Who is the restrainer?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Rebellion, Falling Away or Departure

2 Now concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our assembling to meet him, we beg you, brethren, 2 not to be quickly shaken in mind or excited, either by spirit or by word, or by letter purporting to be from us, to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. 3 Let no one deceive you in any way; for that day will not come, unless the departure comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of perdition, 4 who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God.


Not a departure of truth but a physical departure

Represents the rapture of the church which must come first

Many such scholars have in print many of the same understandings as I presented here
 
There is nothing of this world that can hold back the lawless one. Has to be God. Its written.. and you know what is now restraining him. How did we forget? And were debating it? The Church? Well when this was written the Church was "the young Christian community". So not the Church. The other stuff.. yeah we all have our personal belief and ..some tend to take their personal view as the gospel.. no offense :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: OMC
So, you believe that Satan and the Antichrist will be allowed to kill every Christian on earth during his reign? What's the point in having the 144,000 sealed Israelites evangelizing during the tribulation period then? You really think that people will be able to accept God/Jesus during the tribulation without the power of the Holy Spirit working through the 144,000 to bring more people to Jesus Christ?!
I believe what the bible says - Jesus prophesied of the great tribulation, it's guaranteed for at least two churches, Smyrna and Thyatira, you tell me what you make of it.

"Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake."
"Indeed, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and you will have tribulation ten days. "
"Indeed I will cast her into a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of their deeds."
 
The “falling away” in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is not the world’s political condition, nor a global cease‑fire, nor governments “stopping the preaching of the Gospel”; Paul says it is a religious rebellion — an apostasia — a deliberate turning from truth by those who profess it, not the Church itself, but the visible sphere of religion that contains wheat and tares (Matt 13:24–30).
The Church cannot fall away because Christ preserves His own (Matt 16:18), but Scripture is clear that many will depart from the faith (1 Tim 4:1), many will follow destructive heresies (2 Pet 2:1–2), and many will not endure sound doctrine (2 Tim 4:3–4); that is the falling away Paul describes, not geopolitical cooperation.
And the man of sin does not rise because nations “stopped believing in a personal God,” but because God removes restraint (2 Thess 2:7) and the world, already loving darkness (John 3:19), embraces the lie.
The saints are gathered to Christ after this rebellion and after the man of sin is revealed, but none of this requires redefining the Church as “only those who act Christlike,” because Scripture says the Church is those who belong to Christ, not those who perform perfectly (Rom 8:9).
The falling away is apostasy — not the collapse of the Church, not world peace, and not a political coalition — but the final religious revolt that clears the stage for the man of sin to be received by those who refused the truth.
"Apostasia" is not the church's gradual backslide from the faith, even though that is happening; what "apostasia" refers to is a single event, like the desacration of the temple by the Greek king, and through this event the Antichrist will be revealed. But the caveat is that, there won't be a real physical brick and mortar temple for that, it'll unfold in another way.
 
"Apostasia" is not the church's gradual backslide from the faith, even though that is happening; what "apostasia" refers to is a single event, like the desacration of the temple by the Greek king, and through this event the Antichrist will be revealed. But the caveat is that, there won't be a real physical brick and mortar temple for that, it'll unfold in another way
Apostasia in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is not a temple‑desecration event like Antiochus IV, nor a slow centuries‑long backslide, but a decisive religious revolt—a deliberate, identifiable abandonment of truth among professing believers—which becomes the stage on which the man of sin is revealed.
Paul never ties apostasia to a physical temple; instead, he consistently uses “temple of God” for the church, meaning the Antichrist’s self‑exaltation happens within the sphere of religion, not inside a rebuilt building.
So the apostasia is a single moment of exposure emerging from a long process of corruption: a climactic defection from truth that unveils the man of sin, who then claims divine authority in the “temple of God,” unfolding in a non‑architectural, spiritual way rather than through a literal brick‑and‑mortar desecration.
 
So, you believe that Satan and the Antichrist will be allowed to kill every Christian on earth during his reign? What's the point in having the 144,000 sealed Israelites evangelizing during the tribulation period then? You really think that people will be able to accept God/Jesus during the tribulation without the power of the Holy Spirit working through the 144,000 to bring more people to Jesus Christ?!
BTW I don't intend to argue with you on whether the Holy Spirit will be taken away, I believe the restrainer is civil power, not the Holy Spirit at all.
 
