Europe sends troops to Greenland.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Just so everyone is clear, Greenland has a population approximately the same as Grand Forks, North Dakota. Or Hempstead, NY, or Fountainbleu, Fl. So let's stop calling it a "country" or a "Nation". It is equivalent in population to a very small city in the US. For example, Irvine California is owned by the Irvine corporation. No one fought a civil war over some company owning a city in the US. BTW, Irvine is more than 5x bigger than the population of Greenland.

So do you think Congress will approve of an Greenland invasion or will we have to pull our troops out after 60 days?
 
So do you think Congress will approve of an Greenland invasion or will we have to pull our troops out after 60 days?
We are already in Greenland with a military base. To my knowledge Greenland does not have an army anymore than Hempstead, NY has an army. People throwing around terms like this are clueless. No war, no army, simply a handshake agreement in some backroom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squigglylines
We are already in Greenland with a military base. To my knowledge Greenland does not have an army anymore than Hempstead, NY has an army. People throwing around terms like this are clueless. No war, no army, simply a handshake agreement in some backroom.

So when Trump was ask if he had ruled out taking Greenland by force and he said all options were still on the table he was clueless?
 
So when Trump was ask if he had ruled out taking Greenland by force and he said all options were still on the table he was clueless?
No, it is a standard reply, all options are on the table. Stupid questions deserve vague answers. Why would he lay out what he is and is not willing to do?

What is far more likely than Denmark going to war with the US over Greenland is the US threatening to withdraw from NATO when they are terrified of Russia.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squigglylines
No, it is a standard reply, all options are on the table. Stupid questions deserve vague answers. Why would he lay out what he is and is not willing to do?

What is far more likely than Denmark going to war with the US over Greenland is the US threatening to withdraw from NATO when they are terrified of Russia.

It doesn't seem to matter either way Trump just ruled out a forced takeover. I guess someone explained the Constitution part to him. https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/21/world/video/trump-nato-hosts-davos-greenland-digvid
 
Pfft.. anyone play chess? Then you see what's been going on since Jan 2025. The place has what 54000 people.. so force take was never on the table. Man, to many people watch news and just run with what's said. What can you say... hmm you hear things.. I'm not talking you heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who.. you get it. Lol so to be very cryptic.. there is so much going on that is no where in the news and it wont ever be. Just what two or three months go "this is scary" and then tell you only what they can.

So this is not some old guy trying to get land. We read Rev and we know this system we have now has to fall some how and when it does it will crash and there will be even more crazy stuff.

This(Greenland) is not where the real problem is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caan
I have said it before, and I may repeat it:

The world is laughing at USA. And Putin is so very very happy. Congrats, USA.
What Mr Trump has acheived is to destroy relationships to the allies of US, to mock Europeans, to try to steal Greenland from Denmark and a whole lot of dirty things.

Of course NATO have troops in Greenland as everywhere else in NATO-land. What else had you expected ?
 
I have said it before, and I may repeat it:

The world is laughing at USA. And Putin is so very very happy. Congrats, USA.
What Mr Trump has acheived is to destroy relationships to the allies of US, to mock Europeans, to try to steal Greenland from Denmark and a whole lot of dirty things.

Of course NATO have troops in Greenland as everywhere else in NATO-land. What else had you expected ?
Wow, thanks for the update, here I was thinking the world was laughing at Norway.
 
Why should the world laugh at Norway?
Good point, you guys can defend yourselves from Russia, you don't need the US and I think many in the US agree with you. To be honest I think many of us look at Europe and wonder if it would really be so bad if they were under Russian rule? 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. If the US were attacked by Russia and China, would Norway come to our defense? I highly doubt it, NATO is a relationship that is one sided. I can see that Denmark was a powerful country back in the 1700s when they first began to colonize Greenland. But not anymore, the days of them being a powerful king that needs to be kind, those days are gone. So I naturally assumed you were joking when you shared that.

If that wasn't a joke what was your point? Are you saying China which has wanted Greenland would be a more kind king than the US? You see, that is why I look at this whole NATO and wonder if it is really in the best interests of the US to continue with that alliance.
 
This military story was just for the media to keep simple-minded people "in a good mood" against Trump. It was really suggested that Trump would take over Greenland militarily.
Of course, what is being concealed is that the US has been operating a military base in Greenland since 1951.

Nevertheless, I still don't understand the whole Greenland story. How do you assess his intentions and actions?
If the US wants to “take over” Greenland, wouldn't it make more sense to talk calmly and diplomatically with the strategically important people in Denmark and Greenland?
And what does “take over” mean specifically? Would it then be the 51st state?

In my view, it should ultimately be up to the Greenlanders themselves to decide in a referendum. Greenland is not in the EU (the mother country Denmark, on the other hand, is), but if I were a Greenlander and had the choice between the EU and the US, I wouldn't have to think twice...
Nothing has been concealed about America's base in Greenland. I'm in Australia and I knew about it. Greenlanders have already made their position clear. They want to be left alone.

"Calmly and diplomatically"? You expect that from Mr Trump? I worked for someone like him. He delighted in stirring everyone up and setting workers against each other. I liked the job so I put my head down and tried to stay out of trouble. It was not easy.

That it was deliberate became obvious. I got in trouble more than once. Then I was offered the opportunity to set up a branch office in New Zealand. I was sent over to check out if it was feasible or not. The market was too small. But it proved that the boss was mostly bluffing. As another manager said to me, "I shake the trees to see who falls off". That time I was one of the victims.

Now it seems that there is a sensible solution to the Greenland issue. All the drama was unnecessary.
 
Don't get too excited. The troops are preparing logistics for a soon to be held military exercise. Get excited when Islam and Roman Catholicism merge. Some Jews will also sign up to it. Why do I believe this? It's already being attempted, publicly, without any conspiracy.

This proposed merger is based on the "Abrahamic religion" myth. Personally, I believe this to be the "three frogs" in the book of Revelation. I do not believe that this can happen while the church is still on the earth. We are the power that restrains (2 Thessalonians 2:6 & 7). However, for sure Satan is laying the groundwork for his world wide deception.
No one is proposing that.
 
Just so everyone is clear, Greenland has a population approximately the same as Grand Forks, North Dakota. Or Hempstead, NY, or Fountainbleu, Fl. So let's stop calling it a "country" or a "Nation". It is equivalent in population to a very small city in the US. For example, Irvine California is owned by the Irvine corporation. No one fought a civil war over some company owning a city in the US. BTW, Irvine is more than 5x bigger than the population of Greenland.

They want things to remain as they are and having a small population is no reason for invading another country.
 
The US are the ones wanting to take over people that do not want it.
Are you clueless, the only imperial power today with colonies is Denmark. Greenland is a colony of Denmark ever since the 1700s. So complaining about the US wanting it is simply the kettle calling the pot black.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eli1
They want things to remain as they are and having a small population is no reason for invading another country.
No one is planning on invading Greenland, it has the population of a small city, a very small city. Right now Greenland does not have an army, that function is carried out by NATO and that is how it will stay the same. And yes, there is plenty of reason to view Greenland as an extremely strategic location during war time, and right now, it is war time.