The Covid CANCER Shot!

[Skittle]

That principle that "correlation is not causation" is often misused.

It is correctly used by people in response to people making up pseudo-science. Correlation is the beginning of a hypothesis which needs to be tested. Until that time correlation is just a hypothesis, it is not a fact.

People who understand science will then find a way to test the hypothesis having established controls and reducing bias. The first thing you would do is throw-out the rate of vaccines with the rate of diagnosis of autism.

Correlation is evidence that two things are linked. Ice cream sales go up in the summer, they are linked, doesn't mean that the more ice cream that is sold causes global temperatures to rise. But it is evidence that the two things are linked.

That ice cream sales increased is a fact.
That autism has increased is NOT a fact.
That the diagnosis of autism has increased is a fact.

This is evidence that autism rates and the vaccine schedule for kids are linked.

If one is to say they are linked in that the DIAGNOSIS of autism increased at the same time vaccines increased, sure.
One can rightly just say that the DIAGNOSIS of autism increased at the same time cable TV increased. This is more likely.

There is more evidence in favor of cable TV. You see, impoverished people have access to vaccines by various organizations, but do not have access to cable. So, we find kids without cable TV are less likely to have autism.

This is the problem in not using the scientific method. For those with crayons up their noses and can't play along at home: The reason you would not have more cases of autism in impoverished populations is due to lack of a diagnosis.

Are we getting more vaccines to treat autism? That would mean that increased autism is causing the drug companies to come up with more vaccines. No, we don't have a vaccine for autism. That doesn't make sense.

You are not making sense and don't seem to understand biology on a high school level. Your statements are so out of whack I cannot even think where to begin. There are no vaccines to treat autism. Autism is not known to be caused by something that an immune response can prevent. I cannot be said that autism is increasing. You should know better than that. It is a simple matter of critical thinking.

Also the autism shows up after they get the the vaccines, not the other way around.

Wrong again. I really wonder how people can be so lacking in critical thinking.
Autism is diagnosed. There is not a blood test for it. Autism is diagnosed as early as four, but can be diagnosed as young as two.
Therefore, the diagnosis will come after initial vaccination.

This is, yet again, not science except in the formation of a hypothesis. There is more evidence that cable tv causes autism using the same pseudo-science methodology.

 

[Skittle]

That is not how it works. Mucus and inflammation are a response. The immune system produces antibodies to remove and destroy something it considers invasive.

Silly me, I left out phagocytosis via cells that eat up

 

[4urenlightment]

You mean an immune response and immune responses generally have inflammation.



That is not how it works. Mucus and inflammation are a response. The immune system produces antibodies to remove and destroy something it considers invasive.

You do not know the first thing about immunology and you are writing about it as if written for a five year old.



That is not how that works. A virus does not "infect" mucus.



Obviously, you know nothing about immunology.

Now, with your mucus theory, could you explain why there are blood types and their significance?



Who is "they?" Are they coming after you next? I mean, you wrote it on the interwebs.

[/QUOTE]
If it ends with an "Itis", that is inflammation (Mucus).

 

[PennEd]

Or it could be due to expanded diagnostic criteria, better awareness, and increased screening

In Russia they say “bullsh**tski!!!

As kid and teen, NONE of us saw an “autistic” kid. My parents said it was unheard of in their day.

There may, just like the graph illustrates, be ONE kid in a thousand that was mentally retarded. Probably autistic by today’s understanding.

Now all of us know more than a dozen, some relatives, that are autistic or on the autism spectrum scale.

Wake up!!!!!!’

 

[Skittle]

If it ends with an "Itis", that is inflammation (Mucus).

View attachment 283556

[/quote]

Yes, an itis is a reference to the inflammatory response. Thank you, Cap'n. Still unanswered:

That is not how it works. Mucus and inflammation are a response. The immune system produces antibodies to remove and destroy something it considers invasive.

You do not know the first thing about immunology and you are writing about it as if written for a five year old.

That is not how that works. A virus does not "infect" mucus.

Obviously, you know nothing about immunology.

Now, with your mucus theory, could you explain why there are blood types and their significance?


Who is "they?" Are they coming after you next? I mean, you wrote it on the interwebs.

 

[Skittle]

In Russia they say “bullsh**tski!!!

To basic scientific methodology?

As kid and teen, NONE of us saw an “autistic” kid. My parents said it was unheard of in their day.

Because it was unknown and undiagnosed.

There may, just like the graph illustrates, be ONE kid in a thousand that was mentally retarded. Probably autistic by today’s understanding.