Apostasia in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is not a temple‑desecration event like Antiochus IV, nor a slow centuries‑long backslide, but a decisive religious revolt—a deliberate, identifiable abandonment of truth among professing believers—which becomes the stage on which the man of sin is revealed.
Paul never ties apostasia to a physical temple; instead, he consistently uses “temple of God” for the church, meaning the Antichrist’s self‑exaltation happens within the sphere of religion, not inside a rebuilt building.
So the apostasia is a single moment of exposure emerging from a long process of corruption: a climactic defection from truth that unveils the man of sin, who then claims divine authority in the “temple of God,” unfolding in a non‑architectural, spiritual way rather than through a literal brick‑and‑mortar desecration.
Yeah, the third temple is the body temple of the church, that's what will be desacrated.
 
Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things? And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time. For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He who now restrains will do so until He is taken out of the way. And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming. (2 Thess. 2:3-8)

The absolutely definitive signs of the (great) tribulation is the revealing of the Antichrist through the act of great apostasy, and the hard condition for that is the removal of the "restrainer", and that raises the question - who or what is the "restrainer"?

So far there're three most plausible answers - 1. the Holy Spirit, which has been suppressing the Antichrist's spirit, even though it's been at work since the days of apostle Paul. When the time comes, the Holy Spirit will be gone, Antichrist freed; 2. Civil power, specifically, national governments. Whne the Antichrist rises, national sovereignty will be surrendered to a global government, which will rule over the entire world; 3. the church and all church organizations, no good church left, all will be incorporated into the false religion of Mystery Babylon.

I think the answer is heavily affected by each one's eschatalogical view. If you're pre-trib, it'll likely to be 1 or 3; if you're post-trib like me, though, it'll likely to be 2. It all depends on how you identify of the "saints" in Revelation. If they're "new converts" - even though the whole world is deceived by the Antichrist, the original church is gone, then it might be 3, I personally side with 2, as I identify them as the remnant church, the great multitude specifically identified as the followers of Christ coming "out of the great tribulation" (Rev. 7:14). However, in most translations, the "he" and the "restrainer" are both capped, indicating the Holy Spirit, which doesn't really make sense, considering the prophecy, "it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh," (Acts 2:17).
So who could that be? just a supposition here i am speculating.

Daniel gives us a clue that is easy to overlook. In Daniel 10, we are shown that there is a spiritual conflict taking place behind the kingdoms of this world. An angel tells Daniel: But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days; and behold, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I had been left there alone with the kings of Persia. (Daniel 10:13, NKJV)

The angel later says: And now I must return to fight with the prince of Persia; and when I have gone forth, indeed the prince of Greece will come. (Daniel 10:20, NKJV) This gives us something very important. Daniel shows that earthly kingdoms are not the whole story. There is also a spiritual conflict taking place behind them, and Michael is directly involved in that conflict.

But the most important passage is found in Daniel 12: At that time Michael shall stand up, The great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people; And there shall be a time of trouble, Such as never was since there was a nation, Even to that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, Every one who is found written in the book. (Daniel 12:1, NKJV)

if we Look carefully at the timing. Michael is described as the great prince who stands watch over God's people. Then comes a time of trouble greater than anything that came before it. And after that, God's people are delivered. That is very close to the pattern we see in the New Testament. Paul tells us that something is restraining the lawless one until his appointed time. When that restraint is removed, the lawless one is revealed. Then, at the coming of Jesus, the Lord destroys him.

Daniel does not say, “Michael is the restrainer.” We have to be honest about that. But Daniel does show Michael exercising a protective and opposing role in the spiritual conflict surrounding the final events. Then Revelation gives us another remarkable connection. Michael appears again, this time fighting Satan himself: And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought.(Revelation 12:7, NKJV)

Satan is then cast down: So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world.(Revelation 12:9, NKJV)

So we have Michael involved in a direct conflict with Satan and his angels. Daniel shows Michael standing watch over God's people at the time of the great end-time trouble. Revelation shows Michael fighting Satan. And Paul speaks of a restraining power that holds back the final lawless one until the appointed time.

Are these all describing the same thing? We cannot say for certain. But the similarities are too important to simply ignore.
There is also something else worth remembering. Scripture consistently shows that Satan and the forces of evil do not have unlimited freedom. They can act only within the limits God permits. Their time is controlled by God.

That is why I think the identity of the restrainer should be approached carefully. It may be tempting to immediately say that the restrainer is the Holy Spirit, human government, Michael, or some other power. But the passage itself does not give us that answer.

What Scripture does give us is a pattern. There is a power that restrains. There is an appointed time. The restraint is removed. The lawless one is revealed. And finally, Jesus Himself destroys him.

Daniel adds another important piece to this picture. Michael is not an ordinary angel. He is called “the great prince” who stands watch over God's people, and he is involved in spiritual warfare at the very time when the final trouble comes.

