A question for the ladies: What makes a man attractive?
- Thread starter zeroturbulence
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
oh!Oh I didn't see you wrote "chest". It's chest.
Why didn't I look at a man's chest first.
Most men cover their chests with shirts so I'm not really looking at bare chests. It's not summer year round, plus, you can get sunburned if you do that.
Isn't it the same with men looking at women's chests??!
Most of us don't want men constantly staring there. Also, it doesn't always mean they are attracted. It just mean they got nothing else to look at.
So, meh to your you-tube video. Honestly, stop watching them. They not always right. Actually, most of the time, they're wrong! lol
I was going to say, "Just sit up straight, and you'll do just fine."
And, now I see, it is the good advice since it shows off your chest, you back, your shoulders, your neck, your jaw, your arms, your hips, your thighs, etc etc etc.
Those ladies' eyes might've just as well have been keying in on the man's center to see how much he went off balance. Even if your physique isn't perfectly defined, as long as you're 'balanced,' it looks good. I think it's something to do with the formula of pi.
And, now I see, it is the good advice since it shows off your chest, you back, your shoulders, your neck, your jaw, your arms, your hips, your thighs, etc etc etc.
Those ladies' eyes might've just as well have been keying in on the man's center to see how much he went off balance. Even if your physique isn't perfectly defined, as long as you're 'balanced,' it looks good. I think it's something to do with the formula of pi.
For me, the most attractive physical feature would be hair.
But of course, for a relationship looks aren't the only things that matter or make someone attractive.
Personality/faith/fruits of the spirit, those traits overlap from my perspective and someone who displays the fruits of the spirit of kindness and patience is very attractive to me.
Other things that are attractive are good hygiene, acts of service, and a good heart toward animals.
Ideally, attractiveness also comes from someone who feels like they could be a "best-friend" (man version) because friends are fun, someone to enjoy interests with, a comfort, supportive, and good company.
But of course, for a relationship looks aren't the only things that matter or make someone attractive.
Personality/faith/fruits of the spirit, those traits overlap from my perspective and someone who displays the fruits of the spirit of kindness and patience is very attractive to me.
Other things that are attractive are good hygiene, acts of service, and a good heart toward animals.
Ideally, attractiveness also comes from someone who feels like they could be a "best-friend" (man version) because friends are fun, someone to enjoy interests with, a comfort, supportive, and good company.
It was a scientific experiment and the men weren't shirtless. I know there are tons of clickbait fake titles, but this woman's video was based on science, not opinions or questionnaires.
This is how the study was done. I know the difference between objective and subjective data. The study was done by licensed PSYCHOLOGISTS. It wasn't a clickbait video.
licensed psychologists
Licensed psychos!
Who would want to submit their picture and have others rate it for a scientific experiment?
Obvs most people would see it in a full frontal picture as the largest area of the body you can see. It depends on the focus of the photograph.
Still not buying it.
Has this 'experiment' been replicated? Did they do the same thing for women, or did they only do men? Did it matter the gender of the viewer/subject? How old were the subjects and viewers? There's a whole lot of variables.
Did they do a randomised controlled trial, and how many experiments did they do? Did they answer all this in the video? Is it published in a scientific, peer reviewed reputable Journal? Did they do people of all cultures/ethnicities or was it restricted to a certain type of people?
Licensed psychos!
Who would want to submit their picture and have others rate it for a scientific experiment?
Obvs most people would see it in a full frontal picture as the largest area of the body you can see. It depends on the focus of the photograph.
Still not buying it.
Has this 'experiment' been replicated? Did they do the same thing for women, or did they only do men? Did it matter the gender of the viewer/subject? How old were the subjects and viewers? There's a whole lot of variables.
Did they do a randomised controlled trial, and how many experiments did they do? Did they answer all this in the video? Is it published in a scientific, peer reviewed reputable Journal? Did they do people of all cultures/ethnicities or was it restricted to a certain type of people?
I remember studying this type of thing for Pyschology at Uni and poking holes in all the behaviouristic paradigms and biases of the researchers. Plus the methodology needs to be questioned, lab results often won't be the same as in real life.
Your eyes can view different things, but a REAL person is not just their photograph.
Your eyes can view different things, but a REAL person is not just their photograph.
It's like reading a ZNP post, but for sociology instead of economics and politics.
Sadly you will have to make many, many, MANY more posts to even come close to ZNP's post output.
Lol. Blue skin and large foreheads? I'm pretty sure women hate all that. But I'm no expert... Or at least, I wasn't until Mel Gibson made it really simple in his movie.
Wow is that really him?Lol. Blue skin and large foreheads? I'm pretty sure women hate all that. But I'm no expert... Or at least, I wasn't until Mel Gibson made it really simple in his movie.
View attachment 289531
I was just recalling Braveheart
Lol. No. That was Megamind, just an example of someone with blue skin and a large forehead. Mel Gibson is better looking.
He was in Elf
I thought he was cute, but some women prefer Orlando Bloom.
But aren't elves meant to be small, or is that pixies?
I thought he was cute, but some women prefer Orlando Bloom.
But aren't elves meant to be small, or is that pixies?
OK a long time since I saw the movie, but Will Farell's character was a human raised by elves, he wasn't really an elf.
Orlando Bloom was taller than your average hobbit. So I don't know whats going on in Middle Earth. Maybe thats what they look like when it isn't Christmas.
They both have long legs...
Orlando Bloom was taller than your average hobbit. So I don't know whats going on in Middle Earth. Maybe thats what they look like when it isn't Christmas.
They both have long legs...
Legolas never blinked. So, he must've been made primarily of water. This would explain his exceptionally clear skin.