Now all of us know more than a dozen, some relatives, that are autistic or on the autism spectrum scale.

Wake up!!!!!!’

Are you really this way? Do you get your kicks on promoting absurdities?

 

[gb9]

To basic scientific methodology?





Because it was unknown and undiagnosed.



Are you really this way? Do you get your kicks on promoting absurdities?

so, in 2000, the autism rate was 1 of 150. by 2022, it was 1 of 31.

you think that in modern times, that rate of an increase over a relatively short period of time was due to "unknown and undiagnosed"..


o k.

 

[PennEd]

so, in 2000, the autism rate was 1 of 150. by 2022, it was 1 of 31.

you think that in modern times, that rate of an increase over a relatively short period of time was due to "unknown and undiagnosed"..


o k.

The indoctrinated will fight tooth and nail to avoid confessing they were indoctrinated.

That’s why they CANT believe facts, their own eyes, or conclusive proof presented to them.

They just keep digging deeper.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

The indoctrinated will fight tooth and nail to avoid confessing they were indoctrinated.

That’s why they CANT believe facts, their own eyes, or conclusive proof presented to them.

They just keep digging deeper.

Christmas Break from the Hospital

 

[gb9]

The indoctrinated will fight tooth and nail to avoid confessing they were indoctrinated.

That’s why they CANT believe facts, their own eyes, or conclusive proof presented to them.

They just keep digging deeper.

remember " the flu disappeared 2020 and '21 due to people washing and sanitizing their hands"??

the stuff the medical industry tried to get us to believe...

 

[Skittle]

so, in 2000, the autism rate was 1 of 150. by 2022, it was 1 of 31.

you think that in modern times, that rate of an increase over a relatively short period of time was due to "unknown and undiagnosed"..


o k.

Autism is a complicated neurodevelopmental disorder that is diagnosed. It is not something you can test by blood. No one was diagnosed with it in 1900.

There was not a known increase in cases. There was a determination of the disorder and over time an increase in the diagnosis of cases.
I understand that some people want everything dumbed down unless you can make a convoluted non-sensical conspiracy out of it.
Autism did not "increase." To make a statement like that you would need to use the same standard and population.

Ice cream was mentioned. That is straight forward. Awesome Ice Cream shows an increase in product demand from stores May to August every year. You have an order form and it is that simple. In the case, you have a verifiable increase.
Autism is not an order, it is a diagnosis. To be diagnosed a child needs access to someone trained. To have an increase from 1970 to 2020, you would need the same conditions for the diagnosis.

 

[Skittle]

remember " the flu disappeared 2020 and '21 due to people washing and sanitizing their hands"??

the stuff the medical industry tried to get us to believe...

No, the rate was at its lowest since reporting began due to COVID precautions. This is a great example of containment.

 

[HealthAndHappiness]

remember " the flu disappeared 2020 and '21 due to people washing and sanitizing their hands"??

the stuff the medical industry tried to get us to believe...

They used a complex plan of deception, the injections of toxins, medical suffocation devices, 6 foot rules, lock downs were illegitimate exercises of power.
The rest was medical tyranny.

One Example

 

[Skittle]

The indoctrinated will fight tooth and nail to avoid confessing they were indoctrinated.

That’s why they CANT believe facts, their own eyes, or conclusive proof presented to them.

They just keep digging deeper.

No facts have been presented. You do not seem to have an understanding of facts as they pertain to science.

Magic Rock keeps wolves away. I have had Magic Rock for 13 years and no wolves.
Evil Rock makes everyone sick. I threw it in the river and now many towns are sick.

Magic Rock is likely a coincidence. People feel more confident with their lucky charms.
Evil Rock can be a coincidence, or it could be radioactive or harboring bacterium.

In these cases you still have some standard for a determination of the disease or issue. I will go biblical, one does not need a complicated test for being blind, or having leprosy.

Autism does not have such a standard. One cannot even begin to claim autism is increasing, only that the diagnosis is increasing.

 

[Skittle]

They used a complex plan of deception, the injections of toxins, medical suffocation devices, 6 foot rules, lock downs were illegitimate exercises of power.
The rest was medical tyranny.

One Example

And yet an easily measurable disease like influenza decreased.

You know what the problem is with people that subscribe to conspiracies? They disseminate so many it becomes like a virus.

If "the government" is this powerful and out for money they'd make it impossible to use the internet or severely restrict it. Make up a virus to inject us with a placebo like saline. Why would you make something up and inject people with something harmful?
In no way is that in the interest of the government.
So you trust the government. No- I trust common sense.