So I would not conclude, “Michael is definitely the restrainer.” I would say something more careful and, I believe, more faithful to Scripture: Michael is one of the strongest biblical figures we should examine when trying to understand the restraining power, because Daniel and Revelation place him directly in the spiritual conflict surrounding God's people, Satan, and the events of the end.

The answer may become clearer when we put Daniel, Revelation, and 2 Thessalonians side by side and follow the sequence of events rather than trying to identify the restrainer from one verse alone. That is where this becomes especially interesting, because the same final powers begin appearing in all three books.


Blessings
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Daniel gives us a clue that is easy to overlook. In Daniel 10, we are shown that there is a spiritual conflict taking place behind the kingdoms of this world. An angel tells Daniel: But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days; and behold, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I had been left there alone with the kings of Persia. (Daniel 10:13, NKJV)

Excellent. You are bringing up something that everyone seems to miss. I am wondering if you did as well.

The angel later says: And now I must return to fight with the prince of Persia; and when I have gone forth, indeed the prince of Greece will come. (Daniel 10:20, NKJV) This gives us something very important. Daniel shows that earthly kingdoms are not the whole story. There is also a spiritual conflict taking place behind them, and Michael is directly involved in that conflict.

You are absolutely correct. However, did you not notice the pattern?
  • Prince of Persia
  • Prince of Greece
What comes next?
  • Prince of Rome
Yes, there is a Prince of Rome that is described in other parts of Daniel that Michael also fights with. This happens immediately after Greece. There is no 'gap' of time that we are still waiting for to end.

But the most important passage is found in Daniel 12: At that time Michael shall stand up, The great prince who stands watch over the sons of your people; And there shall be a time of trouble, Such as never was since there was a nation, Even to that time. And at that time your people shall be delivered, Every one who is found written in the book. (Daniel 12:1, NKJV)

According to the context of the Book of Daniel, Michael stood up during the Prince of Rome era. That was a long time ago. That prophecy is already fulfilled.

if we Look carefully at the timing.

I did. I am wondering if you did as well?

Michael is described as the great prince who stands watch over God's people.

OK.

Then comes a time of trouble greater than anything that came before it.

The time of great trouble began with the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. Again, it happened during the 'Prince of Rome'... aka Little Horn of Daniel 8 era. We are waiting for that time to end.

And after that, God's people are delivered.

Incorrect. God's people are delivered 'at that time' i.e., in that age or era. Therefore, Daniel 12 is a prophecy of the Crucifixion. God's people were delivered at the Cross. It is finished...

1788481086462.png

We are not waiting to be delivered.

That is very close to the pattern we see in the New Testament. Paul tells us that something is restraining the lawless one until his appointed time. When that restraint is removed, the lawless one is revealed. Then, at the coming of Jesus, the Lord destroys him.

Each head of the Beast should be examined through said pattern.

But Daniel does show Michael exercising a protective and opposing role in the spiritual conflict surrounding the final events.

What do you mean by 'final events'? Are your referring to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD?

Then Revelation gives us another remarkable connection. Michael appears again, this time fighting Satan himself: And war broke out in heaven: Michael and his angels fought with the dragon; and the dragon and his angels fought.(Revelation 12:7, NKJV)

Satan is then cast down: So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world.(Revelation 12:9, NKJV)

Do you interpret this as already happened, or still future?

So we have Michael involved in a direct conflict with Satan and his angels. Daniel shows Michael standing watch over God's people at the time of the great end-time trouble.

What 'end time' are you referring to? There is more than one in Scripture.
 
I believe what the bible says - Jesus prophesied of the great tribulation, it's guaranteed for at least two churches, Smyrna and Thyatira, you tell me what you make of it.

"Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake."
"Indeed, the devil is about to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and you will have tribulation ten days. "
"Indeed I will cast her into a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of their deeds."

The Bible speaks of many tribulations that the Disciples and Christians would go through leading up to the fall of the second temple in 70 AD. What everyone should know about the prophetic books in the Bible is that they all contain what's called "Prophetic Telescoping". They speak of near future events to take place and far future events to take place all in the same chapters, which is why you have to pay careful attention to the wording and know when there is a shift, like in Matthew 24:21 and Mark 13:19.
 
Apostasia in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is not a temple‑desecration event like Antiochus IV...

Just a friendly reminder that the Abomination of Desolation has nothing to do with Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The Abomination of Desolation was the Crucifixion. I am not trying to derail, but it seems you and OP both are wrong on what that event was. It is important not to use false doctrine and false dogma when trying to determine who the Restrainer is. Unfortunately, OP has done much of that already.

