced from the top down via CIA-Tavistock agendas and agents of influence. Socially-engineered 'hippies' dropped out of the sociopolitical loop. Psychotropic warfare came to the homefront in the world's biggest social experiment.[/FONT]
[FONT=arial,helvetica,sans-serif]In 1936 Aldous Huxley wrote "Propaganda and Pharmacology" - a more detailed prediction of mind-control drug technology than the "soma" found in his 1932 novel "Brave New World". Huxley predicted: The propagandists of the future will probably be chemists and physiologists as well as writers." Moksha - Writings on Psychedelics and the Visionary Experience 1931-1963" Aldous Huxley, Penguin, 1983, p.38[/FONT]
~
anyways.....i'll leave this thread and try to find the one i made in Miscelleanous awhile back.
SAME FAMILES, PEOPLE!
Last edited:
BIOETHICS, DRUGS
http://christianchat.com/miscellaneous/22735-bioethics-drugs.html
WHAT ABOUT DRUGS?
Revelation 18:23
and the light of a lamp will shine in you no more, and the voice of bridegroom and bride will be heard in you no more, for your merchants were the great ones of the earth, and all nations were deceived by your sorcery.
φαρμακεια noun - dative singular feminine
pharmakeia far-mak-i'-ah: medication (pharmacy), i.e. (by extension) magic -- sorcery, witchcraft.
"And it seems to me perfectly in the cards that there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing … a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods."
- Aldous Huxley
http://christianchat.com/miscellaneous/22735-bioethics-drugs.html
WHAT ABOUT DRUGS?
Revelation 18:23
and the light of a lamp will shine in you no more, and the voice of bridegroom and bride will be heard in you no more, for your merchants were the great ones of the earth, and all nations were deceived by your sorcery.
φαρμακεια noun - dative singular feminine
pharmakeia far-mak-i'-ah: medication (pharmacy), i.e. (by extension) magic -- sorcery, witchcraft.
"And it seems to me perfectly in the cards that there will be within the next generation or so a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing … a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods."
- Aldous Huxley
FROM FEMA:
TRAINING FOR ROUNDUPS.
IS-100 Introduction to Incident Command System, I-100
FROM FEMA:
PDF on Crises, managing TRANSPORT TO CAMPS, etc.
http://training.fema.gov/EMIweb/IS/ICS100CR/ICS100IG/06ICS100ICSFac_NMSept05.pdf
TRAINING FOR ROUNDUPS.
IS-100 Introduction to Incident Command System, I-100
FROM FEMA:
PDF on Crises, managing TRANSPORT TO CAMPS, etc.
http://training.fema.gov/EMIweb/IS/ICS100CR/ICS100IG/06ICS100ICSFac_NMSept05.pdf