Harvesting of the Earth

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=e928...3cyt0cm91YmxlK3ZlcnNlJmZvcm09Q1NCUkFORA&ntb=1


The phrase “time of Jacob’s trouble” comes from Jeremiah 30:7, which describes a future period of unparalleled distress for Israel, followed by deliverance.

Full Verse (KJV)​

Jeremiah 30:7“Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob's trouble; but he shall be saved out of it.”

Jacob's troubles are referring to Israel
The fact that your Verse declares Jacob will be saved out of it removes this from being the 70 AD Destruction where basically every Jew in Jerusalem was slaughtered or captured. Like you said this is in reference to the future.
 
  • Love
Reactions: 2Christ
Isaiah 65:12-16
12 Therefore will I number you to the sword, and ye shall all bow down to the slaughter: because when I called, ye did not answer; when I spake, ye did not hear; but did evil before mine eyes, and did choose that wherein I delighted not.
13 Therefore thus saith the Lord God, Behold, my servants shall eat, but ye shall be hungry: behold, my servants shall drink, but ye shall be thirsty: behold, my servants shall rejoice, but ye shall be ashamed:
14 Behold, my servants shall sing for joy of heart, but ye shall cry for sorrow of heart, and shall howl for vexation of spirit.
15 And ye shall leave your name for a curse unto my chosen: for the Lord God shall slay thee, and call his servants by another name:
16 That he who blesseth himself in the earth shall bless himself in the God of truth; and he that sweareth in the earth shall swear by the God of truth; because the former troubles are forgotten, and because they are hid from mine eyes.

Bringing in additional portions of the context that shows the above is NOT a reference to ALL of Israel:

Isaiah 65:10-11
10 And Sharon shall be a fold of flocks, and the valley of Achor a place for the herds to lie down in, for my people that have sought me.
11 But ye [are] they that forsake the LORD, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop, and that furnish the drink offering unto that number.

So this section of scripture fails to uphold the idea of replacement theology.

Just wanted to make that clarification.

MM
 
Daniel 9:26-27
The Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and
the sanctuary
.
And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined. And he will
confirm a covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering
;
and on the wing of abominations will come the one who makes desolate, until a complete destruction, one that is decreed,
gushes forth on the one who makes desolate.

I can see three separate characters.

The Messiah is cut off.

The Prince whom destroys the city and the temple.

Then The One who makes desolate.

Finally, The Many.

Please see:

 
Dispensationalism vs Covenant Theology vs Replacement Theology

The answer to the perplexity of this dilemma is actually fairly simple.

If you will, in your mind, separate the 'law' from the 'promises' and consider them separately:

1. The old covenant ('law') has been "replaced" by the new covenant ('grace') - where salvation and the Church is concerned.

Hebrews 8:

6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.


2. The 'promises' of the old covenant are still intact - they have not been replaced. And, according to those promises, Israel as a nation "still has a part to play" - during the Millennium.

3. The 'law' was nailed to the cross of Christ - but, not the 'promises'.

Colossians 2:

14 Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;


Where covenants are concerned - during the Millennium, Israel will "exist and operate" accordingly:

1. The individuals (original Israel) will live by/in the new covenant. (salvation-by-grace, just like everyone else)

2. The nation will "operate" within the promises of the old covenant. (essentially, the land, living in peace, etc.)

It really is that simple - do not confuse 'law' with 'promises'. With regard to relationship-with-God-through-Jesus, it is-and-will-be the same for all - Jew and Gentile alike. The only "difference" is that [original] Israel will once again be a nation on the earth - according to the promises that God made through the old covenant. (But, not part of the Church.)
 
The Law and the Prophets

17 “Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets; I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them. 18 For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the law until all is accomplished.

19 Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

20 For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.
 
“For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, so that no one may boast” Eph. 2: 8

God gave us Grace that not even the angels have
 
Dispensationalism vs Covenant Theology vs Replacement Theology

The answer to the perplexity of this dilemma is actually fairly simple.

If you will, in your mind, separate the 'law' from the 'promises' and consider them separately:

1. The old covenant ('law') has been "replaced" by the new covenant ('grace') - where salvation and the Church is concerned.

Hebrews 8:

6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.

Dare we pay close attention to the grammar, that verse doesn't at all say that the new covenant is now in force from a past activation. The Mosaic Law is still in force today all the way through the tribulation. Notice that the establishment of the new covenant is upon "better promises," not that it has yet become in force. Assuming that into the text is a timeline error.

MM
 
  • Like
Reactions: Omegatime
“For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, so that no one may boast” Eph. 2: 8

God gave us Grace that not even the angels have

You have to understand that the works-based salvation crowd who believe in salvation retention by their works as the means by which they allegedly keep from "losing" their salvation, they must inject meaning where it's nowhere stated in relation to the body of Christ today.

I've seen many, many hypotheticals by which they will try validating their anti-biblical beliefs, but, thankfully, our salvation isn't predicated upon the mounds of trashy hypotheticals so many seem to reek of in their drive to establish their beliefs as being biblical. There is no salvation nor a retention of salvation by works. That is a false salvation with no power to save even one soul.

The faithfulness in our salvation isn't rooted in us, but in Christ Jesus alone:

2 Timothy 2:13
If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.

Were Christ to fail in His faithfulness to the truly saved who lapse into unbelief in any of its manifestations, Christ would then be denying even Himself any more than He can reverse His crucifixion, and He will NOT ever do that but the works-based salvation gang , they seem to believe otherwise from what this verse and many others declare.

MM
 
  • Like
Reactions: Omegatime
Revelation 13:1

The Beast out of the Sea

And I saw a beast rising out of the sea, with ten horns and seven heads, with ten diadems upon its horns and a blasphemous name upon its heads.

These are 10 nations around the Mediterranean Sea, old roman empire.

Revelations 13:11

11 Then I saw a second beast, coming out of the earth. It had two horns like a lamb, but it spoke like a dragon. 12 It exercised all the authority of the first beast on its behalf, and made the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose fatal wound had been healed.

Kingdom of the Antichrist
 
The second Beast out of the earth sometimes called the False Prophet has a high chance of being the High Priest, leader of the Sanhedrin
 
They believe in the God of Abraham and you would be surprised just how many Jews believe in Yeshua.
Sure. Those Jews are known as Messianic Jews.

More Jews would likely come to believe if the Rabbi's would read them Isaiah 7:14.

"Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel." (meaning,God with us)
 
  • Like
Reactions: lrs68
In an Atlantic article, titled "Kosher Jesus: Messianic Jews in the Holy Land," Sarah Posner explains that "there are an estimated 175,000 to 250,000 Messianic Jews in the U.S. and 350,000 worldwide, according to various counts, they are a tiny minority in Israel -- just 10,000-20,000 people by some estimates -- but growing, according to both its proponents and critics."