I'm always doing awesome. Yourself?Are you doing well today, my friend?
I'm always doing awesome. Yourself?Are you doing well today, my friend?
Yeah, it should be considered a preface. i never got to the meat of the answer. I got called away 3 times while trying to finish it. At the airport now awaiting my flight.This is a wonderful explanation and I don't disagree with any of it. I'm more concerned with what transpires to restore man into relationship and be reconciled to God.
The explanation that all man need do is stop resisting God is accurate, but it is very simplistic and doesn't actually account for all that transpires between God and the individual. I find so many who only concern themselves with what I believe are the visible responses of individuals, and little thought is given to the unseen spiritual activity of God.
It's been sporty to say the least but I'm still hereI'm always doing awesome. Yourself?
As much as I agree with you it still doesn't make sense for God to Inspire Joshua while addressing the Hebrew people to make them choose to follow God or not if man had no say in the matter.I truly appreciate the discussion. And I don't deny the cooperation of man in salvation, but I don't believe people understand well the invisible hand of God that undergirds so much of the transaction.
Joshua’s command makes sense because God’s commands reveal the heart, not because sinners have native moral ability.As much as I agree with you it still doesn't make sense for God to Inspire Joshua while addressing the Hebrew people to make them choose to follow God or not if man had no say in the matter
I always appreciate our discussions. Take your time.Yeah, it should be considered a preface. i never got to the meat of the answer. I got called away 3 times while trying to finish it. At the airport now awaiting my flight.
God was in covenant with the Hebrew people. Joshua was calling them back into that relationship. He wasn't calling them to be saved.As much as I agree with you it still doesn't make sense for God to Inspire Joshua while addressing the Hebrew people to make them choose to follow God or not if man had no say in the matter.
Considering that Jesus was tempted just as we are, what does temptation act on? At first glance, the flesh appears to be the obvious answer to that, but Jesus was tempted and did not sin, and so sin did not work on his flesh successfully in achieving what it did by Adam. And, surely, that distinguished, discriminating factor is revealed in His declaration, "Father, ...not My will, but Yours be done."it stemmed from adams temptation. It stemmed from adams lack of faith. It stemed from what some say adams love for his wife.. If she was going to go. he would go with her.
the problem with our thinking, is we think the act is sin. While the act is sin, it resulted from a deeper sin. by the time you do the act. you have probably sinned many times over
Joshua’s command makes sense because God’s commands reveal the heart, not because sinners have native moral ability.
When Joshua says, “Choose this day whom you will serve,” he is not assuming Israel has autonomous power to repent; he is confronting them with God’s covenant word so their true desire is exposed.
Scripture shows this pattern everywhere: God commands (“Turn to Me,” Isa 45:22), warns (“Do not harden your hearts,” Ps 95:8), and invites (“Come,” Isa 55:1), yet also says the natural man cannot submit (Rom 8:7), cannot receive the things of the Spirit (1 Cor 2:14), and does not seek God (Rom 3:11).
The command reveals the heart; the heart responds; and God enables obedience for those who truly turn. So Joshua’s challenge is not proof of native moral ability — it is God’s way of exposing whether Israel loves Him or idols.
Calling them back means some left or considered leaving which is another act of the human will.God was in covenant with the Hebrew people. Joshua was calling them back into that relationship. He wasn't calling them to be saved.
Man is able choose, but man cannot make every choice, and neither can he insure the choices he makes come to fruition. So, that doesn't qualify, in my opinion, as freewill.
When it comes to life in general, and salvation in particular, I believe God is more active than people realize. For example, read Philippians 2:12-13. What is the Apostle teaching? He says God at work in us, and we are to be aware of this and adjust our actions accordingly. Jesus, Himself, said He always did what He saw the Father doing. Our lives are to be a response to what God is doing. Likewise, I believe this is true in salvation. I believe repentance is a response to godly sorrow and conviction of the Spirit. I believe obedience is the result of a new heart and spirit. I could go on but you get the point. I believe God is much more active in the affairs of man than most people know, and I believe many miss this because their relationship with God is not as intimate as it could be. I don't say this critically, but because I believe there is much more available to Christians than they have yet come to know.
Making a choice is an an act of the will. But making a choice does not insure the choice comes to fruition. Jonah made a choice not to go to Nineveh and acted on that choice. But Jonah went to Nineveh. In James 4:13-15, a choice was made to go to a town to buy and sell and make much gain. James said what should have been said that IF THE LORD WILLS, we will buy and sell and make much gain. In Acts 17, Paul says that God appoints our times and the bounds of our habitation. I don't call that freedom.Calling them back means some left or considered leaving which is another act of the human will.
*something in you that is. But this is that. What goes on behind your eyes as they read this. What you decide for yourself what this is, and what you think to seek or how you reach out with what you can reach about it.There is something in you this is that
Can you answer a simple question regarding your .with our Lord under grace?
Do you pray everyday without ceasing?