I did. I didn't see thousands of women in it.
www.pbs.org
Nixon beat Humphrey by 63.4% and considered an overwhelming victory.
The reason we have abortion and abortion up to birth and even beyond in some cases and the reason we have Dems in power is account of women voting as a bloc. That is in the sense the word overwhelming support for Clancy is used. Nationally, it really does not have to reach your high bar, but I think it does if the silent and ignorant crowd is included.
So you ignore that silence is consent and ignorance crowds in your assessment? It should be easy for you to falsify the claim. Overwhelming could be as low as 60%. There is just a lot you ignored in my post. Including all your research you did on the subject. I see some female backlash from the same females who support repealing the 19th against the bulk who would argue for leniency. The bulk of males argue for death or prison. It is all incidental anyway since Clancy will get leniency. An activist minority will always move a passive majority, and whether it is overwhelming or not, the results are the same.
OK so you have not falsified it. I have not seen any evidence from you on anything.
Yeah it could. Besides, overwhelming in the case of elections is much lower than your high bar.
Sounds like you are ignoring my arguments. Tone deaf
Never claimed that, did you? Where do you come up with these preposterous standards?
Yeah there is. If going by results, you bet there is.
What reason and what evidence?
Where did i write i go all over the net? Mostly YouTube and X, including some political shows.
Pushback? Have not seen much, and all the females I consulted on this are for leniency, hands down. It is not even close. I have not talked to one female who argues for prison or death for Clancy and the latter is real justice. Most of us reject the postpartum psychotic defense. There are cases where men are crazy, kill off their kids, wives, or both, and get death or prison. Not loony bins because of some mental health issue. The only category where i see women overly punished is on account of sex with minor males.
Then your standard is impossible by your own admission.
I have not. The only ones i seen is the repeal of 19th crowd.
My claim is not falsified by ignoring and discounting evidence presented. Oh it is social media so i can ignore that. I made no secret of my sources.
If reality is your standard, you may not like the results.
Nice catch. Keep me on my toes.
Feel free to hand wave this bit of evidence because its source is social media. It comes from professional women who support leniency and influence public opinion.
| Here's the thing: his core question is fair. How do you prove what was happening in someone's mind months ago? You can't run a lab test for it. But that's not how any of this works. Juries integrate evidence, and this case has evidence most cases never have. A medical record showing deterioration with every medication change. A mother and husband she told about her homicidal thoughts. An antidepressant dose doubled the day before the tragedy, on top of benzodiazepine withdrawal. And no motive. No affair, no violence, no history of anything but being a loving mother and nurse. That's why "anyone could just claim insanity" falls apart. Without that paper trail, the defense never works. I also pushed back on his claim that postpartum depression is largely about selfishness. I've sat with too many struggling new mothers to accept that. What I see is isolation: women raising children far from family and community, most households needing two incomes, and one in five American women now on an antidepressant. Since my first video on this case, patients have written to me saying they had frightening, intrusive thoughts in the postpartum period too and never told anyone. Those thoughts are far more common than we admit. Acting on them is extraordinarily rare. The silence around them helps no one. |
| Lindsay’s older children attended school or childcare outside the home, meaning she was not caring for all three children alone all day. Patrick had approximately 12 weeks of paid paternity leave from Microsoft after Callan’s birth. After returning to work, Patrick was able to work from home. He handled responsibilities including school and daycare drop-offs and pickups. Lindsay was a labor-and-delivery nurse who generally worked a limited number of nursing shifts rather than a traditional five-day workweek. They were a two-professional-income household before she stopped working. Patrick worked for Microsoft, while Lindsay worked at Massachusetts General Hospital. They owned a substantial home in affluent Duxbury, Massachusetts. The family had a boat and regularly took the children boating. They took family vacations, including a trip shortly before the killings. |
www.thegatewaypundit.com
No one here has ever said, nor implied, evilMurder is wrong, IMHO this case is revealing how far we are into the Last Days, when so many people can call evil good. 'In the last days terrible times will come'. God Bless All
I agree. Just that some here want evil to be looked at as if it really isn't that bad.
That means dismissing with a hand wave. Ignoring. By the by, that type of stratagem does not falsify the claim.
I do not see you falsifying the cliam, nor do i see you showing counter protests of females arguing for death or life imprisonment of Clancy. I don't think there are any, nothing beyond lip service and accusations of slander (to me).
I do not know the conclusion is false and you have not shown it to be false. Again, silence is consent and so is ignorance.
Where did you get authority to speak on behalf of all women?
I do not see your posting here as fair and honest. We would agree to disagree.
The results would not be a hung jury, which points to a major flaw in their premise.
| Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think that you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong". Ayn Rand. Atlas Shrugged. |
Will she get off because of postpartum psychosis? Or some other mental issue absolving her of responsibility? Supporting the concept of inequality between the sexes.