...nor a slow centuries‑long backslide, but a decisive religious revolt—a deliberate, identifiable abandonment of truth among professing believers—which becomes the stage on which the man of sin is revealed.

What if those believers were in Heaven? In other words, what if the 'falling away' is a reference to falling angels?

Revelation 6:13 - And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.

Matthew 24:29 - Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

Mark 13:25 - And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.

The Powers in Heaven are shaken, then they fall to earth. It would seem no one has factored that into their equations.
 
Just a friendly reminder that the Abomination of Desolation has nothing to do with Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The Abomination of Desolation was the Crucifixion. I am not trying to derail, but it seems you and OP both are wrong on what that event was. It is important not to use false doctrine and false dogma when trying to determine who the Restrainer is. Unfortunately, OP has done much of that already.



What if those believers were in Heaven? In other words, what if the 'falling away' is a reference to falling angels?

Revelation 6:13 - And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.

Matthew 24:29 - Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:

Mark 13:25 - And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken.

The Powers in Heaven are shaken, then they fall to earth. It would seem no one has factored that into their equations.

How do you figure that? Maybe you should look up the definition of "Abomination of Desolation":

The Abomination of Desolation is a biblical phrase referring to an idolatrous act or sacrilegious object that defiles God’s holy place, specifically the Temple in Jerusalem, resulting in spiritual and physical desolation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Just a friendly reminder that the Abomination of Desolation has nothing to do with Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The Abomination of Desolation was the Crucifixion. I am not trying to derail, but it seems you and OP both are wrong on what that event was. It is important not to use false doctrine and false dogma when trying to determine who the Restrainer is. Unfortunately, OP has done much of that already.
The Abomination of Desolation is not the Crucifixion. In Daniel, the phrase always refers to a defiling act performed by a hostile ruler against the sanctuary — never to the suffering of the Messiah. Jesus, speaking in Matthew 24 and Mark 13, quotes Daniel and tells His disciples to watch for a future desecration event, not a past one, and He places it as the trigger for the flight of Judea, which occurred in 70 AD. Luke interprets the same prophecy as Jerusalem being “surrounded by armies,” not Golgotha. The Crucifixion is the atoning act of the spotless Lamb, not a desecration of the holy place; it fulfills the sacrifices, it does not defile them. The abomination is an act of hostile intrusion, not divine redemption. So while Antiochus IV is not the final referent, the Crucifixion cannot be the referent either — the text’s structure, timing, and typology simply do not allow it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Revelation1v8
What if those believers were in Heaven? In other words, what if the 'falling away' is a reference to falling angels?
No — the “falling away” (apostasia) in 2 Thessalonians 2:3 cannot refer to fallen angels, because Paul ties the event to human deception, human rebellion, and the rise of the man of sin within human society. Fallen angels rebelled long before Paul wrote, and their fall is never called an apostasia. Apostasia in Greek always refers to human religious or political revolt, never angelic rebellion. Paul says this falling away happens before the man of sin is revealed and leads to human rejection of truth, which matches the prophetic pattern of human apostasy, not angelic fall. So while the Church cannot fall away, the world can — and that is exactly what Paul is describing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Revelation1v8
The Bible speaks of many tribulations that the Disciples and Christians would go through leading up to the fall of the second temple in 70 AD. What everyone should know about the prophetic books in the Bible is that they all contain what's called "Prophetic Telescoping". They speak of near future events to take place and far future events to take place all in the same chapters, which is why you have to pay careful attention to the wording and know when there is a shift, like in Matthew 24:21 and Mark 13:19.
Both are incomplete, read Lk. 21:20-24 and you'll see that the abomination of desolation is extended all the way to the end of the church age.
 
Both are incomplete, read Lk. 21:20-24 and you'll see that the abomination of desolation is extended all the way to the end of the church age.

Yes, history will repeat itself. There will be a third temple and the Antichrist will declare himself as God in it. When he does, it will become another "abomination of desolation", which is why I mentioned "Prophetic Telescoping" happening. It happened on a smaller scale during the destruction of the 2nd temple and will happen on a much larger scale for the last time when the Antichrist arrives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
Yes, the restrainer is the Holy Spirit. While the Antichrist will rule over the governments of the earth doesn't mean that he owns the earth. The Holy Spirit will still be working in individual people like He always has. Without the presence of the Holy Spirit, none of us would know who God/Jesus is. He works in our hearts and minds when/while we're surrounded by corruption.
The power of the Two Witnesses will come from the Holy Spirit therefore the Holy Spirit must be the Restrainer because once the Witnesses are resurrected and raptured the Antichrist will finally rule the complete world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Revelation1v8