The indoctrinated will fight tooth and nail to avoid confessing they were indoctrinated.

That’s why they CANT believe facts, their own eyes, or conclusive proof presented to them.

They just keep digging deeper.

When I was a little kid, I learned a little about computers and the internet. Do you even begin to realize how out there it is for you to post videos from youtube or whatever about some hidden truth?

People like you think you have access to some secret knowledge accessible on a .com like youtube or facebook.

 

[Inquisitor]

It is correctly used by people in response to people making up pseudo-science. Correlation is the beginning of a hypothesis which needs to be tested. Until that time correlation is just a hypothesis, it is not a fact.

People who understand science will then find a way to test the hypothesis having established controls and reducing bias. The first thing you would do is throw-out the rate of vaccines with the rate of diagnosis of autism.



That ice cream sales increased is a fact.
That autism has increased is NOT a fact.
That the diagnosis of autism has increased is a fact.



If one is to say they are linked in that the DIAGNOSIS of autism increased at the same time vaccines increased, sure.
One can rightly just say that the DIAGNOSIS of autism increased at the same time cable TV increased. This is more likely.

There is more evidence in favor of cable TV. You see, impoverished people have access to vaccines by various organizations, but do not have access to cable. So, we find kids without cable TV are less likely to have autism.

This is the problem in not using the scientific method. For those with crayons up their noses and can't play along at home: The reason you would not have more cases of autism in impoverished populations is due to lack of a diagnosis.



You are not making sense and don't seem to understand biology on a high school level. Your statements are so out of whack I cannot even think where to begin. There are no vaccines to treat autism. Autism is not known to be caused by something that an immune response can prevent. I cannot be said that autism is increasing. You should know better than that. It is a simple matter of critical thinking.



Wrong again. I really wonder how people can be so lacking in critical thinking.
Autism is diagnosed. There is not a blood test for it. Autism is diagnosed as early as four, but can be diagnosed as young as two.
Therefore, the diagnosis will come after initial vaccination.

This is, yet again, not science except in the formation of a hypothesis. There is more evidence that cable tv causes autism using the same pseudo-science methodology.

The current rate of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in the US population is approximately 1 in 36.

ASD is inherited in 80% of the people with ASD.

There is also a strong link between ADHD and ASD.

There is a 40% to 70% chance that someone with ASD will also score high on the ADHD test.

Simple symptoms of ASD are problems with social interaction, textures, lights, noise.

Where as ADHD has symptoms which might include hyper-focus, inattentive, losing things,
fidgeting, etc. The wiggly 8 year old at school that cannot pay attention in class.

ASD and ADHD is not a good mix.

 

[Skittle]

They used a complex plan of deception, the injections of toxins, medical suffocation devices, 6 foot rules, lock downs were illegitimate exercises of power.
The rest was medical tyranny.

One Example

You gained access to this multi-trillion dollar plan via the dark web, aka "Geocities, Angelfire, and the elusive Facebook?"

 

[Skittle]

The current rate of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in the US population is approximately 1 in 36.

ASD is inherited in 80% of the people with ASD.

There is also a strong link between ADHD and ASD.

There is a 40% to 70% chance that someone with ASD will also score high on the ADHD test.

Simple symptoms of ASD are problems with social interaction, textures, lights, noise.

Where as ADHD has symptoms which might include hyper-focus, inattentive, losing things,
fidgeting, etc. The wiggly 8 year old at school that cannot pay attention in class.

ASD and ADHD is not a good mix.

That is sparkly and fun. I an not claiming anything is your point, but those are not disorders that are objectively measured as in a test using a biological sample. It is within the realm of mystery like gambling or alcoholism.

 

[Inquisitor]

That is sparkly and fun. I an not claiming anything is your point, but those are not disorders that are objectively measured as in a test using a biological sample. It is within the realm of mystery like gambling or alcoholism.

A set of written tests will give you a good idea of whether you have one or both, ASD and ADHD.

In my state the Govt tested the prison population and 41% had ADHD.

ADHD is very high in youth offenders.

You would have experienced other kids at school with ADHD.

They can be impulsive, they take big risks, can't sit still, usually in trouble, bullies.

They can also be hyper-focused like many professors, that is, one subject for life.

 

[Inquisitor]

That is sparkly and fun. I an not claiming anything is your point, but those are not disorders that are objectively measured as in a test using a biological sample. It is within the realm of mystery like gambling or alcoholism.

Odd that you would mention gambling and alcoholism because they are common in ADHD.